[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-7377) SOLR Streaming Expressions

2015-05-02 Thread Joel Bernstein (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525333#comment-14525333
 ] 

Joel Bernstein edited comment on SOLR-7377 at 5/2/15 4:28 PM:
--

New patch with the following changes:

1) ParallelStream can use either Object serialization or streaming expressions 
as a transport mechanism. When the ParalleStream is created using a 
StreamingExpression it defaults to streaming expression transport. When it's 
created through the Streaming API it defaults to Object serialization.

2) Added parallel tests for merge, unique, group, and top functions. Sample 
syntax:
{code}
parallel(collection1, 
merge(
search(collection1, q=id:(4 1 8 9), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
search(collection1, q=id:(0 2 3 6), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
on=a_i desc), 
workers=2, 
sort=a_i desc)

{code}

3) Added the ExpressionRunner class, still needs tests.


was (Author: joel.bernstein):
New patch with the following changes:

1) ParallelStream can use either Object serialization or streaming expression 
as a transport mechanism. When the ParalleStream is created using a 
StreamingExpression it defaults to streaming expression transport. When it's 
created through the Streaming API it defaults to Object serialization.

2) Added parallel tests for merge, unique, group, and top functions. Sample 
syntax:
{code}
parallel(collection1, 
merge(
search(collection1, q=id:(4 1 8 9), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
search(collection1, q=id:(0 2 3 6), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
on=a_i desc), 
workers=2, 
sort=a_i desc)

{code}

3) Added the ExpressionRunner class, still needs tests.

 SOLR Streaming Expressions
 --

 Key: SOLR-7377
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: clients - java
Reporter: Dennis Gove
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: Trunk

 Attachments: SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, 
 SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch


 It would be beneficial to add an expression-based interface to Streaming API 
 described in SOLR-7082. Right now that API requires streaming requests to 
 come in from clients as serialized bytecode of the streaming classes. The 
 suggestion here is to support string expressions which describe the streaming 
 operations the client wishes to perform. 
 {code:java}
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,fieldA,fieldB, sort=fieldA asc)
 {code}
 With this syntax in mind, one can now express arbitrarily complex stream 
 queries with a single string.
 {code:java}
 // merge two distinct searches together on common fields
 merge(
   search(collection1, q=id:(0 3 4), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   search(collection2, q=id:(1 2), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   on=a_f asc, a_s asc)
 // find top 20 unique records of a search
 top(
   n=20,
   unique(
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f desc),
 over=a_f desc),
   sort=a_f desc)
 {code}
 The syntax would support
 1. Configurable expression names (eg. via solrconfig.xml one can map unique 
 to a class implementing a Unique stream class) This allows users to build 
 their own streams and use as they wish.
 2. Named parameters (of both simple and expression types)
 3. Unnamed, type-matched parameters (to support requiring N streams as 
 arguments to another stream)
 4. Positional parameters
 The main goal here is to make streaming as accessible as possible and define 
 a syntax for running complex queries across large distributed systems.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-7377) SOLR Streaming Expressions

2015-05-02 Thread Joel Bernstein (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525333#comment-14525333
 ] 

Joel Bernstein edited comment on SOLR-7377 at 5/2/15 4:26 PM:
--

New patch with the following changes:

1) ParallelStream can use either Object serialization or streaming expression 
as a transport mechanism. When the ParalleStream is created using a 
StreamingExpression it defaults to streaming expression transport. When it's 
created through the Streaming API it defaults to Object serialization.

2) Added parallel tests for merge, unique, group, and top functions. Sample 
syntax:
{code}
parallel(collection1, 
merge(
search(collection1, q=id:(4 1 8 9), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
search(collection1, q=id:(0 2 3 6), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
on=a_i desc), 
workers=2, 
sort=a_i desc)

{code}

3) Added the ExpressionRunner class, still needs tests.


was (Author: joel.bernstein):
New patch with the following changes:

1) ParallelStream can use either Object serialization or streaming expression 
as a transport mechanism. When the ParalleStream is created using a 
StreamingExpression it defaults to streaming expression transport. When it's 
created through the Streaming API it defaults to Object serialization.

2) Added parallel tests for merge, unique, group, and top functions. Sample 
syntax:
{code}
parallel(collection1, 
merge(
search(collection1, q=id:(4 1 8 9), fl=id,a_s,a_i, 
sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
search(collection1, q=id:(0 2 3 6), fl=id,a_s,a_i, 
sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
  on=a_i desc), 
workers=2, 
sort=a_i desc)

{code}

3) Added the ExpressionRunner class, still needs tests.

 SOLR Streaming Expressions
 --

 Key: SOLR-7377
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: clients - java
Reporter: Dennis Gove
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: Trunk

 Attachments: SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, 
 SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch


 It would be beneficial to add an expression-based interface to Streaming API 
 described in SOLR-7082. Right now that API requires streaming requests to 
 come in from clients as serialized bytecode of the streaming classes. The 
 suggestion here is to support string expressions which describe the streaming 
 operations the client wishes to perform. 
 {code:java}
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,fieldA,fieldB, sort=fieldA asc)
 {code}
 With this syntax in mind, one can now express arbitrarily complex stream 
 queries with a single string.
 {code:java}
 // merge two distinct searches together on common fields
 merge(
   search(collection1, q=id:(0 3 4), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   search(collection2, q=id:(1 2), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   on=a_f asc, a_s asc)
 // find top 20 unique records of a search
 top(
   n=20,
   unique(
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f desc),
 over=a_f desc),
   sort=a_f desc)
 {code}
 The syntax would support
 1. Configurable expression names (eg. via solrconfig.xml one can map unique 
 to a class implementing a Unique stream class) This allows users to build 
 their own streams and use as they wish.
 2. Named parameters (of both simple and expression types)
 3. Unnamed, type-matched parameters (to support requiring N streams as 
 arguments to another stream)
 4. Positional parameters
 The main goal here is to make streaming as accessible as possible and define 
 a syntax for running complex queries across large distributed systems.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-7377) SOLR Streaming Expressions

2015-05-02 Thread Joel Bernstein (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525333#comment-14525333
 ] 

Joel Bernstein edited comment on SOLR-7377 at 5/2/15 4:25 PM:
--

New patch with the following changes:

1) ParallelStream can use either Object serialization or streaming expression 
as a transport mechanism. When the ParalleStream is created using a 
StreamingExpression it defaults to streaming expression transport. When it's 
created through the Streaming API it defaults to Object serialization.

2) Added parallel tests for merge, unique, group, and top functions. Sample 
syntax:
{code}
parallel(collection1, 
merge(
search(collection1, q=id:(4 1 8 9), fl=id,a_s,a_i, 
sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
search(collection1, q=id:(0 2 3 6), fl=id,a_s,a_i, 
sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
  on=a_i desc), 
workers=2, 
sort=a_i desc)

{code}

3) Added the ExpressionRunner class, still needs tests.


was (Author: joel.bernstein):
New patch with the following changes:

1) ParallelStream can use either Object serialization or streaming expression 
as a transport mechanism. When the ParalleStream is created using a 
StreamingExpression it defaults to streaming expression transport. When it's 
created through the Streaming API it defaults to Object serialization.

2) Added parallel tests for merge, unique, group, and top functions. Sample 
syntax:
{code}
parallel(collection1, 
merge(
search(collection1, q=id:(4 1 8 9), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
   search(collection1, q=id:(0 2 3 6), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
  on=a_i desc), 
workers=2, 
sort=a_i desc)

{code}

3) Added the ExpressionRunner class, still needs tests.

 SOLR Streaming Expressions
 --

 Key: SOLR-7377
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: clients - java
Reporter: Dennis Gove
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: Trunk

 Attachments: SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, 
 SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch


 It would be beneficial to add an expression-based interface to Streaming API 
 described in SOLR-7082. Right now that API requires streaming requests to 
 come in from clients as serialized bytecode of the streaming classes. The 
 suggestion here is to support string expressions which describe the streaming 
 operations the client wishes to perform. 
 {code:java}
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,fieldA,fieldB, sort=fieldA asc)
 {code}
 With this syntax in mind, one can now express arbitrarily complex stream 
 queries with a single string.
 {code:java}
 // merge two distinct searches together on common fields
 merge(
   search(collection1, q=id:(0 3 4), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   search(collection2, q=id:(1 2), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   on=a_f asc, a_s asc)
 // find top 20 unique records of a search
 top(
   n=20,
   unique(
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f desc),
 over=a_f desc),
   sort=a_f desc)
 {code}
 The syntax would support
 1. Configurable expression names (eg. via solrconfig.xml one can map unique 
 to a class implementing a Unique stream class) This allows users to build 
 their own streams and use as they wish.
 2. Named parameters (of both simple and expression types)
 3. Unnamed, type-matched parameters (to support requiring N streams as 
 arguments to another stream)
 4. Positional parameters
 The main goal here is to make streaming as accessible as possible and define 
 a syntax for running complex queries across large distributed systems.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-7377) SOLR Streaming Expressions

2015-05-02 Thread Joel Bernstein (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525333#comment-14525333
 ] 

Joel Bernstein edited comment on SOLR-7377 at 5/2/15 4:24 PM:
--

New patch with the following changes:

1) ParallelStream can use either Object serialization or streaming expression 
as a transport mechanism. When the ParalleStream is created using a 
StreamingExpression it defaults to streaming expression transport. When it's 
created through the Streaming API it defaults to Object serialization.

2) Added parallel tests for merge, unique, group, and top functions. Sample 
syntax:
{code}
parallel(collection1, 
merge(
search(collection1, q=id:(4 1 8 9), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
   search(collection1, q=id:(0 2 3 6), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
  on=a_i desc), 
workers=2, 
sort=a_i desc)

{code}

3) Added the ExpressionRunner class, still needs tests.


was (Author: joel.bernstein):
New patch with the following changes:

1) ParallelStream works can use either Object serialization or streaming 
expression as a transport mechanism. When the ParalleStream is created using a 
StreamingExpression it defaults to streaming expression transport. When it's 
created through the Streaming API it defaults to Object serialization.

2) Added parallel tests for merge, unique, group, and top functions. Sample 
syntax:
{code}
parallel(collection1, 
merge(
search(collection1, q=id:(4 1 8 9), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
   search(collection1, q=id:(0 2 3 6), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
  on=a_i desc), 
workers=2, 
sort=a_i desc)

{code}

3) Added the ExpressionRunner class, still needs tests.

 SOLR Streaming Expressions
 --

 Key: SOLR-7377
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: clients - java
Reporter: Dennis Gove
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: Trunk

 Attachments: SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, 
 SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch


 It would be beneficial to add an expression-based interface to Streaming API 
 described in SOLR-7082. Right now that API requires streaming requests to 
 come in from clients as serialized bytecode of the streaming classes. The 
 suggestion here is to support string expressions which describe the streaming 
 operations the client wishes to perform. 
 {code:java}
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,fieldA,fieldB, sort=fieldA asc)
 {code}
 With this syntax in mind, one can now express arbitrarily complex stream 
 queries with a single string.
 {code:java}
 // merge two distinct searches together on common fields
 merge(
   search(collection1, q=id:(0 3 4), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   search(collection2, q=id:(1 2), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   on=a_f asc, a_s asc)
 // find top 20 unique records of a search
 top(
   n=20,
   unique(
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f desc),
 over=a_f desc),
   sort=a_f desc)
 {code}
 The syntax would support
 1. Configurable expression names (eg. via solrconfig.xml one can map unique 
 to a class implementing a Unique stream class) This allows users to build 
 their own streams and use as they wish.
 2. Named parameters (of both simple and expression types)
 3. Unnamed, type-matched parameters (to support requiring N streams as 
 arguments to another stream)
 4. Positional parameters
 The main goal here is to make streaming as accessible as possible and define 
 a syntax for running complex queries across large distributed systems.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-7377) SOLR Streaming Expressions

2015-05-02 Thread Joel Bernstein (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-7377:
-
Attachment: SOLR-7377.patch

New patch with the following changes:

1) ParallelStream works can use either Object serialization or streaming 
expression as a transport mechanism. When the ParalleStream is created using a 
StreamingExpression it defaults to streaming expression transport. When it's 
created through the Streaming API it defaults to Object serialization.

2) Added parallel tests for merge, unique, group, and top functions. Sample 
syntax:
{code}
parallel(collection1, 
merge(
search(collection1, q=id:(4 1 8 9), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
   search(collection1, q=id:(0 2 3 6), 
fl=id,a_s,a_i, sort=a_i desc, partitionKeys=a_i), 
  on=a_i desc), 
workers=2, 
sort=a_i desc)

{code}

3) Added the ExpressionRunner class, still needs tests.

 SOLR Streaming Expressions
 --

 Key: SOLR-7377
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: clients - java
Reporter: Dennis Gove
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: Trunk

 Attachments: SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, 
 SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch


 It would be beneficial to add an expression-based interface to Streaming API 
 described in SOLR-7082. Right now that API requires streaming requests to 
 come in from clients as serialized bytecode of the streaming classes. The 
 suggestion here is to support string expressions which describe the streaming 
 operations the client wishes to perform. 
 {code:java}
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,fieldA,fieldB, sort=fieldA asc)
 {code}
 With this syntax in mind, one can now express arbitrarily complex stream 
 queries with a single string.
 {code:java}
 // merge two distinct searches together on common fields
 merge(
   search(collection1, q=id:(0 3 4), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   search(collection2, q=id:(1 2), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   on=a_f asc, a_s asc)
 // find top 20 unique records of a search
 top(
   n=20,
   unique(
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f desc),
 over=a_f desc),
   sort=a_f desc)
 {code}
 The syntax would support
 1. Configurable expression names (eg. via solrconfig.xml one can map unique 
 to a class implementing a Unique stream class) This allows users to build 
 their own streams and use as they wish.
 2. Named parameters (of both simple and expression types)
 3. Unnamed, type-matched parameters (to support requiring N streams as 
 arguments to another stream)
 4. Positional parameters
 The main goal here is to make streaming as accessible as possible and define 
 a syntax for running complex queries across large distributed systems.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7377) SOLR Streaming Expressions

2015-05-02 Thread Joel Bernstein (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525367#comment-14525367
 ] 

Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-7377:
--

Forgot to add the class. Just put up a new patch with the ExpressionRunner.

 SOLR Streaming Expressions
 --

 Key: SOLR-7377
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: clients - java
Reporter: Dennis Gove
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: Trunk

 Attachments: SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, 
 SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch


 It would be beneficial to add an expression-based interface to Streaming API 
 described in SOLR-7082. Right now that API requires streaming requests to 
 come in from clients as serialized bytecode of the streaming classes. The 
 suggestion here is to support string expressions which describe the streaming 
 operations the client wishes to perform. 
 {code:java}
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,fieldA,fieldB, sort=fieldA asc)
 {code}
 With this syntax in mind, one can now express arbitrarily complex stream 
 queries with a single string.
 {code:java}
 // merge two distinct searches together on common fields
 merge(
   search(collection1, q=id:(0 3 4), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   search(collection2, q=id:(1 2), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   on=a_f asc, a_s asc)
 // find top 20 unique records of a search
 top(
   n=20,
   unique(
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f desc),
 over=a_f desc),
   sort=a_f desc)
 {code}
 The syntax would support
 1. Configurable expression names (eg. via solrconfig.xml one can map unique 
 to a class implementing a Unique stream class) This allows users to build 
 their own streams and use as they wish.
 2. Named parameters (of both simple and expression types)
 3. Unnamed, type-matched parameters (to support requiring N streams as 
 arguments to another stream)
 4. Positional parameters
 The main goal here is to make streaming as accessible as possible and define 
 a syntax for running complex queries across large distributed systems.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7377) SOLR Streaming Expressions

2015-05-02 Thread Dennis Gove (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525364#comment-14525364
 ] 

Dennis Gove commented on SOLR-7377:
---

I don't see the ExpressionRunner in the patch - am I missing it somewhere? 
Also, I noticed ParallelStream lines 94-100 have some System.out.println lines. 
I suspect you intended to remove those.

Tests look good.

 SOLR Streaming Expressions
 --

 Key: SOLR-7377
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: clients - java
Reporter: Dennis Gove
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: Trunk

 Attachments: SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, 
 SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch


 It would be beneficial to add an expression-based interface to Streaming API 
 described in SOLR-7082. Right now that API requires streaming requests to 
 come in from clients as serialized bytecode of the streaming classes. The 
 suggestion here is to support string expressions which describe the streaming 
 operations the client wishes to perform. 
 {code:java}
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,fieldA,fieldB, sort=fieldA asc)
 {code}
 With this syntax in mind, one can now express arbitrarily complex stream 
 queries with a single string.
 {code:java}
 // merge two distinct searches together on common fields
 merge(
   search(collection1, q=id:(0 3 4), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   search(collection2, q=id:(1 2), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   on=a_f asc, a_s asc)
 // find top 20 unique records of a search
 top(
   n=20,
   unique(
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f desc),
 over=a_f desc),
   sort=a_f desc)
 {code}
 The syntax would support
 1. Configurable expression names (eg. via solrconfig.xml one can map unique 
 to a class implementing a Unique stream class) This allows users to build 
 their own streams and use as they wish.
 2. Named parameters (of both simple and expression types)
 3. Unnamed, type-matched parameters (to support requiring N streams as 
 arguments to another stream)
 4. Positional parameters
 The main goal here is to make streaming as accessible as possible and define 
 a syntax for running complex queries across large distributed systems.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.x - Build # 835 - Still Failing

2015-05-02 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.x/835/

2 tests failed.
REGRESSION:  org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest.test

Error Message:
Invalid content type: 

Stack Trace:
org.apache.http.ParseException: Invalid content type: 
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([D82449739AD0D42D:507076A9342CB9D5]:0)
at org.apache.http.entity.ContentType.parse(ContentType.java:273)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.executeMethod(HttpSolrClient.java:513)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:235)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:227)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:135)
at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrClient.query(SolrClient.java:943)
at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrClient.query(SolrClient.java:958)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.CloudInspectUtil.compareResults(CloudInspectUtil.java:224)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.CloudInspectUtil.compareResults(CloudInspectUtil.java:166)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest.testIndexingBatchPerRequestWithHttpSolrClient(FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest.java:676)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest.test(FullSolrCloudDistribCmdsTest.java:152)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1627)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:836)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:872)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:886)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:960)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:935)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:365)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:798)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:458)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:845)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:747)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:781)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:792)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:42)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-7377) SOLR Streaming Expressions

2015-05-02 Thread Joel Bernstein (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Joel Bernstein updated SOLR-7377:
-
Attachment: SOLR-7377.patch

 SOLR Streaming Expressions
 --

 Key: SOLR-7377
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7377
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: clients - java
Reporter: Dennis Gove
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: Trunk

 Attachments: SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, 
 SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch, SOLR-7377.patch


 It would be beneficial to add an expression-based interface to Streaming API 
 described in SOLR-7082. Right now that API requires streaming requests to 
 come in from clients as serialized bytecode of the streaming classes. The 
 suggestion here is to support string expressions which describe the streaming 
 operations the client wishes to perform. 
 {code:java}
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,fieldA,fieldB, sort=fieldA asc)
 {code}
 With this syntax in mind, one can now express arbitrarily complex stream 
 queries with a single string.
 {code:java}
 // merge two distinct searches together on common fields
 merge(
   search(collection1, q=id:(0 3 4), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   search(collection2, q=id:(1 2), fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f asc, a_s 
 asc),
   on=a_f asc, a_s asc)
 // find top 20 unique records of a search
 top(
   n=20,
   unique(
 search(collection1, q=*:*, fl=id,a_s,a_i,a_f, sort=a_f desc),
 over=a_f desc),
   sort=a_f desc)
 {code}
 The syntax would support
 1. Configurable expression names (eg. via solrconfig.xml one can map unique 
 to a class implementing a Unique stream class) This allows users to build 
 their own streams and use as they wish.
 2. Named parameters (of both simple and expression types)
 3. Unnamed, type-matched parameters (to support requiring N streams as 
 arguments to another stream)
 4. Positional parameters
 The main goal here is to make streaming as accessible as possible and define 
 a syntax for running complex queries across large distributed systems.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



suggest.Suggester - Loading stored lookup data failed

2015-05-02 Thread Jilani Shaik
Hi,

When my solr core is loading, I am getting the below error, even though it
is WARN. I just wants to fix this. Please let me know how to fix it.It is
showing file missing, do we have any sample file for this. I did not find
even in Apache Solr SVN.

2015-05-01 11:33:52,475 WARN suggest.Suggester - Loading stored lookup data
failed
java.io.FileNotFoundException:
/solr/Applications/shards/shard1/data/solr/cores/syslog/data/autocomplete/tst.dat
(No such file or directory)
at java.io.FileInputStream.open0(Native Method)
at java.io.FileInputStream.open(FileInputStream.java:195)
at java.io.FileInputStream.init(FileInputStream.java:138)
at
org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.Suggester.init(Suggester.java:117)
at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponent.inform(SpellCheckComponent.java:636)
at
org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.inform(SolrResourceLoader.java:651)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.init(SolrCore.java:849)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.init(SolrCore.java:641)
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.create(CoreContainer.java:583)
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$1.call(CoreContainer.java:264)
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$1.call(CoreContainer.java:256)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)


Please suggest me what to do to remove this warning from my logs.


Thanks,
Jilani


Re: Where Search Meets Machine Learning

2015-05-02 Thread J. Delgado
Doug,

Thanks for your insights. We actually started with trying to build off of
features and boosting weights combined with built-in relevance scoring
http://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/guide/current/scoring-theory.html.
We also played around with replacing and/or combining the default score
with other computations using function_score
http://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/guide/current/function-score-query.html
query, with
but as you mentioned in your article, the crux of the problem is *how to
figure out the weights that control each features influence*:

*Once important features are placed in the search engine the final problem
becomes balancing and regulating their influence. Should text-based factors
matter more than sales based factors? Should exact text matches matter more
than synonym-based matches? What about metadata we glean from machine
learning – how much weight should this play*?

Furthermore, this only covers cases where the scoring can be represented as
a function of such weights! We felt that this approach was short sighted as
some of the problems we are dealing with (e.g. product recommendations,
response prediction, real-time bidding for advertising, etc) have a very
large feature space, sometimes requiring *dimensionality reduction* (e.g.
Matrix Factorization techniques) or learning from past actions/feedback
(e.g. clickthrough data, bidding win rates, remaining budget, etc.). All
this seemed well suited for for Machine (supervised) Learning tasks such as
prediction based on past training data (classification or regression).
These algorithms usually have an offline model building phase and an online
evaluator phase that uses the created model to perform the
prediction/scoring during query evaluation.  Additionally, some of the best
algorithms in machine learning (Random Forest, Support Vector Machines,
Deep Learning/Neural Networks, etc.) are not linear combinations of
feature-weights requiring additional data structure (e.g. trees, support
vectors) to support the computation.

Since there is no one-size-fits all predictive algorithm we architected the
solution so any algorithm that implements our interface can be used. We
tried this out with algorithms available in Weka
http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/ and Spark MLib
https://spark.apache.org/docs/1.2.1/mllib-guide.html (only linear models
for now) and it worked! In any case, nothing prevents us from leverage the
text based analysis of features and the default scoring available within
the plugin, which can be combined with the results of the prediction.

To demonstrate its general utility we tested this with datasets available
at the the UCI Machine Learning Repository http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/ but
I have been using this approach for real-life response prediction/bidding
problems in advertising and its very powerful. Of course, this is not the
panacea, as there are still some issues with the approach, specially on the
operational side.  Let's keep the conversation going as I think we are on
to something useful.

-- Joaquin


On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Doug Turnbull 
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com wrote:

 Hi Joaquin

 Very neat, thanks for sharing,

 Viewing search relevance as something akin to a classification problem is
 actually a driving narrative in Taming Search
 http://manning.com/turnbull. We generalize the relevance problem as one
 of measuring the similarity between features of content (locations of
 restaurants, price of a product, the words in the body of articles,
 expanded synonyms in articles, etc) and features of a query (the search
 terms, user usage history, any location, etc). What makes search
 interesting is that unlike other classification systems, search has built
 in similarity systems (largely TF*IDF).

 So we actually cut the other direction from your talk. It appears that you
 amend the search engine to change the underlying scoring to be based on
 machine learning constructs. In our book, we work the opposite way. We
 largely enable feature similarity classifications between document and
 query by massaging features into terms and use the built in TF*IDF or other
 relevant similarity approach.

 We feel this plays to the advantages of a search engine. Search engines
 already have some basic text analysis built in. They've also been heavily
 optimized for most forms of text-based similarity. If you can massage text
 such that your TF*IDF similarity reflects a rough proportion of text-based
 features important to your users, this tends to reflect their intuitive
 notions of relevance. A lot of this work involves feature section, or what
 we term in the book feature modeling. What features should you introduce to
 your documents that can be used to generate good signals at ranking time.

 You can read more about our thoughts here
 http://java.dzone.com/articles/solr-and-elasticsearch.

 That all being said, what makes your stuff interesting is when you have
 enough 

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7275) Pluggable authorization module in Solr

2015-05-02 Thread Don Bosco Durai (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525503#comment-14525503
 ] 

Don Bosco Durai commented on SOLR-7275:
---

[~anshumg] thanks. When you are doing the change, can you give set method to 
the member attribute or make it public? With the current code, I need to extend 
the class to return the value.

public class SolrAuthorizationResponse {
  boolean authorized;
  
  public boolean isAuthorized() {
return authorized;
  }
}




 Pluggable authorization module in Solr
 --

 Key: SOLR-7275
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7275
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Anshum Gupta
Assignee: Anshum Gupta
 Attachments: SOLR-7275.patch, SOLR-7275.patch, SOLR-7275.patch


 Solr needs an interface that makes it easy for different authorization 
 systems to be plugged into it. Here's what I plan on doing:
 Define an interface {{SolrAuthorizationPlugin}} with one single method 
 {{isAuthorized}}. This would take in a {{SolrRequestContext}} object and 
 return an {{SolrAuthorizationResponse}} object. The object as of now would 
 only contain a single boolean value but in the future could contain more 
 information e.g. ACL for document filtering etc.
 The reason why we need a context object is so that the plugin doesn't need to 
 understand Solr's capabilities e.g. how to extract the name of the collection 
 or other information from the incoming request as there are multiple ways to 
 specify the target collection for a request. Similarly request type can be 
 specified by {{qt}} or {{/handler_name}}.
 Flow:
 Request - SolrDispatchFilter - isAuthorized(context) - Process/Return.
 {code}
 public interface SolrAuthorizationPlugin {
   public SolrAuthorizationResponse isAuthorized(SolrRequestContext context);
 }
 {code}
 {code}
 public  class SolrRequestContext {
   UserInfo; // Will contain user context from the authentication layer.
   HTTPRequest request;
   Enum OperationType; // Correlated with user roles.
   String[] CollectionsAccessed;
   String[] FieldsAccessed;
   String Resource;
 }
 {code}
 {code}
 public class SolrAuthorizationResponse {
   boolean authorized;
   public boolean isAuthorized();
 }
 {code}
 User Roles: 
 * Admin
 * Collection Level:
   * Query
   * Update
   * Admin
 Using this framework, an implementation could be written for specific 
 security systems e.g. Apache Ranger or Sentry. It would keep all the security 
 system specific code out of Solr.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7275) Pluggable authorization module in Solr

2015-05-02 Thread Don Bosco Durai (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525504#comment-14525504
 ] 

Don Bosco Durai commented on SOLR-7275:
---

[~anshumg] thanks. When you are doing the change, can you give set method to 
the member attribute or make it public? With the current code, I need to extend 
the class to return the value.

public class SolrAuthorizationResponse {
  boolean authorized;
  
  public boolean isAuthorized() {
return authorized;
  }
}




 Pluggable authorization module in Solr
 --

 Key: SOLR-7275
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7275
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Anshum Gupta
Assignee: Anshum Gupta
 Attachments: SOLR-7275.patch, SOLR-7275.patch, SOLR-7275.patch


 Solr needs an interface that makes it easy for different authorization 
 systems to be plugged into it. Here's what I plan on doing:
 Define an interface {{SolrAuthorizationPlugin}} with one single method 
 {{isAuthorized}}. This would take in a {{SolrRequestContext}} object and 
 return an {{SolrAuthorizationResponse}} object. The object as of now would 
 only contain a single boolean value but in the future could contain more 
 information e.g. ACL for document filtering etc.
 The reason why we need a context object is so that the plugin doesn't need to 
 understand Solr's capabilities e.g. how to extract the name of the collection 
 or other information from the incoming request as there are multiple ways to 
 specify the target collection for a request. Similarly request type can be 
 specified by {{qt}} or {{/handler_name}}.
 Flow:
 Request - SolrDispatchFilter - isAuthorized(context) - Process/Return.
 {code}
 public interface SolrAuthorizationPlugin {
   public SolrAuthorizationResponse isAuthorized(SolrRequestContext context);
 }
 {code}
 {code}
 public  class SolrRequestContext {
   UserInfo; // Will contain user context from the authentication layer.
   HTTPRequest request;
   Enum OperationType; // Correlated with user roles.
   String[] CollectionsAccessed;
   String[] FieldsAccessed;
   String Resource;
 }
 {code}
 {code}
 public class SolrAuthorizationResponse {
   boolean authorized;
   public boolean isAuthorized();
 }
 {code}
 User Roles: 
 * Admin
 * Collection Level:
   * Query
   * Update
   * Admin
 Using this framework, an implementation could be written for specific 
 security systems e.g. Apache Ranger or Sentry. It would keep all the security 
 system specific code out of Solr.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.x-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.7.0) - Build # 2208 - Failure!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-MacOSX/2208/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.ShardSplitTest.test

Error Message:
Timeout occured while waiting response from server at: 
http://127.0.0.1:57649/nfuz/r

Stack Trace:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: Timeout occured while waiting 
response from server at: http://127.0.0.1:57649/nfuz/r
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([BE31E1DFC1571C6:83B721C752E91C3E]:0)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.executeMethod(HttpSolrClient.java:570)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:235)
at 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:227)
at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrClient.request(SolrClient.java:1220)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.ShardSplitTest.splitShard(ShardSplitTest.java:497)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.ShardSplitTest.incompleteOrOverlappingCustomRangeTest(ShardSplitTest.java:131)
at org.apache.solr.cloud.ShardSplitTest.test(ShardSplitTest.java:83)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1627)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:836)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:872)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:886)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:960)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:935)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:365)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:798)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:458)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:845)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:747)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:781)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:792)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:42)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:54)
at 

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_45) - Build # 4759 - Still Failing!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/4759/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_45 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 45267 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
 [echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
   [delete] Deleting directory 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\build\jtidy_tmp
 [echo] Checking for broken links...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Crawl/parse...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Verify...
 [echo] Checking for missing docs...
 [exec] Traceback (most recent call last):
 [exec]   File 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 384, in module
 [exec] if checkPackageSummaries(sys.argv[1], level):
 [exec]   File 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 364, in checkPackageSummaries
 [exec] if checkClassSummaries(fullPath):
 [exec]   File 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 225, in checkClassSummaries
 [exec] raise RuntimeError('failed to locate javadoc item in %s, line 
%d? last line: %s' % (fullPath, lineCount, line.rstrip()))
 [exec] RuntimeError: failed to locate javadoc item in 
build/docs/classification\org\apache\lucene\classification/BooleanPerceptronClassifier.html,
 line 153? last line: /tr

BUILD FAILED
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\build.xml:526: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\build.xml:90: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\build.xml:135: 
The following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\build.xml:165: 
The following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\common-build.xml:2476:
 exec returned: 1

Total time: 65 minutes 27 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (32bit/jdk1.8.0_45) - Build # 4758 - Still Failing!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/4758/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_45 -client -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

2 tests failed.
FAILED:  
org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIAsyncDistributedZkTest.testSolrJAPICalls

Error Message:
Shard split did not complete. Last recorded state: running 
expected:[completed] but was:[running]

Stack Trace:
org.junit.ComparisonFailure: Shard split did not complete. Last recorded state: 
running expected:[completed] but was:[running]
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([DB5F01738C615733:833B8D128A0BFFE7]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:125)
at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIAsyncDistributedZkTest.testSolrJAPICalls(CollectionsAPIAsyncDistributedZkTest.java:101)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1627)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:836)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:872)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:886)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:960)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:935)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:365)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:798)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:458)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:845)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:747)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:781)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:792)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:42)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:54)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:55)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_45) - Build # 4757 - Still Failing!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/4757/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_45 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 45300 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
 [echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
   [delete] Deleting directory 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\build\jtidy_tmp
 [echo] Checking for broken links...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Crawl/parse...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Verify...
 [echo] Checking for missing docs...
 [exec] Traceback (most recent call last):
 [exec]   File 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 384, in module
 [exec] if checkPackageSummaries(sys.argv[1], level):
 [exec]   File 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 364, in checkPackageSummaries
 [exec] if checkClassSummaries(fullPath):
 [exec]   File 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 225, in checkClassSummaries
 [exec] raise RuntimeError('failed to locate javadoc item in %s, line 
%d? last line: %s' % (fullPath, lineCount, line.rstrip()))
 [exec] RuntimeError: failed to locate javadoc item in 
build/docs/classification\org\apache\lucene\classification/BooleanPerceptronClassifier.html,
 line 153? last line: /tr

BUILD FAILED
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\build.xml:526: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\build.xml:90: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\build.xml:135: 
The following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\build.xml:165: 
The following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\common-build.xml:2476:
 exec returned: 1

Total time: 66 minutes 1 second
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 2253 - Still Failing!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/2253/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 45345 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
 [echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
   [delete] Deleting directory 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build/jtidy_tmp
 [echo] Checking for broken links...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Crawl/parse...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Verify...
 [echo] Checking for missing docs...
 [exec] Traceback (most recent call last):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 384, in module
 [exec] if checkPackageSummaries(sys.argv[1], level):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 364, in checkPackageSummaries
 [exec] if checkClassSummaries(fullPath):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 225, in checkClassSummaries
 [exec] raise RuntimeError('failed to locate javadoc item in %s, line 
%d? last line: %s' % (fullPath, lineCount, line.rstrip()))
 [exec] RuntimeError: failed to locate javadoc item in 
build/docs/classification/org/apache/lucene/classification/BooleanPerceptronClassifier.html,
 line 153? last line: /tr

BUILD FAILED
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:526: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:90: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:135: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:165: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/common-build.xml:2476: 
exec returned: 1

Total time: 78 minutes 21 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 2252 - Still Failing!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/2252/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 45339 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
 [echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
   [delete] Deleting directory 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build/jtidy_tmp
 [echo] Checking for broken links...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Crawl/parse...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Verify...
 [echo] Checking for missing docs...
 [exec] Traceback (most recent call last):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 384, in module
 [exec] if checkPackageSummaries(sys.argv[1], level):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 364, in checkPackageSummaries
 [exec] if checkClassSummaries(fullPath):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 225, in checkClassSummaries
 [exec] raise RuntimeError('failed to locate javadoc item in %s, line 
%d? last line: %s' % (fullPath, lineCount, line.rstrip()))
 [exec] RuntimeError: failed to locate javadoc item in 
build/docs/classification/org/apache/lucene/classification/BooleanPerceptronClassifier.html,
 line 153? last line: /tr

BUILD FAILED
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:526: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:90: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:135: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:165: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/common-build.xml:2476: 
exec returned: 1

Total time: 76 minutes 22 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 2251 - Still Failing!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/2251/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 45361 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
 [echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
   [delete] Deleting directory 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build/jtidy_tmp
 [echo] Checking for broken links...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Crawl/parse...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Verify...
 [echo] Checking for missing docs...
 [exec] Traceback (most recent call last):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 384, in module
 [exec] if checkPackageSummaries(sys.argv[1], level):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 364, in checkPackageSummaries
 [exec] if checkClassSummaries(fullPath):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 225, in checkClassSummaries
 [exec] raise RuntimeError('failed to locate javadoc item in %s, line 
%d? last line: %s' % (fullPath, lineCount, line.rstrip()))
 [exec] RuntimeError: failed to locate javadoc item in 
build/docs/classification/org/apache/lucene/classification/BooleanPerceptronClassifier.html,
 line 153? last line: /tr

BUILD FAILED
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:526: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:90: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:135: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:165: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/common-build.xml:2476: 
exec returned: 1

Total time: 76 minutes 37 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (32bit/jdk1.8.0_45) - Build # 4756 - Failure!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/4756/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_45 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.core.TestArbitraryIndexDir.testLoadNewIndexDir

Error Message:
Exception during query

Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception during query
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([BF4D40872F4436BD:5617FBBFB1DDA615]:0)
at org.apache.solr.SolrTestCaseJ4.assertQ(SolrTestCaseJ4.java:794)
at 
org.apache.solr.core.TestArbitraryIndexDir.testLoadNewIndexDir(TestArbitraryIndexDir.java:128)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1627)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:836)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:872)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:886)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:365)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:798)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:458)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:845)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:747)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:781)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:792)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:42)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:54)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:55)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:365)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: REQUEST FAILED: xpath=*[count(//doc)=1]
xml response was: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
response
lst name=responseHeaderint name=status0/intint 
name=QTime1/int/lstresult name=response numFound=0 
start=0/result
/response

request was:q=id:2qt=standardstart=0rows=20version=2.2

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_45) - Build # 4754 - Still Failing!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/4754/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_45 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 45304 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
 [echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
   [delete] Deleting directory 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\build\jtidy_tmp
 [echo] Checking for broken links...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Crawl/parse...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Verify...
 [echo] Checking for missing docs...
 [exec] Traceback (most recent call last):
 [exec]   File 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 384, in module
 [exec] if checkPackageSummaries(sys.argv[1], level):
 [exec]   File 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 364, in checkPackageSummaries
 [exec] if checkClassSummaries(fullPath):
 [exec]   File 
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 225, in checkClassSummaries
 [exec] raise RuntimeError('failed to locate javadoc item in %s, line 
%d? last line: %s' % (fullPath, lineCount, line.rstrip()))
 [exec] RuntimeError: failed to locate javadoc item in 
build/docs/classification\org\apache\lucene\classification/BooleanPerceptronClassifier.html,
 line 153? last line: /tr

BUILD FAILED
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\build.xml:526: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\build.xml:90: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\build.xml:135: 
The following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\build.xml:165: 
The following error occurred while executing this line:
C:\Users\JenkinsSlave\workspace\Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows\lucene\common-build.xml:2476:
 exec returned: 1

Total time: 71 minutes 35 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 2249 - Still Failing!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/2249/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 45358 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
 [echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
   [delete] Deleting directory 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build/jtidy_tmp
 [echo] Checking for broken links...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Crawl/parse...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Verify...
 [echo] Checking for missing docs...
 [exec] Traceback (most recent call last):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 384, in module
 [exec] if checkPackageSummaries(sys.argv[1], level):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 364, in checkPackageSummaries
 [exec] if checkClassSummaries(fullPath):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 225, in checkClassSummaries
 [exec] raise RuntimeError('failed to locate javadoc item in %s, line 
%d? last line: %s' % (fullPath, lineCount, line.rstrip()))
 [exec] RuntimeError: failed to locate javadoc item in 
build/docs/classification/org/apache/lucene/classification/BooleanPerceptronClassifier.html,
 line 153? last line: /tr

BUILD FAILED
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:526: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:90: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:135: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:165: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/common-build.xml:2476: 
exec returned: 1

Total time: 87 minutes 26 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 2248 - Still Failing!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/2248/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 45231 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
 [echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
   [delete] Deleting directory 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build/jtidy_tmp
 [echo] Checking for broken links...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Crawl/parse...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Verify...
 [echo] Checking for missing docs...
 [exec] Traceback (most recent call last):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 384, in module
 [exec] if checkPackageSummaries(sys.argv[1], level):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 364, in checkPackageSummaries
 [exec] if checkClassSummaries(fullPath):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 225, in checkClassSummaries
 [exec] raise RuntimeError('failed to locate javadoc item in %s, line 
%d? last line: %s' % (fullPath, lineCount, line.rstrip()))
 [exec] RuntimeError: failed to locate javadoc item in 
build/docs/classification/org/apache/lucene/classification/BooleanPerceptronClassifier.html,
 line 153? last line: /tr

BUILD FAILED
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:526: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:90: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:135: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:165: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/common-build.xml:2476: 
exec returned: 1

Total time: 88 minutes 57 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 2250 - Still Failing!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/2250/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 45349 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
 [echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
   [delete] Deleting directory 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build/jtidy_tmp
 [echo] Checking for broken links...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Crawl/parse...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Verify...
 [echo] Checking for missing docs...
 [exec] Traceback (most recent call last):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 384, in module
 [exec] if checkPackageSummaries(sys.argv[1], level):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 364, in checkPackageSummaries
 [exec] if checkClassSummaries(fullPath):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 225, in checkClassSummaries
 [exec] raise RuntimeError('failed to locate javadoc item in %s, line 
%d? last line: %s' % (fullPath, lineCount, line.rstrip()))
 [exec] RuntimeError: failed to locate javadoc item in 
build/docs/classification/org/apache/lucene/classification/BooleanPerceptronClassifier.html,
 line 153? last line: /tr

BUILD FAILED
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:526: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:90: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:135: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:165: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/common-build.xml:2476: 
exec returned: 1

Total time: 77 minutes 44 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_45) - Build # 12535 - Failure!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/12535/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_45 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 45414 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
 [echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
   [delete] Deleting directory 
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/lucene/build/jtidy_tmp
 [echo] Checking for broken links...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Crawl/parse...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Verify...
 [echo] Checking for missing docs...
 [exec] Traceback (most recent call last):
 [exec]   File 
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 384, in module
 [exec] if checkPackageSummaries(sys.argv[1], level):
 [exec]   File 
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 364, in checkPackageSummaries
 [exec] if checkClassSummaries(fullPath):
 [exec]   File 
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 225, in checkClassSummaries
 [exec] raise RuntimeError('failed to locate javadoc item in %s, line 
%d? last line: %s' % (fullPath, lineCount, line.rstrip()))
 [exec] RuntimeError: failed to locate javadoc item in 
build/docs/classification/org/apache/lucene/classification/KNearestNeighborClassifier.html,
 line 150? last line: /tr

BUILD FAILED
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/build.xml:526: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/build.xml:90: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/lucene/build.xml:135: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/lucene/build.xml:165: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/lucene/common-build.xml:2476: 
exec returned: 1

Total time: 47 minutes 42 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.7.0_80) - Build # 12367 - Failure!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux/12367/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_80 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC

1 tests failed.
FAILED:  org.apache.solr.cloud.MultiThreadedOCPTest.test

Error Message:
Captured an uncaught exception in thread: Thread[id=4968, 
name=parallelCoreAdminExecutor-2110-thread-8, state=RUNNABLE, 
group=TGRP-MultiThreadedOCPTest]

Stack Trace:
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.UncaughtExceptionError: Captured an uncaught 
exception in thread: Thread[id=4968, 
name=parallelCoreAdminExecutor-2110-thread-8, state=RUNNABLE, 
group=TGRP-MultiThreadedOCPTest]
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([17834948F26607B8:9FD776925C9A6A40]:0)
Caused by: java.lang.AssertionError: Too many closes on SolrCore
at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([17834948F26607B8]:0)
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.close(SolrCore.java:1138)
at org.apache.solr.common.util.IOUtils.closeQuietly(IOUtils.java:31)
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.create(CoreContainer.java:535)
at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.create(CoreContainer.java:494)
at 
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.CoreAdminHandler.handleCreateAction(CoreAdminHandler.java:598)
at 
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.CoreAdminHandler.handleRequestInternal(CoreAdminHandler.java:212)
at 
org.apache.solr.handler.admin.CoreAdminHandler$ParallelCoreAdminHandlerThread.run(CoreAdminHandler.java:1219)
at 
org.apache.solr.common.util.ExecutorUtil$MDCAwareThreadPoolExecutor$1.run(ExecutorUtil.java:148)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)




Build Log:
[...truncated 10200 lines...]
   [junit4] Suite: org.apache.solr.cloud.MultiThreadedOCPTest
   [junit4]   2 Creating dataDir: 
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux/solr/build/solr-core/test/J1/temp/solr.cloud.MultiThreadedOCPTest
 17834948F26607B8-001/init-core-data-001
   [junit4]   2 516941 T4643 oas.SolrTestCaseJ4.buildSSLConfig Randomized ssl 
(false) and clientAuth (false)
   [junit4]   2 516941 T4643 oas.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.initHostContext 
Setting hostContext system property: /
   [junit4]   2 516943 T4643 oasc.ZkTestServer.run STARTING ZK TEST SERVER
   [junit4]   2 516944 T4644 oasc.ZkTestServer$2$1.setClientPort client 
port:0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:0
   [junit4]   2 516944 T4644 oasc.ZkTestServer$ZKServerMain.runFromConfig 
Starting server
   [junit4]   2 517044 T4643 oasc.ZkTestServer.run start zk server on 
port:37704
   [junit4]   2 517044 T4643 
oascc.SolrZkClient.createZkCredentialsToAddAutomatically Using default 
ZkCredentialsProvider
   [junit4]   2 517045 T4643 oascc.ConnectionManager.waitForConnected Waiting 
for client to connect to ZooKeeper
   [junit4]   2 517046 T4651 oascc.ConnectionManager.process Watcher 
org.apache.solr.common.cloud.ConnectionManager@1c1e01a name:ZooKeeperConnection 
Watcher:127.0.0.1:37704 got event WatchedEvent state:SyncConnected type:None 
path:null path:null type:None
   [junit4]   2 517046 T4643 oascc.ConnectionManager.waitForConnected Client 
is connected to ZooKeeper
   [junit4]   2 517047 T4643 oascc.SolrZkClient.createZkACLProvider Using 
default ZkACLProvider
   [junit4]   2 517047 T4643 oascc.SolrZkClient.makePath makePath: /solr
   [junit4]   2 517048 T4643 
oascc.SolrZkClient.createZkCredentialsToAddAutomatically Using default 
ZkCredentialsProvider
   [junit4]   2 517049 T4643 oascc.ConnectionManager.waitForConnected Waiting 
for client to connect to ZooKeeper
   [junit4]   2 517050 T4654 oascc.ConnectionManager.process Watcher 
org.apache.solr.common.cloud.ConnectionManager@1856b76 name:ZooKeeperConnection 
Watcher:127.0.0.1:37704/solr got event WatchedEvent state:SyncConnected 
type:None path:null path:null type:None
   [junit4]   2 517050 T4643 oascc.ConnectionManager.waitForConnected Client 
is connected to ZooKeeper
   [junit4]   2 517050 T4643 oascc.SolrZkClient.createZkACLProvider Using 
default ZkACLProvider
   [junit4]   2 517050 T4643 oascc.SolrZkClient.makePath makePath: 
/collections/collection1
   [junit4]   2 517051 T4643 oascc.SolrZkClient.makePath makePath: 
/collections/collection1/shards
   [junit4]   2 517052 T4643 oascc.SolrZkClient.makePath makePath: 
/collections/control_collection
   [junit4]   2 517052 T4643 oascc.SolrZkClient.makePath makePath: 
/collections/control_collection/shards
   [junit4]   2 517053 T4643 oasc.AbstractZkTestCase.putConfig put 
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux/solr/core/src/test-files/solr/collection1/conf/solrconfig-tlog.xml
 to /configs/conf1/solrconfig.xml
   [junit4]   2 517053 T4643 oascc.SolrZkClient.makePath makePath: 
/configs/conf1/solrconfig.xml
   [junit4]   2 517055 T4643 oasc.AbstractZkTestCase.putConfig put 

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7409) Sort dataimport by name in gui

2015-05-02 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525649#comment-14525649
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-7409:
---

Commit 1677365 from [~elyograg] in branch 'dev/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1677365 ]

SOLR-7409: Sort datimport handlers in the admin UI

 Sort dataimport by name in gui
 --

 Key: SOLR-7409
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7409
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: web gui
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Jellyfrog
Priority: Trivial
 Fix For: Trunk, 5.2

 Attachments: SOLR-7409-1.patch, SOLR-7409-2.patch, SOLR-7409.patch, 
 SOLR-7409.patch, SOLR-7409.patch, SOLR-7409.patch


 As discussed with steffkes on IRC 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-7409) Sort dataimport by name in gui

2015-05-02 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525659#comment-14525659
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-7409:
---

Commit 1677366 from [~elyograg] in branch 'dev/branches/branch_5x'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1677366 ]

SOLR-7409: Sort datimport handlers in the admin UI (backport trunk r1677365)

 Sort dataimport by name in gui
 --

 Key: SOLR-7409
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7409
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: web gui
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Jellyfrog
Priority: Trivial
 Fix For: Trunk, 5.2

 Attachments: SOLR-7409-1.patch, SOLR-7409-2.patch, SOLR-7409.patch, 
 SOLR-7409.patch, SOLR-7409.patch, SOLR-7409.patch


 As discussed with steffkes on IRC 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-7409) Sort dataimport by name in gui

2015-05-02 Thread Shawn Heisey (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shawn Heisey resolved SOLR-7409.

Resolution: Fixed

 Sort dataimport by name in gui
 --

 Key: SOLR-7409
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7409
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: web gui
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Jellyfrog
Priority: Trivial
 Fix For: Trunk, 5.2

 Attachments: SOLR-7409-1.patch, SOLR-7409-2.patch, SOLR-7409.patch, 
 SOLR-7409.patch, SOLR-7409.patch, SOLR-7409.patch


 As discussed with steffkes on IRC 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7 - Build # 3053 - Failure

2015-05-02 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7/3053/

1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:  org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest.test

Error Message:
shard1 is not consistent.  Got 779 from 
https://127.0.0.1:16481/_cr/xc/collection1lastClient and got 232 from 
https://127.0.0.1:16493/_cr/xc/collection1

Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: shard1 is not consistent.  Got 779 from 
https://127.0.0.1:16481/_cr/xc/collection1lastClient and got 232 from 
https://127.0.0.1:16493/_cr/xc/collection1
at 
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([F8AEBABCA735A137:70FA856609C9CCCF]:0)
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:93)
at org.apache.solr.cloud.RecoveryZkTest.test(RecoveryZkTest.java:123)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.invoke(RandomizedRunner.java:1627)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$6.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:836)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$7.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:872)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$8.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:886)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsFixedStatement.callStatement(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:960)
at 
org.apache.solr.BaseDistributedSearchTestCase$ShardsRepeatRule$ShardsStatement.evaluate(BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java:935)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleSetupTeardownChained$1.evaluate(TestRuleSetupTeardownChained.java:50)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleThreadAndTestName$1.evaluate(TestRuleThreadAndTestName.java:49)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$StatementRunner.run(ThreadLeakControl.java:365)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl.forkTimeoutingTask(ThreadLeakControl.java:798)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.ThreadLeakControl$3.evaluate(ThreadLeakControl.java:458)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner.runSingleTest(RandomizedRunner.java:845)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$3.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:747)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$4.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:781)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.RandomizedRunner$5.evaluate(RandomizedRunner.java:792)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.SystemPropertiesRestoreRule$1.evaluate(SystemPropertiesRestoreRule.java:57)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.AbstractBeforeAfterRule$1.evaluate(AbstractBeforeAfterRule.java:46)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleStoreClassName$1.evaluate(TestRuleStoreClassName.java:42)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule$1.evaluate(NoShadowingOrOverridesOnMethodsRule.java:39)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleAssertionsRequired$1.evaluate(TestRuleAssertionsRequired.java:54)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleMarkFailure$1.evaluate(TestRuleMarkFailure.java:48)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreAfterMaxFailures.java:65)
at 
org.apache.lucene.util.TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites$1.evaluate(TestRuleIgnoreTestSuites.java:55)
at 
com.carrotsearch.randomizedtesting.rules.StatementAdapter.evaluate(StatementAdapter.java:36)
at 

Re: suggest.Suggester - Loading stored lookup data failed

2015-05-02 Thread Erick Erickson
Looks like you have a suggester configured with an external file
called: tst.dat. Check your solrconfig.xml and see if that file is
ever mentioned. Either remove the configuration or put the file in the
indicated directory.

Best,
Erick


On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Jilani Shaik jilani24...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 When my solr core is loading, I am getting the below error, even though it
 is WARN. I just wants to fix this. Please let me know how to fix it.It is
 showing file missing, do we have any sample file for this. I did not find
 even in Apache Solr SVN.

 2015-05-01 11:33:52,475 WARN suggest.Suggester - Loading stored lookup data
 failed
 java.io.FileNotFoundException:
 /solr/Applications/shards/shard1/data/solr/cores/syslog/data/autocomplete/tst.dat
 (No such file or directory)
 at java.io.FileInputStream.open0(Native Method)
 at java.io.FileInputStream.open(FileInputStream.java:195)
 at java.io.FileInputStream.init(FileInputStream.java:138)
 at
 org.apache.solr.spelling.suggest.Suggester.init(Suggester.java:117)
 at
 org.apache.solr.handler.component.SpellCheckComponent.inform(SpellCheckComponent.java:636)
 at
 org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.inform(SolrResourceLoader.java:651)
 at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.init(SolrCore.java:849)
 at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.init(SolrCore.java:641)
 at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer.create(CoreContainer.java:583)
 at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$1.call(CoreContainer.java:264)
 at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$1.call(CoreContainer.java:256)
 at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
 at
 java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
 at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
 at
 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
 at
 java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
 at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)


 Please suggest me what to do to remove this warning from my logs.


 Thanks,
 Jilani

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_45) - Build # 12538 - Failure!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/12538/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_45 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 45391 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
 [echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
   [delete] Deleting directory 
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/lucene/build/jtidy_tmp
 [echo] Checking for broken links...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Crawl/parse...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Verify...
 [echo] Checking for missing docs...
 [exec] Traceback (most recent call last):
 [exec]   File 
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 384, in module
 [exec] if checkPackageSummaries(sys.argv[1], level):
 [exec]   File 
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 364, in checkPackageSummaries
 [exec] if checkClassSummaries(fullPath):
 [exec]   File 
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 225, in checkClassSummaries
 [exec] raise RuntimeError('failed to locate javadoc item in %s, line 
%d? last line: %s' % (fullPath, lineCount, line.rstrip()))
 [exec] RuntimeError: failed to locate javadoc item in 
build/docs/classification/org/apache/lucene/classification/KNearestNeighborClassifier.html,
 line 150? last line: /tr

BUILD FAILED
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/build.xml:526: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/build.xml:90: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/lucene/build.xml:135: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/lucene/build.xml:165: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/home/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/lucene/common-build.xml:2476: 
exec returned: 1

Total time: 47 minutes 53 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6045) Refator classifier APIs to work better with multi threading

2015-05-02 Thread Shawn Heisey (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14525605#comment-14525605
 ] 

Shawn Heisey commented on LUCENE-6045:
--

BooleanPerceptronClassifier is missing javadocs after r1676997, which breaks 
precommit.  This was mentioned twice on the dev list, once on 2015/04/30 and 
again on 2015/05/01.

 Refator classifier APIs to work better with multi threading
 ---

 Key: LUCENE-6045
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6045
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: modules/classification
Reporter: Tommaso Teofili
Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
 Fix For: Trunk


 In 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4345?focusedCommentId=13454729page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13454729
  [~simonw] pointed out that the current Classifier API doesn't work well in 
 multi threading environments: 
 bq. The interface you defined has some problems with respect to 
 Multi-Threading IMO. The interface itself suggests that this class is 
 stateful and you have to call methods in a certain order and at the same you 
 need to make sure that it is not published for read access before training is 
 done. I think it would be wise to pass in all needed objects as constructor 
 arguments and make the references final so it can be shared across threads 
 and add an interface that represents the trained model computed offline? In 
 this case it doesn't really matter but in the future it might make sense. We 
 can also skip the model interface entirely and remove the training method 
 until we have some impls that really need to be trained.
 I missed that at that point but I think for 6.0 (?) it would be wise to 
 rearrange the API to address that properly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 2254 - Still Failing!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/2254/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC

All tests passed

Build Log:
[...truncated 45331 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
 [echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
   [delete] Deleting directory 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build/jtidy_tmp
 [echo] Checking for broken links...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Crawl/parse...
 [exec] 
 [exec] Verify...
 [echo] Checking for missing docs...
 [exec] Traceback (most recent call last):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 384, in module
 [exec] if checkPackageSummaries(sys.argv[1], level):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 364, in checkPackageSummaries
 [exec] if checkClassSummaries(fullPath):
 [exec]   File 
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/dev-tools/scripts/checkJavaDocs.py,
 line 225, in checkClassSummaries
 [exec] raise RuntimeError('failed to locate javadoc item in %s, line 
%d? last line: %s' % (fullPath, lineCount, line.rstrip()))
 [exec] RuntimeError: failed to locate javadoc item in 
build/docs/classification/org/apache/lucene/classification/BooleanPerceptronClassifier.html,
 line 153? last line: /tr

BUILD FAILED
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:526: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/build.xml:90: The following 
error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:135: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/build.xml:165: The 
following error occurred while executing this line:
/Users/jenkins/workspace/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/lucene/common-build.xml:2476: 
exec returned: 1

Total time: 91 minutes 44 seconds
Build step 'Invoke Ant' marked build as failure
Archiving artifacts
Recording test results
Email was triggered for: Failure - Any
Sending email for trigger: Failure - Any



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_60-ea-b12) - Build # 12365 - Failure!

2015-05-02 Thread Policeman Jenkins Server
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux/12365/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_60-ea-b12 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC

3 tests failed.
FAILED:  junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.SaslZkACLProviderTest

Error Message:
6 threads leaked from SUITE scope at 
org.apache.solr.cloud.SaslZkACLProviderTest: 1) Thread[id=811, 
name=apacheds, state=WAITING, group=TGRP-SaslZkACLProviderTest] at 
java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at 
java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:502) at 
java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:526) at 
java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:505)2) Thread[id=812, 
name=changePwdReplayCache.data, state=TIMED_WAITING, 
group=TGRP-SaslZkACLProviderTest] at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native 
Method) at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
 at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)
 at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
 at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1067)   
  at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1127) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) 
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)3) Thread[id=815, 
name=ou=system.data, state=TIMED_WAITING, group=TGRP-SaslZkACLProviderTest] 
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
 at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)
 at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
 at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1067)   
  at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1127) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) 
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)4) Thread[id=816, 
name=NioSocketAcceptor-1, state=RUNNABLE, group=TGRP-SaslZkACLProviderTest] 
at sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.epollWait(Native Method) at 
sun.nio.ch.EPollArrayWrapper.poll(EPollArrayWrapper.java:269) at 
sun.nio.ch.EPollSelectorImpl.doSelect(EPollSelectorImpl.java:79) at 
sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.lockAndDoSelect(SelectorImpl.java:86) at 
sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:97) at 
sun.nio.ch.SelectorImpl.select(SelectorImpl.java:101) at 
org.apache.mina.transport.socket.nio.NioSocketAcceptor.select(NioSocketAcceptor.java:234)
 at 
org.apache.mina.core.polling.AbstractPollingIoAcceptor$Acceptor.run(AbstractPollingIoAcceptor.java:417)
 at 
org.apache.mina.util.NamePreservingRunnable.run(NamePreservingRunnable.java:64) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) 
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)5) Thread[id=813, 
name=groupCache.data, state=TIMED_WAITING, group=TGRP-SaslZkACLProviderTest]
 at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
 at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)
 at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
 at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1067)   
  at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1127) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) 
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)6) Thread[id=814, 
name=kdcReplayCache.data, state=TIMED_WAITING, 
group=TGRP-SaslZkACLProviderTest] at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native 
Method) at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215) 
at 
java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
 at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-6461) TwoPhaseCommitTool should suppress not discard exceptions from rollback.

2015-05-02 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
Robert Muir created LUCENE-6461:
---

 Summary: TwoPhaseCommitTool should suppress not discard exceptions 
from rollback.
 Key: LUCENE-6461
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6461
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Robert Muir
 Attachments: LUCENE-6461.patch

This is just generally nice to do, since we are on java 7 we should try to 
always preserve any context like this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6461) TwoPhaseCommitTool should suppress not discard exceptions from rollback.

2015-05-02 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Robert Muir updated LUCENE-6461:

Attachment: LUCENE-6461.patch

 TwoPhaseCommitTool should suppress not discard exceptions from rollback.
 

 Key: LUCENE-6461
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6461
 Project: Lucene - Core
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Robert Muir
 Attachments: LUCENE-6461.patch


 This is just generally nice to do, since we are on java 7 we should try to 
 always preserve any context like this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org