[VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in OAuthBearer authentication

2018-07-25 Thread Stanislav Kozlovski 
Hey everbody,

I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom SASL
extensions in OAuthBearer authentication


-- 
Best,
Stanislav

Re: [VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in OAuthBearer authentication

2018-07-25 Thread Ron Dagostino 
+1 (Non-binding).  Thanks for the KIP and the PR, Stanislav.

Ron

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:04 PM Stanislav Kozlovski 
wrote:

> Hey everbody,
>
> I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom SASL
> extensions in OAuthBearer authentication
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-342%3A+Add+support+for+Custom+SASL+extensions+in+OAuthBearer+authentication
> >
>
> --
> Best,
> Stanislav
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in OAuthBearer authentication

2018-07-26 Thread Rajini Sivaram 
Hi Stanislav,

Thanks for the KIP.

+1 (binding)

Regards,

Rajini


On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Ron Dagostino  wrote:

> +1 (Non-binding).  Thanks for the KIP and the PR, Stanislav.
>
> Ron
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:04 PM Stanislav Kozlovski <
> stanis...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey everbody,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom SASL
> > extensions in OAuthBearer authentication
> > <
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 342%3A+Add+support+for+Custom+SASL+extensions+in+
> OAuthBearer+authentication
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Best,
> > Stanislav
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in OAuthBearer authentication

2018-08-02 Thread Jun Rao 
Hi, Stanislav,

Thanks for the KIP. +1

Just one minor comment. Since the JWT token supports customizable claim
fields, it would be useful to clarify when to use the SASL extension vs the
customized fields in JWT.

Jun

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Stanislav Kozlovski <
stanis...@confluent.io> wrote:

> Hey everbody,
>
> I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom SASL
> extensions in OAuthBearer authentication
>  342%3A+Add+support+for+Custom+SASL+extensions+in+
> OAuthBearer+authentication>
>
> --
> Best,
> Stanislav
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in OAuthBearer authentication

2018-08-03 Thread Stanislav Kozlovski 
Thank you, Jun. Noted in the KIP.

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:28 AM Jun Rao  wrote:

> Hi, Stanislav,
>
> Thanks for the KIP. +1
>
> Just one minor comment. Since the JWT token supports customizable claim
> fields, it would be useful to clarify when to use the SASL extension vs the
> customized fields in JWT.
>
> Jun
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Stanislav Kozlovski <
> stanis...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Hey everbody,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom SASL
> > extensions in OAuthBearer authentication
> >  > 342%3A+Add+support+for+Custom+SASL+extensions+in+
> > OAuthBearer+authentication>
> >
> > --
> > Best,
> > Stanislav
> >
>


-- 
Best,
Stanislav

Re: [VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in OAuthBearer authentication

2018-08-03 Thread Jason Gustafson 
+1 Thanks Stanislav!

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Stanislav Kozlovski 
wrote:

> Thank you, Jun. Noted in the KIP.
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:28 AM Jun Rao  wrote:
>
> > Hi, Stanislav,
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> >
> > Just one minor comment. Since the JWT token supports customizable claim
> > fields, it would be useful to clarify when to use the SASL extension vs
> the
> > customized fields in JWT.
> >
> > Jun
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Stanislav Kozlovski <
> > stanis...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey everbody,
> > >
> > > I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom SASL
> > > extensions in OAuthBearer authentication
> > >  > > 342%3A+Add+support+for+Custom+SASL+extensions+in+
> > > OAuthBearer+authentication>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best,
> > > Stanislav
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best,
> Stanislav
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-342 - Add support for custom SASL extensions in OAuthBearer authentication

2018-08-06 Thread Stanislav Kozlovski 
KIP-342 has passed.

Here is the vote break down:

Binding:
   - Jason Gustafson
   - Jun Rao
   - Rajini Sivaram

Non-Binding:
   - Ron Dagostino

Thanks to all of those who voted and provided feedback!

On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:50 PM Jason Gustafson  wrote:

> +1 Thanks Stanislav!
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Stanislav Kozlovski <
> stanis...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you, Jun. Noted in the KIP.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:28 AM Jun Rao  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Stanislav,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP. +1
> > >
> > > Just one minor comment. Since the JWT token supports customizable claim
> > > fields, it would be useful to clarify when to use the SASL extension vs
> > the
> > > customized fields in JWT.
> > >
> > > Jun
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:03 AM, Stanislav Kozlovski <
> > > stanis...@confluent.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey everbody,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to start a vote thread for KIP-342 Add support for custom
> SASL
> > > > extensions in OAuthBearer authentication
> > > >  > > > 342%3A+Add+support+for+Custom+SASL+extensions+in+
> > > > OAuthBearer+authentication>
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best,
> > > > Stanislav
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best,
> > Stanislav
> >
>


-- 
Best,
Stanislav