Re: BadApple report, but please read the first bit

2020-08-13 Thread David Smiley
Thanks Kevin; clearly I missed the link to that which I can now see at
fucit.

I was worried I may have worked on something that could have perturbed this
recent issue but no -- I don't think so.

~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley


On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:08 AM Kevin Risden  wrote:

>
> http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/history-trend-of-recent-failures.html#series/org.apache.solr.cloud.SharedFSAutoReplicaFailoverTest.test
>
> David for that specific test you asked the failures are recent with as far
> as I know no change to HDFS stuff. Starting June/July failing regularly.
>
> Kevin Risden
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:03 AM Erick Erickson 
> wrote:
>
>> I have the weekly rollups (with a few gaps) going back to about April
>> 2018, but nothing’s been done to try to make them generally available. Each
>> BadApple report has rates for the last 4 weeks in the attached file, just
>> below "Failures over the last 4 weeks, but not every week. Ordered
>> most-recent first:”
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Aug 12, 2020, at 2:06 AM, David Smiley  wrote:
>> >
>> > Do we have any long term (aka "longitudinal") pass/fail rates for tests?
>> >
>> > SharedFSAutoReplicaFailoverTest in particular is kinda-sorta tied to
>> HDFS, and that's going away to a plug-in for 9.0.  The shared file system
>> notion isn't well supported in SolrCloud, I think.
>> >
>> > ~ David Smiley
>> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 7:26 AM Erick Erickson 
>> wrote:
>> > There are several tests that are causing a lot of noise:
>> >
>> > SharedFSAutoReplicaFailoverTest is failing 90%+ of the time.
>> > TestBulkSchemaConcurrent 31%
>> > StressHdfsTest  16%
>> > SchemaApiFailureTest 13.88%
>> >
>> > I encourage people to look at:
>> http://fucit.org/solr-jenkins-reports/failure-report.html and see if
>> anything looks like it is affected by recent work. TestBulkSchemaConcurrent
>> has been failing off and on for a long time, but the failure rate picked up
>> dramatically in the last couple of weeks. Ditto SchemaApiFailureTest.
>> >
>> > Do we even care about Hdfs? Are we deprecating it or not?
>> >
>> > Holding relatively steady otherwise:
>> >
>> > Raw fail count by week totals, most recent week first (corresponds to
>> bits):
>> > Week: 0  had  82 failures
>> > Week: 1  had  94 failures
>> > Week: 2  had  502 failures
>> > Week: 3  had  19 failures
>> >
>> >
>> > Failures in Hoss' reports for the last 4 rollups.
>> >
>> > There were 562 unannotated tests that failed in Hoss' rollups. Ordered
>> by the date I downloaded the rollup file, newest->oldest. See above for the
>> dates the files were collected
>> > These tests were NOT BadApple'd or AwaitsFix'd
>> >
>> > Failures in the last 4 reports..
>> >Report   Pct runsfails   test
>> >  0123   0.3 1271  8  RollingRestartTest.test
>> >  0123  93.3   41 36
>> SharedFSAutoReplicaFailoverTest.test
>> >  0123   3.5  627 16
>> TestCircuitBreaker.testBuildingMemoryPressure
>> >  0123   1.0  627  8
>> TestCircuitBreaker.testResponseWithCBTiming
>> >  0123   5.8 1483 79
>> TestContainerPlugin.testApiFromPackage
>> >  0123   2.3 1335 23  TestDistributedGrouping.test
>> > 
>> >
>> >
>> > Full report:
>> >
>> > -
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>


Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.1 RC2

2020-08-13 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
Late, but +1

SUCCESS! [1:02:21.504688]

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:06 PM Houston Putman 
wrote:

> It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
>
> +1  8  (5 binding)
>  0  0
> -1  0
>
> This vote has PASSED
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:13 AM Anshum Gupta 
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for doing this, Houston.
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:21:02.914140]
>>
>> Tested out basic getting started w/ a 10 node cluster across a few local
>> machines and looked at the CHANGELOG. Everything LGTM on that front.
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:02 PM Houston Putman 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>>>
>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>
>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>
>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13 20:00
>>> UTC.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.1 RC2

2020-08-13 Thread Houston Putman
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:

+1  8  (5 binding)
 0  0
-1  0

This vote has PASSED

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 9:13 AM Anshum Gupta  wrote:

> Thanks for doing this, Houston.
>
> SUCCESS! [1:21:02.914140]
>
> Tested out basic getting started w/ a 10 node cluster across a few local
> machines and looked at the CHANGELOG. Everything LGTM on that front.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:02 PM Houston Putman 
> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13 20:00
>> UTC.
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.6.1 RC2

2020-08-13 Thread Anshum Gupta
Thanks for doing this, Houston.

SUCCESS! [1:21:02.914140]

Tested out basic getting started w/ a 10 node cluster across a few local
machines and looked at the CHANGELOG. Everything LGTM on that front.

+1 (binding)


On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:02 PM Houston Putman 
wrote:

> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.6.1
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.6.1-RC2-rev6e11a1c3f0599f1c918bc69c4f51928d23160e99
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2020-08-13 20:00
> UTC.
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta