[GitHub] incubator-joshua pull request #77: Tweaked Dockerfile to contain only jre 1....

[KellenSunderland]

GitHub user KellenSunderland opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-joshua/pull/77

Tweaked Dockerfile to contain only jre 1.8 and to use mvn package

Just some small changes here.  I found when creating files with the 
previous version that is was often using java 1.7 for some reason.  Changed the 
base image partially to get an image that already has maven, and partly to make 
sure on jre 1.8 is installed. 

Also switched to mvn package.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/KellenSunderland/incubator-joshua master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-joshua/pull/77.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #77






---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Re: language packs blog post

[Matt Post]

That's better, fixed.


> On Nov 21, 2016, at 3:14 PM, kellen sunderland  
> wrote:
> 
> Looks good to me, no objection to tweeting it.  Nice work putting them all
> together.
> 
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Matt Post  wrote:
> 
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> I just drafted this; any objections to tweeting it?
>> 
>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JOSHUA/
>> 2016/11/21/Apache+Joshua+Language+Packs
>> 
>> matt

Re: language packs blog post

[kellen sunderland]

Looks good to me, no objection to tweeting it.  Nice work putting them all
together.

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Matt Post  wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I just drafted this; any objections to tweeting it?
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JOSHUA/
> 2016/11/21/Apache+Joshua+Language+Packs
>
> matt

language packs blog post

[Matt Post]

Hi folks,

I just drafted this; any objections to tweeting it?


https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JOSHUA/2016/11/21/Apache+Joshua+Language+Packs

matt

Re: Updating Incubator summary

[Matt Post]

I've put up a private roadmap page on Confluence. Feel free to add / edit / 
comment.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JOSHUA/Private+Roadmap

Johns, the hook is that there are a lot of NLP tools that one can download and 
use (Berkeley Parser, spacy, etc), which have prebuilt models and just work — 
black box. But there is nothing like that for MT! Nothing you can just download 
and easily run, without caring about how it works or wanting to improve it. We 
want to build MT as a tool that people can easily include in their projects. 
Making MT available in this way will lead to uses that we haven't imagined.

matt


> On Nov 18, 2016, at 2:14 AM, Henri Yandell  wrote:
> 
> Given the community-over-code meme, incubator graduation is more about the
> people than the code :)
> 
> So I'm more interested in your roadmap being discussed and consensus
> existing, than on how many releases are done etc. I like your proposed
> roadmap and it seems like nice timing on request-for-graduation.
> 
> Hen
> 
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Matt Post  wrote:
> 
>> My thinking on that roadmap was a comment Lewis made a while ago about
>> incubator graduation being judged by the number of releases. If you think
>> we can get out sooner, then I'm all for it! Maybe we can get the docker
>> containers out and then push for it after that?
>> 
>> I like your idea about a more concerted advertising effort. We could also
>> try to pull together a demo paper for ACL   which is
>> due in February. I think I might have a hook that would appeal to reviewers
>> there.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 17, 2016, at 2:12 AM, Henri Yandell  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Sounds good :)
>>> 
>>> My basic mantra is 'get the summary page all signed off, then start
>> asking
>>> "when graduate?"'. Projects can tend to linger in the Incubator awaiting
>>> perfection.
>>> 
>>> I wonder how you could take the 3rd item (Linux.com article) and make
>> that
>>> bigger. Perhaps encourage every committer to write a blog post so you end
>>> up with the article as an intro, and then each committer's blog entry or
>>> website hosted article as a personal "how I got into this" or "what I
>> work
>>> on" or "a commit I recently did, a commit I keep meaning to getting
>> around
>>> to working on". Random thought :)
>>> 
>>> Hen
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Matt Post  wrote:
>>> 
 We're still waiting on our first software release, so it seems to me a
>> bit
 premature to graduate? Though I don't know how these decisions are made
>> —
 what goes into it?
 
 Here is the roadmap that I have in mind:
 
 - 6.1 release (imminent)
 - Large-scale release of language packs (imminent)
 - Linux.com article introducing people to MT, Joshua, language packs,
>> and
 adding custom rules
 - Release of docker-based language packs (including KenLM)
 - 7.0 release (spring)
 - Graduate
 
 If we keep that rough schedule, we'll have incubated a year and have a
>> lot
 to show for it.
 
 matt
 
 
> On Nov 15, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Henri Yandell  wrote:
> 
> Thanks :)
> 
> Reason for asking being that it felt that the standard checklist things
> were complete and I was wondering what the path to graduation is?
> 
> Any reason not to start thinking about a vote?
> 
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 04:02 Matt Post  wrote:
> 
>> Thanks, Lewis, and Henri, for pointing this out.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:18 AM, lewis john mcgibbney <
>> lewi...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Henri,
>>> I just pushed the update to SVN. Should update asynch reasonably
>> soon.
>>> 
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/joshua.html
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 1:22 PM, <
>>> dev-digest-h...@joshua.incubator.apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
 
 From: Henri Yandell 
 To: dev@joshua.incubator.apache.org
 Cc:
 Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 01:17:57 -0800
 Subject: Updating Incubator summary
 Would be useful to update this page:
 
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/joshua.html
 
 
 Are there any of the checklist items that are still open?
 
 
>>> As far as I am aware no :)
>> 
>> 
 
 
>> 
>> 

Re: Reduce number of branches in the source repo

[Matt Post]

I just cleaned out a bunch of old branches, but I can't write directly to our 
Github mirror, and I'm not sure that deleted branches get pushed down.

From this page you can see all the deletable branches:

https://github.com/apache/incubator-joshua/branches/stale

They are ones that are way behind and 0 commits ahead.

matt


> On Nov 19, 2016, at 1:46 AM, Tommaso Teofili  
> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> Tommaso
> 
> Il giorno sab 19 nov 2016 alle ore 06:15 Henry Saputra <
> henry.sapu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> 
>> HI All,
>> 
>> I think we have bit too many branches in our source repo.
>> 
>> Would it be easier to keep the branches to just master and releases
>> branches?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> - Henry
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Joshua (Incubating) 6.1

[Matt Post]

That would be great to fix!


> On Nov 21, 2016, at 4:47 AM, kellen sunderland  
> wrote:
> 
> I'd vote for a respin fixing Henry's changes.  There's also a small break
> in the Dockerfile which I can fix at some point today (we need to switch it
> to use mvn package I believe).
> 
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Tommaso Teofili > wrote:
> 
>> I think this settles for a respin of a new RC, doesn't it ?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tommaso
>> 
>> Il giorno sab 19 nov 2016 alle ore 06:20 Henry Saputra <
>> henry.sapu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>> 
>>> Sorry I was late on dev@ list for this Vote, Lewis
>>> 
>>> Looks like I have to -1 for this one:
>>> Missing DISCLAIMER file for the source release artifact
>>> NOTICE.txt file contains Apache HTrace instead of Apache Joshua
>>> 
>>> Minor issue:
>>> Extra file "pom.xml.release.releaseBackup"
>>> 
>>> - Henry
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:11 PM, lewis john mcgibbney <
>> lewi...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hello general@incubator,
 Please VOTE on the Apache Joshua 6.1 Release Candidate #1. The release
>>> VOTE
 has passed over on user@ and dev@joshua with the following results
 http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40joshua.incubator.apache.
 org/msg01884.html.
 
 We solved 44 issues: https://s.apache.org/joshua6.1
 
 Git source tag (167489bbd78526b9833fe7c88646bf96101d5d2b):
 https://s.apache.org/joshua6.1tag
 
 Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
 orgapachejoshua-1000/
 
 Source Release Artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/
 dist/dev/incubator/joshua/
 
 PGP release keys (signed using 48BAEBF6):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
 dist/release/incubator/joshua/KEYS
 
 Vote will be open for 72 hours.
 Thank you to everyone that is able to VOTE as well as everyone that
 contributed to Apache Joshua 6.1.
 
 [ ] +1, let's get it released!!!
 [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before...
 [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why)
 
 P.S. here is my +1
 
 --
 http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
 @hectorMcSpector
 http://www.linkedin.com/in/lmcgibbney
 
>>> 
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Joshua (Incubating) 6.1

[kellen sunderland]

I'd vote for a respin fixing Henry's changes.  There's also a small break
in the Dockerfile which I can fix at some point today (we need to switch it
to use mvn package I believe).

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Tommaso Teofili  wrote:

> I think this settles for a respin of a new RC, doesn't it ?
>
> Regards,
> Tommaso
>
> Il giorno sab 19 nov 2016 alle ore 06:20 Henry Saputra <
> henry.sapu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> > Sorry I was late on dev@ list for this Vote, Lewis
> >
> > Looks like I have to -1 for this one:
> > Missing DISCLAIMER file for the source release artifact
> > NOTICE.txt file contains Apache HTrace instead of Apache Joshua
> >
> > Minor issue:
> > Extra file "pom.xml.release.releaseBackup"
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:11 PM, lewis john mcgibbney <
> lewi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello general@incubator,
> > > Please VOTE on the Apache Joshua 6.1 Release Candidate #1. The release
> > VOTE
> > > has passed over on user@ and dev@joshua with the following results
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40joshua.incubator.apache.
> > > org/msg01884.html.
> > >
> > > We solved 44 issues: https://s.apache.org/joshua6.1
> > >
> > > Git source tag (167489bbd78526b9833fe7c88646bf96101d5d2b):
> > > https://s.apache.org/joshua6.1tag
> > >
> > > Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapachejoshua-1000/
> > >
> > > Source Release Artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> > > dist/dev/incubator/joshua/
> > >
> > > PGP release keys (signed using 48BAEBF6):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> > > dist/release/incubator/joshua/KEYS
> > >
> > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > Thank you to everyone that is able to VOTE as well as everyone that
> > > contributed to Apache Joshua 6.1.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1, let's get it released!!!
> > > [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before...
> > > [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why)
> > >
> > > P.S. here is my +1
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
> > > @hectorMcSpector
> > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/lmcgibbney
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Joshua (Incubating) 6.1

[Tommaso Teofili]

I think this settles for a respin of a new RC, doesn't it ?

Regards,
Tommaso

Il giorno sab 19 nov 2016 alle ore 06:20 Henry Saputra <
henry.sapu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Sorry I was late on dev@ list for this Vote, Lewis
>
> Looks like I have to -1 for this one:
> Missing DISCLAIMER file for the source release artifact
> NOTICE.txt file contains Apache HTrace instead of Apache Joshua
>
> Minor issue:
> Extra file "pom.xml.release.releaseBackup"
>
> - Henry
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:11 PM, lewis john mcgibbney 
> wrote:
>
> > Hello general@incubator,
> > Please VOTE on the Apache Joshua 6.1 Release Candidate #1. The release
> VOTE
> > has passed over on user@ and dev@joshua with the following results
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40joshua.incubator.apache.
> > org/msg01884.html.
> >
> > We solved 44 issues: https://s.apache.org/joshua6.1
> >
> > Git source tag (167489bbd78526b9833fe7c88646bf96101d5d2b):
> > https://s.apache.org/joshua6.1tag
> >
> > Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapachejoshua-1000/
> >
> > Source Release Artifacts: https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> > dist/dev/incubator/joshua/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 48BAEBF6): https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> > dist/release/incubator/joshua/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > Thank you to everyone that is able to VOTE as well as everyone that
> > contributed to Apache Joshua 6.1.
> >
> > [ ] +1, let's get it released!!!
> > [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before...
> > [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why)
> >
> > P.S. here is my +1
> >
> > --
> > http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
> > @hectorMcSpector
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/lmcgibbney
> >
>