Re: pro coding style
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > > Right, I'm positive this (pull requests) is github :) > Just a note - "pull request" has been a git concept before github embraced and extended it. However, almost nobody uses the old meaning, and it's really only useful for projects like the Linux kernel, where everything is done through the mailing list. http://stackoverflow.com/a/6235394/7581
Re: Problem: High Term Frequency After Search
This is not trivial. You should take a look at how solr does it for faceting using UnInvertedField. On Wednesday, January 11, 2012, colbacc8 wrote: > Hi, this is my first post in this forum! :-) > I'm Italian and sorry for my bad english :-( > I developing a search engine in java with lucene in eclipse. > > I've a problem: I run a search for a terms, after I want know the first five > keywords in order by frequency on subset of document resulting from search. > > I tried to use TermVectorFreq, but seems more complicated. > > there is a simple method for do that? > > > Thank you! :-) > > -- > View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-High-Term-Frequency-After-Search-tp3651188p3651188.html > Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Israel Tsadok | Chief Developer | Omgili T +972.3.6720970 | F +972.3.6720972 | C +972.52.4745047 itsa...@gmail.com | www.omgili.com
Re: what's the differences between Hits and TopDocs
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/973354 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 4:41 AM, xu cheng wrote: > hi all: > I notice that ,once apon a time, long long ago...the IndexSeacher.search > returns Hits, and now the returned object is TopDocs? > what's the differences? > any answer and references are appreciated.thanks >
Re: Threading of JIRA e-mails in gmail?
I'm not sure if this solution has been suggested, but I just noticed that the gmail threading algorithm ignores the bracketed part of the subject line. (I couldn't find it documented officially, though). That means that if JIRA subject lines can indeed be customized to say e.g. "[JIRA - Created:] (LUCENE-XXX) blah" instead of the current "[JIRA] Created: (LUCENE-XXX) blah", the gmail issue would be resolved. I only noticed it because this is exactly how YouTrack handles this. Is this a viable option?
