Re: Review Request 28240: Follow-up KAFKA-1580

2014-11-21 Thread Guozhang Wang


> On Nov. 21, 2014, 1:48 p.m., Joel Koshy wrote:
> > core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaApis.scala, line 193
> > 
> >
> > I think it is more suitable to have this access control implemented 
> > inside ReplicaManager. One can argue both ways though...

I was actually back and forth quite some times back then. The main reason I 
choose to do this in the Kafka API layer is that otherwise the offset manager / 
replica manager has to handle operations with clientId, which defeats the 
purpose of the refactoring effort.


- Guozhang


---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28240/#review62547
---


On Nov. 19, 2014, 7:01 p.m., Guozhang Wang wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28240/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Nov. 19, 2014, 7:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1580
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1580
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Add the logic for checking internal topics in the replica manager layer
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/admin/AdminUtils.scala 
> 94c53320b768b83b0324336b73cc06537c0fe78d 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaApis.scala 
> 968b0c4f809ea9f9c3f322aef9db105f9d2e0e23 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/OffsetManager.scala 
> 2957bc435102bc4004d8f100dbcdd56287c8ffae 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala 
> 3007a6d89b637b93f71fdb7adab561a93d9c4c62 
>   core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/api/ProducerFailureHandlingTest.scala 
> 8531f533f3a6431f4f9fc8cb1ad3e9f1f1b110e0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28240/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guozhang Wang
> 
>



Re: Review Request 28240: Follow-up KAFKA-1580

2014-11-21 Thread Joel Koshy

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28240/#review62547
---

Ship it!


Minor comment.


core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaApis.scala


I think it is more suitable to have this access control implemented inside 
ReplicaManager. One can argue both ways though...


- Joel Koshy


On Nov. 19, 2014, 7:01 p.m., Guozhang Wang wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28240/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Nov. 19, 2014, 7:01 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kafka.
> 
> 
> Bugs: KAFKA-1580
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1580
> 
> 
> Repository: kafka
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Add the logic for checking internal topics in the replica manager layer
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/admin/AdminUtils.scala 
> 94c53320b768b83b0324336b73cc06537c0fe78d 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaApis.scala 
> 968b0c4f809ea9f9c3f322aef9db105f9d2e0e23 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/OffsetManager.scala 
> 2957bc435102bc4004d8f100dbcdd56287c8ffae 
>   core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala 
> 3007a6d89b637b93f71fdb7adab561a93d9c4c62 
>   core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/api/ProducerFailureHandlingTest.scala 
> 8531f533f3a6431f4f9fc8cb1ad3e9f1f1b110e0 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28240/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Guozhang Wang
> 
>



Review Request 28240: Follow-up KAFKA-1580

2014-11-19 Thread Guozhang Wang

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28240/
---

Review request for kafka.


Bugs: KAFKA-1580
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1580


Repository: kafka


Description
---

Add the logic for checking internal topics in the replica manager layer


Diffs
-

  core/src/main/scala/kafka/admin/AdminUtils.scala 
94c53320b768b83b0324336b73cc06537c0fe78d 
  core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/KafkaApis.scala 
968b0c4f809ea9f9c3f322aef9db105f9d2e0e23 
  core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/OffsetManager.scala 
2957bc435102bc4004d8f100dbcdd56287c8ffae 
  core/src/main/scala/kafka/server/ReplicaManager.scala 
3007a6d89b637b93f71fdb7adab561a93d9c4c62 
  core/src/test/scala/integration/kafka/api/ProducerFailureHandlingTest.scala 
8531f533f3a6431f4f9fc8cb1ad3e9f1f1b110e0 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28240/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Guozhang Wang