[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-979) Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16115438#comment-16115438 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on KNOX-979: -- Commit 1804195 from [~lmc...@apache.org] in branch 'knox/trunk' [ https://svn.apache.org/r1804195 ] KNOX-979 - Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy (Nixon Rodrigues via lmccay) > Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy > -- > > Key: KNOX-979 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979 > Project: Apache Knox > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Nixon Rodrigues >Assignee: Nixon Rodrigues > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > Attachments: KNOX-979.patch > > > Documentation for KNOX-788 and KNOX-789 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-979) Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16110998#comment-16110998 ] Nixon Rodrigues commented on KNOX-979: -- Sandeep, I tested the Atlas UI with API and found that the Anonymous authentication provider is not needed in topology but identity-assertion provider is needed. [~lmccay] , i have updated patch with policies back to service definition XML in KNOX-789, please review KNOX-789.3.patch. > Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy > -- > > Key: KNOX-979 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979 > Project: Apache Knox > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Nixon Rodrigues >Assignee: Nixon Rodrigues > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > Attachments: KNOX-979.patch > > > Documentation for KNOX-788 and KNOX-789 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-979) Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16109470#comment-16109470 ] Larry McCay commented on KNOX-979: -- [~nixonrodrigues] - can you comment on the above as we are trying to ramp down this 0.13.0 release. I think we may need to add the policies back to the service definition since it seems that we require the API to be in a topology that has the anonymous authentication provider. > Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy > -- > > Key: KNOX-979 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979 > Project: Apache Knox > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Nixon Rodrigues >Assignee: Nixon Rodrigues > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > Attachments: KNOX-979.patch > > > Documentation for KNOX-788 and KNOX-789 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-979) Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16092358#comment-16092358 ] Larry McCay commented on KNOX-979: -- [~nixonrodrigues] - ping... > Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy > -- > > Key: KNOX-979 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979 > Project: Apache Knox > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Nixon Rodrigues >Assignee: Nixon Rodrigues > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > Attachments: KNOX-979.patch > > > Documentation for KNOX-788 and KNOX-789 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-979) Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16080401#comment-16080401
]
Larry McCay commented on KNOX-979:
--
Due to the fact that the UI service definition includes the policy elements and
specifies the Anonymous authentication provider, it will ALWAYS pull in that
provider regardless of what is configured in the topology. Therefore, the
statement about it requiring a separate topology should be unnecessary. In
addition to the "Note:" at the end - well, maybe it should just be reworded...
This also has me thinking about the previous discussion regarding the service
definition having the policies defined and therefore limited to th Anonymous
authentication provider. I assume that was about the API portion of this. If
the API doesn't support the trusted proxy pattern then perhaps we do have to
put that limitation back in. Since it is using
org.apache.hadoop.gateway.dispatch.PassAllHeadersDispatch in the API as well,
the user.name and doas params will not be added anyway. I know that I am
changing my original opinion on this but it seems like it has to be limited to
Anonymous for now and then you will not need a separate topology that
explicitly uses the Anonymous provider. Sorry for not catching that before.
Is the following referring to a limitation in the UI itself or in the Knox
service definition?
{code}
+### Atlas UI ###
+In addition to the Atlas REST API, from this release there is the ability to
access some of the functionality via a web. The initial functionality is very
limited and serves more as a starting point/placeholder. The details are below.
{code}
If the former, then you may not want to put it here as it will require us to
maintain it as the UI functionality emerges to be more complete.
> Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy
> --
>
> Key: KNOX-979
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979
> Project: Apache Knox
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Nixon Rodrigues
>Assignee: Nixon Rodrigues
> Fix For: 0.13.0
>
> Attachments: KNOX-979.patch
>
>
> Documentation for KNOX-788 and KNOX-789
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-979) Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16080360#comment-16080360
]
Sandeep More commented on KNOX-979:
---
Hello [~nixonrodrigues],
Sorry for the delay in getting to this patch, it looks good, few things though.
In your example you have Anonymous authentication in the topology definition
and you also have identity-assertion provider turned off.
I think you have already handled that in your Service definition files, do you
still need to turn it off in the topology ?
{code}
authentication
Anonymous
true
identity-assertion
Default
false
{code}
> Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy
> --
>
> Key: KNOX-979
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979
> Project: Apache Knox
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Nixon Rodrigues
>Assignee: Nixon Rodrigues
> Fix For: 0.13.0
>
> Attachments: KNOX-979.patch
>
>
> Documentation for KNOX-788 and KNOX-789
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (KNOX-979) Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16076606#comment-16076606 ] Nixon Rodrigues commented on KNOX-979: -- [~lmccay], I have added svn diff patch for documentation for KNOX-788 and KNOX-789. Please review. [~madhan.neethiraj] > Documentation for Atlas UI & Atlas Rest Api via Knox Proxy > -- > > Key: KNOX-979 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-979 > Project: Apache Knox > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Nixon Rodrigues >Assignee: Nixon Rodrigues > Fix For: 0.13.0 > > Attachments: KNOX-979.patch > > > Documentation for KNOX-788 and KNOX-789 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
