Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Greg Harris
Congratulations Greg On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 9:02 AM Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya < quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Congrats Greg!! > > On Tue 11. Jul 2023 at 15.20, Federico Valeri > wrote: > > > Congrats Greg! > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 3:55 AM Luke Chen wrote: > > > > > > Congrats Greg! > > > > > > Luke > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 8:19 AM Matthew de Detrich > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Congratulations, well deserved! > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 5:45 PM Chris Egerton > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > The PMC for Apache Kafka has invited Greg Harris to become a > > committer, > > > > and > > > > > we are happy to announce that he has accepted! > > > > > > > > > > Greg has been contributing to Kafka since 2019. He has made over 50 > > > > commits > > > > > mostly around Kafka Connect and Mirror Maker 2. His most notable > > > > > contributions include KIP-898: "Modernize Connect plugin discovery" > > and a > > > > > deep overhaul of the offset syncing logic in MM2 that addressed > > several > > > > > technically-difficult, long-standing, high-impact issues. > > > > > > > > > > He has also been an active participant in discussions and reviews > on > > the > > > > > mailing lists and on GitHub. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for all of your contributions, Greg. Congratulations! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Matthew de Detrich > > > > > > > > *Aiven Deutschland GmbH* > > > > > > > > Immanuelkirchstraße 26, 10405 Berlin > > > > > > > > Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 209739 B > > > > > > > > Geschäftsführer: Oskari Saarenmaa & Hannu Valtonen > > > > > > > > *m:* +491603708037 > > > > > > > > *w:* aiven.io *e:* matthew.dedetr...@aiven.io > > > > > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-0422: Add Record Footers
Excellent addition, can we consider building in priority for all footer elements such that each could be designated high or low? Cheers, Anna On Fri, Apr 1, 2022, 10:56 AM Chris Egerton wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > Thanks for the KIP! For context, it looks like this was discussed earlier > at Kafka Summit (recording here: https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ); could we > add that to the background section? > > Cheers, > > Chris > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2022, 10:51 Bill Bejeck wrote: > > > Hi Matthias > > > > This is a great idea, and I have one suggestion, can we name them record > > footnotes? > > > > Thanks, > > Bill > > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 10:45 AM Matthias J. Sax > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > we added record header support to Kafka via KIP-82 many years ago. I > > > think it's time to complement this feature with record footers. > > > > > > Looking forward to your feedback. > > > > > > https://tinyurl.com/43jubbaj > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-714: Client Metrics and Observability
Hi MagnUs, Thanks for the KIP. +1 (non-binding) Cheers, Anna On Mon, Oct 18, 2021, 5:30 AM Magnus Edenhill wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-714. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2xRRCg > > Discussion thread: > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg119000.html > > Thanks, > Magnus >
Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-568: Explicit rebalance triggering on the Consumer
This situation was discussed at length after a recent talk I gave. This KIP would be a great step towards increased availability and in facilitating lightweight rebalances. anna On Fri, Feb 7, 2020, 9:38 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > Hi all, > > In light of some recent and upcoming rebalancing and availability > improvements, it seems we have a need for explicitly triggering a consumer > group rebalance. Therefore I'd like to propose adding a new > rejoinGroup()method > to the Consumer client (better method name suggestions are very welcome). > > Please take a look at the KIP and let me know what you think! > > KIP document: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-568%3A+Explicit+rebalance+triggering+on+the+Consumer > > JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9525 > > Cheers, > Sophie >
Re: [VOTE] KIP-399: Extend ProductionExceptionHandler to cover serialization exceptions
Hi All, With +1 binding votes from Guozhang, Matthias and Bill and non-binding +1 votes from Mitch, and M. Manna, the vote passes Thanks all, anna On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 9:54 PM Anna McDonald wrote: > > Done. Thanks for pointing that out. > > anna > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 8:52 PM Guozhang Wang wrote: > > > > Hi Anna, > > > > Just a minor comment on the wiki page itself: > > > > ``` > > > > The new method, handleSerializationException, in ProductionExceptionHandler > > will be invoked when > > > >1. ClassCastException is thrown while serializing record key / value. We > >will continue to throw this exception and not invoke the new method. > > > > ``` > > > > I think you meant to say that when ClassCastException is thrown, we would > > NOT trigger the handler method. But at the beginning it mentioned "will be > > invoked when.." which sounds a bit conflicting with itself. Could you > > update the wiki page? > > > > Otherwise, I'm +1 on this. > > > > > > Guozhang. > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 1:42 PM Matthias J. Sax > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for pushing this KIP over the finish line! > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > On 1/15/20 12:57 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote: > > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > -Bill > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 3:45 PM M. Manna wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > > >> > > > >> Thanks for this KIP > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> > > > >> On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 20:35, Mitchell wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> +1(non-binding) > > > >>> > > > >>> Very useful > > > >>> -mitch > > > >>> > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 3:29 PM Anna McDonald > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Greetings, > > > >>>> I would like to propose a vote on KIP-399, extending the > > > >>>> ProductionExceptionHandler to cover serialization exceptions. This > > > >>>> KIP > > > >>>> is aimed at improving the error-handling semantics in Kafka Streams > > > >>>> when Kafka Streams fails to serialize a message to the downstream > > > >>>> sink. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> KIP details located here: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-399%3A+Extend+ProductionExceptionHandler+to+cover+serialization+exceptions > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Discussion Thread: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbbc887ca31d46f6e73ffc6e08df7e4bda69c89ff820986c30274e272%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > >>>> anna > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -- Guozhang
Re: [VOTE] KIP-399: Extend ProductionExceptionHandler to cover serialization exceptions
Done. Thanks for pointing that out. anna On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 8:52 PM Guozhang Wang wrote: > > Hi Anna, > > Just a minor comment on the wiki page itself: > > ``` > > The new method, handleSerializationException, in ProductionExceptionHandler > will be invoked when > >1. ClassCastException is thrown while serializing record key / value. We >will continue to throw this exception and not invoke the new method. > > ``` > > I think you meant to say that when ClassCastException is thrown, we would > NOT trigger the handler method. But at the beginning it mentioned "will be > invoked when.." which sounds a bit conflicting with itself. Could you > update the wiki page? > > Otherwise, I'm +1 on this. > > > Guozhang. > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 1:42 PM Matthias J. Sax > wrote: > > > Thanks for pushing this KIP over the finish line! > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > On 1/15/20 12:57 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote: > > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > -Bill > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 3:45 PM M. Manna wrote: > > > > > >> +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > >> Thanks for this KIP > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 20:35, Mitchell wrote: > > >> > > >>> +1(non-binding) > > >>> > > >>> Very useful > > >>> -mitch > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 3:29 PM Anna McDonald > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Greetings, > > >>>> I would like to propose a vote on KIP-399, extending the > > >>>> ProductionExceptionHandler to cover serialization exceptions. This KIP > > >>>> is aimed at improving the error-handling semantics in Kafka Streams > > >>>> when Kafka Streams fails to serialize a message to the downstream > > >>>> sink. > > >>>> > > >>>> KIP details located here: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-399%3A+Extend+ProductionExceptionHandler+to+cover+serialization+exceptions > > >>>> > > >>>> Discussion Thread: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbbc887ca31d46f6e73ffc6e08df7e4bda69c89ff820986c30274e272%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E > > >>>> > > >>>> Thanks, > > >>>> anna > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > -- Guozhang
[VOTE] KIP-399: Extend ProductionExceptionHandler to cover serialization exceptions
Greetings, I would like to propose a vote on KIP-399, extending the ProductionExceptionHandler to cover serialization exceptions. This KIP is aimed at improving the error-handling semantics in Kafka Streams when Kafka Streams fails to serialize a message to the downstream sink. KIP details located here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-399%3A+Extend+ProductionExceptionHandler+to+cover+serialization+exceptions Discussion Thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbbc887ca31d46f6e73ffc6e08df7e4bda69c89ff820986c30274e272%40%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E Thanks, anna
