Re: Updating Incubator summary

[Henri Yandell]

Sounds good :)

My basic mantra is 'get the summary page all signed off, then start asking
"when graduate?"'. Projects can tend to linger in the Incubator awaiting
perfection.

I wonder how you could take the 3rd item (Linux.com article) and make that
bigger. Perhaps encourage every committer to write a blog post so you end
up with the article as an intro, and then each committer's blog entry or
website hosted article as a personal "how I got into this" or "what I work
on" or "a commit I recently did, a commit I keep meaning to getting around
to working on". Random thought :)

Hen

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Matt Post  wrote:

> We're still waiting on our first software release, so it seems to me a bit
> premature to graduate? Though I don't know how these decisions are made —
> what goes into it?
>
> Here is the roadmap that I have in mind:
>
> - 6.1 release (imminent)
> - Large-scale release of language packs (imminent)
> - Linux.com article introducing people to MT, Joshua, language packs, and
> adding custom rules
> - Release of docker-based language packs (including KenLM)
> - 7.0 release (spring)
> - Graduate
>
> If we keep that rough schedule, we'll have incubated a year and have a lot
> to show for it.
>
> matt
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Henri Yandell  wrote:
> >
> > Thanks :)
> >
> > Reason for asking being that it felt that the standard checklist things
> > were complete and I was wondering what the path to graduation is?
> >
> > Any reason not to start thinking about a vote?
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 04:02 Matt Post  wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks, Lewis, and Henri, for pointing this out.
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:18 AM, lewis john mcgibbney 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Henri,
> >>> I just pushed the update to SVN. Should update asynch reasonably soon.
> >>>
> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/joshua.html
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 1:22 PM, <
> >>> dev-digest-h...@joshua.incubator.apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> 
>  From: Henri Yandell 
>  To: dev@joshua.incubator.apache.org
>  Cc:
>  Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 01:17:57 -0800
>  Subject: Updating Incubator summary
>  Would be useful to update this page:
> 
>  http://incubator.apache.org/projects/joshua.html
> 
> 
>  Are there any of the checklist items that are still open?
> 
> 
> >>> As far as I am aware no :)
> >>
> >>
>
>

RE: package-info.java

[lewis john mcgibbney]

Hi Matt,
I get digest email, however I saw you email on the remote list.
The answer is here
https://www.intertech.com/Blog/whats-package-info-java-for/
I couldn't find any Oracle or Open JDK-level documentation.
package.html is deprecated in current JDK.

-- 
http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
@hectorMcSpector
http://www.linkedin.com/in/lmcgibbney

RE: "mvn assembly" no longer works

[lewis john mcgibbney]

Hi Matt,
Again, I am on digest and didn't receive but I'll reply here.
No need to use the Maven assembly plugin anymore... simply execute mvn
package... you will then see
./target/joshua-6.2-SNAPSHOT-jar-with-dependencies.jar the exact same, but
now a default Maven task rather than a custom plugin implementation.
Do we need to update README?

-- 
http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
@hectorMcSpector
http://www.linkedin.com/in/lmcgibbney

package-info.java

[Matt Post]

Hi Thamme,

Eclipse is complaining about package-info.java files, e.g.,

The type package-info is already defined

for org.apache.joshua.decoder.package-info.java. I see that a while ago you 
replaced the package-info.html files with these. Is there a particular reason 
for this? Is .java preferred to .html? In researching solutions to this one of 
the suggestions was to go to .html.

matt