Thank you for addressing KUDU-2990, Adar.
I can run the RM machinery for 1.11.1 and 1.10.1.
BTW, what 1.11.1 and 1.10.1 release notes should include besides a note on
KUDU-2990? Should that be the note on KUDU-2990 and the rest of notes for
1.11.0 and 1.10.0 correspondingly?
Thanks,
Alexey
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 5:07 AM Adar Lieber-Dembo
wrote:
> KUDU-2990 has been fixed on master, so 1.12.0 will be conformant when
> it is released in several months.
>
> I also cherry-picked the fix into branch-1.10.x and branch-1.11.x.
> Would anyone like to volunteer to RM 1.10.1 and 1.11.1? Besides the
> usual RM machinery, we need new release notes that document the
> effects of KUDU-2990.
>
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 8:21 PM Grant Henke
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 I agree with all of Adars suggestions.
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 8:34 PM Alexey Serbin
>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you for the feedback, Adar.
> > >
> > > I'll add the information on the licensing issue into the 1.11.0 release
> > > announcement I'm about to send.
> > >
> > > I asked a question about the proper way of communicating of the issue
> on
> > > the LEGAL-487's comment thread, mentioning that we are about to add a
> > > notice into
> > > https://kudu.apache.org/docs/known_issues.html#_other_known_issues
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Alexey
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:20 PM Adar Lieber-Dembo
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > My two cents:
> > > > - The presence of 1.11.0 on the download page means that 1.11.0 has
> > > > been de facto released, announcement or no announcement. The
> > > > announcement doesn't add any additional hurt, so I think we should
> > > > move forward with it.
> > > > - Separately, let's also announce the licensing issue and say that
> > > > we're working to rectify it in all affected release lines. To that
> > > > end, we will release 1.10.1 and 1.11.1 with the fix ASAP. The
> guidance
> > > > offered in LEGAL-487 so far seems to corroborate this.
> > > > - When 1.12.0 is released several months hence, it will be de facto
> > > > compliant by virtue of whatever fix first landing in master and then
> > > > being backported to branch-1.10.x and branch-1.11.x.
> > > > - I don't know whether we should call this out as a "known issue", as
> > > > that's typically been used for technical issues rather than legal
> > > > ones. Would be curious to hear what others think, and maybe you can
> > > > solicit further feedback in LEGAL-487?
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:08 PM Alexey Serbin
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > As Adar recently found, both in Kudu 1.10.0 and Kudu 1.11.0 (due
> to be
> > > > > announced today) the kudu-binary artifact contains libnuma library
> > > which
> > > > is
> > > > > under LGPL v.2.1, but it's against the ASF 3rd-party license
> policy:
> > > > > https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x
> > > > >
> > > > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-2990 for details.
> > > > >
> > > > > Apart from the technical discussion on how to resolve that, there
> are
> > > few
> > > > > process-related questions like:
> > > > > 1. How to address the issue in Kudu 1.11.0, which is de facto
> already
> > > > out
> > > > > of the door?
> > > > > 2. Should we address the issue in upcoming Kudu 1.12.0 release
> (about
> > > > 3-4
> > > > > month in the future) or implement the solution and release it with
> Kudu
> > > > > 1.11.1 ASAP?
> > > > > 3. If choosing the latter option from the previous item, should
> the
> > > > > announcement of the new Kudu 1.11.0 release be postponed/muted, so
> we
> > > > > announce only when Kudu 1.11.1 is out with KUDU-2990 addressed?
> > > > >
> > > > > Given the timing and the fact that Kudu 1.11.0 artifacts are
> already
> > > > > published, I think one of the possible paths forward is to proceed
> with
> > > > the
> > > > > announcement of Kudu 1.11.0 release as planned, but add an item
> about
> > > > > KUDU-2990 into the 'known issues' document, so it will be
> available at
> > > > the
> > > > > Apache Kudu website:
> > > > > https://kudu.apache.org/docs/known_issues.html#_other_known_issues
> > > > >
> > > > > What do you think? Your feedback is appreciated.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Alexey
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Grant Henke
> > Software Engineer | Cloudera
> > gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke
>
