Re: v1.3.25 (PR#9181)

[Martin Kraemer]

On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:53:20AM -0700, Sander van Zoest wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2002, Martin Kraemer wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:56:38AM -0700, Sander van Zoest wrote:
> > > Can we add in PR#9181?
> > > More and more people will run into this issue.
> > -0.5 (it's a feature, and is actively being used by many).
> > Or did you mean "add the new directive AcceptPathInfo off"?
> > In that case, +1 (but within the time frame, not required for a
> > 1.3.25 release IMO).
> 
> Ehmm.. I meant the one in the Bugzilla database.
> 

Yep. +1 on that one.

   Martin
-- 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Fujitsu Siemens
Fon: +49-89-636-46021, FAX: +49-89-636-47655 | 81730  Munich,  Germany

Re: v1.3.25 (PR#9181)

[Jim Jagielski]

At 9:56 AM -0700 5/28/02, Sander van Zoest wrote:
>On Tue, 28 May 2002, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
>> There has been much talk of releasing v1.3.25, but no actual release - I
>> am starting to really need the new proxy fixes since v1.3.22 - is there
>> a release planned for the near future?
>> The status says "end of May" - is it possible to release now?
>
>Can we add in PR#9181?
>More and more people will run into this issue.
>

Bugz or Bugzilla ?
-- 
===
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
  "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
 will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: v1.3.25 (PR#9181)

[Sander van Zoest]

On Wed, 29 May 2002, Martin Kraemer wrote:

> On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:56:38AM -0700, Sander van Zoest wrote:
> > Can we add in PR#9181?
> > More and more people will run into this issue.
> -0.5 (it's a feature, and is actively being used by many).
> Or did you mean "add the new directive AcceptPathInfo off"?
> In that case, +1 (but within the time frame, not required for a
> 1.3.25 release IMO).

Ehmm.. I meant the one in the Bugzilla database.


Cheers,

--
Sander van Zoest  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
San Diego, CA, US http://Sander.vanZoest.com/

Re: v1.3.25 (PR#9181)

[Martin Kraemer]

On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 09:56:38AM -0700, Sander van Zoest wrote:
> 
> Can we add in PR#9181?
> More and more people will run into this issue.

-0.5 (it's a feature, and is actively being used by many).
Or did you mean "add the new directive AcceptPathInfo off"?
In that case, +1 (but within the time frame, not required for a
1.3.25 release IMO).

  Martin
-- 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Fujitsu Siemens
Fon: +49-89-636-46021, FAX: +49-89-636-47655 | 81730  Munich,  Germany

Re: v1.3.25 (PR#9181)

[Sander van Zoest]

On Tue, 28 May 2002, Graham Leggett wrote:

> There has been much talk of releasing v1.3.25, but no actual release - I
> am starting to really need the new proxy fixes since v1.3.22 - is there
> a release planned for the near future?
> The status says "end of May" - is it possible to release now?

Can we add in PR#9181?
More and more people will run into this issue.

Cheers,

--
Sander van Zoest  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
San Diego, CA, US http://Sander.vanZoest.com/