[VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2019-11-18 Thread Mickael Maison 
Hi all,

I'd like to start the vote on KIP-518:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-518%3A+Allow+listing+consumer+groups+per+state

Thanks

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-05-29 Thread Mickael Maison 
Quick update:
While implementing the KIP, we made a couple of changes:
- Use regular fields instead of flexible fields. We had to bump the
protocol version to detect compatibility so flexible fields were not
helping much for this low volume API.
- If no states are specified in the request, return all groups instead
of nothing. This allows clients to not necessarily know all the state
names but still retrieve them all.

More details about these 2 points can be found in the PR discussion:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8238

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:39 AM Mickael Maison
 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> The vote has passed with 3 binding votes (Gwen, Colin and Rajini) and
> 5 non-binding votes (Kevin, Ryanne, Dongjin, Tom and David).
> Thanks everybody
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:09 AM Rajini Sivaram  
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP, Mickael!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rajini
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:06 PM Colin McCabe  wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, Mickael.  +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > best,
> > > Colin
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020, at 02:05, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > > > Thanks David and Gwen for the votes
> > > > Colin, I believe I've answered all your questions, can you take another
> > > look?
> > > >
> > > > So far we have 1 binding and 5 non binding votes.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:56 PM Gwen Shapira  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Gwen Shapira
> > > > > Engineering Manager | Confluent
> > > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > > > Follow us: Twitter | blog
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 8:32 AM, David Jacot < dja...@confluent.io >
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > David
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 PM Colin McCabe < cmccabe@ apache. org
> > > (
> > > > > > cmcc...@apache.org ) > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hi Mickael,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks for the KIP. I left a comment on the DISCUSS thread as well.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> best,
> > > > > >> Colin
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, at 08:58, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Hi Manikumar,
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> I believe I've answered David's comments in the DISCUSS thread.
> > > Thanks
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Manikumar < manikumar. reddy@
> > > gmail. com (
> > > > > >>> manikumar.re...@gmail.com ) >
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  Hi Mickael,
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  Thanks for the KIP. Can you respond to the comments from David on
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> discuss
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  thread?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >  Thanks,
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-06-02 Thread David Jacot 
Thanks for the update, Mickael. Changes look good to me.

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:39 AM Mickael Maison 
wrote:

> Quick update:
> While implementing the KIP, we made a couple of changes:
> - Use regular fields instead of flexible fields. We had to bump the
> protocol version to detect compatibility so flexible fields were not
> helping much for this low volume API.
> - If no states are specified in the request, return all groups instead
> of nothing. This allows clients to not necessarily know all the state
> names but still retrieve them all.
>
> More details about these 2 points can be found in the PR discussion:
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8238
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:39 AM Mickael Maison
>  wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The vote has passed with 3 binding votes (Gwen, Colin and Rajini) and
> > 5 non-binding votes (Kevin, Ryanne, Dongjin, Tom and David).
> > Thanks everybody
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:09 AM Rajini Sivaram 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP, Mickael!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rajini
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:06 PM Colin McCabe 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks, Mickael.  +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > best,
> > > > Colin
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020, at 02:05, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > > > > Thanks David and Gwen for the votes
> > > > > Colin, I believe I've answered all your questions, can you take
> another
> > > > look?
> > > > >
> > > > > So far we have 1 binding and 5 non binding votes.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:56 PM Gwen Shapira 
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gwen Shapira
> > > > > > Engineering Manager | Confluent
> > > > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > > > > Follow us: Twitter | blog
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 8:32 AM, David Jacot <
> dja...@confluent.io >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > David
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 PM Colin McCabe < cmccabe@
> apache. org
> > > > (
> > > > > > > cmcc...@apache.org ) > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Hi Mickael,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks for the KIP. I left a comment on the DISCUSS thread as
> well.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> best,
> > > > > > >> Colin
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, at 08:58, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Hi Manikumar,
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> I believe I've answered David's comments in the DISCUSS
> thread.
> > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Manikumar < manikumar.
> reddy@
> > > > gmail. com (
> > > > > > >>> manikumar.re...@gmail.com ) >
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  Hi Mickael,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  Thanks for the KIP. Can you respond to the comments from
> David on
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> discuss
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  thread?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  Thanks,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2019-11-18 Thread Kevin Lu 
+1 (non-binding)

I can see this being useful. Thanks for the KIP!

Regards,
Kevin

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:09 AM Mickael Maison 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start the vote on KIP-518:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-518%3A+Allow+listing+consumer+groups+per+state
>
> Thanks
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2019-12-12 Thread Mickael Maison 
Bumping this thread

On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:27 AM Kevin Lu  wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I can see this being useful. Thanks for the KIP!
>
> Regards,
> Kevin
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:09 AM Mickael Maison 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to start the vote on KIP-518:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-518%3A+Allow+listing+consumer+groups+per+state
> >
> > Thanks
> >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2019-12-12 Thread Ryanne Dolan 
+1 non-binding, thx

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:09 AM Mickael Maison 
wrote:

> Bumping this thread
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:27 AM Kevin Lu  wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I can see this being useful. Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kevin
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:09 AM Mickael Maison  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'd like to start the vote on KIP-518:
> > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-518%3A+Allow+listing+consumer+groups+per+state
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-01-13 Thread Mickael Maison 
Hi all.

With 2.5.0 approaching, bumping this thread once more as feedback or
votes would be nice.

Thanks

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 9:45 PM Ryanne Dolan  wrote:
>
> +1 non-binding, thx
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:09 AM Mickael Maison 
> wrote:
>
> > Bumping this thread
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:27 AM Kevin Lu  wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > I can see this being useful. Thanks for the KIP!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:09 AM Mickael Maison  > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to start the vote on KIP-518:
> > > >
> > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-518%3A+Allow+listing+consumer+groups+per+state
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-01-13 Thread Dongjin Lee 
+1 (non-binding)

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 7:16 PM Mickael Maison 
wrote:

> Hi all.
>
> With 2.5.0 approaching, bumping this thread once more as feedback or
> votes would be nice.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 9:45 PM Ryanne Dolan 
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 non-binding, thx
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:09 AM Mickael Maison  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Bumping this thread
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:27 AM Kevin Lu 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > I can see this being useful. Thanks for the KIP!
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Kevin
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:09 AM Mickael Maison <
> mickael.mai...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to start the vote on KIP-518:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-518%3A+Allow+listing+consumer+groups+per+state
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > >
>
-- 
*Dongjin Lee*

*A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
*github:  github.com/dongjinleekr
linkedin: kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
speakerdeck: speakerdeck.com/dongjin
*

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-01-13 Thread Tom Bentley 
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP.

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:15 PM Dongjin Lee  wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 7:16 PM Mickael Maison 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all.
> >
> > With 2.5.0 approaching, bumping this thread once more as feedback or
> > votes would be nice.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 9:45 PM Ryanne Dolan 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 non-binding, thx
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 6:09 AM Mickael Maison <
> mickael.mai...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Bumping this thread
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 6:27 AM Kevin Lu 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > I can see this being useful. Thanks for the KIP!
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Kevin
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:09 AM Mickael Maison <
> > mickael.mai...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to start the vote on KIP-518:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-518%3A+Allow+listing+consumer+groups+per+state
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> --
> *Dongjin Lee*
>
> *A hitchhiker in the mathematical world.*
> *github:  github.com/dongjinleekr
> linkedin: kr.linkedin.com/in/dongjinleekr
> speakerdeck:
> speakerdeck.com/dongjin
> *
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-01-15 Thread Manikumar 
Hi Mickael,

Thanks for the KIP.  Can you respond to the comments from David on discuss
thread?

Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-02-06 Thread Mickael Maison 
Hi Manikumar,

I believe I've answered David's comments in the DISCUSS thread.
Thanks

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Manikumar  wrote:
>
> Hi Mickael,
>
> Thanks for the KIP.  Can you respond to the comments from David on discuss
> thread?
>
> Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-02-06 Thread Colin McCabe 
Hi Mickael,

Thanks for the KIP.  I left a comment on the DISCUSS thread as well.

best,
Colin


On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, at 08:58, Mickael Maison wrote:
> Hi Manikumar,
> 
> I believe I've answered David's comments in the DISCUSS thread.
> Thanks
> 
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Manikumar  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mickael,
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP.  Can you respond to the comments from David on discuss
> > thread?
> >
> > Thanks,
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-03-02 Thread David Jacot 
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!

David

On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 PM Colin McCabe  wrote:

> Hi Mickael,
>
> Thanks for the KIP.  I left a comment on the DISCUSS thread as well.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, at 08:58, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > Hi Manikumar,
> >
> > I believe I've answered David's comments in the DISCUSS thread.
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Manikumar 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Mickael,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP.  Can you respond to the comments from David on
> discuss
> > > thread?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-03-02 Thread Gwen Shapira 
+1 (binding)

Gwen Shapira
Engineering Manager | Confluent
650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
Follow us: Twitter | blog

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 8:32 AM, David Jacot < dja...@confluent.io > wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> 
> 
> 
> David
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 PM Colin McCabe < cmccabe@ apache. org (
> cmcc...@apache.org ) > wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Mickael,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks for the KIP. I left a comment on the DISCUSS thread as well.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> best,
>> Colin
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, at 08:58, Mickael Maison wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi Manikumar,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I believe I've answered David's comments in the DISCUSS thread. Thanks
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Manikumar < manikumar. reddy@ gmail. com (
>>> manikumar.re...@gmail.com ) >
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> 
 
 
 Hi Mickael,
 
 
 
 Thanks for the KIP. Can you respond to the comments from David on
 
 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> discuss
>> 
>> 
>>> 
 
 
 thread?
 
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-03-06 Thread Mickael Maison 
Thanks David and Gwen for the votes
Colin, I believe I've answered all your questions, can you take another look?

So far we have 1 binding and 5 non binding votes.

On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:56 PM Gwen Shapira  wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Gwen Shapira
> Engineering Manager | Confluent
> 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> Follow us: Twitter | blog
>
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 8:32 AM, David Jacot < dja...@confluent.io > wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> >
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 PM Colin McCabe < cmccabe@ apache. org (
> > cmcc...@apache.org ) > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Mickael,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for the KIP. I left a comment on the DISCUSS thread as well.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> best,
> >> Colin
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, at 08:58, Mickael Maison wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Manikumar,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I believe I've answered David's comments in the DISCUSS thread. Thanks
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Manikumar < manikumar. reddy@ gmail. com 
> >>> (
> >>> manikumar.re...@gmail.com ) >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> 
> 
>  Hi Mickael,
> 
> 
> 
>  Thanks for the KIP. Can you respond to the comments from David on
> 
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> discuss
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> 
> 
>  thread?
> 
> 
> 
>  Thanks,
> 
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-03-12 Thread Colin McCabe 
Thanks, Mickael.  +1 (binding)

best,
Colin

On Fri, Mar 6, 2020, at 02:05, Mickael Maison wrote:
> Thanks David and Gwen for the votes
> Colin, I believe I've answered all your questions, can you take another look?
> 
> So far we have 1 binding and 5 non binding votes.
> 
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:56 PM Gwen Shapira  wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Gwen Shapira
> > Engineering Manager | Confluent
> > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > Follow us: Twitter | blog
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 8:32 AM, David Jacot < dja...@confluent.io > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 PM Colin McCabe < cmccabe@ apache. org (
> > > cmcc...@apache.org ) > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hi Mickael,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for the KIP. I left a comment on the DISCUSS thread as well.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> best,
> > >> Colin
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, at 08:58, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi Manikumar,
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I believe I've answered David's comments in the DISCUSS thread. Thanks
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Manikumar < manikumar. reddy@ gmail. 
> > >>> com (
> > >>> manikumar.re...@gmail.com ) >
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > 
> > 
> >  Hi Mickael,
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  Thanks for the KIP. Can you respond to the comments from David on
> > 
> > 
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> discuss
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>
> > 
> > 
> >  thread?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  Thanks,
> > 
> > 
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-03-13 Thread Rajini Sivaram 
+1 (binding)

Thanks for the KIP, Mickael!

Regards,

Rajini


On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:06 PM Colin McCabe  wrote:

> Thanks, Mickael.  +1 (binding)
>
> best,
> Colin
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020, at 02:05, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > Thanks David and Gwen for the votes
> > Colin, I believe I've answered all your questions, can you take another
> look?
> >
> > So far we have 1 binding and 5 non binding votes.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:56 PM Gwen Shapira  wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Gwen Shapira
> > > Engineering Manager | Confluent
> > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > Follow us: Twitter | blog
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 8:32 AM, David Jacot < dja...@confluent.io >
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 PM Colin McCabe < cmccabe@ apache. org
> (
> > > > cmcc...@apache.org ) > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Mickael,
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks for the KIP. I left a comment on the DISCUSS thread as well.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> best,
> > > >> Colin
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, at 08:58, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi Manikumar,
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I believe I've answered David's comments in the DISCUSS thread.
> Thanks
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Manikumar < manikumar. reddy@
> gmail. com (
> > > >>> manikumar.re...@gmail.com ) >
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  Hi Mickael,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  Thanks for the KIP. Can you respond to the comments from David on
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> discuss
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  thread?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  Thanks,
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-518: Allow listing consumer groups per state

2020-03-16 Thread Mickael Maison 
Hi all,

The vote has passed with 3 binding votes (Gwen, Colin and Rajini) and
5 non-binding votes (Kevin, Ryanne, Dongjin, Tom and David).
Thanks everybody

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:09 AM Rajini Sivaram  wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP, Mickael!
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:06 PM Colin McCabe  wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Mickael.  +1 (binding)
> >
> > best,
> > Colin
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2020, at 02:05, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > > Thanks David and Gwen for the votes
> > > Colin, I believe I've answered all your questions, can you take another
> > look?
> > >
> > > So far we have 1 binding and 5 non binding votes.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:56 PM Gwen Shapira  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Gwen Shapira
> > > > Engineering Manager | Confluent
> > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > > Follow us: Twitter | blog
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 8:32 AM, David Jacot < dja...@confluent.io >
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > David
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:45 PM Colin McCabe < cmccabe@ apache. org
> > (
> > > > > cmcc...@apache.org ) > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hi Mickael,
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks for the KIP. I left a comment on the DISCUSS thread as well.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> best,
> > > > >> Colin
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020, at 08:58, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Hi Manikumar,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I believe I've answered David's comments in the DISCUSS thread.
> > Thanks
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Manikumar < manikumar. reddy@
> > gmail. com (
> > > > >>> manikumar.re...@gmail.com ) >
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  Hi Mickael,
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  Thanks for the KIP. Can you respond to the comments from David on
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> discuss
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  thread?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >