The vote passes with +1's from

Aaron, Adam, Bruno, Andy

Files now sync'ing.

    Andy

On 16/01/2020 17:34, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Hi,

Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 3.14.0
This is the second proposed release candidate.

The deadline is only 72hours in case there are enough +1 votes and I can do the final stage on Sunday - otherwise, it is likely to be mid next week.

==== Changes from RC1:

Fix for JENA-1817
https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/08ca0b83

==== Changes for 3.14.0:

https://s.apache.org/jena-3.14.0-jira

==== Release Vote

Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
Please download and test the proposed release.

Staging repository:
   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1036

Proposed dist/ area:
   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/

Keys:
   https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS

Git commit (browser URL):
   https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/d0abcd14

Git Commit Hash:
   d0abcd14f82c36045a3c047941a6518f3bdb56ce

Git Commit Tag:
   jena-3.14.0

Please vote to approve this release:

         [ ] +1 Approve the release
         [ ]  0 Don't care
         [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

This vote will be open until at least

     Sunday, 19th January 2020 at 18:00 UTC

If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
and we can extend the vote period.

Thanks,

       Andy

Checking needed:

+ are the GPG signatures fine?
+ are the checksums correct?
+ is there a source archive?

+ can the source archive really be built?
           (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
+ is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
           (both source and binary artifacts)?
+ does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
+ have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
            if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
+ does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?

Reply via email to