Re: [DISCUSS] Adopt new Karaf logo

2022-11-14 Thread Matt Pavlovich
-1 (non-binding)

My $0.02 —

1. The cloud logo is not friendly to be turned into a font
2. I prefer the alternative hexagon logo is simpler (even if similar to others) 
and better suited for the things logos are used for — stickers, font, ascii 
art, etc.

Thanks,
Matt Pavlovich

> On Nov 13, 2022, at 1:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:
> 
> Hi guys
> 
> I did a review on twitter and linkedin feedback about Karaf logo (the « cloud 
> » one). 
> 
> To summarize, we only have +1 and two « comments » like « cloud is not 
> related to Karaf ». 
> 
> So, I wonder to make a call and formal vote:
> 
> +1 to adopt Karaf cloud logo
> -1 for Karaf cloud logo and work on a new one
> 
> The reason I’m asking is because I’m working on website proposal. So I would 
> like to integrate the logo. 
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> Le mar. 1 nov. 2022 à 14:11, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  > a écrit :
> Hi guys,
> 
> as discussed on a previous thread, I'm working on a new website
> proposal with the following objectives:
> 
> 1. Use docusaurus instead of jekyll to build. The good thing is that
> it supports md syntax, blog, etc.
> 2. Give the same space/visibility to the subprojects (Karaf Minho,
> Karaf OSGi, Karaf Decanter, Karaf Cellar, Karaf Cave, Karaf
> Winegrower)
> 3. Add blog feature to announce and provide details about Karaf projects
> 
> Related to that, I created a new "generic" logo for Karaf (each
> project can have its own logo).
> 
> You can see the logo proposal attached.
> 
> Basically the idea is:
> - boxes populating the cloud represent Karaf projects
> - we can assembly Karaf projects to create a cloud solution
> 
> Thoughts ?
> 
> If we agree with this logo, I would like to prepare some goodies using
> it (probably on https://www.redbubble.com/en/ 
> ).
> 
> Regards
> JB



Re: Unable to create default RequestDispatcher

2022-11-14 Thread Grzegorz Grzybek
Prashanth - just one thing - what's the method you're using to register
ExampleServlet?

Because according to HttpService and Whiteboard specifications, there's no
"default" servlet registered.

See - in Karaf 4.4.2, I've installed hawtio application
(mvn:io.hawt/hawtio-osgi/2.15.0/war) and this "showcase" bundle from Pax
Web:

karaf@root()> install mvn:org.ops4j.pax.web.samples/showcase/8.0.11
Bundle ID: 79
karaf@root()> start 79

karaf@root()> sample:whiteboard servlet s1 /s1/*
>> Using context for bundle org.ops4j.pax.web.samples.showcase [79]
>> Registering a servlet with "s1" name, "/s1/*" pattern, "(
osgi.http.whiteboard.context.name=default)" context selector and for
org.ops4j.pax.web.samples.showcase [79].
 Registered successfully. You can test it using `curl -i
http://127.0.0.1:8181/s1/anything`

karaf@root()> web:servlet-list
Bundle ID │ Name  │ Class
  │ Context Path(s) │ URLs │ Type   │ Context
Filter
──┼───┼───┼─┼──┼┼
75│ default   │
org.ops4j.pax.web.service.jetty.internal.web.JettyResourceServlet │ /hawtio
│ /│ WAB│ -
75│ jolokia-agent │
io.hawt.web.servlets.JolokiaConfiguredAgentServlet│ /hawtio
│ /jolokia/*   │ WAB│ -
75│ jolokia-proxy │ io.hawt.web.proxy.ProxyServlet
   │ /hawtio │ /proxy/* │ WAB│ -
75│ keycloak  │ io.hawt.web.auth.keycloak.KeycloakServlet
  │ /hawtio │ /keycloak/*  │ WAB│ -
75│ login │ io.hawt.web.auth.LoginServlet
  │ /hawtio │ /auth/login  │ WAB│ -
75│ logout│ io.hawt.web.auth.LogoutServlet
   │ /hawtio │ /auth/logout │ WAB│ -
75│ plugin│ io.hawt.web.plugin.PluginServlet
   │ /hawtio │ /plugin/*│ WAB│ -
75│ user  │ io.hawt.web.auth.keycloak.KeycloakUserServlet
  │ /hawtio │ /user/*  │ WAB│ -
79│ s1│
org.ops4j.pax.web.samples.config.commands.web.TestServlet │ /
│ /s1/*│ Whiteboard │ (osgi.http.whiteboard.context.name
=default)

And there's no "defaul" servlet in "/" context.

"default" servlet is installed by default only for WAB scenarios (WAR).

regards
Grzegorz Grzybek

pon., 14 lis 2022 o 15:05 Grzegorz Grzybek 
napisał(a):

> Hello
>
> There were a lot of changes in Pax Web 8 and in previous versions,
> getNamedDispatch() was simply delegated to underlying web server. Now the
> servlet context is always OSGi-specific and there indeed may be something
> missing.
>
> I've created https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/issues/1794 to
> track this problem - please give me ~1 day to find the reason of the
> problem.
>
> kind regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> pon., 14 lis 2022 o 14:56 Prashanth Ettaboina
>  napisał(a):
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> I have updated my KARAF version from 4.2.15 to 4.4.1 and Java from 8 to
>> 11 in my application.
>> Gone through the official Release notes and updated some dependencies as
>> well.
>>
>> Upgraded OSGI-Core from 6.0.0 to 8.0.0.
>> Upgraded osgi.compendium 5.0.0 to osgi.cmpn 7.0.0
>> Upgraded Jetty from 9.4.43.v20210629 to 9.4.46.v20220331.
>> Upgraded pax-web-spi from 4.3.4 to 7.2.11.
>> I'm using javax.servlet-api 3.1.0 version in my application.
>>
>> I'm unable to create default RequestDispatcher.
>> Please check the below code lines.
>>
>> public class ExampleServlet extends HttpServlet {
>>   protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest request,
>> HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException {
>>  RequestDispatcher requestDispatcher =
>> getServletContext().getNamedDispatcher("default"); // get
>> getServletContext() is calling the method in GenericServlet.
>>  requestDispatcher.include(request, response);
>>   }
>> }
>>
>> the above code used to work fine before the version upgrades but now I'm
>> getting the requestDispatcher as null.
>>
>> Can anyone please look at it, let me know if I'm missing something.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Prashanth Ettaboina
>>
>>
>>
>>


Re: Unable to create default RequestDispatcher

2022-11-14 Thread Grzegorz Grzybek
Hello

There were a lot of changes in Pax Web 8 and in previous versions,
getNamedDispatch() was simply delegated to underlying web server. Now the
servlet context is always OSGi-specific and there indeed may be something
missing.

I've created https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/issues/1794 to
track this problem - please give me ~1 day to find the reason of the
problem.

kind regards
Grzegorz Grzybek

pon., 14 lis 2022 o 14:56 Prashanth Ettaboina
 napisał(a):

> Hi Team,
>
> I have updated my KARAF version from 4.2.15 to 4.4.1 and Java from 8 to 11
> in my application.
> Gone through the official Release notes and updated some dependencies as
> well.
>
> Upgraded OSGI-Core from 6.0.0 to 8.0.0.
> Upgraded osgi.compendium 5.0.0 to osgi.cmpn 7.0.0
> Upgraded Jetty from 9.4.43.v20210629 to 9.4.46.v20220331.
> Upgraded pax-web-spi from 4.3.4 to 7.2.11.
> I'm using javax.servlet-api 3.1.0 version in my application.
>
> I'm unable to create default RequestDispatcher.
> Please check the below code lines.
>
> public class ExampleServlet extends HttpServlet {
>   protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse
> response) throws ServletException, IOException {
>  RequestDispatcher requestDispatcher =
> getServletContext().getNamedDispatcher("default"); // get
> getServletContext() is calling the method in GenericServlet.
>  requestDispatcher.include(request, response);
>   }
> }
>
> the above code used to work fine before the version upgrades but now I'm
> getting the requestDispatcher as null.
>
> Can anyone please look at it, let me know if I'm missing something.
>
> Thanks,
> Prashanth Ettaboina
>
>
>
>


Unable to create default RequestDispatcher

2022-11-14 Thread Prashanth Ettaboina
Hi Team,

I have updated my KARAF version from 4.2.15 to 4.4.1 and Java from 8 to 11 in 
my application.
Gone through the official Release notes and updated some dependencies as well.

Upgraded OSGI-Core from 6.0.0 to 8.0.0.
Upgraded osgi.compendium 5.0.0 to osgi.cmpn 7.0.0
Upgraded Jetty from 9.4.43.v20210629 to 9.4.46.v20220331.
Upgraded pax-web-spi from 4.3.4 to 7.2.11.
I'm using javax.servlet-api 3.1.0 version in my application.

I'm unable to create default RequestDispatcher.
Please check the below code lines.

public class ExampleServlet extends HttpServlet {
  protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse 
response) throws ServletException, IOException {
 RequestDispatcher requestDispatcher = 
getServletContext().getNamedDispatcher("default"); // get getServletContext() 
is calling the method in GenericServlet.
 requestDispatcher.include(request, response);
  }
}

the above code used to work fine before the version upgrades but now I'm 
getting the requestDispatcher as null.

Can anyone please look at it, let me know if I'm missing something.

Thanks,
Prashanth Ettaboina