Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd
+1 for remove visorcmd and daemon nodes (there was already discussion about this on dev list as far as I remember). GridClient and related classes are not used by visorcmd, but used by control.sh and can't be removed. чт, 1 дек. 2022 г. в 09:00, Zhenya Stanilovsky : > > +1 for remove. > > > > > >+1 This module seems to be completely abandoned > > > >чт, 1 дек. 2022 г., 00:46 Ilya Kasnacheev < ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com >: > > > >> Hello! > >> > >> Let's go ahead and remove what we don't use. Most of that stuff is deep > >> legacy, even if it contains some rare gems of functionality that nobody > >> knows how to use anymore. > >> > >> Regards, > >> -- > >> Ilya Kasnacheev > >> > >> > >> ср, 30 нояб. 2022 г. в 20:12, Nikolay Izhikov < nizhi...@apache.org >: > >> > >> > Hello, Igniters. > >> > > >> > There are legacy modules - visor-console, visor-plugins, > >> visor-console-2.10 > >> > Looks like that modules are not evolving by community and barely used > by > >> > the Ignite users. > >> > > >> > I propose to remove it completely. > >> > There are IEP [1] for this > >> > > >> > It seems that removal of visor modules allow to us to remove another > >> legacy > >> > code from Ignite codebase: > >> > > >> > * support of daemon nodes. > >> > * GridClient and related classes. > >> > > >> > What do you think? > >> > > >> > [1] > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=217392419 > >> > > >> > > > >
Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd
+1 for remove. >+1 This module seems to be completely abandoned > >чт, 1 дек. 2022 г., 00:46 Ilya Kasnacheev < ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com >: > >> Hello! >> >> Let's go ahead and remove what we don't use. Most of that stuff is deep >> legacy, even if it contains some rare gems of functionality that nobody >> knows how to use anymore. >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Ilya Kasnacheev >> >> >> ср, 30 нояб. 2022 г. в 20:12, Nikolay Izhikov < nizhi...@apache.org >: >> >> > Hello, Igniters. >> > >> > There are legacy modules - visor-console, visor-plugins, >> visor-console-2.10 >> > Looks like that modules are not evolving by community and barely used by >> > the Ignite users. >> > >> > I propose to remove it completely. >> > There are IEP [1] for this >> > >> > It seems that removal of visor modules allow to us to remove another >> legacy >> > code from Ignite codebase: >> > >> > * support of daemon nodes. >> > * GridClient and related classes. >> > >> > What do you think? >> > >> > [1] >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=217392419 >> > >>
Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd
+1 This module seems to be completely abandoned чт, 1 дек. 2022 г., 00:46 Ilya Kasnacheev : > Hello! > > Let's go ahead and remove what we don't use. Most of that stuff is deep > legacy, even if it contains some rare gems of functionality that nobody > knows how to use anymore. > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > ср, 30 нояб. 2022 г. в 20:12, Nikolay Izhikov : > > > Hello, Igniters. > > > > There are legacy modules - visor-console, visor-plugins, > visor-console-2.10 > > Looks like that modules are not evolving by community and barely used by > > the Ignite users. > > > > I propose to remove it completely. > > There are IEP [1] for this > > > > It seems that removal of visor modules allow to us to remove another > legacy > > code from Ignite codebase: > > > > * support of daemon nodes. > > * GridClient and related classes. > > > > What do you think? > > > > [1] > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=217392419 > > >
Re: [DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd
Hello! Let's go ahead and remove what we don't use. Most of that stuff is deep legacy, even if it contains some rare gems of functionality that nobody knows how to use anymore. Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev ср, 30 нояб. 2022 г. в 20:12, Nikolay Izhikov : > Hello, Igniters. > > There are legacy modules - visor-console, visor-plugins, visor-console-2.10 > Looks like that modules are not evolving by community and barely used by > the Ignite users. > > I propose to remove it completely. > There are IEP [1] for this > > It seems that removal of visor modules allow to us to remove another legacy > code from Ignite codebase: > > * support of daemon nodes. > * GridClient and related classes. > > What do you think? > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=217392419 >
Re: Apache JIRA account request
Hello! I have created an account for you and also added you to Ignite Contributors role. Please make sure to read https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev ср, 30 нояб. 2022 г. в 19:44, Ilkhom Ulmasov : > Dear Ignite team, > > May I have an Apache JIRA account to be able to work with Ignite tickets? > > My email ilhom.ulma...@gmail.com > Preferred user name is (iulmasov or imulmasov) > Display name is Ilhom Ulmasov > > BR, Ilhom >
A new feedback has been added : 98
A new feedback has been added, go to bugyard.io to see all the details... https://bugyard.io A new feedback has been added "'two ways' should be replaced to 'three ways'" by shishkovilja View feedback https://app.bugyard.io/web/app/rycqZJDyY/f/63875dfd4266a50014c92c3b
[DISCUSSION] Removal of ignitevisorcmd
Hello, Igniters. There are legacy modules - visor-console, visor-plugins, visor-console-2.10 Looks like that modules are not evolving by community and barely used by the Ignite users. I propose to remove it completely. There are IEP [1] for this It seems that removal of visor modules allow to us to remove another legacy code from Ignite codebase: * support of daemon nodes. * GridClient and related classes. What do you think? [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=217392419
Apache JIRA account request
Dear Ignite team, May I have an Apache JIRA account to be able to work with Ignite tickets? My email ilhom.ulma...@gmail.com Preferred user name is (iulmasov or imulmasov) Display name is Ilhom Ulmasov BR, Ilhom
