Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
Thanks for the update! I suppose this explains why I was unable to use the ref guide online today -- also noticed by my colleagues :-( ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:28 AM Cassandra Targett wrote: > Just so everyone is aware, an accidental commit as part of the 8.8 release > process that Noble was working on removed all the Lucene Javadocs, Solr > Javadocs, and Solr Ref Guides for the 8.5.0 through 8.8.0 releases from the > SVN production repo where they are served from. > > I talked to Noble about it in Slack ( > https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/CEKUCUNE9/p1611931168079700) and I > think we pinpointed the commit that did it. As it’s quite late in Australia > now, he said he will work on fixing it in his morning so he can be sure he > doesn’t mess it up further. > > I thought I’d let everyone know in case others notice today that these > versions are missing. > > Cassandra > On Jan 29, 2021, 8:46 AM -0600, Noble Paul , wrote: > > Yes, if someone is willing to invest time to fix the failures we > should. totally do it. > > Unfortunately, I don't see anyone making that investment > > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 12:12 AM Jason Gerlowski > wrote: > > > I agree with Noble that we shouldn't let those flakies hold up the > release. It really sucks, but Solr wouldn't've gotten out a release in > years if that was our bar. > > FWIW though I disagree with his finer point that we shouldn't worry > about autoscaling in particular because it's slated for removal in > 9.0. We're not releasing 9.0, we're releasing 8.8. And there's > likely to be an 8.8.1 or 8.9 at some point later. So there's > definitely a "point in trying to fix" those failures, generally > speaking. > > Jason > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:01 PM Noble Paul wrote: > > > I'm not sure why the tests fail. But, there is no point in trying to > fix them if that code is removed from master and we do not plan to > support them anyway > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:43 AM David Smiley > wrote: > > > Ah; I see they appear to be 8x only. Any idea what the story is with them? > Do you think it is just test flakiness or flakiness in Solr's related > functionality? > > ~ David > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:36 PM Noble Paul wrote: > > > Both of those are gone for good @David Smiley I think we can safely > make them BadApples > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:07 AM David Smiley wrote: > > > I ran it twice on my old-ish MacBook, and it failed each time on Solr > tests that have a history of flakiness (as shown by Hossman's awesome > fucit.org site) -- AutoscalingHistoryHandlerTest & TestWithCollection. > Neither seed repeated. I'll pass on voting. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:35 AM Cassandra Targett > wrote: > > > I’ve updated the Ref Guide to remove the DRAFT status on 8.8 pages, so > that’s done. I’ll also take care of the next Ref Guide step to update the > website to show 8.8 as the latest. > On Jan 28, 2021, 9:59 AM -0600, Tomás Fernández Löbbe < > tomasflo...@gmail.com>, wrote: > > It’s 9 binding: Noble, Tim, me, Ignacio, Mike M, Namgyu, Atri, Anshum and > Mike S. > > 1 non-binding: Haoyu > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:34 AM Michael Sokolov > wrote: > > > SUCCESS! [0:58:25.213071] > > +1 better late than never? > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > wrote: > > > Thanks Noble! > > On Thu, 28 Jan, 2021, 4:24 pm Noble Paul, wrote: > > > [+1] 9 (4 binding) > > [0] 0 > > [-1] 0 > > > This vote has PASSED. > > I shall proceed with the rest of the release process > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > > > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! > > +1 (binding) > > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] > > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All of that > looks good. > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul wrote: > > > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Here is my +1 > -- > - > Noble Paul > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > -- > Anshum Gupta > > > > > -- > - > Noble Paul > > - > To unsubscribe,
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
Just so everyone is aware, an accidental commit as part of the 8.8 release process that Noble was working on removed all the Lucene Javadocs, Solr Javadocs, and Solr Ref Guides for the 8.5.0 through 8.8.0 releases from the SVN production repo where they are served from. I talked to Noble about it in Slack (https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/CEKUCUNE9/p1611931168079700) and I think we pinpointed the commit that did it. As it’s quite late in Australia now, he said he will work on fixing it in his morning so he can be sure he doesn’t mess it up further. I thought I’d let everyone know in case others notice today that these versions are missing. Cassandra On Jan 29, 2021, 8:46 AM -0600, Noble Paul , wrote: > Yes, if someone is willing to invest time to fix the failures we > should. totally do it. > > Unfortunately, I don't see anyone making that investment > > > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 12:12 AM Jason Gerlowski > wrote: > > > > I agree with Noble that we shouldn't let those flakies hold up the > > release. It really sucks, but Solr wouldn't've gotten out a release in > > years if that was our bar. > > > > FWIW though I disagree with his finer point that we shouldn't worry > > about autoscaling in particular because it's slated for removal in > > 9.0. We're not releasing 9.0, we're releasing 8.8. And there's > > likely to be an 8.8.1 or 8.9 at some point later. So there's > > definitely a "point in trying to fix" those failures, generally > > speaking. > > > > Jason > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:01 PM Noble Paul wrote: > > > > > > I'm not sure why the tests fail. But, there is no point in trying to > > > fix them if that code is removed from master and we do not plan to > > > support them anyway > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:43 AM David Smiley > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Ah; I see they appear to be 8x only. Any idea what the story is with > > > > them? Do you think it is just test flakiness or flakiness in Solr's > > > > related functionality? > > > > > > > > ~ David > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:36 PM Noble Paul wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Both of those are gone for good @David Smiley I think we can safely > > > > > make them BadApples > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:07 AM David Smiley > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I ran it twice on my old-ish MacBook, and it failed each time on > > > > > > Solr tests that have a history of flakiness (as shown by Hossman's > > > > > > awesome fucit.org site) -- AutoscalingHistoryHandlerTest & > > > > > > TestWithCollection. Neither seed repeated. I'll pass on voting. > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:35 AM Cassandra Targett > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I’ve updated the Ref Guide to remove the DRAFT status on 8.8 > > > > > > > pages, so that’s done. I’ll also take care of the next Ref Guide > > > > > > > step to update the website to show 8.8 as the latest. > > > > > > > On Jan 28, 2021, 9:59 AM -0600, Tomás Fernández Löbbe > > > > > > > , wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It’s 9 binding: Noble, Tim, me, Ignacio, Mike M, Namgyu, Atri, > > > > > > > Anshum and Mike S. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 non-binding: Haoyu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:34 AM Michael Sokolov > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:58:25.213071] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 better late than never? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Noble! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 28 Jan, 2021, 4:24 pm Noble Paul, > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [+1] 9 (4 binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [0] 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [-1] 0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This vote has PASSED. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I shall proceed with the rest of the release process > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change > > > > > > > > > > > log. All of that looks good. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr > > > > > > > > > > > > 8.8.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
Yes, if someone is willing to invest time to fix the failures we should. totally do it. Unfortunately, I don't see anyone making that investment On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 12:12 AM Jason Gerlowski wrote: > > I agree with Noble that we shouldn't let those flakies hold up the > release. It really sucks, but Solr wouldn't've gotten out a release in > years if that was our bar. > > FWIW though I disagree with his finer point that we shouldn't worry > about autoscaling in particular because it's slated for removal in > 9.0. We're not releasing 9.0, we're releasing 8.8. And there's > likely to be an 8.8.1 or 8.9 at some point later. So there's > definitely a "point in trying to fix" those failures, generally > speaking. > > Jason > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:01 PM Noble Paul wrote: > > > > I'm not sure why the tests fail. But, there is no point in trying to > > fix them if that code is removed from master and we do not plan to > > support them anyway > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:43 AM David Smiley > > wrote: > > > > > > Ah; I see they appear to be 8x only. Any idea what the story is with > > > them? Do you think it is just test flakiness or flakiness in Solr's > > > related functionality? > > > > > > ~ David > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:36 PM Noble Paul wrote: > > >> > > >> Both of those are gone for good @David Smiley I think we can safely > > >> make them BadApples > > >> > > >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:07 AM David Smiley wrote: > > >> > > > >> > I ran it twice on my old-ish MacBook, and it failed each time on Solr > > >> > tests that have a history of flakiness (as shown by Hossman's awesome > > >> > fucit.org site) -- AutoscalingHistoryHandlerTest & TestWithCollection. > > >> > Neither seed repeated. I'll pass on voting. > > >> > > > >> > ~ David Smiley > > >> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > >> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:35 AM Cassandra Targett > > >> > wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> I’ve updated the Ref Guide to remove the DRAFT status on 8.8 pages, > > >> >> so that’s done. I’ll also take care of the next Ref Guide step to > > >> >> update the website to show 8.8 as the latest. > > >> >> On Jan 28, 2021, 9:59 AM -0600, Tomás Fernández Löbbe > > >> >> , wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> It’s 9 binding: Noble, Tim, me, Ignacio, Mike M, Namgyu, Atri, Anshum > > >> >> and Mike S. > > >> >> > > >> >> 1 non-binding: Haoyu > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:34 AM Michael Sokolov > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> SUCCESS! [0:58:25.213071] > > >> >>> > > >> >>> +1 better late than never? > > >> >>> > > >> >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > Thanks Noble! > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > On Thu, 28 Jan, 2021, 4:24 pm Noble Paul, > > >> >>> > wrote: > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> [+1] 9 (4 binding) > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> [0] 0 > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> [-1] 0 > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> This vote has PASSED. > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> I shall proceed with the rest of the release process > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta > > >> >>> >> wrote: > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > +1 (binding) > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. > > >> >>> >> > All of that looks good. > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul > > >> >>> >> > wrote: > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > >> >>> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> [ ] +1 approve > > >> >>> >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion > > >> >>> >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> Here is my +1 > > >> >>> >> >> -- > > >> >>> >> >> - > > >> >>> >> >> Noble Paul > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> - > > >> >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > >> >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > -- > > >> >>> >> > Anshum Gupta > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
I agree with Noble that we shouldn't let those flakies hold up the release. It really sucks, but Solr wouldn't've gotten out a release in years if that was our bar. FWIW though I disagree with his finer point that we shouldn't worry about autoscaling in particular because it's slated for removal in 9.0. We're not releasing 9.0, we're releasing 8.8. And there's likely to be an 8.8.1 or 8.9 at some point later. So there's definitely a "point in trying to fix" those failures, generally speaking. Jason On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:01 PM Noble Paul wrote: > > I'm not sure why the tests fail. But, there is no point in trying to > fix them if that code is removed from master and we do not plan to > support them anyway > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:43 AM David Smiley wrote: > > > > Ah; I see they appear to be 8x only. Any idea what the story is with them? > > Do you think it is just test flakiness or flakiness in Solr's related > > functionality? > > > > ~ David > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:36 PM Noble Paul wrote: > >> > >> Both of those are gone for good @David Smiley I think we can safely > >> make them BadApples > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:07 AM David Smiley wrote: > >> > > >> > I ran it twice on my old-ish MacBook, and it failed each time on Solr > >> > tests that have a history of flakiness (as shown by Hossman's awesome > >> > fucit.org site) -- AutoscalingHistoryHandlerTest & TestWithCollection. > >> > Neither seed repeated. I'll pass on voting. > >> > > >> > ~ David Smiley > >> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > >> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:35 AM Cassandra Targett > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I’ve updated the Ref Guide to remove the DRAFT status on 8.8 pages, so > >> >> that’s done. I’ll also take care of the next Ref Guide step to update > >> >> the website to show 8.8 as the latest. > >> >> On Jan 28, 2021, 9:59 AM -0600, Tomás Fernández Löbbe > >> >> , wrote: > >> >> > >> >> It’s 9 binding: Noble, Tim, me, Ignacio, Mike M, Namgyu, Atri, Anshum > >> >> and Mike S. > >> >> > >> >> 1 non-binding: Haoyu > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:34 AM Michael Sokolov > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> SUCCESS! [0:58:25.213071] > >> >>> > >> >>> +1 better late than never? > >> >>> > >> >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Thanks Noble! > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Thu, 28 Jan, 2021, 4:24 pm Noble Paul, > >> >>> > wrote: > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> [+1] 9 (4 binding) > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> [0] 0 > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> [-1] 0 > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> This vote has PASSED. > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> I shall proceed with the rest of the release process > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta > >> >>> >> wrote: > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > +1 (binding) > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All > >> >>> >> > of that looks good. > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul > >> >>> >> > wrote: > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > >> >>> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> [ ] +1 approve > >> >>> >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> >>> >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> Here is my +1 > >> >>> >> >> -- > >> >>> >> >> - > >> >>> >> >> Noble Paul > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> >> - > >> >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>> >> >> > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > -- > >> >>> >> > Anshum Gupta > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> -- > >> >>> >> - > >> >>> >> Noble Paul > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> - > >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> - > >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
I'm not sure why the tests fail. But, there is no point in trying to fix them if that code is removed from master and we do not plan to support them anyway On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:43 AM David Smiley wrote: > > Ah; I see they appear to be 8x only. Any idea what the story is with them? > Do you think it is just test flakiness or flakiness in Solr's related > functionality? > > ~ David > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:36 PM Noble Paul wrote: >> >> Both of those are gone for good @David Smiley I think we can safely >> make them BadApples >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:07 AM David Smiley wrote: >> > >> > I ran it twice on my old-ish MacBook, and it failed each time on Solr >> > tests that have a history of flakiness (as shown by Hossman's awesome >> > fucit.org site) -- AutoscalingHistoryHandlerTest & TestWithCollection. >> > Neither seed repeated. I'll pass on voting. >> > >> > ~ David Smiley >> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:35 AM Cassandra Targett >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I’ve updated the Ref Guide to remove the DRAFT status on 8.8 pages, so >> >> that’s done. I’ll also take care of the next Ref Guide step to update the >> >> website to show 8.8 as the latest. >> >> On Jan 28, 2021, 9:59 AM -0600, Tomás Fernández Löbbe >> >> , wrote: >> >> >> >> It’s 9 binding: Noble, Tim, me, Ignacio, Mike M, Namgyu, Atri, Anshum and >> >> Mike S. >> >> >> >> 1 non-binding: Haoyu >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:34 AM Michael Sokolov >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> SUCCESS! [0:58:25.213071] >> >>> >> >>> +1 better late than never? >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >> >>> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > Thanks Noble! >> >>> > >> >>> > On Thu, 28 Jan, 2021, 4:24 pm Noble Paul, wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> [+1] 9 (4 binding) >> >>> >> >> >>> >> [0] 0 >> >>> >> >> >>> >> [-1] 0 >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> This vote has PASSED. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> I shall proceed with the rest of the release process >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta >> >>> >> wrote: >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > +1 (binding) >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All >> >>> >> > of that looks good. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul >> >>> >> > wrote: >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> >>> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> >>> >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> >>> >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> Here is my +1 >> >>> >> >> -- >> >>> >> >> - >> >>> >> >> Noble Paul >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> - >> >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > -- >> >>> >> > Anshum Gupta >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> -- >> >>> >> - >> >>> >> Noble Paul >> >>> >> >> >>> >> - >> >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> - >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>> >> >> >> -- >> - >> Noble Paul -- - Noble Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
Ah; I see they appear to be 8x only. Any idea what the story is with them? Do you think it is just test flakiness or flakiness in Solr's related functionality? ~ David On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:36 PM Noble Paul wrote: > Both of those are gone for good @David Smiley I think we can safely > make them BadApples > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:07 AM David Smiley wrote: > > > > I ran it twice on my old-ish MacBook, and it failed each time on Solr > tests that have a history of flakiness (as shown by Hossman's awesome > fucit.org site) -- AutoscalingHistoryHandlerTest & TestWithCollection. > Neither seed repeated. I'll pass on voting. > > > > ~ David Smiley > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:35 AM Cassandra Targett < > casstarg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I’ve updated the Ref Guide to remove the DRAFT status on 8.8 pages, so > that’s done. I’ll also take care of the next Ref Guide step to update the > website to show 8.8 as the latest. > >> On Jan 28, 2021, 9:59 AM -0600, Tomás Fernández Löbbe < > tomasflo...@gmail.com>, wrote: > >> > >> It’s 9 binding: Noble, Tim, me, Ignacio, Mike M, Namgyu, Atri, Anshum > and Mike S. > >> > >> 1 non-binding: Haoyu > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:34 AM Michael Sokolov > wrote: > >>> > >>> SUCCESS! [0:58:25.213071] > >>> > >>> +1 better late than never? > >>> > >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > Thanks Noble! > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, 28 Jan, 2021, 4:24 pm Noble Paul, > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> [+1] 9 (4 binding) > >>> >> > >>> >> [0] 0 > >>> >> > >>> >> [-1] 0 > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> This vote has PASSED. > >>> >> > >>> >> I shall proceed with the rest of the release process > >>> >> > >>> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta < > ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! > >>> >> > > >>> >> > +1 (binding) > >>> >> > > >>> >> > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All > of that looks good. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul > wrote: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > >>> >> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> [ ] +1 approve > >>> >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >>> >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Here is my +1 > >>> >> >> -- > >>> >> >> - > >>> >> >> Noble Paul > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > - > >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >>> >> >> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > -- > >>> >> > Anshum Gupta > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> - > >>> >> Noble Paul > >>> >> > >>> >> > - > >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >>> >> > >>> > >>> - > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >>> > > > -- > - > Noble Paul >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
Both of those are gone for good @David Smiley I think we can safely make them BadApples On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:07 AM David Smiley wrote: > > I ran it twice on my old-ish MacBook, and it failed each time on Solr tests > that have a history of flakiness (as shown by Hossman's awesome fucit.org > site) -- AutoscalingHistoryHandlerTest & TestWithCollection. Neither seed > repeated. I'll pass on voting. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:35 AM Cassandra Targett > wrote: >> >> I’ve updated the Ref Guide to remove the DRAFT status on 8.8 pages, so >> that’s done. I’ll also take care of the next Ref Guide step to update the >> website to show 8.8 as the latest. >> On Jan 28, 2021, 9:59 AM -0600, Tomás Fernández Löbbe >> , wrote: >> >> It’s 9 binding: Noble, Tim, me, Ignacio, Mike M, Namgyu, Atri, Anshum and >> Mike S. >> >> 1 non-binding: Haoyu >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:34 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: >>> >>> SUCCESS! [0:58:25.213071] >>> >>> +1 better late than never? >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Thanks Noble! >>> > >>> > On Thu, 28 Jan, 2021, 4:24 pm Noble Paul, wrote: >>> >> >>> >> [+1] 9 (4 binding) >>> >> >>> >> [0] 0 >>> >> >>> >> [-1] 0 >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> This vote has PASSED. >>> >> >>> >> I shall proceed with the rest of the release process >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! >>> >> > >>> >> > +1 (binding) >>> >> > >>> >> > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] >>> >> > >>> >> > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All of >>> >> > that looks good. >>> >> > >>> >> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 >>> >> >> >>> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >>> >> >> >>> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours >>> >> >> >>> >> >> [ ] +1 approve >>> >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Here is my +1 >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >> - >>> >> >> Noble Paul >>> >> >> >>> >> >> - >>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > Anshum Gupta >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> - >>> >> Noble Paul >>> >> >>> >> - >>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> -- - Noble Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
I ran it twice on my old-ish MacBook, and it failed each time on Solr tests that have a history of flakiness (as shown by Hossman's awesome fucit.org site) -- AutoscalingHistoryHandlerTest & TestWithCollection. Neither seed repeated. I'll pass on voting. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:35 AM Cassandra Targett wrote: > I’ve updated the Ref Guide to remove the DRAFT status on 8.8 pages, so > that’s done. I’ll also take care of the next Ref Guide step to update the > website to show 8.8 as the latest. > On Jan 28, 2021, 9:59 AM -0600, Tomás Fernández Löbbe < > tomasflo...@gmail.com>, wrote: > > It’s 9 binding: Noble, Tim, me, Ignacio, Mike M, Namgyu, Atri, Anshum and > Mike S. > > 1 non-binding: Haoyu > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:34 AM Michael Sokolov > wrote: > >> SUCCESS! [0:58:25.213071] >> >> +1 better late than never? >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >> wrote: >> > >> > Thanks Noble! >> > >> > On Thu, 28 Jan, 2021, 4:24 pm Noble Paul, wrote: >> >> >> >> [+1] 9 (4 binding) >> >> >> >> [0] 0 >> >> >> >> [-1] 0 >> >> >> >> >> >> This vote has PASSED. >> >> >> >> I shall proceed with the rest of the release process >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! >> >> > >> >> > +1 (binding) >> >> > >> >> > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] >> >> > >> >> > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All of >> that looks good. >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 >> >> >> >> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >> >> >> >> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours >> >> >> >> >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> >> >> >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> >> -- >> >> >> - >> >> >> Noble Paul >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Anshum Gupta >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> - >> >> Noble Paul >> >> >> >> - >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
I’ve updated the Ref Guide to remove the DRAFT status on 8.8 pages, so that’s done. I’ll also take care of the next Ref Guide step to update the website to show 8.8 as the latest. On Jan 28, 2021, 9:59 AM -0600, Tomás Fernández Löbbe , wrote: > It’s 9 binding: Noble, Tim, me, Ignacio, Mike M, Namgyu, Atri, Anshum and > Mike S. > 1 non-binding: Haoyu > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:34 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: > > > SUCCESS! [0:58:25.213071] > > > > > > +1 better late than never? > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks Noble! > > > > > > > > On Thu, 28 Jan, 2021, 4:24 pm Noble Paul, wrote: > > > >> > > > >> [+1] 9 (4 binding) > > > >> > > > >> [0] 0 > > > >> > > > >> [-1] 0 > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> This vote has PASSED. > > > >> > > > >> I shall proceed with the rest of the release process > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! > > > >> > > > > >> > +1 (binding) > > > >> > > > > >> > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] > > > >> > > > > >> > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All of > > > >> > that looks good. > > > >> > > > > >> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 > > > >> >> > > > >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > >> >> > > > >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > > > >> >> > > > >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > > >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > > > >> >> > > > >> >> [ ] +1 approve > > > >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion > > > >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Here is my +1 > > > >> >> -- > > > >> >> - > > > >> >> Noble Paul > > > >> >> > > > >> >> - > > > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Anshum Gupta > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> - > > > >> Noble Paul > > > >> > > > >> - > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > >> > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
It’s 9 binding: Noble, Tim, me, Ignacio, Mike M, Namgyu, Atri, Anshum and Mike S. 1 non-binding: Haoyu On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:34 AM Michael Sokolov wrote: > SUCCESS! [0:58:25.213071] > > +1 better late than never? > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya > wrote: > > > > Thanks Noble! > > > > On Thu, 28 Jan, 2021, 4:24 pm Noble Paul, wrote: > >> > >> [+1] 9 (4 binding) > >> > >> [0] 0 > >> > >> [-1] 0 > >> > >> > >> This vote has PASSED. > >> > >> I shall proceed with the rest of the release process > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > >> > > >> > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! > >> > > >> > +1 (binding) > >> > > >> > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] > >> > > >> > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All of > that looks good. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 > >> >> > >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >> >> > >> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > >> >> > >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > >> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > >> >> > >> >> [ ] +1 approve > >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> >> > >> >> Here is my +1 > >> >> -- > >> >> - > >> >> Noble Paul > >> >> > >> >> - > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Anshum Gupta > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> - > >> Noble Paul > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
SUCCESS! [0:58:25.213071] +1 better late than never? On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:04 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya wrote: > > Thanks Noble! > > On Thu, 28 Jan, 2021, 4:24 pm Noble Paul, wrote: >> >> [+1] 9 (4 binding) >> >> [0] 0 >> >> [-1] 0 >> >> >> This vote has PASSED. >> >> I shall proceed with the rest of the release process >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: >> > >> > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! >> > >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] >> > >> > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All of that >> > looks good. >> > >> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul wrote: >> >> >> >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 >> >> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >> >> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours >> >> >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> -- >> >> - >> >> Noble Paul >> >> >> >> - >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Anshum Gupta >> >> >> >> -- >> - >> Noble Paul >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
Thanks Noble! On Thu, 28 Jan, 2021, 4:24 pm Noble Paul, wrote: > [+1] 9 (4 binding) > > [0] 0 > > [-1] 0 > > > This vote has PASSED. > > I shall proceed with the rest of the release process > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > > > > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] > > > > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All of > that looks good. > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul wrote: > >> > >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 > >> > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > >> > >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > >> > >> > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > >> Here is my +1 > >> -- > >> - > >> Noble Paul > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > > > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > > > > -- > - > Noble Paul > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
Yeah , there were 5 binding votes On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:19 PM Atri Sharma wrote: > > Hi Noble, > > Is the binding vote count not incorrect? > > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021, 16:24 Noble Paul, wrote: >> >> [+1] 9 (4 binding) >> >> [0] 0 >> >> [-1] 0 >> >> >> This vote has PASSED. >> >> I shall proceed with the rest of the release process >> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: >> > >> > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! >> > >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] >> > >> > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All of that >> > looks good. >> > >> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul wrote: >> >> >> >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 >> >> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >> >> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours >> >> >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> -- >> >> - >> >> Noble Paul >> >> >> >> - >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Anshum Gupta >> >> >> >> -- >> - >> Noble Paul >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> -- - Noble Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
Hi Noble, Is the binding vote count not incorrect? On Thu, 28 Jan 2021, 16:24 Noble Paul, wrote: > [+1] 9 (4 binding) > > [0] 0 > > [-1] 0 > > > This vote has PASSED. > > I shall proceed with the rest of the release process > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta > wrote: > > > > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] > > > > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All of > that looks good. > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul wrote: > >> > >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 > >> > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: > >> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > >> > >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > >> > >> > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > >> Here is my +1 > >> -- > >> - > >> Noble Paul > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > > > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > > > > -- > - > Noble Paul > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
[+1] 9 (4 binding) [0] 0 [-1] 0 This vote has PASSED. I shall proceed with the rest of the release process On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 6:24 PM Anshum Gupta wrote: > > Thanks for handing the release, Noble! > > +1 (binding) > > SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] > > Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All of that > looks good. > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul wrote: >> >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >> >> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> Here is my +1 >> -- >> - >> Noble Paul >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > > -- > Anshum Gupta -- - Noble Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
Thanks for handing the release, Noble! +1 (binding) SUCCESS! [0:56:12.016387] Ran the smoke tester, a demo app, and checked the change log. All of that looks good. On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:22 AM Noble Paul wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Here is my +1 > -- > - > Noble Paul > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Anshum Gupta
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [1:24:26.38423] On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:52 PM Noble Paul wrote: > > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Here is my +1 > -- > - > Noble Paul > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > -- Regards, Atri Apache Concerted - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
+1 (non-binding) Tested Lucene part of RC1 on our service, since that part is not changed so still +1. Patrick Namgyu Kim 于2021年1月27日周三 上午10:26写道: > +1 (binding) > > SUCCESS! [1:30:27.376324] > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:19 PM Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> >> SUCCESS! [0:43:40.201461] >> >> >> However, the first time I ran smoke tester, it failed with this: >> >>[junit4] Tests with failures [seed: D3F97A1F3602195A]: >> >>[junit4] - >> org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderTragicEventTest.testLeaderFailsOver >> >> >>[junit4] 2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test >> -Dtestcase=LeaderTragicEventTest >> -Dtests.method=testLeaderFailsOver -Dtests.seed=D3F97A1F3602195A >> -Dtests.locale=ar-LB -Dtests.timezone=SystemV/MST7MDT -Dtests.asserts=true >> -Dtes\ >> >> ts.file.encoding=US-ASCII >> >>[junit4] ERROR 10.9s J1 | LeaderTragicEventTest.testLeaderFailsOver >> <<< >> >>[junit4]> Throwable #1: >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error >> from server at https://127.0.0.1:33003/solr: Underlying core creation >> failed while creating collection: testLeaderFailsO\ >> >> ver >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.executeMethod(HttpSolrClient.java:681) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:266) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:248) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBSolrClient.doRequest(LBSolrClient.java:369) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBSolrClient.request(LBSolrClient.java:297) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.sendRequest(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:1171) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:934) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.request(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:866) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:214) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:231) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderTragicEventTest.testLeaderFailsOver(LeaderTragicEventTest.java:80) >> >>[junit4]>at >> java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)Throwable #2: >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error >> from server at https://127.0.0.1:33003/solr: Could not find collection : >> \ >> >> testLeaderFailsOver >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.executeMethod(HttpSolrClient.java:681) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:266) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:248) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBSolrClient.doRequest(LBSolrClient.java:369) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBSolrClient.request(LBSolrClient.java:297) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.sendRequest(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:1171) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:934) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.request(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:866) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:214) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:231) >> >>[junit4]>at >> org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderTragicEventTest.tearDown(LeaderTragicEventTest.java:73) >> >>[junit4]>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) >> >> >> I guess it was a transient failure -- I re-ran smoke tester and it passed >> the 2nd time. Is this a known Bad Apple test? >> >> Mike McCandless >> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:53 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> SUCCESS! [0:53:01.546134] >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:51 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < >>> tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thanks Noble! And thanks for fixing that concurrency issue, I'd hit it but didn't have time to investigate it. +1 SUCCESS! [0:58:32.036482] On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:19 AM Timothy Potter wrote: > Thanks Noble! > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:24:28.212370] (my internet is super slow today) > > Re-ran all the Solr
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [1:30:27.376324] On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:19 PM Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > SUCCESS! [0:43:40.201461] > > > However, the first time I ran smoke tester, it failed with this: > >[junit4] Tests with failures [seed: D3F97A1F3602195A]: > >[junit4] - > org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderTragicEventTest.testLeaderFailsOver > > >[junit4] 2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test > -Dtestcase=LeaderTragicEventTest > -Dtests.method=testLeaderFailsOver -Dtests.seed=D3F97A1F3602195A > -Dtests.locale=ar-LB -Dtests.timezone=SystemV/MST7MDT -Dtests.asserts=true > -Dtes\ > > ts.file.encoding=US-ASCII > >[junit4] ERROR 10.9s J1 | LeaderTragicEventTest.testLeaderFailsOver > <<< > >[junit4]> Throwable #1: > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error > from server at https://127.0.0.1:33003/solr: Underlying core creation > failed while creating collection: testLeaderFailsO\ > > ver > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.executeMethod(HttpSolrClient.java:681) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:266) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:248) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBSolrClient.doRequest(LBSolrClient.java:369) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBSolrClient.request(LBSolrClient.java:297) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.sendRequest(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:1171) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:934) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.request(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:866) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:214) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:231) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderTragicEventTest.testLeaderFailsOver(LeaderTragicEventTest.java:80) > >[junit4]>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)Throwable > #2: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: > Error from server at https://127.0.0.1:33003/solr: Could not find > collection : \ > > testLeaderFailsOver > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.executeMethod(HttpSolrClient.java:681) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:266) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:248) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBSolrClient.doRequest(LBSolrClient.java:369) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBSolrClient.request(LBSolrClient.java:297) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.sendRequest(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:1171) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:934) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.request(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:866) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:214) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:231) > >[junit4]>at > org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderTragicEventTest.tearDown(LeaderTragicEventTest.java:73) > >[junit4]>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) > > > I guess it was a transient failure -- I re-ran smoke tester and it passed > the 2nd time. Is this a known Bad Apple test? > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:53 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> SUCCESS! [0:53:01.546134] >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:51 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < >> tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Noble! And thanks for fixing that concurrency issue, I'd hit it >>> but didn't have time to investigate it. >>> >>> +1 >>> SUCCESS! [0:58:32.036482] >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:19 AM Timothy Potter >>> wrote: >>> Thanks Noble! +1 SUCCESS! [1:24:28.212370] (my internet is super slow today) Re-ran all the Solr operator tests and verified the Cloud graph UI renders correctly now. On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:22 AM Noble Paul wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [0:43:40.201461] However, the first time I ran smoke tester, it failed with this: [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: D3F97A1F3602195A]: [junit4] - org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderTragicEventTest.testLeaderFailsOver [junit4] 2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test -Dtestcase=LeaderTragicEventTest -Dtests.method=testLeaderFailsOver -Dtests.seed=D3F97A1F3602195A -Dtests.locale=ar-LB -Dtests.timezone=SystemV/MST7MDT -Dtests.asserts=true -Dtes\ ts.file.encoding=US-ASCII [junit4] ERROR 10.9s J1 | LeaderTragicEventTest.testLeaderFailsOver <<< [junit4]> Throwable #1: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error from server at https://127.0.0.1:33003/solr: Underlying core creation failed while creating collection: testLeaderFailsO\ ver [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.executeMethod(HttpSolrClient.java:681) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:266) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:248) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBSolrClient.doRequest(LBSolrClient.java:369) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBSolrClient.request(LBSolrClient.java:297) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.sendRequest(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:1171) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:934) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.request(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:866) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:214) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:231) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderTragicEventTest.testLeaderFailsOver(LeaderTragicEventTest.java:80) [junit4]>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)Throwable #2: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error from server at https://127.0.0.1:33003/solr: Could not find collection : \ testLeaderFailsOver [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.executeMethod(HttpSolrClient.java:681) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:266) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient.request(HttpSolrClient.java:248) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBSolrClient.doRequest(LBSolrClient.java:369) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.LBSolrClient.request(LBSolrClient.java:297) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.sendRequest(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:1171) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.requestWithRetryOnStaleState(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:934) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.BaseCloudSolrClient.request(BaseCloudSolrClient.java:866) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:214) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrRequest.process(SolrRequest.java:231) [junit4]>at org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderTragicEventTest.tearDown(LeaderTragicEventTest.java:73) [junit4]>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) I guess it was a transient failure -- I re-ran smoke tester and it passed the 2nd time. Is this a known Bad Apple test? Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:53 AM Ignacio Vera wrote: > +1 (binding) > > SUCCESS! [0:53:01.546134] > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:51 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < > tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Noble! And thanks for fixing that concurrency issue, I'd hit it >> but didn't have time to investigate it. >> >> +1 >> SUCCESS! [0:58:32.036482] >> >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:19 AM Timothy Potter >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Noble! >>> >>> +1 SUCCESS! [1:24:28.212370] (my internet is super slow today) >>> >>> Re-ran all the Solr operator tests and verified the Cloud graph UI >>> renders correctly now. >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:22 AM Noble Paul wrote: >>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ The vote will be open for at least 72 hours [ ] +1 approve
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
+1 (binding) SUCCESS! [0:53:01.546134] On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:51 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote: > Thanks Noble! And thanks for fixing that concurrency issue, I'd hit it but > didn't have time to investigate it. > > +1 > SUCCESS! [0:58:32.036482] > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:19 AM Timothy Potter > wrote: > >> Thanks Noble! >> >> +1 SUCCESS! [1:24:28.212370] (my internet is super slow today) >> >> Re-ran all the Solr operator tests and verified the Cloud graph UI >> renders correctly now. >> >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:22 AM Noble Paul wrote: >> >>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 >>> >>> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>> >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >>> >>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >>> >>> >>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours >>> >>> [ ] +1 approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> >>> Here is my +1 >>> -- >>> - >>> Noble Paul >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
Thanks Noble! And thanks for fixing that concurrency issue, I'd hit it but didn't have time to investigate it. +1 SUCCESS! [0:58:32.036482] On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:19 AM Timothy Potter wrote: > Thanks Noble! > > +1 SUCCESS! [1:24:28.212370] (my internet is super slow today) > > Re-ran all the Solr operator tests and verified the Cloud graph UI renders > correctly now. > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:22 AM Noble Paul wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ >> >> >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> Here is my +1 >> -- >> - >> Noble Paul >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
Thanks Noble! +1 SUCCESS! [1:24:28.212370] (my internet is super slow today) Re-ran all the Solr operator tests and verified the Cloud graph UI renders correctly now. On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:22 AM Noble Paul wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Here is my +1 > -- > - > Noble Paul > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 RC2
Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 8.8.0 The artifacts can be downloaded from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.8.0-RC2-revb10659f0fc18b58b90929cfdadde94544d202c4a/ The vote will be open for at least 72 hours [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Here is my +1 -- - Noble Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org