Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Hi all,

I pinged INFRA in the Jira about this action without success.

I try to have them on IRC, I keep you posted.

Sorry for the delay.

Regards
JB

On 08/30/2013 10:50 AM, j...@nanthrax.net wrote:

Hi all,

FYI, I created the Jira at INFRA for the migration:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6708

I'm taking care of that and keep you posted.

Regards
JB

On 2013-06-25 11:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

Hi all,

to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
formal vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.

Please vote to approve this switch:

[ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
[ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Regards
JB




--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[jb]

Hi all,

FYI, I created the Jira at INFRA for the migration:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6708

I'm taking care of that and keep you posted.

Regards
JB

On 2013-06-25 11:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

Hi all,

to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
formal vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.

Please vote to approve this switch:

[ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
[ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Regards
JB

[RESULT][VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Hi all,

This vote has passed with the following result:

+1 (binding): Andreas Pieber, Lukasz Dywicki, Achim Nierbeck, Jamie 
Goodyear, Ioannis Canellos, Freeman Fang, Guillaume Nodet, Jean-Baptiste 
Onofré
+1 (non-binding): Lukaasz Dywicki, Filippo Balicchia, Christoph 
Gritschenberger, Charles Moulliard, Heath Kesler, Johan Edstrom, 
Christian Schneider


I'm going to deal with the INFRA for the migration, and I will update 
our pom, documentation, website.


Thanks all for your vote.

Regards
JB

On 06/25/2013 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

Hi all,

to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
formal vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.

Please vote to approve this switch:

[ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
[ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Regards
JB


--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

+1 (binding)

Regards
JB

On 06/25/2013 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

Hi all,

to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
formal vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.

Please vote to approve this switch:

[ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
[ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Regards
JB


--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Hi David,

Please attach a patch to the Jira, I will review and apply just before 
the switch to git.


Thanks,
Regards
JB

On 08/12/2013 03:20 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:

I'm working preparing my contribution for KARAF-2434 and KARAF-2435...
What's the process I should follow? Should I still attach a patch to the
bugs or should I simply refer to a commit on github or even file a pull
request somewhere?

Apologies if this has already been discussed.

David


On 9 August 2013 14:06, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:


Yes, I will close the vote and deal with infra.

Thanks for the reminder.

Regards
JB


On 08/09/2013 08:23 AM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:


Can we finish this vote and move forward to git? :)

Cheers,
Łukasz Dywicki
--
l...@code-house.org
Twitter: ldywicki
Blog: http://dywicki.pl
Code-House - http://code-house.org

Wiadomość napisana przez Christian Müller 
w dniu 17 lip 2013, o godz. 00:00:

  Apache Camel is using Git since a few weeks now without any issue. We

also
did three releases in this time without any problems. Feel free to ask if
you need any assistance/help. I like to help...

Best,
Christian
-

Software Integration Specialist

Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team
V.P. Apache Camel: 
https://www.apache.org/**foundation/
Apache Member: 
https://www.apache.org/**foundation/members.html

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/**christian-mueller/11/551/642


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
wrote:


  Hi all,


to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
formal
vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.

Please vote to approve this switch:

[ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
[ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com






--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com





--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[David Bosschaert]

I'm working preparing my contribution for KARAF-2434 and KARAF-2435...
What's the process I should follow? Should I still attach a patch to the
bugs or should I simply refer to a commit on github or even file a pull
request somewhere?

Apologies if this has already been discussed.

David


On 9 August 2013 14:06, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  wrote:

> Yes, I will close the vote and deal with infra.
>
> Thanks for the reminder.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 08/09/2013 08:23 AM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:
>
>> Can we finish this vote and move forward to git? :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Łukasz Dywicki
>> --
>> l...@code-house.org
>> Twitter: ldywicki
>> Blog: http://dywicki.pl
>> Code-House - http://code-house.org
>>
>> Wiadomość napisana przez Christian Müller 
>> w dniu 17 lip 2013, o godz. 00:00:
>>
>>  Apache Camel is using Git since a few weeks now without any issue. We
>>> also
>>> did three releases in this time without any problems. Feel free to ask if
>>> you need any assistance/help. I like to help...
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Christian
>>> -
>>>
>>> Software Integration Specialist
>>>
>>> Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team
>>> V.P. Apache Camel: 
>>> https://www.apache.org/**foundation/
>>> Apache Member: 
>>> https://www.apache.org/**foundation/members.html
>>>
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/pub/**christian-mueller/11/551/642
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> >wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi all,

 to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
 formal
 vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.

 Please vote to approve this switch:

 [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
 [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)

 This vote will be open for 72 hours.

 Thanks,
 Regards
 JB
 --
 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
 jbono...@apache.org
 http://blog.nanthrax.net
 Talend - http://www.talend.com


>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Yes, I will close the vote and deal with infra.

Thanks for the reminder.

Regards
JB

On 08/09/2013 08:23 AM, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:

Can we finish this vote and move forward to git? :)

Cheers,
Łukasz Dywicki
--
l...@code-house.org
Twitter: ldywicki
Blog: http://dywicki.pl
Code-House - http://code-house.org

Wiadomość napisana przez Christian Müller  w dniu 
17 lip 2013, o godz. 00:00:


Apache Camel is using Git since a few weeks now without any issue. We also
did three releases in this time without any problems. Feel free to ask if
you need any assistance/help. I like to help...

Best,
Christian
-

Software Integration Specialist

Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team
V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/
Apache Member: https://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:


Hi all,

to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a formal
vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.

Please vote to approve this switch:

[ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
[ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com






--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Andreas Pieber]

+1 :-)

Kind regards,
Andreas


On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Łukasz Dywicki  wrote:

> Can we finish this vote and move forward to git? :)
>
> Cheers,
> Łukasz Dywicki
> --
> l...@code-house.org
> Twitter: ldywicki
> Blog: http://dywicki.pl
> Code-House - http://code-house.org
>
> Wiadomość napisana przez Christian Müller  w
> dniu 17 lip 2013, o godz. 00:00:
>
> > Apache Camel is using Git since a few weeks now without any issue. We
> also
> > did three releases in this time without any problems. Feel free to ask if
> > you need any assistance/help. I like to help...
> >
> > Best,
> > Christian
> > -
> >
> > Software Integration Specialist
> >
> > Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team
> > V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/
> > Apache Member: https://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html
> >
> > https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
> formal
> >> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
> >>
> >> Please vote to approve this switch:
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
> >> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
> >>
> >> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> jbono...@apache.org
> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Łukasz Dywicki]

Can we finish this vote and move forward to git? :)

Cheers,
Łukasz Dywicki
--
l...@code-house.org
Twitter: ldywicki
Blog: http://dywicki.pl
Code-House - http://code-house.org

Wiadomość napisana przez Christian Müller  w dniu 
17 lip 2013, o godz. 00:00:

> Apache Camel is using Git since a few weeks now without any issue. We also
> did three releases in this time without any problems. Feel free to ask if
> you need any assistance/help. I like to help...
> 
> Best,
> Christian
> -
> 
> Software Integration Specialist
> 
> Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team
> V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/
> Apache Member: https://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html
> 
> https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a formal
>> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
>> 
>> Please vote to approve this switch:
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
>> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
>> 
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbono...@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Christian Müller]

Apache Camel is using Git since a few weeks now without any issue. We also
did three releases in this time without any problems. Feel free to ask if
you need any assistance/help. I like to help...

Best,
Christian
-

Software Integration Specialist

Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team
V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/
Apache Member: https://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a formal
> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
>
> Please vote to approve this switch:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Guillaume Nodet]

+1


2013/6/25 Jean-Baptiste Onofré 

> Hi all,
>
> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a formal
> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
>
> Please vote to approve this switch:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Freeman Fang]

+1
－
Freeman(Yue) Fang

Red Hat, Inc. 
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: @Freeman小屋



On 2013-6-25, at 下午5:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a formal 
> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
> 
> Please vote to approve this switch:
> 
> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
> 
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> 
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
> -- 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Johan Edstrom]

+1

On Jun 25, 2013, at 16:52, Heath Kesler  wrote:

> +1
> 
> 
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a formal
>>> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
>>> 
>>> Please vote to approve this switch:
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
>>> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> 

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Heath Kesler]

+1


> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a formal
>> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
>> 
>> Please vote to approve this switch:
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
>> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
>> 
>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbono...@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> 

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Christoph Gritschenberger]

+1
for reasons already stated

kind regards,
christoph

On 2013-06-25 13:31, Jamie G. wrote:

+1

For clarification - all our generated artifacts will be signed, and a tag
of our release created such that anyone could reproduce our release.

The actual commit transaction to SCM is the only part that does not have a
signature.

As to the snapshots appearing in poms, Central Nexus will not allow us to
release if it detects them during a promote - I do not believe however this
is related to SCM, that's probably a configuration issue of the release
plugin.

Our release procedures and release check signatures scripts will need to be
verified post change.

-Jamie


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Łukasz Dywicki  wrote:


+1 from me

Switching to git will let us process pull requests in easier way. Maven is
not afraid of git as well.

I'm not scared by Camel issues with git since they have more modules than
they need. ;-)

Cheers,
Lukasz

Wiadomość napisana przez Achim Nierbeck  w dniu
25 cze 2013, o godz. 11:54:


Hi,

I'm
-1 for this due to the things that popped up with the latest Camel

release.

[1]
Even though I do not fully understand why this is an issue, cause when
releasing OPS4j artefacts we never had such issues.

If this issues is cleared I'd go for +1

regards, Achim


[1] -


http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-10-5-tp5734607p5734684.html



2013/6/25 Andreas Pieber 


hey, there is no 0 option :-)

still +1 for the switch. Would make forking and experimenting (and
especially getting the changes back) so much easier...

Kind regards,
Andreas


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
wrote:



Hi all,

to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a

formal

vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.

Please vote to approve this switch:

[ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
[ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com







--

Apache Karaf  Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web  Committer

&

Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin 
Commiter & Project Lead
blog 










smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Christian Schneider]

+1

Christian

Am 25.06.2013 11:12, schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré:

Hi all,

to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a 
formal vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.


Please vote to approve this switch:

[ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
[ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Regards
JB



--
 
Christian Schneider

http://www.liquid-reality.de

Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Ioannis Canellos]

+1


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Charles Moulliard  wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  >wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
> formal
> > vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
> >
> > Please vote to approve this switch:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
> > [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Regards
> > JB
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbono...@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Charles Moulliard
> Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat
> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
>



-- 
*Ioannis Canellos*
*

**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Charles Moulliard]

+1


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a formal
> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
>
> Please vote to approve this switch:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>



-- 
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer / Architect @RedHat
Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Filippo Balicchia]

>From my point of view is +1
allows you to contribute immediately

Regards

--Filippo


2013/6/25 Jamie G. 

> +1
>
> For clarification - all our generated artifacts will be signed, and a tag
> of our release created such that anyone could reproduce our release.
>
> The actual commit transaction to SCM is the only part that does not have a
> signature.
>
> As to the snapshots appearing in poms, Central Nexus will not allow us to
> release if it detects them during a promote - I do not believe however this
> is related to SCM, that's probably a configuration issue of the release
> plugin.
>
> Our release procedures and release check signatures scripts will need to be
> verified post change.
>
> -Jamie
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Łukasz Dywicki 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 from me
> >
> > Switching to git will let us process pull requests in easier way. Maven
> is
> > not afraid of git as well.
> >
> > I'm not scared by Camel issues with git since they have more modules than
> > they need. ;-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Lukasz
> >
> > Wiadomość napisana przez Achim Nierbeck  w dniu
> > 25 cze 2013, o godz. 11:54:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm
> > > -1 for this due to the things that popped up with the latest Camel
> > release.
> > > [1]
> > > Even though I do not fully understand why this is an issue, cause when
> > > releasing OPS4j artefacts we never had such issues.
> > >
> > > If this issues is cleared I'd go for +1
> > >
> > > regards, Achim
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] -
> > >
> >
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-10-5-tp5734607p5734684.html
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/6/25 Andreas Pieber 
> > >
> > >> hey, there is no 0 option :-)
> > >>
> > >> still +1 for the switch. Would make forking and experimenting (and
> > >> especially getting the changes back) so much easier...
> > >>
> > >> Kind regards,
> > >> Andreas
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> j...@nanthrax.net
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
> > >> formal
> > >>> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
> > >>>
> > >>> Please vote to approve this switch:
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
> > >>> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
> > >>>
> > >>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> JB
> > >>> --
> > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > >>> jbono...@apache.org
> > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Apache Karaf  Committer & PMC
> > > OPS4J Pax Web 
> Committer
> > &
> > > Project Lead
> > > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <
> http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
> > > Commiter & Project Lead
> > > blog 
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Jamie G.]

+1

For clarification - all our generated artifacts will be signed, and a tag
of our release created such that anyone could reproduce our release.

The actual commit transaction to SCM is the only part that does not have a
signature.

As to the snapshots appearing in poms, Central Nexus will not allow us to
release if it detects them during a promote - I do not believe however this
is related to SCM, that's probably a configuration issue of the release
plugin.

Our release procedures and release check signatures scripts will need to be
verified post change.

-Jamie


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Łukasz Dywicki  wrote:

> +1 from me
>
> Switching to git will let us process pull requests in easier way. Maven is
> not afraid of git as well.
>
> I'm not scared by Camel issues with git since they have more modules than
> they need. ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Lukasz
>
> Wiadomość napisana przez Achim Nierbeck  w dniu
> 25 cze 2013, o godz. 11:54:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm
> > -1 for this due to the things that popped up with the latest Camel
> release.
> > [1]
> > Even though I do not fully understand why this is an issue, cause when
> > releasing OPS4j artefacts we never had such issues.
> >
> > If this issues is cleared I'd go for +1
> >
> > regards, Achim
> >
> >
> > [1] -
> >
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-10-5-tp5734607p5734684.html
> >
> >
> > 2013/6/25 Andreas Pieber 
> >
> >> hey, there is no 0 option :-)
> >>
> >> still +1 for the switch. Would make forking and experimenting (and
> >> especially getting the changes back) so much easier...
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> Andreas
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
> >> formal
> >>> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
> >>>
> >>> Please vote to approve this switch:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
> >>> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
> >>>
> >>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Regards
> >>> JB
> >>> --
> >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>> jbono...@apache.org
> >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Apache Karaf  Committer & PMC
> > OPS4J Pax Web  Committer
> &
> > Project Lead
> > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin 
> > Commiter & Project Lead
> > blog 
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Achim Nierbeck]

Hi,

after clarifying with Jamie that the Camel issue doesn't bother us as we
don't sign the commit,
and the SNAPSHOT version in the tag must be another issue I'm reverting my
vote to:
+1

regards, Achim


2013/6/25 Łukasz Dywicki 

> +1 from me
>
> Switching to git will let us process pull requests in easier way. Maven is
> not afraid of git as well.
>
> I'm not scared by Camel issues with git since they have more modules than
> they need. ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> Lukasz
>
> Wiadomość napisana przez Achim Nierbeck  w dniu
> 25 cze 2013, o godz. 11:54:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm
> > -1 for this due to the things that popped up with the latest Camel
> release.
> > [1]
> > Even though I do not fully understand why this is an issue, cause when
> > releasing OPS4j artefacts we never had such issues.
> >
> > If this issues is cleared I'd go for +1
> >
> > regards, Achim
> >
> >
> > [1] -
> >
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-10-5-tp5734607p5734684.html
> >
> >
> > 2013/6/25 Andreas Pieber 
> >
> >> hey, there is no 0 option :-)
> >>
> >> still +1 for the switch. Would make forking and experimenting (and
> >> especially getting the changes back) so much easier...
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> Andreas
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
> >> formal
> >>> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
> >>>
> >>> Please vote to approve this switch:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
> >>> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
> >>>
> >>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Regards
> >>> JB
> >>> --
> >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>> jbono...@apache.org
> >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Apache Karaf  Committer & PMC
> > OPS4J Pax Web  Committer
> &
> > Project Lead
> > OPS4J Pax for Vaadin 
> > Commiter & Project Lead
> > blog 
>
>


-- 

Apache Karaf  Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web  Committer &
Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin 
Commiter & Project Lead
blog 

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Łukasz Dywicki]

+1 from me

Switching to git will let us process pull requests in easier way. Maven is not 
afraid of git as well. 

I'm not scared by Camel issues with git since they have more modules than they 
need. ;-)

Cheers,
Lukasz

Wiadomość napisana przez Achim Nierbeck  w dniu 25 cze 
2013, o godz. 11:54:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm
> -1 for this due to the things that popped up with the latest Camel release.
> [1]
> Even though I do not fully understand why this is an issue, cause when
> releasing OPS4j artefacts we never had such issues.
> 
> If this issues is cleared I'd go for +1
> 
> regards, Achim
> 
> 
> [1] -
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-10-5-tp5734607p5734684.html
> 
> 
> 2013/6/25 Andreas Pieber 
> 
>> hey, there is no 0 option :-)
>> 
>> still +1 for the switch. Would make forking and experimenting (and
>> especially getting the changes back) so much easier...
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Andreas
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
>> formal
>>> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
>>> 
>>> Please vote to approve this switch:
>>> 
>>> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
>>> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
>>> 
>>> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Apache Karaf  Committer & PMC
> OPS4J Pax Web  Committer &
> Project Lead
> OPS4J Pax for Vaadin 
> Commiter & Project Lead
> blog 

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Achim Nierbeck]

Hi,

I'm
-1 for this due to the things that popped up with the latest Camel release.
[1]
Even though I do not fully understand why this is an issue, cause when
releasing OPS4j artefacts we never had such issues.

If this issues is cleared I'd go for +1

regards, Achim


[1] -
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-10-5-tp5734607p5734684.html


2013/6/25 Andreas Pieber 

> hey, there is no 0 option :-)
>
> still +1 for the switch. Would make forking and experimenting (and
> especially getting the changes back) so much easier...
>
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré  >wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a
> formal
> > vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
> >
> > Please vote to approve this switch:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
> > [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > This vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Regards
> > JB
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbono...@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>



-- 

Apache Karaf  Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web  Committer &
Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin 
Commiter & Project Lead
blog 

Re: [VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Andreas Pieber]

hey, there is no 0 option :-)

still +1 for the switch. Would make forking and experimenting (and
especially getting the changes back) so much easier...

Kind regards,
Andreas


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a formal
> vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.
>
> Please vote to approve this switch:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
> [ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)
>
> This vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

[VOTE] Switch from svn to git

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

Hi all,

to follow the discussion that we had some weeks ago, I start here a 
formal vote to migrate our scm from svn to git.


Please vote to approve this switch:

[ ] +1 Approve the switch (from svn to git)
[ ] -1 Do not approve the switch (please provide specific comments)

This vote will be open for 72 hours.

Thanks,
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com