[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16075150#comment-16075150 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7899: - Commit f288b440b76f6b2ab23cc134054e2b1d374d182a in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/branch_7_0 from Mike McCandless [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=f288b44 ] LUCENE-7899: add text after header in MIGRATE.txt > Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > --- > > Key: LUCENE-7899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Michael McCandless >Assignee: Michael McCandless >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 7.0, master (8.0) > > Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch > > > I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values > field exists (has any value) for each document in the index? > Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient > query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values. > ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a > document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values > fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". > I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for > discussion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16075149#comment-16075149 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7899: - Commit b52974f3386746b1b529243afc7fa321d9b204bb in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/branch_7x from Mike McCandless [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=b52974f ] LUCENE-7899: add text after header in MIGRATE.txt > Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > --- > > Key: LUCENE-7899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Michael McCandless >Assignee: Michael McCandless >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 7.0, master (8.0) > > Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch > > > I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values > field exists (has any value) for each document in the index? > Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient > query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values. > ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a > document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values > fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". > I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for > discussion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074897#comment-16074897 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7899: - Commit 084e5290e1eb232ceba62f6361a0e2c6625dceaa in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/branch_7x from Mike McCandless [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=084e529 ] LUCENE-7899: add entry in MIGRATE.txt > Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > --- > > Key: LUCENE-7899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Michael McCandless >Assignee: Michael McCandless >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 7.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch > > > I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values > field exists (has any value) for each document in the index? > Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient > query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values. > ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a > document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values > fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". > I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for > discussion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074894#comment-16074894 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7899: - Commit a0b5bce31acdbed5bfc74df6232733e39b6d67de in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/branch_7_0 from Mike McCandless [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=a0b5bce ] LUCENE-7899: add missing file > Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > --- > > Key: LUCENE-7899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Michael McCandless >Assignee: Michael McCandless >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 7.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch > > > I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values > field exists (has any value) for each document in the index? > Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient > query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values. > ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a > document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values > fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". > I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for > discussion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074895#comment-16074895 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7899: - Commit 6837e3d93f8eadb325229f2d9aa72a9e597d1993 in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/branch_7_0 from Mike McCandless [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=6837e3d ] LUCENE-7899: add entry in MIGRATE.txt > Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > --- > > Key: LUCENE-7899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Michael McCandless >Assignee: Michael McCandless >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 7.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch > > > I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values > field exists (has any value) for each document in the index? > Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient > query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values. > ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a > document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values > fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". > I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for > discussion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074893#comment-16074893 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7899: - Commit 71feef105667793b58dc7449bb5646caf9c23275 in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/branch_7_0 from Mike McCandless [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=71feef1 ] LUCENE-7899: rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > --- > > Key: LUCENE-7899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Michael McCandless >Assignee: Michael McCandless >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 7.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch > > > I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values > field exists (has any value) for each document in the index? > Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient > query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values. > ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a > document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values > fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". > I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for > discussion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074887#comment-16074887 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7899: - Commit f7ab772066faa0018814d7761b44b76a5114e796 in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/branch_7x from Mike McCandless [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=f7ab772 ] LUCENE-7899: add missing file > Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > --- > > Key: LUCENE-7899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Michael McCandless >Assignee: Michael McCandless >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 7.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch > > > I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values > field exists (has any value) for each document in the index? > Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient > query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values. > ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a > document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values > fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". > I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for > discussion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074886#comment-16074886 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7899: - Commit 52f11df3ab64b5334492fd37612d64eb23d530bd in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/branch_7x from Mike McCandless [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=52f11df ] LUCENE-7899: rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > --- > > Key: LUCENE-7899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Michael McCandless >Assignee: Michael McCandless >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 7.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch > > > I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values > field exists (has any value) for each document in the index? > Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient > query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values. > ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a > document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values > fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". > I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for > discussion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074882#comment-16074882 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7899: - Commit 6e36ad7c5d654030385156cd7c7e4845aeabb174 in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/master from Mike McCandless [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=6e36ad7 ] LUCENE-7899: add missing file > Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > --- > > Key: LUCENE-7899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Michael McCandless >Assignee: Michael McCandless >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 7.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch > > > I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values > field exists (has any value) for each document in the index? > Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient > query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values. > ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a > document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values > fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". > I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for > discussion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074878#comment-16074878 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7899: - Commit 6abff51edeab08f272774683b9cbec3c517587a7 in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/master from Mike McCandless [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=6abff51 ] LUCENE-7899: rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > --- > > Key: LUCENE-7899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Michael McCandless >Assignee: Michael McCandless >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 7.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch > > > I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values > field exists (has any value) for each document in the index? > Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient > query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values. > ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a > document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values > fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". > I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for > discussion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074744#comment-16074744 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-7899: --- bq. ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". IMHO, this is still the preferable method of doing this as you only need one field and you can quickly lookup all documents with a simple inverted index query. I generally recommend the same strategy also to Solr users (they just have to do it manually). Index size is in most cases not a problem, as the term index is small and the posting list is highly compressed! > Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > --- > > Key: LUCENE-7899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Michael McCandless >Assignee: Michael McCandless >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 7.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch > > > I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values > field exists (has any value) for each document in the index? > Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient > query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values. > ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a > document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values > fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". > I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for > discussion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074709#comment-16074709 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7899: bq. Maybe add a note to lucene/MIGRATE.txt before pushing to branch_7_0 and branch_7x? +1, will do > Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > --- > > Key: LUCENE-7899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Michael McCandless >Assignee: Michael McCandless >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 7.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch > > > I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values > field exists (has any value) for each document in the index? > Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient > query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values. > ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a > document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values > fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". > I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for > discussion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074529#comment-16074529
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7899:
--
Maybe add a note to {{lucene/MIGRATE.txt}} before pushing to branch_7_0 and
branch_7x?
> Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-7899
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Michael McCandless
>Assignee: Michael McCandless
>Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 7.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch
>
>
> I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values
> field exists (has any value) for each document in the index?
> Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient
> query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values.
> ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a
> document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values
> fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free".
> I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for
> discussion.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7899) Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16074528#comment-16074528 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7899: -- +1 > Rename FieldValueQuery to DocValuesFieldExistsQuery > --- > > Key: LUCENE-7899 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Michael McCandless >Assignee: Michael McCandless >Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 7.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-7899.patch > > > I don't think we have a query today to efficiently test whether a doc values > field exists (has any value) for each document in the index? > Now that we use iterators to access doc values, this should be an efficient > query: we can return the DISI we get for the doc values. > ElasticSearch indexes its own field to record which field names occur in a > document, so it's able to do "exists" for any field (not just doc values > fields), but I think doc values fields we can just get "for free". > I haven't started on this ... just wanted to open the issue first for > discussion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
