[GitHub] [jena-site] kinow commented on a change in pull request #42: Use main instead of master

2021-02-19 Thread GitBox


kinow commented on a change in pull request #42:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/42#discussion_r579590181



##
File path: build-script
##
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 ## ---
 
 # Specify source and site branches
-SOURCE="master"
+SOURCE="main"

Review comment:
   Pushed a commit removing the `build-script` file. If no lights blink, 
and there's no smoke coming out anywhere, it should be safe to leave it out 
:laughing: but I agree it's probably not used. I thought it was used to build 
something locally only.





This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




Re: ApacheCon 2021

2021-02-19 Thread Marco Neumann
I'd like to see a demo session.

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:52 PM Claude Warren  wrote:

> arrrgg.  What was I thinking??  I don't know either.  I meant to ping this
> topic to see if there was any interest before dropping it.  So if you are
> interested in a Jena topic at ApacheCon this year let me know and I will
> propose it and drive it forward as best I can.
>
> Claude
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:50 PM Claude Warren  wrote:
>
> > not hearing any suggestions on this topic. I will drop it.
> >
> > Thx
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 5:41 PM Marco Neumann 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I am in touch with the Apache spatial group about the 2021 slots, and it
> >> looks like I will dedicate a strand to linked data and geosparql with
> jena
> >> here in spatial track.
> >>
> >> Marco
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:43 AM Claude Warren 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > There is a call for tracks for ApacheCon 2021.  Do we want to propose
> a
> >> > track again this year?  Perhaps we could get some presentations from
> >> users.
> >> >
> >> > FYI:  I gave an impromptu talk about Jena at the Apache "table" during
> >> > FOSDEM at the beginning of this month.
> >> >
> >> > Claude
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
> >> > 
> >> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Marco Neumann
> >> KONA
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
> > 
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
> >
>
>
> --
> I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
> 
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
>


-- 


---
Marco Neumann
KONA


[GitHub] [jena-site] afs commented on a change in pull request #42: Use main instead of master

2021-02-19 Thread GitBox


afs commented on a change in pull request #42:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/42#discussion_r579416102



##
File path: build-script
##
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 ## ---
 
 # Specify source and site branches
-SOURCE="master"
+SOURCE="main"

Review comment:
   There is no way `build-script` is active. It checks out the old default 
branch by name.





This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[GitHub] [jena-site] afs opened a new pull request #43: Note modules as "retired"

2021-02-19 Thread GitBox


afs opened a new pull request #43:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/43


   This PR is for retired modules in Jena 4.0.0.
   
   Even though it is for 4.0.0, it might be worth applying now as advance 
notice. The text says "last in 3.17.0" so it is correct.
   
   The old documentation of retried modules is still present and linked to from 
the module index page.
   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




Re: ApacheCon 2021

2021-02-19 Thread Claude Warren
ApacheCon date is not set but it normally is at the end of Sept.

Nothing is set yet as tracks are just being established.

Last year we did a track that comprised 4 talks and a chat session (I
forget what that was called).  we got some folks from Rya attending as
well.  We might consider asking Rya if they would like to join us in an
RDF/Linked data track.  However, what I would need is commitment from the
team for 4 talks, or 2 talks and an agreement to ask Rya to join us in an
RDF/Linked data track.

Thoughts?
Claude

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 7:00 PM Martynas Jusevičius 
wrote:

> We might be interested :) When is it and what does it take?
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 7:52 PM Claude Warren  wrote:
> >
> > arrrgg.  What was I thinking??  I don't know either.  I meant to ping
> this
> > topic to see if there was any interest before dropping it.  So if you are
> > interested in a Jena topic at ApacheCon this year let me know and I will
> > propose it and drive it forward as best I can.
> >
> > Claude
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 6:50 PM Claude Warren  wrote:
> >
> > > not hearing any suggestions on this topic. I will drop it.
> > >
> > > Thx
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 5:41 PM Marco Neumann  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I am in touch with the Apache spatial group about the 2021 slots, and
> it
> > >> looks like I will dedicate a strand to linked data and geosparql with
> jena
> > >> here in spatial track.
> > >>
> > >> Marco
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:43 AM Claude Warren 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > There is a call for tracks for ApacheCon 2021.  Do we want to
> propose a
> > >> > track again this year?  Perhaps we could get some presentations from
> > >> users.
> > >> >
> > >> > FYI:  I gave an impromptu talk about Jena at the Apache "table"
> during
> > >> > FOSDEM at the beginning of this month.
> > >> >
> > >> > Claude
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
> > >> > 
> > >> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---
> > >> Marco Neumann
> > >> KONA
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
> > > 
> > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
> > 
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
>


-- 
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren


Re: ApacheCon 2021

2021-02-19 Thread Claude Warren
My talk at FOSDEM was ok.  Basically just talked about what Jena is and
does.  Turns out that is a lot to say.   It was all off the cuff and more
like a radio show than anything else.


On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 7:37 PM Andy Seaborne  wrote:

>
>
> On 17/02/2021 11:43, Claude Warren wrote:
> > FYI:  I gave an impromptu talk about Jena at the Apache "table" during
> > FOSDEM at the beginning of this month.
>
> How did that go?
>
>  Andy
>


-- 
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren


[GitHub] [jena-site] afs commented on a change in pull request #42: Use main instead of master

2021-02-19 Thread GitBox


afs commented on a change in pull request #42:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/42#discussion_r579111948



##
File path: build-script
##
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 ## ---
 
 # Specify source and site branches
-SOURCE="master"
+SOURCE="main"

Review comment:
   I think `build-script` isn't used any more. IIRC it was the original way 
to build the site but was replaced by `Jenkinsfile`, and that does not call 
`build-script`. `Jenkinsfile` has similar shell fragments.
   
   Only way to find out is delete `build-script` and see!
   
   Can make this change and separately investigate the effect of `build-script`.





This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org




[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-2053) Preparation for Eclipse Jetty 10

2021-02-19 Thread Andy Seaborne (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-2053.
-
Resolution: Done

> Preparation for Eclipse Jetty 10
> 
>
> Key: JENA-2053
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2053
> Project: Apache Jena
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Andy Seaborne
>Assignee: Andy Seaborne
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Jena 4.0.0
>
>
> A small change to make the code compile with Jetty 10.0.0.
> The change works in Jetty 9 (current Jena dependency) as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2053) Preparation for Eclipse Jetty 10

2021-02-19 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17286973#comment-17286973
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-2053:
---

Commit b2d3991615d6ee87f89397b8dd13944487650fce in jena's branch 
refs/heads/main from Andy Seaborne
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;h=b2d3991 ]

Merge pull request #929 from afs/jetty-prep

JENA-2053: Use SslContextFactory.Server 

> Preparation for Eclipse Jetty 10
> 
>
> Key: JENA-2053
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2053
> Project: Apache Jena
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Andy Seaborne
>Assignee: Andy Seaborne
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Jena 4.0.0
>
>
> A small change to make the code compile with Jetty 10.0.0.
> The change works in Jetty 9 (current Jena dependency) as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (JENA-2053) Preparation for Eclipse Jetty 10

2021-02-19 Thread ASF subversion and git services (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17286972#comment-17286972
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-2053:
---

Commit 2638aae6e002ad76f53a0e787bc1b1b351e5dd8d in jena's branch 
refs/heads/main from Andy Seaborne
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;h=2638aae ]

JENA-2053: Use SslContextFactory.Server


> Preparation for Eclipse Jetty 10
> 
>
> Key: JENA-2053
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2053
> Project: Apache Jena
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Andy Seaborne
>Assignee: Andy Seaborne
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Jena 4.0.0
>
>
> A small change to make the code compile with Jetty 10.0.0.
> The change works in Jetty 9 (current Jena dependency) as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)