Re: [rdo-dev] openstack-newton rpm packages unavailable now
Just sliding in with my 2 cents which are off-topic to the discussion but... I've always found it fascinating why one would completely remove packages from official mirrors when the version is not supported anymore. There will probably always be somebody that might be looking for them, I've always had that feeling with RPMs compared to Debs. I guess this is why there's archive sites that store old packages... but maybe this is just me Best regards On 06/06/2018 02:45 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:44 PM, lucker zheng wrote: >> Sorry to trouble, I met a problem when I want to install RDO newton version, >> after installed the rdo-release-newton.rpm, it links to repo >> >> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-newton/ >> seems no rpm avaiable there, is this a mistake? > CentOS SIG repos are retired everytime when CentOS minor update is released, > and it's up to SIG to declare which of their releases should be retired. > In this case OpenStack Newton was EOLed upstream already Oct 2017: > https://releases.openstack.org/ > Old packages are frozen at > http://vault.centos.org/centos/7.4.1708/cloud/x86_64/openstack-newton/ > and are NOT receiving any updates, so please do not use them! > >> BTW I didn't find it in >> https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/EOL/ > Those are only archives of rdo-release RPMs only anyway and we should > probably get rid of that old hosting location in Fedora. > >> and I found the build system successful built newton jobs at >> https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-newton/report.html > Those are available to support Fast Forward Upgrades CI testing from > Newton to Queens, building project which did not push newton-eol tags > yet. Anything else is frozen at Newton EOL point. > Other than for CI, any other usage of those packages is not > recommended, best would be if you could upgrade to the latest RDO > Queens release ASAP. > > Cheers, > Alan > ___ > dev mailing list > dev@lists.rdoproject.org > http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscr...@lists.rdoproject.org > ___ dev mailing list dev@lists.rdoproject.org http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscr...@lists.rdoproject.org
[rdo-dev] Kathy Cacciatore
I'm sure that many of you already saw this - https://twitter.com/laurensell/status/1003743674323349504 If you knew Kathy, consider taking a moment to send a note to Tony. I worked at a number of events with Kathy. She was always kind, and always very organized, and kept things running smoothly. She'll definitely be missed. --Rich -- Rich Bowen: CentOS Community Manager rbo...@redhat.com @rbowen // @CentOSProject 1 859 351 9166 ___ dev mailing list dev@lists.rdoproject.org http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscr...@lists.rdoproject.org
[rdo-dev] [meeting] RDO meeting (2018-06-06) minutes
== #rdo: RDO meeting - 2018-06-06 == Meeting started by mjturek at 15:00:14 UTC. The full logs are available athttp://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rdo_meeting___2018_06_06/2018/rdo_meeting___2018_06_06.2018-06-06-15.00.log.html . Meeting summary --- * roll call (mjturek, 15:00:51) * Test Day Prep (mjturek, 15:02:43) * LINK: https://review.rdoproject.org/jenkins/job/periodic-tripleo-centos-7-master-containers-build/981/ (amoralej, 15:07:42) * LINK: https://review.rdoproject.org/jenkins/job/periodic-tripleo-centos-7-master-containers-build/981/ (mjturek, 15:08:25) * current blocker is https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1775199 (amoralej, 15:09:32) * ACTION: leanderthal follow up with the DF DFG re: next week's test cloud environment (leanderthal, 15:24:42) * ACTION: mjturek chair next week's meeting (leanderthal, 15:27:25) * open floor (leanderthal, 15:27:37) * LINK: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/13951/ is our mapping for zuul-migrate, plus some changes to JJB which is used to generate https://review.rdoproject.org/r/13964/ (pabelanger, 15:30:47) * LINK: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/q/status:open+branch:master+topic:zuulv3-init (more reviews here) (number80, 15:30:59) * LINK: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/14042/ is a working example of a zuulv3 job, see Zuul CI user (pabelanger, 15:31:17) * LINK: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/13951/ (leanderthal, 15:32:41) * LINK: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/13964/ (leanderthal, 15:32:53) * LINK: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/q/status:open+branch:master+topic:zuulv3-init (leanderthal, 15:33:05) * LINK: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/14042/ (leanderthal, 15:33:14) * LINK: https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/#/c/12458/ (leanderthal, 15:47:35) Meeting ended at 15:50:46 UTC. Action items, by person --- * leanderthal * leanderthal follow up with the DF DFG re: next week's test cloud environment * mjturek * mjturek chair next week's meeting People present (lines said) --- * leanderthal (55) * mjturek (19) * amoralej (16) * pabelanger (10) * openstack (7) * weshay (2) * apevec (2) * jpena (2) * number80 (2) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 ___ dev mailing list dev@lists.rdoproject.org http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscr...@lists.rdoproject.org
Re: [rdo-dev] Bringing OpenStack back to Fedora
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:06 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > Hey all, > > It's been several years since OpenStack has been part of the Fedora > distribution. Since then, a number of things have changed. > > Some of the major ones: > * Python packaging has gotten better and easier in Fedora (the changes are > numerous) > * RDO now has Software Factory and full-range CI capabilities > * Fedora has CI hook support for packaging (with the transition to Pagure > dist-git) > * OpenStack and Fedora schedules line up again: > https://releases.openstack.org/ > > In my view, it's a huge shame that we don't offer OpenStack for people to > use on Fedora, integrated with the latest software. OpenStack distribution > on other distros are able to pull this off, and I feel like we should be > able to as well. > > So what I want to know is the following: > * What are the (real or perceived) difficulties in packaging OpenStack for > Fedora? > * How difficult would it be to adapt RDO CI tooling to plug into Fedora > Dist-Git? > * How many of the underlying dependencies exist in Fedora today that were > forked into CentOS for RDO and which ones? > * What dependencies are in RDO that don't exist in Fedora? > > I'm willing to help with a lot of the packaging stuff, including adapting > packages for Fedora, and helping with reviews to bring stuff back in. I > firmly believe that maintenance of OpenStack in Fedora should be far easier > than it was three years ago, when it was ripped out. > Hey Neal, There is actually some planning and discussions around RDO and Fedora going on atm. I suspect there will be some updates to this list in the near future. Thanks > > So help me... Help you! > > Best regards, > Neal > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > ___ > dev mailing list > dev@lists.rdoproject.org > http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscr...@lists.rdoproject.org > ___ dev mailing list dev@lists.rdoproject.org http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscr...@lists.rdoproject.org
Re: [rdo-dev] openstack-newton rpm packages unavailable now
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:44 PM, lucker zheng wrote: > Sorry to trouble, I met a problem when I want to install RDO newton version, > after installed the rdo-release-newton.rpm, it links to repo > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/openstack-newton/ > seems no rpm avaiable there, is this a mistake? CentOS SIG repos are retired everytime when CentOS minor update is released, and it's up to SIG to declare which of their releases should be retired. In this case OpenStack Newton was EOLed upstream already Oct 2017: https://releases.openstack.org/ Old packages are frozen at http://vault.centos.org/centos/7.4.1708/cloud/x86_64/openstack-newton/ and are NOT receiving any updates, so please do not use them! > BTW I didn't find it in > https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/openstack/EOL/ Those are only archives of rdo-release RPMs only anyway and we should probably get rid of that old hosting location in Fedora. > and I found the build system successful built newton jobs at > https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-newton/report.html Those are available to support Fast Forward Upgrades CI testing from Newton to Queens, building project which did not push newton-eol tags yet. Anything else is frozen at Newton EOL point. Other than for CI, any other usage of those packages is not recommended, best would be if you could upgrade to the latest RDO Queens release ASAP. Cheers, Alan ___ dev mailing list dev@lists.rdoproject.org http://lists.rdoproject.org/mailman/listinfo/dev To unsubscribe: dev-unsubscr...@lists.rdoproject.org
