[GitHub] [knox] smolnar82 commented on pull request #358: KNOX-2395 - Make Gateway Services Pluggable
smolnar82 commented on pull request #358: URL: https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/358#issuecomment-657289760 > It still seems that the possible implementations are constrained to some set already known by Knox. Why can't a developer "plug-in" an arbitrary implementation of any gateway service to suit their individual need? Thanks for this very useful comment @pzampino. I've just submitted a new commit making it possible to plug-in an arbitrary gateway service implementation. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [knox] smolnar82 commented on pull request #358: KNOX-2395 - Make Gateway Services Pluggable
smolnar82 commented on pull request #358: URL: https://github.com/apache/knox/pull/358#issuecomment-656149035 > It still seems that the possible implementations are constrained to some set already known by Knox. Why can't a developer "plug-in" an arbitrary implementation of any gateway service to suit their individual need? Hm..this is a good idea. I haven't thought about it until now. It'd also mean that the developer will need to make sure the implementation is on the classpath. Let me ad it to this PR. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org