Re: svn commit: r106879 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/core.c

[André Malo]

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> +  *) core: Error out on sections that are missing an argument instead of
> + silently consuming the section. PR 25460.
> + [Geoffrey Young, Paul Querna]

:-( Actually, for IfDefine I've sold that that as feature, since it's the 
only reliable way to produce multiline comments.

I'd said that before here on the list, could we *please* let that in or 
provide an alternative?

nd
-- 
Das einzige, das einen GebÃudekollaps (oder auch einen
thermonuklearen Krieg) unbeschadet Ãbersteht, sind Kakerlaken
und AOL-CDs.
  -- Bastian Lipp in dcsm

Re: svn commit: r106879 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/core.c

[Paul Querna]

Andrà Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

+  *) core: Error out on sections that are missing an argument instead of
+ silently consuming the section. PR 25460.
+ [Geoffrey Young, Paul Querna]

:-( Actually, for IfDefine I've sold that that as feature, since it's the 
only reliable way to produce multiline comments.

I'd said that before here on the list, could we *please* let that in or 
provide an alternative?

nd
What is wrong with ?
I didn't feel it was correct to never allow -D 0 from the command line, 
but is having '' that much more difficult than ''?

-Paul Querna

Re: svn commit: r106879 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/core.c

[André Malo]

* Paul Querna wrote:

> What is wrong with ?

First, that  is now no longer reliable ;-)
And second -D 0, of course.

> I didn't feel it was correct to never allow -D 0 from the command line,

You mean, -D0 is not allowed?

But wait,  might work...

nd
-- 
print "Just Another Perl Hacker";

# Andrà Malo,  #

Re: svn commit: r106879 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/core.c

[Rici Lake]

On 29-Nov-04, at 4:05 AM, André Malo wrote:
* Paul Querna wrote:
What is wrong with ?
It's ugly and non-intuitive.
Just out of curiousity, what do people think is wrong with the
 directive implemented by this micro-module:
https://ssl.bulix.org/projects/rici/file/apache/mod_comment.c?rev=49

Re: svn commit: r106879 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/core.c

[Rici Lake]

Rephrasing the question slightly:
On 29-Nov-04, at 9:44 AM, Rici Lake wrote:
Just out of curiousity, what do people think is wrong with the
 directive implemented by this micro-module:
I meant to ask: What do people think about a 
directive, which would simply absorb the configuration
stream up to the matching  line, parsing only
to the extent necessary to match section opens and closes?
Thanks to Greg Stein for pushing me to be clearer about the
question.
Rici