Re: Logback CVE-2021-42550

2021-12-18 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
I’m closing current release votes, and I will update in Karaf to prepare new 
releases.

Regards
JB

> Le 18 déc. 2021 à 20:25, Grzegorz Grzybek  a écrit :
> 
> Hello
> 
> Done - I've released Pax Logging 1.11.12 and 2.0.13 with the Logback
> update. Thanks Matt for the initial PR - I've checked that no other changes
> are required.
> 
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
> 
> sob., 18 gru 2021 o 05:42 Jean-Baptiste Onofre  napisał(a):
> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> However, the PR is not correct.
>> 
>> We (Greg and I) will create a right PR and move forward on Pax Logging
>> release.
>> 
>> However, just a note for the users: this issue is largely less critical
>> than log4j one.
>> Anyway, I will cut maintenance release quickly.
>> 
>> Regards
>> JB
>> 
>>> Le 17 déc. 2021 à 16:35, Matt Pavlovich  a écrit :
>>> 
>>> PR created for pax-logging against main:
>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/pull/425 <
>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/pull/425>
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 17, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Matt Pavlovich  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I summarized notes on the Logback CVE-2021-42550 . While significantly
>> less critical, we probably need to consider another round of releases to
>> address and bring in logback 1.2.9.
>>>> 
>>>> notes here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7299 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7299>
>>>> 
>>>> Thoughts?
>>> 
>> 
>> 



Re: Logback CVE-2021-42550

2021-12-18 Thread Grzegorz Grzybek
Hello

Done - I've released Pax Logging 1.11.12 and 2.0.13 with the Logback
update. Thanks Matt for the initial PR - I've checked that no other changes
are required.

regards
Grzegorz Grzybek

sob., 18 gru 2021 o 05:42 Jean-Baptiste Onofre  napisał(a):

> Thanks,
>
> However, the PR is not correct.
>
> We (Greg and I) will create a right PR and move forward on Pax Logging
> release.
>
> However, just a note for the users: this issue is largely less critical
> than log4j one.
> Anyway, I will cut maintenance release quickly.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 17 déc. 2021 à 16:35, Matt Pavlovich  a écrit :
> >
> > PR created for pax-logging against main:
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/pull/425 <
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/pull/425>
> >
> >
> >> On Dec 17, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Matt Pavlovich  wrote:
> >>
> >> I summarized notes on the Logback CVE-2021-42550 . While significantly
> less critical, we probably need to consider another round of releases to
> address and bring in logback 1.2.9.
> >>
> >> notes here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7299 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7299>
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >
>
>


Re: Logback CVE-2021-42550

2021-12-17 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Thanks,

However, the PR is not correct.

We (Greg and I) will create a right PR and move forward on Pax Logging release.

However, just a note for the users: this issue is largely less critical than 
log4j one.
Anyway, I will cut maintenance release quickly.

Regards
JB

> Le 17 déc. 2021 à 16:35, Matt Pavlovich  a écrit :
> 
> PR created for pax-logging against main: 
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/pull/425 
> <https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/pull/425>
> 
> 
>> On Dec 17, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Matt Pavlovich  wrote:
>> 
>> I summarized notes on the Logback CVE-2021-42550 . While significantly less 
>> critical, we probably need to consider another round of releases to address 
>> and bring in logback 1.2.9.
>> 
>> notes here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7299 
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7299>
>> 
>> Thoughts?
> 



Re: Logback CVE-2021-42550

2021-12-17 Thread Matt Pavlovich
PR created for pax-logging against main: 
https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/pull/425 
<https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/pull/425>


> On Dec 17, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Matt Pavlovich  wrote:
> 
> I summarized notes on the Logback CVE-2021-42550 . While significantly less 
> critical, we probably need to consider another round of releases to address 
> and bring in logback 1.2.9.
> 
> notes here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7299 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7299>
> 
> Thoughts?



Logback CVE-2021-42550

2021-12-17 Thread Matt Pavlovich
I summarized notes on the Logback CVE-2021-42550 . While significantly less 
critical, we probably need to consider another round of releases to address and 
bring in logback 1.2.9.

notes here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7299 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7299>

Thoughts?