date:20170712

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Anda Nicolae

Will do. I have already added that the bug is not reproducible in 3.2.4.0 
Contrail version.

Can you please let me know in which files is implemented the logic of the route 
targets?

Thanks,
Anda

Get Outlook for iOS

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 8:01 PM +0300, "Andrey Pavlov" 
> wrote:

Hi Anda,
It will be very helpful if you add this info directly to the bug.

Regards,
Andrey Pavlov.

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Anda Nicolae 
> wrote:
Hi all,

Thanks a lot for your responses.

Contrail version I was using when I encountered this bug was 3.2.3.0.
I have checked contrail-schema process status from contrail-status output and 
it is active.
I have also browsed through contrail-schema log, but I did not find anything 
relevant.

Now I have installed Contrail version 3.2.4.0 and the bug is not reproducible.

If you know the commit that fixed this, please let me know. I have tried to 
find the functions/modules where the routing logic happens, but without any 
notable results.

I have checked route-target link from Contrail 3.2.4.0 and below is the output. 
Virtual networks names are anda_lenovoA and anda_lenovoB and logical router 
name is router1. I can see “routing_instance_back_refs” and “routing-instance” 
so the route targets are exported.

{"route-target": {"display_name": "target:64512:803", "uuid": 
"6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", 
"routing_instance_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", 
"anda_lenovoA", "anda_lenovoA"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/routing-instance/0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d", "attr": 
{"import_export": null}, "uuid": "0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d"}, 
{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "anda_lenovoB", "anda_lenovoB"], 
"href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/routing-instance/8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003", "attr": 
{"import_export": null}, "uuid": "8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003"}], 
"perms2": {"owner": "5792015c404a4bd4a0ff775de5c38bf4", "owner_access": 7, 
"global_access": 0, "share": []}, "id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": 
{"uuid_mslong": 7900791620273325437, "uuid_lslong": 12354003745875729914}, 
"created": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", "description": null, "creator": null, 
"user_visible": true, "last_modified": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", 
"permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "other_access": 7, 
"group": "cloud-admin-group", "group_access": 7}}, "logical_router_back_refs": 
[{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "router1"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/logical-router/98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e", "attr": null, 
"uuid": "98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e"}], "fq_name": 
["target:64512:803"], "name": "target:64512:803"}}

Thanks,
Anda

From: Sachin Bansal [mailto:sban...@juniper.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 6:08 PM
To: Anda Nicolae
Cc: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi; 
dev@lists.opencontrail.org

Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Anda,

As Vedu explained earlier, the IP address of the logical router interface is 
completely inconsequential and is not used in any forwarding at all. You can 
rest assured that with .100 addresses, the connectivity is expected to work. 
Also, gateway of a network cannot be changed.

The way it works is, we allocate a route target for the logical router and 
attach it to each of the VNs so that the VRFs for each of those VNs can import 
each other’s routes. Now

From the output you sent, it seems the route target is only connected to the 
logical router, not the two virtual networks. Could you please make sure 
contrail-schema is running and active? If it is, please check its logs for any 
errors.

Sachin

On Jul 12, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Anda Nicolae 
> wrote:

I have errors in contrail-api.log such as: Error while accessing route_target 
uuid 408155ef-22d0-46e8-b0c2-07f3fec44dae
The above uuid does not correspond neither to subnet, net, net or logical 
router assigned to my networks.

I don't think that the RT is exported. I have followed the links and I arrived 
at https:// 
IP>:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea.
I don't see any route here. (below is the output)

{"route-target": {"fq_name": ["target:64512:814"], "uuid": 
"5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "href":"https:// :8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// :8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "perms2": 
{"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "global_access": 0, "share": []}, 
"id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": {"uuid_mslong": 6220793826397211851, 
"uuid_lslong":

Re: [opencontrail-dev] [TSC]Proposed set of sub-projects/components along with mapping of existing repos

2017-07-12 Thread Gasparakis, Joseph

Hi Valentine,

Thanks for the additions in the list of dependencies.
Your suggestions to make a clear separation of OpenContrail and OpenStack makes 
sense. In fact maybe we need to define some guidelines on what will be 
submitted as OpenStack blueprints and what will stay within the OpenContrail 
github moving forward. Similarly, are there any plans to interface OpenContrail 
with container engines, such as Kubernetes? I assume making the guidelines 
wider and generic could cover something like that too?

Anybody any other thoughts on this topic?

Joseph

-Original Message-
From: Valentine Sinitsyn [mailto:valentine.sinit...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:10 AM
To: Gasparakis, Joseph ; dev@lists.opencontrail.org
Cc: ashbhal...@gmail.com; adapt...@juniper.net
Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] [TSC]Proposed set of sub-projects/components 
along with mapping of existing repos

Hi all,

On 10.07.2017 13:05, Gasparakis, Joseph wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> These are the items for this topic:
> 
> -What do we have?  Where is it?  Do we use it?  Who owns it?
> 
> -Project wide structure and subcomponent structure. (TSC/PTL like)
> 
> Trying to kick off the discussion, here are some (scattered) thoughts 
> I have, please add your thoughts:
> 
> *_What do we have?  Where is it?  Do we use it?  Who owns it?_*
> 
> Here is a list of what I have seen in my (pretty brief exposure to
> OpenContrail)
> 
> -Dependencies:
> 
> oPackages from Ubuntu or RedHat (about 50 packages)
> 
> ohttp://downloads.datastax.com (Cassandra driver + dev package, libuv)
> 
> ohttp://ubuntu-cloud.archive.canonical.com (liburcu + dev package)
Plus Kafka (and librdkafka) and Redis for analytics/web ui.

> 
> -Repo and build package in https://github.com/Juniper/contrail-vnc 
> (why called contrail-vnc?) - Pulls from repos
> 
> ocontrail-controller
> 
> ocontrail-generateDS
> 
> ovijava
> 
> ocontrail-java-api
> 
> ocontrail-vrouter-java-api
> 
> ocontrail-vcenter-plugin
> 
> ocontrail-build
> 
> ocontrail-vrouter
> 
> ocontrail-third-party
This fetches a whole bunch of third-party stuff including BIND and DPDK, and 
patches most of it.

> 
> ocontrail-sandesh
> 
> ocontrail-packages
> 
> ocontrail-nova-vif-driver
> 
> ocontrail-nova-extensions
> 
> ocontrail-neutron-plugin
> 
> ocontrail-heat
> 
> ocontrail-web-controller
> 
> ocontrail-web-core
> 
> ocontrail-webui-third-party
> 
> ocontrail-web-storage
> 
> ocontrail-web-server-manager

Plus contrail-dpdk for contrail-vrouter-dpdk.

> 
> Is any other github/Juniper project needed?
> 
> I do not know who the owners of the above are…
> 
> *_Project wide structure and subcomponent structure. (TSC/PTL like)_*
> 
> As embarrassing as it might seem, I do not recall what exactly this 
> refers to… Anybody who attended the OpenContrail reboot Summit?
Wasn't it about deciding which [separable] subprojects the OpenContrail project 
should be built of? Each project might have a separate PTL body, so a committer 
in web ui isn't necessarily one in contrail-vrouter.

Some thought to kick off the discussion:

- A clear OpenStack separation. This is the top of my personal list. It should 
be straightforward to see which bits are generic and which bits are OSS 
integration. May require some changes to source code IIRC.

- Each sub-project defines a technology stack and a set of skills needed for 
contribute. Roughly, we have REST APIs and config node services which are 
mostly Python, control plane services (plus collector and query engine from 
analytics) which are C++, and low-level vRouter part, not to mention Node-based 
web ui. Maybe it makes sense to manage these separately, so that someone 
interested to contribute to e.g. config API can commit and test their changes 
with little or no interaction with control plane services. Makes multiproject 
features more challenging though.

Best,
Valentine

> 
> Thank you in advance,
> 
> Joseph
> 
> --
> 
> Joseph Gasparakis
> 
> Intel Corporation
> 
> NPG Architecture & Systems Engineering
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Dev mailing list
> Dev@lists.opencontrail.org
> http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.
> org
> 
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.opencontrail.org
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Andrey Pavlov

Hi Anda,
It will be very helpful if you add this info directly to the bug.

Regards,
Andrey Pavlov.

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Anda Nicolae  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot for your responses.
>
>
>
> Contrail version I was using when I encountered this bug was 3.2.3.0.
>
> I have checked contrail-schema process status from contrail-status output
> and it is active.
>
> I have also browsed through contrail-schema log, but I did not find
> anything relevant.
>
>
>
> Now I have installed Contrail version 3.2.4.0 and the bug is not
> reproducible.
>
>
>
> *If you know the commit that fixed this, please let me know. I have tried
> to find the functions/modules where the routing logic happens, but without
> any notable results.*
>
>
>
> I have checked route-target link from Contrail 3.2.4.0 and below is the
> output. Virtual networks names are anda_lenovoA and anda_lenovoB and
> logical router name is router1. I can see “routing_instance_back_refs” and
> “routing-instance” so the route targets are exported.
>
>
>
> {"route-target": {"display_name": "target:64512:803", "uuid":
> "6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", "href":"https:// IP>:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/
> 6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", "routing_instance_back_refs":
> [{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "anda_lenovoA", "anda_lenovoA"],
> "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// mgmt IP>:8082/routing-instance/0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d",
> "attr": {"import_export": null}, "uuid": 
> "0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d"},
> {"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "anda_lenovoB", "anda_lenovoB"],
> "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// mgmt IP>:8082/routing-instance/8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003",
> "attr": {"import_export": null}, "uuid": 
> "8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003"}],
> "perms2": {"owner": "5792015c404a4bd4a0ff775de5c38bf4", "owner_access":
> 7, "global_access": 0, "share": []}, "id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid":
> {"uuid_mslong": 7900791620273325437, "uuid_lslong": 12354003745875729914},
> "created": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", "description": null, "creator":
> null, "user_visible": true, "last_modified": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006",
> "permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "other_access":
> 7, "group": "cloud-admin-group", "group_access": 7}},
> "logical_router_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "router1"],
> "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// mgmt IP>:8082/logical-router/98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e",
> "attr": null, "uuid": "98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e"}],
> "fq_name": ["target:64512:803"], "name": "target:64512:803"}}
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anda
>
>
>
> *From:* Sachin Bansal [mailto:sban...@juniper.net]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 12, 2017 6:08 PM
> *To:* Anda Nicolae
> *Cc:* Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi; dev@lists.opencontrail.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address
>
>
>
> Anda,
>
>
>
> As Vedu explained earlier, the IP address of the logical router interface
> is completely inconsequential and is not used in any forwarding at all. You
> can rest assured that with .100 addresses, the connectivity is expected to
> work. Also, gateway of a network cannot be changed.
>
>
>
> The way it works is, we allocate a route target for the logical router and
> attach it to each of the VNs so that the VRFs for each of those VNs can
> import each other’s routes. Now
>
>
>
> From the output you sent, it seems the route target is only connected to
> the logical router, not the two virtual networks. Could you please make
> sure contrail-schema is running and active? If it is, please check its logs
> for any errors.
>
>
>
> Sachin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 12, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Anda Nicolae  wrote:
>
>
>
> I have errors in contrail-api.log such as: *Error while accessing
> route_target uuid 408155ef-22d0-46e8-b0c2-07f3fec44dae*
>
> The above uuid does not correspond neither to subnet, net, net or logical
> router assigned to my networks.
>
>
>
> I don't think that the RT is exported. I have followed the links and I
> arrived at *https://  IP>:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// management IP>:8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea*.
>
> I don't see any route here. (below is the output)
>
>
>
> {"route-target": {"fq_name": ["target:64512:814"], "uuid":
> "5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "href":"https://  IP>:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// **
> :8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "perms2":
> {"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "global_access": 0, "share":
> []}, "id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": {"uuid_mslong":
> 6220793826397211851, "uuid_lslong": 10653510834882850794}, "created":
> "2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686", "description": null, "creator": null,
> "user_visible": true, "last_modified": "2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686",
> "permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin",

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Sachin Bansal

Anda,

There has been no change between these releases for this functionality.

Sachin

On Jul 12, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Anda Nicolae 
> wrote:

Hi all,

Thanks a lot for your responses.

Contrail version I was using when I encountered this bug was 3.2.3.0.
I have checked contrail-schema process status from contrail-status output and 
it is active.
I have also browsed through contrail-schema log, but I did not find anything 
relevant.

Now I have installed Contrail version 3.2.4.0 and the bug is not reproducible.

If you know the commit that fixed this, please let me know. I have tried to 
find the functions/modules where the routing logic happens, but without any 
notable results.

I have checked route-target link from Contrail 3.2.4.0 and below is the output. 
Virtual networks names are anda_lenovoA and anda_lenovoB and logical router 
name is router1. I can see “routing_instance_back_refs” and “routing-instance” 
so the route targets are exported.

{"route-target": {"display_name": "target:64512:803", "uuid": 
"6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", 
"routing_instance_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", 
"anda_lenovoA", "anda_lenovoA"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/routing-instance/0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d", "attr": 
{"import_export": null}, "uuid": "0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d"}, 
{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "anda_lenovoB", "anda_lenovoB"], 
"href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/routing-instance/8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003", "attr": 
{"import_export": null}, "uuid": "8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003"}], 
"perms2": {"owner": "5792015c404a4bd4a0ff775de5c38bf4", "owner_access": 7, 
"global_access": 0, "share": []}, "id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": 
{"uuid_mslong": 7900791620273325437, "uuid_lslong": 12354003745875729914}, 
"created": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", "description": null, "creator": null, 
"user_visible": true, "last_modified": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", 
"permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "other_access": 7, 
"group": "cloud-admin-group", "group_access": 7}}, "logical_router_back_refs": 
[{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "router1"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/logical-router/98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e", "attr": null, 
"uuid": "98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e"}], "fq_name": 
["target:64512:803"], "name": "target:64512:803"}}

Thanks,
Anda

From: Sachin Bansal [mailto:sban...@juniper.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 6:08 PM
To: Anda Nicolae
Cc: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi; 
dev@lists.opencontrail.org
Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Anda,

As Vedu explained earlier, the IP address of the logical router interface is 
completely inconsequential and is not used in any forwarding at all. You can 
rest assured that with .100 addresses, the connectivity is expected to work. 
Also, gateway of a network cannot be changed.

The way it works is, we allocate a route target for the logical router and 
attach it to each of the VNs so that the VRFs for each of those VNs can import 
each other’s routes. Now

From the output you sent, it seems the route target is only connected to the 
logical router, not the two virtual networks. Could you please make sure 
contrail-schema is running and active? If it is, please check its logs for any 
errors.

Sachin

On Jul 12, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Anda Nicolae 
> wrote:

I have errors in contrail-api.log such as: Error while accessing route_target 
uuid 408155ef-22d0-46e8-b0c2-07f3fec44dae
The above uuid does not correspond neither to subnet, net, net or logical 
router assigned to my networks.

I don't think that the RT is exported. I have followed the links and I arrived 
at https:// 
IP>:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea.
I don't see any route here. (below is the output)

{"route-target": {"fq_name": ["target:64512:814"], "uuid": 
"5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "href":"https:// :8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// :8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "perms2": 
{"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "global_access": 0, "share": []}, 
"id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": {"uuid_mslong": 6220793826397211851, 
"uuid_lslong": 10653510834882850794}, "created": "2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686", 
"description": null, "creator": null, "user_visible": true, "last_modified": 
"2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686", "permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", 
"owner_access": 7, "other_access": 7, "group": "cloud-admin-group", 
"group_access": 7}}, "logical_router_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", 
"anda", "lrouter"],

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Anda Nicolae

Hi all,

Thanks a lot for your responses.

Contrail version I was using when I encountered this bug was 3.2.3.0.
I have checked contrail-schema process status from contrail-status output and 
it is active.
I have also browsed through contrail-schema log, but I did not find anything 
relevant.

Now I have installed Contrail version 3.2.4.0 and the bug is not reproducible.

If you know the commit that fixed this, please let me know. I have tried to 
find the functions/modules where the routing logic happens, but without any 
notable results.

I have checked route-target link from Contrail 3.2.4.0 and below is the output. 
Virtual networks names are anda_lenovoA and anda_lenovoB and logical router 
name is router1. I can see “routing_instance_back_refs” and “routing-instance” 
so the route targets are exported.

{"route-target": {"display_name": "target:64512:803", "uuid": 
"6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", 
"routing_instance_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", 
"anda_lenovoA", "anda_lenovoA"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/routing-instance/0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d", "attr": 
{"import_export": null}, "uuid": "0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d"}, 
{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "anda_lenovoB", "anda_lenovoB"], 
"href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/routing-instance/8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003", "attr": 
{"import_export": null}, "uuid": "8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003"}], 
"perms2": {"owner": "5792015c404a4bd4a0ff775de5c38bf4", "owner_access": 7, 
"global_access": 0, "share": []}, "id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": 
{"uuid_mslong": 7900791620273325437, "uuid_lslong": 12354003745875729914}, 
"created": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", "description": null, "creator": null, 
"user_visible": true, "last_modified": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", 
"permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "other_access": 7, 
"group": "cloud-admin-group", "group_access": 7}}, "logical_router_back_refs": 
[{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "router1"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/logical-router/98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e", "attr": null, 
"uuid": "98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e"}], "fq_name": 
["target:64512:803"], "name": "target:64512:803"}}

Thanks,
Anda

From: Sachin Bansal [mailto:sban...@juniper.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 6:08 PM
To: Anda Nicolae
Cc: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi; dev@lists.opencontrail.org
Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Anda,

As Vedu explained earlier, the IP address of the logical router interface is 
completely inconsequential and is not used in any forwarding at all. You can 
rest assured that with .100 addresses, the connectivity is expected to work. 
Also, gateway of a network cannot be changed.

The way it works is, we allocate a route target for the logical router and 
attach it to each of the VNs so that the VRFs for each of those VNs can import 
each other’s routes. Now

From the output you sent, it seems the route target is only connected to the 
logical router, not the two virtual networks. Could you please make sure 
contrail-schema is running and active? If it is, please check its logs for any 
errors.

Sachin



On Jul 12, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Anda Nicolae 
> wrote:

I have errors in contrail-api.log such as: Error while accessing route_target 
uuid 408155ef-22d0-46e8-b0c2-07f3fec44dae
The above uuid does not correspond neither to subnet, net, net or logical 
router assigned to my networks.

I don't think that the RT is exported. I have followed the links and I arrived 
at https:// 
IP>:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea.
I don't see any route here. (below is the output)

{"route-target": {"fq_name": ["target:64512:814"], "uuid": 
"5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "href":"https:// :8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// :8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "perms2": 
{"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "global_access": 0, "share": []}, 
"id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": {"uuid_mslong": 6220793826397211851, 
"uuid_lslong": 10653510834882850794}, "created": "2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686", 
"description": null, "creator": null, "user_visible": true, "last_modified": 
"2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686", "permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", 
"owner_access": 7, "other_access": 7, "group": "cloud-admin-group", 
"group_access": 7}}, "logical_router_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", 
"anda", "lrouter"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// 
:8082/logical-router/48b2f8f1-d16f-4e6d-8ab4-5caec740eaf8",

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Sachin Bansal

Anda,

As Vedu explained earlier, the IP address of the logical router interface is 
completely inconsequential and is not used in any forwarding at all. You can 
rest assured that with .100 addresses, the connectivity is expected to work. 
Also, gateway of a network cannot be changed.

The way it works is, we allocate a route target for the logical router and 
attach it to each of the VNs so that the VRFs for each of those VNs can import 
each other’s routes. Now

From the output you sent, it seems the route target is only connected to the 
logical router, not the two virtual networks. Could you please make sure 
contrail-schema is running and active? If it is, please check its logs for any 
errors.

Sachin

On Jul 12, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Anda Nicolae 
> wrote:

I have errors in contrail-api.log such as: Error while accessing route_target 
uuid 408155ef-22d0-46e8-b0c2-07f3fec44dae
The above uuid does not correspond neither to subnet, net, net or logical 
router assigned to my networks.

I don't think that the RT is exported. I have followed the links and I arrived 
at https:// 
IP>:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea.
I don't see any route here. (below is the output)

{"route-target": {"fq_name": ["target:64512:814"], "uuid": 
"5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "href":"https:// :8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// :8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "perms2": 
{"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "global_access": 0, "share": []}, 
"id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": {"uuid_mslong": 6220793826397211851, 
"uuid_lslong": 10653510834882850794}, "created": "2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686", 
"description": null, "creator": null, "user_visible": true, "last_modified": 
"2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686", "permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", 
"owner_access": 7, "other_access": 7, "group": "cloud-admin-group", 
"group_access": 7}}, "logical_router_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", 
"anda", "lrouter"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// 
:8082/logical-router/48b2f8f1-d16f-4e6d-8ab4-5caec740eaf8", "attr": null, 
"uuid": "48b2f8f1-d16f-4e6d-8ab4-5caec740eaf8"}], "display_name": 
"target:64512:814", "name": "target:64512:814"}}

The problem that I think it is is that both subnets have a gateway that is 
already set (1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.1, respectively). Contrail GUI assigns gateway 
IP address as .1.
So, the logical router that I create connects these 2 subnets. Therefore, 
logical router interfaces should have the same IP addresses as the gateway of 
each subnet (1.1.1.1 instead of 1.1.1.100 and 2.2.2.1 instead of 2.2.2.100).

If I use neutron commands to create the logical router, the interfaces of the 
logical router created from neutron commands have the IP addresses of the 
gateway of each subnet.

As workaround, if I try to change the gateway IP address of a subnet (from 
1.1.1.1 to 1.1.1.100, in order to match the IP address of the virtual router), 
I receive the following error:
Error: Virtual-Network(default-domain:anda:aaa) has invalid subnet(1.1.1.0/24)

Thanks,
Anda

From: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi [mailto:vjo...@juniper.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:00 AM
To: Anda Nicolae; dev@lists.opencontrail.org
Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

So 1.1.1.102/32 and 2.2.2.102/32 are not seen in each other’s tables.
Are there any errors in contrail-schema logs?
Can you check if the RT of the logical-router object is both imported and 
exported in both routing-instances?

RT of the router can be got from UI Monitor>Infrastructure> Config Nodes> 
, Click on ‘Config’ link at the bottom. Then follow logical-routers 
link

Routing instance details can be got from 
http:// 
ip>:8083/Snh_ShowRoutingInstanceSummaryReq?search_string=

Vedu

From: Anda Nicolae >
Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 5:49 PM
To: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi >, 
"dev@lists.opencontrail.org" 
>
Subject: RE: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Thank you, Vedu. I have created 2 VMs, first VM having an IP address from VN1 
subnet and the 2nd VM having an IP address from VN2 subnet.
route -n command on the 1st VM shows that default gateway is 1.1.1.1
route -n command on the 2nd VM shows that default gateway is 2.2.2.1.
As I have written in the above e-mail, virtual router IP address is 1.1.1.100.
I have retrieved the vrf associated to each VN and below it is the routing 
table associated to each vrf.

[root@Hercules ~]$rt --dump 4
Flags: L=Label Valid, P=Proxy ARP, T=Trap ARP, F=Flood ARP
vRouter inet4 routing table 0/4/unicast
Destination   PPL

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Anda Nicolae

I have errors in contrail-api.log such as: Error while accessing route_target 
uuid 408155ef-22d0-46e8-b0c2-07f3fec44dae
The above uuid does not correspond neither to subnet, net, net or logical 
router assigned to my networks.

I don't think that the RT is exported. I have followed the links and I arrived 
at https:// 
IP>:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea.
I don't see any route here. (below is the output)

{"route-target": {"fq_name": ["target:64512:814"], "uuid": 
"5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "href":"https:// :8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// :8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "perms2": 
{"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "global_access": 0, "share": []}, 
"id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": {"uuid_mslong": 6220793826397211851, 
"uuid_lslong": 10653510834882850794}, "created": "2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686", 
"description": null, "creator": null, "user_visible": true, "last_modified": 
"2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686", "permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", 
"owner_access": 7, "other_access": 7, "group": "cloud-admin-group", 
"group_access": 7}}, "logical_router_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", 
"anda", "lrouter"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// 
:8082/logical-router/48b2f8f1-d16f-4e6d-8ab4-5caec740eaf8", "attr": null, 
"uuid": "48b2f8f1-d16f-4e6d-8ab4-5caec740eaf8"}], "display_name": 
"target:64512:814", "name": "target:64512:814"}}


The problem that I think it is is that both subnets have a gateway that is 
already set (1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.1, respectively). Contrail GUI assigns gateway 
IP address as .1.
So, the logical router that I create connects these 2 subnets. Therefore, 
logical router interfaces should have the same IP addresses as the gateway of 
each subnet (1.1.1.1 instead of 1.1.1.100 and 2.2.2.1 instead of 2.2.2.100).

If I use neutron commands to create the logical router, the interfaces of the 
logical router created from neutron commands have the IP addresses of the 
gateway of each subnet.

As workaround, if I try to change the gateway IP address of a subnet (from 
1.1.1.1 to 1.1.1.100, in order to match the IP address of the virtual router), 
I receive the following error:
Error: Virtual-Network(default-domain:anda:aaa) has invalid subnet(1.1.1.0/24)


Thanks,
Anda

From: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi [mailto:vjo...@juniper.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:00 AM
To: Anda Nicolae; dev@lists.opencontrail.org
Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

So 1.1.1.102/32 and 2.2.2.102/32 are not seen in each other’s tables.
Are there any errors in contrail-schema logs?
Can you check if the RT of the logical-router object is both imported and 
exported in both routing-instances?

RT of the router can be got from UI Monitor>Infrastructure> Config Nodes> 
, Click on ‘Config’ link at the bottom. Then follow logical-routers 
link

Routing instance details can be got from 
http:// 
ip>:8083/Snh_ShowRoutingInstanceSummaryReq?search_string=

Vedu

From: Anda Nicolae >
Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 5:49 PM
To: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi >, 
"dev@lists.opencontrail.org" 
>
Subject: RE: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Thank you, Vedu. I have created 2 VMs, first VM having an IP address from VN1 
subnet and the 2nd VM having an IP address from VN2 subnet.
route -n command on the 1st VM shows that default gateway is 1.1.1.1
route -n command on the 2nd VM shows that default gateway is 2.2.2.1.
As I have written in the above e-mail, virtual router IP address is 1.1.1.100.
I have retrieved the vrf associated to each VN and below it is the routing 
table associated to each vrf.

[root@Hercules ~]$rt --dump 4
Flags: L=Label Valid, P=Proxy ARP, T=Trap ARP, F=Flood ARP
vRouter inet4 routing table 0/4/unicast
Destination   PPLFlagsLabel NexthopStitched 
MAC(Index)
0.0.0.0/8   0   -  0-
1.0.0.0/16  0   -  0-
1.1.0.0/24  0   -  0-
1.1.1.0/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.1/32 32   PT  -  8-
1.1.1.2/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.3/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.4/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.5/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.6/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.7/32 24   TF  -

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi

So 1.1.1.102/32 and 2.2.2.102/32 are not seen in each other’s tables.
Are there any errors in contrail-schema logs?
Can you check if the RT of the logical-router object is both imported and 
exported in both routing-instances?

RT of the router can be got from UI Monitor>Infrastructure> Config Nodes> 
, Click on ‘Config’ link at the bottom. Then follow logical-routers 
link

Routing instance details can be got from 
http:// 
ip>:8083/Snh_ShowRoutingInstanceSummaryReq?search_string=

Vedu

From: Anda Nicolae 
Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 5:49 PM
To: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi , "dev@lists.opencontrail.org" 

Subject: RE: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Thank you, Vedu. I have created 2 VMs, first VM having an IP address from VN1 
subnet and the 2nd VM having an IP address from VN2 subnet.
route -n command on the 1st VM shows that default gateway is 1.1.1.1
route -n command on the 2nd VM shows that default gateway is 2.2.2.1.
As I have written in the above e-mail, virtual router IP address is 1.1.1.100.
I have retrieved the vrf associated to each VN and below it is the routing 
table associated to each vrf.

[root@Hercules ~]$rt --dump 4
Flags: L=Label Valid, P=Proxy ARP, T=Trap ARP, F=Flood ARP
vRouter inet4 routing table 0/4/unicast
Destination   PPLFlagsLabel NexthopStitched 
MAC(Index)
0.0.0.0/8   0   -  0-
1.0.0.0/16  0   -  0-
1.1.0.0/24  0   -  0-
1.1.1.0/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.1/32 32   PT  -  8-
1.1.1.2/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.3/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.4/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.5/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.6/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.7/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.8/32 24   TF  -  1-
[truncated output]
1.1.1.100/32   24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.101/32   32P  - 69
2:ae:a9:f1:8e:71(218780)
1.1.1.102/32   24   TF  -  1-
[truncated output]


[root@Hercules ~]$rt --dump 7
Flags: L=Label Valid, P=Proxy ARP, T=Trap ARP, F=Flood ARP
vRouter inet4 routing table 0/7/unicast
Destination   PPLFlagsLabel NexthopStitched 
MAC(Index)
0.0.0.0/8   0   -  0-
1.0.0.0/8   0   -  0-
2.0.0.0/16  0   -  0-
2.1.0.0/16  0   -  0-
2.2.0.0/24  0   -  0-
2.2.1.0/24  0   -  0-
2.2.2.0/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.1/32 32   PT  -  8-
2.2.2.2/32 32   PT  -  8-
2.2.2.3/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.4/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.5/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.6/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.7/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.8/32 24   TF  -  1-
[truncated output]
2.2.2.100/32   24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.101/32   24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.102/32   32P  - 82
2:7c:84:1c:eb:e9(209628)
[truncated output]


Thanks,
Anda

From: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi [mailto:vjo...@juniper.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 2:02 PM
To: Anda Nicolae; dev@lists.opencontrail.org
Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

IIRC, the port-ip assigned to the router ports does not affect the forwarding.

I think you should check if the routes of the other VN is present in the 
routing table of each VN(route-target of the router object is used to ensure 
that it happens). You may want to dump the object details to check.

Vedu

From: Dev 
> 
on behalf of Anda Nicolae >
Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] [TSC]Proposed set of sub-projects/components along with mapping of existing repos

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

8 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information