Re: svn commit: r808906 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: CHANGES STATUS
On Aug 28, 2009, at 7:44 AM, j...@apache.org wrote: Submitted by: rpluem Reviewed/backported by: jim Hi Jim, Could you please return to the traditional way of noting this, namely Submitted by: Ruediger Pluem Reviewed by: jim, minfrin We already know who backported it (the committer) and it is kind of annoying to have a different way of noting the reviewers for each person doing the commit. I sure miss having the rcsinfo template from cvs -- wish I knew why subversion never supported it. Cheers, Roy
Re: svn commit: r808906 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: CHANGES STATUS
Maybe it would be helpful to put a template into STATUS. Or somewhere else and put a pointer to it there, anyway. Dan On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:14 -0700, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote: On Aug 28, 2009, at 7:44 AM, j...@apache.org wrote: Submitted by: rpluem Reviewed/backported by: jim Hi Jim, Could you please return to the traditional way of noting this, namely Submitted by: Ruediger Pluem Reviewed by: jim, minfrin We already know who backported it (the committer) and it is kind of annoying to have a different way of noting the reviewers for each person doing the commit. I sure miss having the rcsinfo template from cvs -- wish I knew why subversion never supported it. Cheers, Roy
Re: svn commit: r808906 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: CHANGES STATUS
I'll update my rev of the svn.merge script to do that... But the 'Reviewed by: ...' stuff would require a cut-paste from STATUS, which defeats the whole purpose of grabbing the orig svn logs and using that, but I can maybe figure out some way of cutting that out as well, automagically. On Aug 28, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Aug 28, 2009, at 7:44 AM, j...@apache.org wrote: Submitted by: rpluem Reviewed/backported by: jim Hi Jim, Could you please return to the traditional way of noting this, namely Submitted by: Ruediger Pluem Reviewed by: jim, minfrin We already know who backported it (the committer) and it is kind of annoying to have a different way of noting the reviewers for each person doing the commit. I sure miss having the rcsinfo template from cvs -- wish I knew why subversion never supported it. Cheers, Roy
Re: svn commit: r808906 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: CHANGES STATUS
On Aug 28, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I'll update my rev of the svn.merge script to do that... But the 'Reviewed by: ...' stuff would require a cut-paste from STATUS, which defeats the whole purpose of grabbing the orig svn logs and using that, but I can maybe figure out some way of cutting that out as well, automagically. Sorry for the hassle. How about svn diff STATUS | egrep '^- +\+1 *:' | cut -f 2 -d : Roy
Re: svn commit: r808906 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: CHANGES STATUS
On Aug 28, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Aug 28, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I'll update my rev of the svn.merge script to do that... But the 'Reviewed by: ...' stuff would require a cut-paste from STATUS, which defeats the whole purpose of grabbing the orig svn logs and using that, but I can maybe figure out some way of cutting that out as well, automagically. Sorry for the hassle. How about svn diff STATUS | egrep '^- +\+1 *:' | cut -f 2 -d : That's exactly what I'm thinking :)
