RE: 8.11 / 8.x CI disabled

[Uwe Schindler]

Hi Adrien,

will do this. The 9.0 and 9.x (Lucene) builds are still missing. I will also 
add them.

Uwe

-
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
https://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de

> -Original Message-
> From: Adrien Grand 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 4:05 PM
> To: Lucene Dev ; Solr Dev 
> Subject: 8.11 / 8.x CI disabled
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Now that 8.11 is now out, I disabled all Lucene and Solr 8.11 / 8.x
> jobs on ASF Jenkins. We can re-enable the 8.11 builds if/when we want
> to do a 8.11.1 release.
> 
> Uwe, should we disable these builds on Policeman Jenkins too?
> 
> --
> Adrien
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

8.11 / 8.x CI disabled

[Adrien Grand]

Hello,

Now that 8.11 is now out, I disabled all Lucene and Solr 8.11 / 8.x
jobs on ASF Jenkins. We can re-enable the 8.11 builds if/when we want
to do a 8.11.1 release.

Uwe, should we disable these builds on Policeman Jenkins too?

-- 
Adrien

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Is ARM64 supported ?

[Mark Jens]

On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 14:54, Dawid Weiss  wrote:

> Lucene core doesn't use native code, only Java APIs. So if the JVM is
> available for your platform, it should work just fine (if it doesn't,
> it's a JVM/ vendor bug). You can always scan the source repository to
> peek around.
>

Thank you, Dawid!
Have a great one!


>
> D.
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 1:27 PM Mark Jens  wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 16:51, Vincenzo D'Amore 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi, yes it is supported, given that there is a java virtual machine for
> them.
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your answer, Vincenzo!
> >
> > The Java/JVM is clear!
> > My doubts are with any native code usage.
> >
> > For now my only real confirmation that ARM64 is supported is via
> Elasticsearch. Since ES supports Linux ARM64, Lucene should be fine too.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 2:44 PM Mark Jens 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello Lucene devs,
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to ask whether Linux/Mac ARM64 platforms are supported by
> Lucene ?
> >>>
> >>> I know that Lucene is Java based but I am not sure whether it uses
> native code for some optimizations.
> >>> I've heard that Lucene uses some advanced Java APIs and often is used
> by JDK developers to test for regressions.
> >>> So, my question is: Is it safe to run Lucene on ARM64 ? Does anyone
> already do it ? Any concerns/drawbacks ?
> >>>
> >>> Thank you!
> >>>
> >>> Mark
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Vincenzo D'Amore
> >>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: Is ARM64 supported ?

[Dawid Weiss]

Lucene core doesn't use native code, only Java APIs. So if the JVM is
available for your platform, it should work just fine (if it doesn't,
it's a JVM/ vendor bug). You can always scan the source repository to
peek around.

D.

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 1:27 PM Mark Jens  wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 16:51, Vincenzo D'Amore  wrote:
>>
>> Hi, yes it is supported, given that there is a java virtual machine for them.
>
>
> Thanks for your answer, Vincenzo!
>
> The Java/JVM is clear!
> My doubts are with any native code usage.
>
> For now my only real confirmation that ARM64 is supported is via 
> Elasticsearch. Since ES supports Linux ARM64, Lucene should be fine too.
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 2:44 PM Mark Jens  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Lucene devs,
>>>
>>> I'd like to ask whether Linux/Mac ARM64 platforms are supported by Lucene ?
>>>
>>> I know that Lucene is Java based but I am not sure whether it uses native 
>>> code for some optimizations.
>>> I've heard that Lucene uses some advanced Java APIs and often is used by 
>>> JDK developers to test for regressions.
>>> So, my question is: Is it safe to run Lucene on ARM64 ? Does anyone already 
>>> do it ? Any concerns/drawbacks ?
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Vincenzo D'Amore
>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Re: Is ARM64 supported ?

[Mark Jens]

On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 at 16:51, Vincenzo D'Amore  wrote:

> Hi, yes it is supported, given that there is a java virtual machine for
> them.
>

Thanks for your answer, Vincenzo!

The Java/JVM is clear!
My doubts are with any native code usage.

For now my only real confirmation that ARM64 is supported is via
Elasticsearch. Since ES supports Linux ARM64, Lucene should be fine too.


>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 2:44 PM Mark Jens  wrote:
>
>> Hello Lucene devs,
>>
>> I'd like to ask whether Linux/Mac ARM64 platforms are supported by Lucene
>> ?
>>
>> I know that Lucene is Java based but I am not sure whether it uses native
>> code for some optimizations.
>> I've heard that Lucene uses some advanced Java APIs and often is used by
>> JDK developers to test for regressions.
>> So, my question is: Is it safe to run Lucene on ARM64 ? Does anyone
>> already do it ? Any concerns/drawbacks ?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Mark
>>
>
>
> --
> Vincenzo D'Amore
>
>

Re: Time to write an open-source book?

[Ishan Chattopadhyaya]

+1, great idea.

On Wed, 17 Nov, 2021, 2:19 pm Michael Wechner, 
wrote:

> I think this would be great and I would be very happy to contribute.
>
> For example I am currently trying to understand how the autocomplete /
> auto suggest functionality of Lucene works and I could contribute my
> learnings.
>
> All the best
>
> Michael
>
> Am 16.11.21 um 20:49 schrieb Dongyu Xu:
>
> Hi Devs,
>
> I'm finally motivated enough to start this thread as I believe this is a
> great thing to do for the Lucene community to continuously thrive as the
> library has become so feature-rich but as the same time much more complex.
>
> "What do you recommend to read for learning more Lucene?" -- A question I
> was often asked by my friends and coworkers at Amazon Product Search . I'm
> sure many of you have experienced the same. I always recommend Lucene In
> Action 2nd Edition[1] which is a great book. However, it features *Lucene
> 3.0*
> and we are at *Lucene 9.0* now! There is a huge gap.
>
> Inspired by my recent experience with the Rust Book[2] and the Solr ref
> guide[3], I believe it is possible for the Lucene community to collaborate
> on writing a book/user guide just like how the software is built in the
> open-source way!
>
> Concretely, it will require to first draw the outline of the book with
> clear
> intentions for all sections. Then the effort should be able to scale,
> allow-
> ing individuals to work on different sections in parallel. Once built, the
> book should be a live artifact and evolve together with Lucene.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> [1]
> https://www.amazon.com/Lucene-Action-Second-Covers-Apache/dp/1933988177
> [2] https://github.com/rust-lang/book
> [3] https://github.com/apache/solr/tree/main/solr/solr-ref-guide
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Tony
>
>
>

Re: Time to write an open-source book?

[Carlos .Sponchiado]

There is a book called *Practical Apache Lucene 8* from 2020

https://www.adlibris.com/fi/kirja/practical-apache-lucene-8-9781484263440

Em qua., 17 de nov. de 2021 às 10:49, Michael Wechner <
michael.wech...@wyona.com> escreveu:

> I think this would be great and I would be very happy to contribute.
>
> For example I am currently trying to understand how the autocomplete /
> auto suggest functionality of Lucene works and I could contribute my
> learnings.
>
> All the best
>
> Michael
>
> Am 16.11.21 um 20:49 schrieb Dongyu Xu:
>
> Hi Devs,
>
> I'm finally motivated enough to start this thread as I believe this is a
> great thing to do for the Lucene community to continuously thrive as the
> library has become so feature-rich but as the same time much more complex.
>
> "What do you recommend to read for learning more Lucene?" -- A question I
> was often asked by my friends and coworkers at Amazon Product Search . I'm
> sure many of you have experienced the same. I always recommend Lucene In
> Action 2nd Edition[1] which is a great book. However, it features *Lucene
> 3.0*
> and we are at *Lucene 9.0* now! There is a huge gap.
>
> Inspired by my recent experience with the Rust Book[2] and the Solr ref
> guide[3], I believe it is possible for the Lucene community to collaborate
> on writing a book/user guide just like how the software is built in the
> open-source way!
>
> Concretely, it will require to first draw the outline of the book with
> clear
> intentions for all sections. Then the effort should be able to scale,
> allow-
> ing individuals to work on different sections in parallel. Once built, the
> book should be a live artifact and evolve together with Lucene.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> [1]
> https://www.amazon.com/Lucene-Action-Second-Covers-Apache/dp/1933988177
> [2] https://github.com/rust-lang/book
> [3] https://github.com/apache/solr/tree/main/solr/solr-ref-guide
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Tony
>
>
>

-- 
Abraços
Carlos Sponchiado

Re: Time to write an open-source book?

[Michael Wechner]

I think this would be great and I would be very happy to contribute.

For example I am currently trying to understand how the autocomplete / 
auto suggest functionality of Lucene works and I could contribute my 
learnings.


All the best

Michael

Am 16.11.21 um 20:49 schrieb Dongyu Xu:

Hi Devs,

I'm finally motivated enough to start this thread as I believe this is a
great thing to do for the Lucene community to continuously thrive as the
library has become so feature-rich but as the same time much more 
complex.


"What do you recommend to read for learning more Lucene?" -- A question I
was often asked by my friends and coworkers at Amazon Product Search . 
I'm

sure many of you have experienced the same. I always recommend Lucene In
Action 2nd Edition[1] which is a great book. However, it features 
*Lucene 3.0*

and we are at *Lucene 9.0* now! There is a huge gap.

Inspired by my recent experience with the Rust Book[2] and the Solr ref
guide[3], I believe it is possible for the Lucene community to 
collaborate

on writing a book/user guide just like how the software is built in the
open-source way!

Concretely, it will require to first draw the outline of the book with 
clear
intentions for all sections. Then the effort should be able to scale, 
allow-

ing individuals to work on different sections in parallel. Once built, the
book should be a live artifact and evolve together with Lucene.

Thoughts?

[1] 
https://www.amazon.com/Lucene-Action-Second-Covers-Apache/dp/1933988177

[2] https://github.com/rust-lang/book
[3] https://github.com/apache/solr/tree/main/solr/solr-ref-guide



Thanks,
Tony

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Lucene 8.11.0 released

[Adrien Grand]

Thanks Koji, I thought I had checked all the links, but apparently not. :(

On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 2:39 AM Koji Sekiguchi 
wrote:

> Thank you for your work, Adrien!
>
>  > Further details of changes are available in the change log available at:
>  > http://lucene.apache.org/core/8_11/changes/Changes.html
>
> I got 404 Not Found due to missing "_0" of "8_11_0" in the link for
> Changes.
>
> Koji
>
> On 2021/11/16 21:59, Adrien Grand wrote:
> > The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Lucene 8.11.
> >
> > Apache Lucene is a high-performance, full-featured text search engine
> library written entirely in
> > Java. It is a technology suitable for nearly any application that
> requires full-text search,
> > especially cross-platform.
> >
> > This release contains numerous bug fixes, features, optimizations, and
> improvements, some of which
> > are highlighted below. The release is available for immediate download
> at:
> > https://lucene.apache.org/core/downloads.html <
> https://lucene.apache.org/core/downloads.html>
> >
> > Lucene 8.11 Release Highlights
> >   - Facets now properly ignore deleted documents when accumulating facet
> counts for all documents.
> >   - CheckIndex can run concurrently.
> >
> > Further details of changes are available in the change log available at:
> > http://lucene.apache.org/core/8_11/changes/Changes.html
> > 
> >
> > Please report any feedback to the mailing lists (
> http://lucene.apache.org/core/discussion.html
> > ).
> >
> > --
> > Adrien
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

-- 
Adrien