[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7102) LatLonPoint newDistanceSort fails with "sort missing first"

2016-03-14 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15193802#comment-15193802
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7102:
-

Commit a6fe1c0b155ff464d0596289bb209eef99c269d3 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_6x from [~rcmuir]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=a6fe1c0 ]

LUCENE-7102: LatLonPoint.newDistanceSort fails with "sort missing first"


> LatLonPoint newDistanceSort fails with "sort missing first"
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-7102
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7102
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-7102.patch
>
>
> The distance sort comparator creates bounding boxes when the priority queue 
> is full, to speed up sorting.
> But with missing values (which we don't test), they can be e.g. -Inf/+Inf and 
> we do the wrong thing (e.g. try to make illegal infinite bounding boxes).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7102) LatLonPoint newDistanceSort fails with "sort missing first"

2016-03-14 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15193793#comment-15193793
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7102:
-

Commit 0f949c815343c853499d518e7d565d642d93ce63 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~rcmuir]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=0f949c8 ]

LUCENE-7102: LatLonPoint.newDistanceSort fails with "sort missing first"


> LatLonPoint newDistanceSort fails with "sort missing first"
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-7102
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7102
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-7102.patch
>
>
> The distance sort comparator creates bounding boxes when the priority queue 
> is full, to speed up sorting.
> But with missing values (which we don't test), they can be e.g. -Inf/+Inf and 
> we do the wrong thing (e.g. try to make illegal infinite bounding boxes).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7102) LatLonPoint newDistanceSort fails with "sort missing first"

2016-03-14 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15193733#comment-15193733
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-7102:
-

I thought about this too, but we can do this separately if we want? 

Either way, i don't think we should pass +/- infinite radius to the geo 
functions.

> LatLonPoint newDistanceSort fails with "sort missing first"
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-7102
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7102
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-7102.patch
>
>
> The distance sort comparator creates bounding boxes when the priority queue 
> is full, to speed up sorting.
> But with missing values (which we don't test), they can be e.g. -Inf/+Inf and 
> we do the wrong thing (e.g. try to make illegal infinite bounding boxes).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7102) LatLonPoint newDistanceSort fails with "sort missing first"

2016-03-14 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15193725#comment-15193725
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7102:


+1, nice catch.

I'm not sure we should even allow "sort missing first"...

> LatLonPoint newDistanceSort fails with "sort missing first"
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-7102
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7102
> Project: Lucene - Core
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: LUCENE-7102.patch
>
>
> The distance sort comparator creates bounding boxes when the priority queue 
> is full, to speed up sorting.
> But with missing values (which we don't test), they can be e.g. -Inf/+Inf and 
> we do the wrong thing (e.g. try to make illegal infinite bounding boxes).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org