subject:"Re\: \[opencontrail\-dev\] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address"

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Anda Nicolae

Will do. I have already added that the bug is not reproducible in 3.2.4.0 
Contrail version.

Can you please let me know in which files is implemented the logic of the route 
targets?

Thanks,
Anda

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>




On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 8:01 PM +0300, "Andrey Pavlov" 
<andrey...@gmail.com<mailto:andrey...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Anda,
It will be very helpful if you add this info directly to the bug.

Regards,
Andrey Pavlov.

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Anda Nicolae 
<anico...@lenovo.com<mailto:anico...@lenovo.com>> wrote:
Hi all,

Thanks a lot for your responses.

Contrail version I was using when I encountered this bug was 3.2.3.0.
I have checked contrail-schema process status from contrail-status output and 
it is active.
I have also browsed through contrail-schema log, but I did not find anything 
relevant.

Now I have installed Contrail version 3.2.4.0 and the bug is not reproducible.

If you know the commit that fixed this, please let me know. I have tried to 
find the functions/modules where the routing logic happens, but without any 
notable results.

I have checked route-target link from Contrail 3.2.4.0 and below is the output. 
Virtual networks names are anda_lenovoA and anda_lenovoB and logical router 
name is router1. I can see “routing_instance_back_refs” and “routing-instance” 
so the route targets are exported.

{"route-target": {"display_name": "target:64512:803", "uuid": 
"6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", 
"routing_instance_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", 
"anda_lenovoA", "anda_lenovoA"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/routing-instance/0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d", "attr": 
{"import_export": null}, "uuid": "0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d"}, 
{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "anda_lenovoB", "anda_lenovoB"], 
"href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/routing-instance/8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003", "attr": 
{"import_export": null}, "uuid": "8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003"}], 
"perms2": {"owner": "5792015c404a4bd4a0ff775de5c38bf4", "owner_access": 7, 
"global_access": 0, "share": []}, "id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": 
{"uuid_mslong": 7900791620273325437, "uuid_lslong": 12354003745875729914}, 
"created": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", "description": null, "creator": null, 
"user_visible": true, "last_modified": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", 
"permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "other_access": 7, 
"group": "cloud-admin-group", "group_access": 7}}, "logical_router_back_refs": 
[{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "router1"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/logical-router/98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e", "attr": null, 
"uuid": "98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e"}], "fq_name": 
["target:64512:803"], "name": "target:64512:803"}}

Thanks,
Anda

From: Sachin Bansal [mailto:sban...@juniper.net<mailto:sban...@juniper.net>]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 6:08 PM
To: Anda Nicolae
Cc: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi; 
dev@lists.opencontrail.org<mailto:dev@lists.opencontrail.org>

Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Anda,

As Vedu explained earlier, the IP address of the logical router interface is 
completely inconsequential and is not used in any forwarding at all. You can 
rest assured that with .100 addresses, the connectivity is expected to work. 
Also, gateway of a network cannot be changed.

The way it works is, we allocate a route target for the logical router and 
attach it to each of the VNs so that the VRFs for each of those VNs can import 
each other’s routes. Now

From the output you sent, it seems the route target is only connected to the 
logical router, not the two virtual networks. Could you please make sure 
contrail-schema is running and active? If it is, please check its logs for any 
errors.

Sachin



On Jul 12, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Anda Nicolae 
<anico...@lenovo.com<mailto:anico...@lenovo.com>> wrote:

I have errors in contrail-api.log such as: Error while accessing route_target 
uuid 408155ef-22d0-46e8-b0c2-07f3fec44

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Andrey Pavlov

Hi Anda,
It will be very helpful if you add this info directly to the bug.

Regards,
Andrey Pavlov.

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Anda Nicolae <anico...@lenovo.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot for your responses.
>
>
>
> Contrail version I was using when I encountered this bug was 3.2.3.0.
>
> I have checked contrail-schema process status from contrail-status output
> and it is active.
>
> I have also browsed through contrail-schema log, but I did not find
> anything relevant.
>
>
>
> Now I have installed Contrail version 3.2.4.0 and the bug is not
> reproducible.
>
>
>
> *If you know the commit that fixed this, please let me know. I have tried
> to find the functions/modules where the routing logic happens, but without
> any notable results.*
>
>
>
> I have checked route-target link from Contrail 3.2.4.0 and below is the
> output. Virtual networks names are anda_lenovoA and anda_lenovoB and
> logical router name is router1. I can see “routing_instance_back_refs” and
> “routing-instance” so the route targets are exported.
>
>
>
> {"route-target": {"display_name": "target:64512:803", "uuid":
> "6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", "href":"https:// IP>:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/
> 6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", "routing_instance_back_refs":
> [{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "anda_lenovoA", "anda_lenovoA"],
> "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// mgmt IP>:8082/routing-instance/0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d",
> "attr": {"import_export": null}, "uuid": 
> "0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d"},
> {"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "anda_lenovoB", "anda_lenovoB"],
> "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// mgmt IP>:8082/routing-instance/8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003",
> "attr": {"import_export": null}, "uuid": 
> "8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003"}],
> "perms2": {"owner": "5792015c404a4bd4a0ff775de5c38bf4", "owner_access":
> 7, "global_access": 0, "share": []}, "id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid":
> {"uuid_mslong": 7900791620273325437, "uuid_lslong": 12354003745875729914},
> "created": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", "description": null, "creator":
> null, "user_visible": true, "last_modified": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006",
> "permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "other_access":
> 7, "group": "cloud-admin-group", "group_access": 7}},
> "logical_router_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "router1"],
> "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// mgmt IP>:8082/logical-router/98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e",
> "attr": null, "uuid": "98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e"}],
> "fq_name": ["target:64512:803"], "name": "target:64512:803"}}
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anda
>
>
>
> *From:* Sachin Bansal [mailto:sban...@juniper.net]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 12, 2017 6:08 PM
> *To:* Anda Nicolae
> *Cc:* Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi; dev@lists.opencontrail.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address
>
>
>
> Anda,
>
>
>
> As Vedu explained earlier, the IP address of the logical router interface
> is completely inconsequential and is not used in any forwarding at all. You
> can rest assured that with .100 addresses, the connectivity is expected to
> work. Also, gateway of a network cannot be changed.
>
>
>
> The way it works is, we allocate a route target for the logical router and
> attach it to each of the VNs so that the VRFs for each of those VNs can
> import each other’s routes. Now
>
>
>
> From the output you sent, it seems the route target is only connected to
> the logical router, not the two virtual networks. Could you please make
> sure contrail-schema is running and active? If it is, please check its logs
> for any errors.
>
>
>
> Sachin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 12, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Anda Nicolae <anico...@lenovo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> I have errors in contrail-api.log such as: *Error while accessing
> route_targ

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Sachin Bansal

Anda,

There has been no change between these releases for this functionality.

Sachin

On Jul 12, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Anda Nicolae 
<anico...@lenovo.com<mailto:anico...@lenovo.com>> wrote:

Hi all,

Thanks a lot for your responses.

Contrail version I was using when I encountered this bug was 3.2.3.0.
I have checked contrail-schema process status from contrail-status output and 
it is active.
I have also browsed through contrail-schema log, but I did not find anything 
relevant.

Now I have installed Contrail version 3.2.4.0 and the bug is not reproducible.

If you know the commit that fixed this, please let me know. I have tried to 
find the functions/modules where the routing logic happens, but without any 
notable results.

I have checked route-target link from Contrail 3.2.4.0 and below is the output. 
Virtual networks names are anda_lenovoA and anda_lenovoB and logical router 
name is router1. I can see “routing_instance_back_refs” and “routing-instance” 
so the route targets are exported.

{"route-target": {"display_name": "target:64512:803", "uuid": 
"6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", 
"routing_instance_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", 
"anda_lenovoA", "anda_lenovoA"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/routing-instance/0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d", "attr": 
{"import_export": null}, "uuid": "0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d"}, 
{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "anda_lenovoB", "anda_lenovoB"], 
"href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/routing-instance/8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003", "attr": 
{"import_export": null}, "uuid": "8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003"}], 
"perms2": {"owner": "5792015c404a4bd4a0ff775de5c38bf4", "owner_access": 7, 
"global_access": 0, "share": []}, "id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": 
{"uuid_mslong": 7900791620273325437, "uuid_lslong": 12354003745875729914}, 
"created": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", "description": null, "creator": null, 
"user_visible": true, "last_modified": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", 
"permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "other_access": 7, 
"group": "cloud-admin-group", "group_access": 7}}, "logical_router_back_refs": 
[{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "router1"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/logical-router/98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e", "attr": null, 
"uuid": "98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e"}], "fq_name": 
["target:64512:803"], "name": "target:64512:803"}}

Thanks,
Anda

From: Sachin Bansal [mailto:sban...@juniper.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 6:08 PM
To: Anda Nicolae
Cc: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi; 
dev@lists.opencontrail.org<mailto:dev@lists.opencontrail.org>
Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Anda,

As Vedu explained earlier, the IP address of the logical router interface is 
completely inconsequential and is not used in any forwarding at all. You can 
rest assured that with .100 addresses, the connectivity is expected to work. 
Also, gateway of a network cannot be changed.

The way it works is, we allocate a route target for the logical router and 
attach it to each of the VNs so that the VRFs for each of those VNs can import 
each other’s routes. Now

From the output you sent, it seems the route target is only connected to the 
logical router, not the two virtual networks. Could you please make sure 
contrail-schema is running and active? If it is, please check its logs for any 
errors.

Sachin



On Jul 12, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Anda Nicolae 
<anico...@lenovo.com<mailto:anico...@lenovo.com>> wrote:

I have errors in contrail-api.log such as: Error while accessing route_target 
uuid 408155ef-22d0-46e8-b0c2-07f3fec44dae
The above uuid does not correspond neither to subnet, net, net or logical 
router assigned to my networks.

I don't think that the RT is exported. I have followed the links and I arrived 
at https://<controller<https://%3ccontroller/> 
IP>:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea.
I don't see any route here. (below is the output)

{"route-target": {"fq_name": ["target

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Anda Nicolae

Hi all,

Thanks a lot for your responses.

Contrail version I was using when I encountered this bug was 3.2.3.0.
I have checked contrail-schema process status from contrail-status output and 
it is active.
I have also browsed through contrail-schema log, but I did not find anything 
relevant.

Now I have installed Contrail version 3.2.4.0 and the bug is not reproducible.

If you know the commit that fixed this, please let me know. I have tried to 
find the functions/modules where the routing logic happens, but without any 
notable results.

I have checked route-target link from Contrail 3.2.4.0 and below is the output. 
Virtual networks names are anda_lenovoA and anda_lenovoB and logical router 
name is router1. I can see “routing_instance_back_refs” and “routing-instance” 
so the route targets are exported.

{"route-target": {"display_name": "target:64512:803", "uuid": 
"6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/6da5401e-52c6-457d-ab72-3cf3dac49dfa", 
"routing_instance_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", 
"anda_lenovoA", "anda_lenovoA"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/routing-instance/0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d", "attr": 
{"import_export": null}, "uuid": "0b09292b-e4b7-47e6-8329-ce461d89137d"}, 
{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "anda_lenovoB", "anda_lenovoB"], 
"href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/routing-instance/8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003", "attr": 
{"import_export": null}, "uuid": "8b756a10-52bc-4c14-a5f4-7a9261ea1003"}], 
"perms2": {"owner": "5792015c404a4bd4a0ff775de5c38bf4", "owner_access": 7, 
"global_access": 0, "share": []}, "id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": 
{"uuid_mslong": 7900791620273325437, "uuid_lslong": 12354003745875729914}, 
"created": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", "description": null, "creator": null, 
"user_visible": true, "last_modified": "2017-07-12T14:02:42.656006", 
"permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "other_access": 7, 
"group": "cloud-admin-group", "group_access": 7}}, "logical_router_back_refs": 
[{"to": ["default-domain", "admin", "router1"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/logical-router/98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e", "attr": null, 
"uuid": "98c6dabf-b7c0-46f4-b106-4587c3ce242e"}], "fq_name": 
["target:64512:803"], "name": "target:64512:803"}}

Thanks,
Anda

From: Sachin Bansal [mailto:sban...@juniper.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 6:08 PM
To: Anda Nicolae
Cc: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi; dev@lists.opencontrail.org
Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Anda,

As Vedu explained earlier, the IP address of the logical router interface is 
completely inconsequential and is not used in any forwarding at all. You can 
rest assured that with .100 addresses, the connectivity is expected to work. 
Also, gateway of a network cannot be changed.

The way it works is, we allocate a route target for the logical router and 
attach it to each of the VNs so that the VRFs for each of those VNs can import 
each other’s routes. Now

From the output you sent, it seems the route target is only connected to the 
logical router, not the two virtual networks. Could you please make sure 
contrail-schema is running and active? If it is, please check its logs for any 
errors.

Sachin



On Jul 12, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Anda Nicolae 
<anico...@lenovo.com<mailto:anico...@lenovo.com>> wrote:

I have errors in contrail-api.log such as: Error while accessing route_target 
uuid 408155ef-22d0-46e8-b0c2-07f3fec44dae
The above uuid does not correspond neither to subnet, net, net or logical 
router assigned to my networks.

I don't think that the RT is exported. I have followed the links and I arrived 
at https://<controller<https://%3ccontroller/> 
IP>:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea.
I don't see any route here. (below is the output)

{"route-target": {"fq_name": ["target:64512:814"], "uuid": 
"5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "href":"https:// :8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// :8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "perms2":

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Sachin Bansal

Anda,

As Vedu explained earlier, the IP address of the logical router interface is 
completely inconsequential and is not used in any forwarding at all. You can 
rest assured that with .100 addresses, the connectivity is expected to work. 
Also, gateway of a network cannot be changed.

The way it works is, we allocate a route target for the logical router and 
attach it to each of the VNs so that the VRFs for each of those VNs can import 
each other’s routes. Now

From the output you sent, it seems the route target is only connected to the 
logical router, not the two virtual networks. Could you please make sure 
contrail-schema is running and active? If it is, please check its logs for any 
errors.

Sachin



On Jul 12, 2017, at 2:51 AM, Anda Nicolae 
<anico...@lenovo.com<mailto:anico...@lenovo.com>> wrote:

I have errors in contrail-api.log such as: Error while accessing route_target 
uuid 408155ef-22d0-46e8-b0c2-07f3fec44dae
The above uuid does not correspond neither to subnet, net, net or logical 
router assigned to my networks.

I don't think that the RT is exported. I have followed the links and I arrived 
at https://<controller<https://%3ccontroller/> 
IP>:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea.
I don't see any route here. (below is the output)

{"route-target": {"fq_name": ["target:64512:814"], "uuid": 
"5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "href":"https:// :8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// :8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "perms2": 
{"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "global_access": 0, "share": []}, 
"id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": {"uuid_mslong": 6220793826397211851, 
"uuid_lslong": 10653510834882850794}, "created": "2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686", 
"description": null, "creator": null, "user_visible": true, "last_modified": 
"2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686", "permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", 
"owner_access": 7, "other_access": 7, "group": "cloud-admin-group", 
"group_access": 7}}, "logical_router_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", 
"anda", "lrouter"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// 
:8082/logical-router/48b2f8f1-d16f-4e6d-8ab4-5caec740eaf8", "attr": null, 
"uuid": "48b2f8f1-d16f-4e6d-8ab4-5caec740eaf8"}], "display_name": 
"target:64512:814", "name": "target:64512:814"}}


The problem that I think it is is that both subnets have a gateway that is 
already set (1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.1, respectively). Contrail GUI assigns gateway 
IP address as .1.
So, the logical router that I create connects these 2 subnets. Therefore, 
logical router interfaces should have the same IP addresses as the gateway of 
each subnet (1.1.1.1 instead of 1.1.1.100 and 2.2.2.1 instead of 2.2.2.100).

If I use neutron commands to create the logical router, the interfaces of the 
logical router created from neutron commands have the IP addresses of the 
gateway of each subnet.

As workaround, if I try to change the gateway IP address of a subnet (from 
1.1.1.1 to 1.1.1.100, in order to match the IP address of the virtual router), 
I receive the following error:
Error: Virtual-Network(default-domain:anda:aaa) has invalid subnet(1.1.1.0/24)


Thanks,
Anda

From: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi [mailto:vjo...@juniper.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:00 AM
To: Anda Nicolae; dev@lists.opencontrail.org<mailto:dev@lists.opencontrail.org>
Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

So 1.1.1.102/32 and 2.2.2.102/32 are not seen in each other’s tables.
Are there any errors in contrail-schema logs?
Can you check if the RT of the logical-router object is both imported and 
exported in both routing-instances?

RT of the router can be got from UI Monitor>Infrastructure> Config Nodes> 
, Click on ‘Config’ link at the bottom. Then follow logical-routers 
link

Routing instance details can be got from 
http://<control-node<http://%3ccontrol-node/> 
ip>:8083/Snh_ShowRoutingInstanceSummaryReq?search_string=

Vedu

From: Anda Nicolae <anico...@lenovo.com<mailto:anico...@lenovo.com>>
Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 5:49 PM
To: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi <vjo...@juniper.net<mailto:vjo...@juniper.net>>, 
"dev@lists.opencontrail.org<mailto:dev@lists.opencontrail.org>" 
<dev@lists.opencontrail.org<mailto:dev@lists.opencontrail.org>>
Subject: RE: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Thank you, Vedu. I have created 2 VMs, first

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Anda Nicolae

I have errors in contrail-api.log such as: Error while accessing route_target 
uuid 408155ef-22d0-46e8-b0c2-07f3fec44dae
The above uuid does not correspond neither to subnet, net, net or logical 
router assigned to my networks.

I don't think that the RT is exported. I have followed the links and I arrived 
at https://<controller<https://%3ccontroller> 
IP>:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http://:8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea.
I don't see any route here. (below is the output)

{"route-target": {"fq_name": ["target:64512:814"], "uuid": 
"5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "href":"https:// :8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// :8082/route-target/5654b306-a359-4ccb-93d8-dfa8dbf7afea", "perms2": 
{"owner": "cloud-admin", "owner_access": 7, "global_access": 0, "share": []}, 
"id_perms": {"enable": true, "uuid": {"uuid_mslong": 6220793826397211851, 
"uuid_lslong": 10653510834882850794}, "created": "2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686", 
"description": null, "creator": null, "user_visible": true, "last_modified": 
"2017-07-12T07:32:05.894686", "permissions": {"owner": "cloud-admin", 
"owner_access": 7, "other_access": 7, "group": "cloud-admin-group", 
"group_access": 7}}, "logical_router_back_refs": [{"to": ["default-domain", 
"anda", "lrouter"], "href":"https://:8143/proxy?proxyURL=http:// 
:8082/logical-router/48b2f8f1-d16f-4e6d-8ab4-5caec740eaf8", "attr": null, 
"uuid": "48b2f8f1-d16f-4e6d-8ab4-5caec740eaf8"}], "display_name": 
"target:64512:814", "name": "target:64512:814"}}


The problem that I think it is is that both subnets have a gateway that is 
already set (1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.1, respectively). Contrail GUI assigns gateway 
IP address as .1.
So, the logical router that I create connects these 2 subnets. Therefore, 
logical router interfaces should have the same IP addresses as the gateway of 
each subnet (1.1.1.1 instead of 1.1.1.100 and 2.2.2.1 instead of 2.2.2.100).

If I use neutron commands to create the logical router, the interfaces of the 
logical router created from neutron commands have the IP addresses of the 
gateway of each subnet.

As workaround, if I try to change the gateway IP address of a subnet (from 
1.1.1.1 to 1.1.1.100, in order to match the IP address of the virtual router), 
I receive the following error:
Error: Virtual-Network(default-domain:anda:aaa) has invalid subnet(1.1.1.0/24)


Thanks,
Anda

From: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi [mailto:vjo...@juniper.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:00 AM
To: Anda Nicolae; dev@lists.opencontrail.org
Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

So 1.1.1.102/32 and 2.2.2.102/32 are not seen in each other’s tables.
Are there any errors in contrail-schema logs?
Can you check if the RT of the logical-router object is both imported and 
exported in both routing-instances?

RT of the router can be got from UI Monitor>Infrastructure> Config Nodes> 
, Click on ‘Config’ link at the bottom. Then follow logical-routers 
link

Routing instance details can be got from 
http://<control-node<http://%3ccontrol-node> 
ip>:8083/Snh_ShowRoutingInstanceSummaryReq?search_string=

Vedu

From: Anda Nicolae <anico...@lenovo.com<mailto:anico...@lenovo.com>>
Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 5:49 PM
To: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi <vjo...@juniper.net<mailto:vjo...@juniper.net>>, 
"dev@lists.opencontrail.org<mailto:dev@lists.opencontrail.org>" 
<dev@lists.opencontrail.org<mailto:dev@lists.opencontrail.org>>
Subject: RE: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Thank you, Vedu. I have created 2 VMs, first VM having an IP address from VN1 
subnet and the 2nd VM having an IP address from VN2 subnet.
route -n command on the 1st VM shows that default gateway is 1.1.1.1
route -n command on the 2nd VM shows that default gateway is 2.2.2.1.
As I have written in the above e-mail, virtual router IP address is 1.1.1.100.
I have retrieved the vrf associated to each VN and below it is the routing 
table associated to each vrf.

[root@Hercules ~]$rt --dump 4
Flags: L=Label Valid, P=Proxy ARP, T=Trap ARP, F=Flood ARP
vRouter inet4 routing table 0/4/unicast
Destination   PPLFlagsLabel NexthopStitched 
MAC(Index)
0.0.0.0/8   0   -  0-
1.0.0.0/16  0   -  0-
1.1.0.0/24  0   -  0-
1

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-12 Thread Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi

So 1.1.1.102/32 and 2.2.2.102/32 are not seen in each other’s tables.
Are there any errors in contrail-schema logs?
Can you check if the RT of the logical-router object is both imported and 
exported in both routing-instances?

RT of the router can be got from UI Monitor>Infrastructure> Config Nodes> 
, Click on ‘Config’ link at the bottom. Then follow logical-routers 
link

Routing instance details can be got from 
http://<control-node<http://%3ccontrol-node> 
ip>:8083/Snh_ShowRoutingInstanceSummaryReq?search_string=

Vedu

From: Anda Nicolae <anico...@lenovo.com>
Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 5:49 PM
To: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi <vjo...@juniper.net>, "dev@lists.opencontrail.org" 
<dev@lists.opencontrail.org>
Subject: RE: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Thank you, Vedu. I have created 2 VMs, first VM having an IP address from VN1 
subnet and the 2nd VM having an IP address from VN2 subnet.
route -n command on the 1st VM shows that default gateway is 1.1.1.1
route -n command on the 2nd VM shows that default gateway is 2.2.2.1.
As I have written in the above e-mail, virtual router IP address is 1.1.1.100.
I have retrieved the vrf associated to each VN and below it is the routing 
table associated to each vrf.

[root@Hercules ~]$rt --dump 4
Flags: L=Label Valid, P=Proxy ARP, T=Trap ARP, F=Flood ARP
vRouter inet4 routing table 0/4/unicast
Destination   PPLFlagsLabel NexthopStitched 
MAC(Index)
0.0.0.0/8   0   -  0-
1.0.0.0/16  0   -  0-
1.1.0.0/24  0   -  0-
1.1.1.0/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.1/32 32   PT  -  8-
1.1.1.2/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.3/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.4/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.5/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.6/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.7/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.8/32 24   TF  -  1-
[truncated output]
1.1.1.100/32   24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.101/32   32P  - 69
2:ae:a9:f1:8e:71(218780)
1.1.1.102/32   24   TF  -  1-
[truncated output]


[root@Hercules ~]$rt --dump 7
Flags: L=Label Valid, P=Proxy ARP, T=Trap ARP, F=Flood ARP
vRouter inet4 routing table 0/7/unicast
Destination   PPLFlagsLabel NexthopStitched 
MAC(Index)
0.0.0.0/8   0   -  0-
1.0.0.0/8   0   -  0-
2.0.0.0/16  0   -  0-
2.1.0.0/16  0   -  0-
2.2.0.0/24  0   -  0-
2.2.1.0/24  0   -  0-
2.2.2.0/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.1/32 32   PT  -  8-
2.2.2.2/32 32   PT  -  8-
2.2.2.3/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.4/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.5/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.6/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.7/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.8/32 24   TF  -  1-
[truncated output]
2.2.2.100/32   24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.101/32   24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.102/32   32P  - 82
2:7c:84:1c:eb:e9(209628)
[truncated output]


Thanks,
Anda

From: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi [mailto:vjo...@juniper.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 2:02 PM
To: Anda Nicolae; dev@lists.opencontrail.org
Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

IIRC, the port-ip assigned to the router ports does not affect the forwarding.

I think you should check if the routes of the other VN is present in the 
routing table of each VN(route-target of the router object is used to ensure 
that it happens). You may want to dump the object details to check.

Vedu

From: Dev 
<dev-boun...@lists.opencontrail.org<mailto:dev-boun...@lists.opencontrail.org>> 
on behalf of Anda Nicolae <anico...@leno

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-11 Thread Anda Nicolae

Thank you, Vedu. I have created 2 VMs, first VM having an IP address from VN1 
subnet and the 2nd VM having an IP address from VN2 subnet.
route -n command on the 1st VM shows that default gateway is 1.1.1.1
route -n command on the 2nd VM shows that default gateway is 2.2.2.1.
As I have written in the above e-mail, virtual router IP address is 1.1.1.100.
I have retrieved the vrf associated to each VN and below it is the routing 
table associated to each vrf.

[root@Hercules ~]$rt --dump 4
Flags: L=Label Valid, P=Proxy ARP, T=Trap ARP, F=Flood ARP
vRouter inet4 routing table 0/4/unicast
Destination   PPLFlagsLabel NexthopStitched 
MAC(Index)
0.0.0.0/8   0   -  0-
1.0.0.0/16  0   -  0-
1.1.0.0/24  0   -  0-
1.1.1.0/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.1/32 32   PT  -  8-
1.1.1.2/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.3/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.4/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.5/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.6/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.7/32 24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.8/32 24   TF  -  1-
[truncated output]
1.1.1.100/32   24   TF  -  1-
1.1.1.101/32   32P  - 69
2:ae:a9:f1:8e:71(218780)
1.1.1.102/32   24   TF  -  1-
[truncated output]


[root@Hercules ~]$rt --dump 7
Flags: L=Label Valid, P=Proxy ARP, T=Trap ARP, F=Flood ARP
vRouter inet4 routing table 0/7/unicast
Destination   PPLFlagsLabel NexthopStitched 
MAC(Index)
0.0.0.0/8   0   -  0-
1.0.0.0/8   0   -  0-
2.0.0.0/16  0   -  0-
2.1.0.0/16  0   -  0-
2.2.0.0/24  0   -  0-
2.2.1.0/24  0   -  0-
2.2.2.0/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.1/32 32   PT  -  8-
2.2.2.2/32 32   PT  -  8-
2.2.2.3/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.4/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.5/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.6/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.7/32 24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.8/32 24   TF  -  1-
[truncated output]
2.2.2.100/32   24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.101/32   24   TF  -  1-
2.2.2.102/32   32P  - 82
2:7c:84:1c:eb:e9(209628)
[truncated output]


Thanks,
Anda

From: Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi [mailto:vjo...@juniper.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 2:02 PM
To: Anda Nicolae; dev@lists.opencontrail.org
Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

IIRC, the port-ip assigned to the router ports does not affect the forwarding.

I think you should check if the routes of the other VN is present in the 
routing table of each VN(route-target of the router object is used to ensure 
that it happens). You may want to dump the object details to check.

Vedu

From: Dev 
<dev-boun...@lists.opencontrail.org<mailto:dev-boun...@lists.opencontrail.org>> 
on behalf of Anda Nicolae <anico...@lenovo.com<mailto:anico...@lenovo.com>>
Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 12:54 PM
To: "dev@lists.opencontrail.org<mailto:dev@lists.opencontrail.org>" 
<dev@lists.opencontrail.org<mailto:dev@lists.opencontrail.org>>
Subject: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Hi all,

I am currently investigating 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/opencontrail/+bug/1696760.

I have a setup with 3 VMs: 1st VM is Openstack node, the 2nd VM is Contrail 
controller node and the 3rd VM is Contrail compute node.
CentOS is running on all the 3 VMs. I have used fab command to install Contrail 
on VMs.

From Contrail GUI I have created 2 Virtual Networks each with its own 
(different) IP subnet (1.1.1.0/24 and 2.2.2.0/24).
By default, Contrail GUI adds 1.1.1.1 as gateway IP address for the 1st VN and 
2

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

2017-07-11 Thread Vedamurthy Ananth Joshi

IIRC, the port-ip assigned to the router ports does not affect the forwarding.

I think you should check if the routes of the other VN is present in the 
routing table of each VN(route-target of the router object is used to ensure 
that it happens). You may want to dump the object details to check.

Vedu

From: Dev  on behalf of Anda Nicolae 

Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 at 12:54 PM
To: "dev@lists.opencontrail.org" 
Subject: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Hi all,

I am currently investigating 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/opencontrail/+bug/1696760.

I have a setup with 3 VMs: 1st VM is Openstack node, the 2nd VM is Contrail 
controller node and the 3rd VM is Contrail compute node.
CentOS is running on all the 3 VMs. I have used fab command to install Contrail 
on VMs.

From Contrail GUI I have created 2 Virtual Networks each with its own 
(different) IP subnet (1.1.1.0/24 and 2.2.2.0/24).
By default, Contrail GUI adds 1.1.1.1 as gateway IP address for the 1st VN and 
2.2.2.1 as gateway IP address for the 2nd VN.

I need to create a logical router to route the traffic between the Virtual 
Networks above. There are 2 ways in which I can create this virtual router:

1. Using neutron cmds:
neutron router-create router1
neutron router-interface-add router1 
neutron router-interface-add router1 

In this case, the IP addresses of the router interfaces are 1.1.1.1 and 
2.2.2.1, which matches the gateway IP address of each subnet.

2. Using Contrail GUI
In this case, the IP addresses of the router interfaces are 1.1.1.100 and 
2.2.2.100, which doesn't match the gateway IP address of each subnet, and the 
traffic is not router between VNs.

I have started looking over the code to see where is gateway IP address .100 
configured.
I am stuck at 
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vnc_cfg_api_server/gen/resource_client.py, 
line 5762, function:
def virtual_router_ip_address(self, virtual_router_ip_address).
The above file is autogenerated and this is a setter function.
Can you please give a hint on how to continue my investigation?

Thanks,
Anda
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.opencontrail.org
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

Re: [opencontrail-dev] Contrail GUI Virtual Router IP address

9 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information