Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

2021-11-14 Thread Grzegorz Grzybek
Hello

niedz., 14 lis 2021 o 17:18 Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
napisał(a):

> Hi guys,
>
> FYI, I just found an issue in Pax Web 7.3.21 (related to Jetty update, in
> the war extender). I’m fixing it now and I will cut a new Pax Web 7.3.x
> release to update in Karaf.
>

Is it related to jetty 9.4.44 and annotations? Can I help?

regards
Grzegorz Grzybek


>
> I’m moving forward as quick as possible to submit Karaf 4.3.4 and
> 4.4.0.RC1 to vote.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 12 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  a écrit
> :
> >
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > From an user standpoint, you are right.
> >
> > I updated Karaf to use "individual" bundles. I think I sent a message on
> the mailing list about that.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 12/11/2021 14:34, Robert Varga wrote:
> >> On 12/11/2021 10:23, Paul Stanley wrote:
> >>> Thanks JB.
> >> Hello Paul,
> >>> I would have though that OSGI R8 is backwards compatible with R7, as I
> >>> didn't see any breaking changes in the spec.
> >> True, but the artifact packaging with R8 broken up to support JPMS --
> i.e. no osgi.cmpn anymore. That is a breaking change from build system
> perspective.
> >> Regards,
> >> Robert
>
>


Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

2021-11-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Hi guys,

FYI, I just found an issue in Pax Web 7.3.21 (related to Jetty update, in the 
war extender). I’m fixing it now and I will cut a new Pax Web 7.3.x release to 
update in Karaf.

I’m moving forward as quick as possible to submit Karaf 4.3.4 and 4.4.0.RC1 to 
vote.

Regards
JB

> Le 12 nov. 2021 à 14:38, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  a écrit :
> 
> Hi Robert,
> 
> From an user standpoint, you are right.
> 
> I updated Karaf to use "individual" bundles. I think I sent a message on the 
> mailing list about that.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> On 12/11/2021 14:34, Robert Varga wrote:
>> On 12/11/2021 10:23, Paul Stanley wrote:
>>> Thanks JB.
>> Hello Paul,
>>> I would have though that OSGI R8 is backwards compatible with R7, as I
>>> didn't see any breaking changes in the spec.
>> True, but the artifact packaging with R8 broken up to support JPMS -- i.e. 
>> no osgi.cmpn anymore. That is a breaking change from build system 
>> perspective.
>> Regards,
>> Robert