[GitHub] [jmeter] FSchumacher commented on pull request #608: Bug 64553 When using Transaction Controller, send Bytes and Received Bytes are displayed as 0 in the influxdb(BackendListener)
FSchumacher commented on pull request #608: URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608#issuecomment-682145319 > Hello @FSchumacher , @ham1 , > Thanks for improving the PR. > Can it be merged now ? If it is still doing, what you intended, you can merge the PR. Felix > > Regards This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?
Am 27. August 2020 15:53:31 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad : >Hello, >Oups previous mail was sent too fast. > >I hope you're all fine and have spent nice holidays if you did. > >I think we are ready for a release right ? >Pending issues are: >- https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553 >- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has a >patch >from Felix waiting for confirmation Here it would be nice, if you could have a look at it, as you did the original implementation, if I recall correctly. Another pr (#595) that could probably be merged is the one about freestyle naming for samples recorded by the proxy. And what about #593? > >Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a version >soon. +1 Felix >Thanks
Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?
Hello, Oups previous mail was sent too fast. I hope you're all fine and have spent nice holidays if you did. I think we are ready for a release right ? Pending issues are: - https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553 - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has a patch from Felix waiting for confirmation Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a version soon. Thanks -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad. > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:49 PM Philippe Mouawad wrote: > Hello, > > I think we are ready for a release right ? > Pending issues are: > - https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553 > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:54 PM Philippe Mouawad < > philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> Thanks for the answer. >> Unfortunately, we need to wait for 3 fixes in Darklaf: >> >>- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64626 >>- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64625 >>- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64453 >> >> The first one being a blocker for any release. >> >> Regards >> >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:49 PM Milamber wrote: >> >>> >>> Why not. The release process is fast. >>> >>> On 7/25/20 1:14 PM, Philippe Mouawad wrote: >>> > Hello, >>> > Shouldn’t we release a new version 5.3.1 ? >>> > >>> > The 5.3 version has many GUI issues that are particularly visible on >>> > Windows OS making it partly unusable. >>> > Some are visible on all OS particularly with popular 3rd party plugins. >>> > The workaround is to switch to system LAF but users may not be aware >>> of >>> > this. >>> > >>> > There has been many fixes on Darklaf thanks to Jannis reactivity but >>> there >>> > are still now issues. >>> > I wonder if we should not switch LAF on windows to the system one >>> until we >>> > have identified and fixed all issues. >>> > >>> > >>> > Regards >>> > Philippe >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Cordialement. >> Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >> > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?
Hello, I think we are ready for a release right ? Pending issues are: - https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553 On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:54 PM Philippe Mouawad wrote: > Hello, > Thanks for the answer. > Unfortunately, we need to wait for 3 fixes in Darklaf: > >- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64626 >- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64625 >- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64453 > > The first one being a blocker for any release. > > Regards > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:49 PM Milamber wrote: > >> >> Why not. The release process is fast. >> >> On 7/25/20 1:14 PM, Philippe Mouawad wrote: >> > Hello, >> > Shouldn’t we release a new version 5.3.1 ? >> > >> > The 5.3 version has many GUI issues that are particularly visible on >> > Windows OS making it partly unusable. >> > Some are visible on all OS particularly with popular 3rd party plugins. >> > The workaround is to switch to system LAF but users may not be aware of >> > this. >> > >> > There has been many fixes on Darklaf thanks to Jannis reactivity but >> there >> > are still now issues. >> > I wonder if we should not switch LAF on windows to the system one until >> we >> > have identified and fixed all issues. >> > >> > >> > Regards >> > Philippe >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
[GitHub] [jmeter] pmouawad commented on pull request #608: Bug 64553 When using Transaction Controller, send Bytes and Received Bytes are displayed as 0 in the influxdb(BackendListener)
pmouawad commented on pull request #608: URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608#issuecomment-681960538 Hello @FSchumacher , @ham1 , Thanks for improving the PR. Can it be merged now ? Regards This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
