Re: [PR] Block repository writes if repo lock is lost [jackrabbit-oak]
smiroslav merged PR #1204: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1204 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: Webdav4s bug
Thank you for the advice. Well it’s for VFS but the webdav functionality is provided by the Jackrabbit2 project. Regards, Sodrul > On Nov 21, 2023, at 4:57 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > On 20.11.2023 15:39, Sodrul Bhuiyan wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I came across a bug in the webdav4s but same code is working fine over >> non-ssl (webdav4). I was looking into the process of creating a bug report >> but saw a notice saying that I should try the mailing list first. Please let >> me know if this is the right mailing list. I can send more information if >> it’s the right mailing list to discuss this issue. Thanks in advance. >> >> Regards, >> Sodrul > > If this is about VFS, you may want to use the commons mailing list > (https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-vfs/mail-lists.html). > > Best regards, Julian > > > >
Re: [PR] Block repository writes if repo lock is lost [jackrabbit-oak]
sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #1204: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1204#issuecomment-1820725340 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&resolved=false&types=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&resolved=false&types=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&resolved=false&types=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [13 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&metric=new_coverage&view=list) [90.3% Coverage](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&metric=new_coverage&view=list) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&metric=new_duplicated_lines_density&view=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=org.apache.jackrabbit%3Ajackrabbit-oak&pullRequest=1204&metric=new_duplicated_lines_density&view=list)  The version of Java (11.0.21) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 17. Read more [here](https://docs.sonarsource.com/sonarcloud/appendices/scanner-environment/) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] OAK-10558: disable flaky ElasticReliabilityTest [jackrabbit-oak]
fabriziofortino merged PR #1227: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1227 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: Webdav4s bug
On 20.11.2023 15:39, Sodrul Bhuiyan wrote: Hi there, I came across a bug in the webdav4s but same code is working fine over non-ssl (webdav4). I was looking into the process of creating a bug report but saw a notice saying that I should try the mailing list first. Please let me know if this is the right mailing list. I can send more information if it’s the right mailing list to discuss this issue. Thanks in advance. Regards, Sodrul If this is about VFS, you may want to use the commons mailing list (https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-vfs/mail-lists.html). Best regards, Julian
[PR] OAK-10558: disable flaky ElasticReliabilityTest [jackrabbit-oak]
fabriziofortino opened a new pull request, #1227: URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1227 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4972) Remove RMI support
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17788333#comment-17788333 ] Manfred Baedke commented on JCR-4972: - As far as I understand, JNDI is only used to look up the RMI stub of a remote repository, which of course is not supposed to be used any longer. > Remove RMI support > -- > > Key: JCR-4972 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4972 > Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository > Issue Type: Task > Components: jackrabbit-jcr-rmi >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.22 > > > Due to the fact that the RMI code has been essentially unmaintained for a > decade, and the inherent risks related to deserialization, we should end > support for this module. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4972) Remove RMI support
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17788331#comment-17788331 ] Manfred Baedke commented on JCR-4972: - Not all of jcr-servlet, just the remote repository access. JackrabbitRepositoryServlet will not be affected. > Remove RMI support > -- > > Key: JCR-4972 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4972 > Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository > Issue Type: Task > Components: jackrabbit-jcr-rmi >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > Fix For: 2.22 > > > Due to the fact that the RMI code has been essentially unmaintained for a > decade, and the inherent risks related to deserialization, we should end > support for this module. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
