RE: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4
+1, go for .NET 4... Thanks -Original Message- From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 May 2011 21:05 To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org Subject: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 All, Please cast your votes regarding the topic of .Net Framework support. The question on the table is: Should Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 be the last release which supports the .Net 2.0 Framework? Some options are: [+1] - Yes, move forward to the latest .Net Framework version, and drop support for 2.0 completely. New features and performance are more important than backwards compatibility. [0] - Yes, focus on the latest .Net Framework, but also include patches and/or preprocessor directives and conditional compilation blocks to include support for 2.0 when needed. New features, performance, and backwards compatibility are all equally important and it's worth the additional complexity and coding work to meet all of those goals. [-1] No, .Net Framework 2.0 should remain our target platform. Backwards compatibility is more important than new features and performance. This vote is not limited to the Apache Lucene.Net IPMC. All users/contributors/committers/mailing list lurkers are welcome to cast their votes with an equal weight. This has been cross posted to both the dev and user mailing lists. Thanks, Troy
RE: Indexing the multiple words at the same position
Hi, it also depends on the complexity of your critical apparatus, but you could just use a custom analyzer which injects synonyms (here variants) of your tokens in THE SAME POSITION as the original word. This way a search will match both daddy and happy. -Original Message- From: Jeroen Lauwers [mailto:jeroen.lauw...@ctlo.net] Sent: venerdì 6 agosto 2010 12:24 To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Indexing the multiple words at the same position Has anyone encountered the following problem (and found a solution) I need to index a classical text that can have multiple words at that same position. Example: if a publisher isn't sure if Shakespeare wrote To be or not to be happy or To be or not to be daddy, he will put the 'best' word (eg. 'happy') in the full text and the second option (eg. 'daddy') in the notes at the bottom of a page. Now, our customer wants to search for to be daddy and find to be happy. So, if I could index daddy at the same position as happy , I would be very happy too. Of course you can think of a solution where one would index the full text for each version, but this is not sustainable when the number of multiple occupation of a single position increase. I have been looking at the 'next()' method of the 'Tokenizer' class, but I haven't found the solution (yet). Thanks in advance to all who reply. Jeroen
[jira] Created: (LUCENENET-371) Unit test for Search.Regex port
Unit test for Search.Regex port --- Key: LUCENENET-371 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-371 Project: Lucene.Net Issue Type: Test Reporter: Daniele Fusi Priority: Minor I added some essential unit tests for my port of Search.Regex. Hope this will help you integrating this feature into one of your next releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (LUCENENET-371) Unit test for Search.Regex port
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniele Fusi updated LUCENENET-371: --- Attachment: TestRegexpQuery.cs Unit tests Unit test for Search.Regex port --- Key: LUCENENET-371 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-371 Project: Lucene.Net Issue Type: Test Reporter: Daniele Fusi Priority: Minor Attachments: TestRegexpQuery.cs I added some essential unit tests for my port of Search.Regex. Hope this will help you integrating this feature into one of your next releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
