[GitHub] [jena] Claudenw commented on issue #534: Prometheus endpoint

2019-04-17 Thread GitBox
Claudenw commented on issue #534: Prometheus endpoint
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-484127705
 
 
   I hope to do that in the next few days / evenings
   
   
   On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 3:59 PM Andy Seaborne 
   wrote:
   
   > @Claudenw  Would it be possible for you to
   > work with Sean to get it in the PR?
   >
   > —
   > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
   > , or mute
   > the thread
   > 

   > .
   >
   
   
   -- 
   I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
   
   LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
   


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [jena] Claudenw commented on issue #534: Prometheus endpoint

2019-04-17 Thread GitBox
Claudenw commented on issue #534: Prometheus endpoint
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/534#issuecomment-484040611
 
 
   What is the process for me (3rd party) to add licenses to PR?
   
   On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 7:35 AM Claude Warren  wrote:
   >
   > The two modules in question come under dual licenses: CC0 or
   > BSD-2-clause.  My understanding from the legal-discuss thread is that
   > the CC0 does not require notification because it is public domain but
   > it also does not confer patent rights, so we elected to use
   > BSD-2-Clause and need to add the BSD-2-Clause license file and a the
   > notation that it applies to the  HdrHistogram and LatencyUtils
   > packages.
   >
   > I assume the notation will be in the Notice files for the fuseki
   > bundles that include the libraries mentioned..
   >
   > Claude
   >
   > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 1:56 PM Andy Seaborne  
wrote:
   > >
   > > From the legal-discuss@ emailing list, the decision seems to be we are 
using 2 clause BSD. Please confirm that here or dev@ so it is in public, on a 
jena list/forum.
   > >
   > > Then we need to execute on that for the two dependencies that will be 
bundled into shared jars because we unpack and repack them.
   > >
   > > —
   > > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
   > > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
   >
   >
   >
   > --
   > I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
   > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
   
   
   
   -- 
   I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
   LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
   


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services