[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10132) Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex

2017-10-31 Thread Gus Heck (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16226817#comment-16226817
 ] 

Gus Heck commented on SOLR-10132:
-

I had been meaning to get back to this, but it got lost in the shuffle, thanks 
for getting it in. 

> Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10132
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: faceting
>Affects Versions: 6.4.1
>Reporter: Gus Heck
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
> Attachments: SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, 
> SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch
>
>
> I recently ran into a case where I really wanted to only return the next 
> level of a hierarchical facet, and while I was able to do that with a 
> coordinated set of dynamic fields, it occurred to me that this would have 
> been much much easier if I could have simply used PathHierarchyTokenizer and 
> written
> ="/my/current/prefix/[^/]+$"
> thereby limiting the returned facets to the next level down and not return 
> the  additional  N levels I didn't (yet) want to display (numbering in the 
> thousands near the top of the tree). I suspect there are other good use 
> cases, and the patch seemed relatively tractable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10132) Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex

2017-10-31 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16226767#comment-16226767
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10132:


Commit e6ec82249f909b25f33c2fd8bff75326b87bf115 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_7x from [~cpoerschke]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=e6ec822 ]

SOLR-10132: A new optional facet.matches parameter to return facet buckets only 
for terms that match a regular expression. (Gus Heck, Christine Poerschke)


> Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10132
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: faceting
>Affects Versions: 6.4.1
>Reporter: Gus Heck
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
> Attachments: SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, 
> SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch
>
>
> I recently ran into a case where I really wanted to only return the next 
> level of a hierarchical facet, and while I was able to do that with a 
> coordinated set of dynamic fields, it occurred to me that this would have 
> been much much easier if I could have simply used PathHierarchyTokenizer and 
> written
> ="/my/current/prefix/[^/]+$"
> thereby limiting the returned facets to the next level down and not return 
> the  additional  N levels I didn't (yet) want to display (numbering in the 
> thousands near the top of the tree). I suspect there are other good use 
> cases, and the patch seemed relatively tractable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10132) Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex

2017-10-30 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16225481#comment-16225481
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10132:


Commit b8bcaf92465eed8477baf9932bea624b6b7830f8 in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~cpoerschke]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=b8bcaf9 ]

SOLR-10132: A new optional facet.matches parameter to return facet buckets only 
for terms that match a regular expression. (Gus Heck, Christine Poerschke)


> Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10132
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: faceting
>Affects Versions: 6.4.1
>Reporter: Gus Heck
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
> Attachments: SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, 
> SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch
>
>
> I recently ran into a case where I really wanted to only return the next 
> level of a hierarchical facet, and while I was able to do that with a 
> coordinated set of dynamic fields, it occurred to me that this would have 
> been much much easier if I could have simply used PathHierarchyTokenizer and 
> written
> ="/my/current/prefix/[^/]+$"
> thereby limiting the returned facets to the next level down and not return 
> the  additional  N levels I didn't (yet) want to display (numbering in the 
> thousands near the top of the tree). I suspect there are other good use 
> cases, and the patch seemed relatively tractable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10132) Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex

2017-10-05 Thread Gus Heck (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16192888#comment-16192888
 ] 

Gus Heck commented on SOLR-10132:
-

The only remaining question is whether or not newExcludeBytesRefFilter was 
intentionally protected access, or if that's just a result of the mood that the 
ide was in that particular day... If it's to be left in as a protected method 
the current patch is good to go (perhaps delete my comment). If there's any 
reasonable scenario where it might have already been relied upon of course it 
stays regardless (for back compatibility), but it's pretty new and pretty deep, 
so maybe not?.

> Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10132
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: faceting
>Affects Versions: 6.4.1
>Reporter: Gus Heck
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
> Attachments: SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, 
> SOLR-10132.patch
>
>
> I recently ran into a case where I really wanted to only return the next 
> level of a hierarchical facet, and while I was able to do that with a 
> coordinated set of dynamic fields, it occurred to me that this would have 
> been much much easier if I could have simply used PathHierarchyTokenizer and 
> written
> ="/my/current/prefix/[^/]+$"
> thereby limiting the returned facets to the next level down and not return 
> the  additional  N levels I didn't (yet) want to display (numbering in the 
> thousands near the top of the tree). I suspect there are other good use 
> cases, and the patch seemed relatively tractable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10132) Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex

2017-09-29 Thread Gus Heck (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16185771#comment-16185771
 ] 

Gus Heck commented on SOLR-10132:
-

Any thoughts on this?

> Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10132
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: faceting
>Affects Versions: 6.4.1
>Reporter: Gus Heck
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
> Attachments: SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, 
> SOLR-10132.patch
>
>
> I recently ran into a case where I really wanted to only return the next 
> level of a hierarchical facet, and while I was able to do that with a 
> coordinated set of dynamic fields, it occurred to me that this would have 
> been much much easier if I could have simply used PathHierarchyTokenizer and 
> written
> ="/my/current/prefix/[^/]+$"
> thereby limiting the returned facets to the next level down and not return 
> the  additional  N levels I didn't (yet) want to display (numbering in the 
> thousands near the top of the tree). I suspect there are other good use 
> cases, and the patch seemed relatively tractable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10132) Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex

2017-09-18 Thread Christine Poerschke (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16169878#comment-16169878
 ] 

Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-10132:


Hi Gus, thanks for returning to this!

bq. ... the MATCH_ALL_TERMS idea has missed the boat. ...  so I think now 
returning null as before is the only path forward. ...

I agree.

bq. ... Also the new ascii doc stuff has come in since the last patch here so I 
probably should add some documentation for this feature too, now that that is 
something I can do myself :-). ...

Yes please.

bq. ... Should I do the patch vs trunk since it seems I just barely missed the 
boat for 7?

Yes please. Almost always patches would be against trunk/master and then from 
there any back porting would be done via cherry-pick to the branches, branch_7x 
at present.

> Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10132
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: faceting
>Affects Versions: 6.4.1
>Reporter: Gus Heck
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
> Attachments: SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch
>
>
> I recently ran into a case where I really wanted to only return the next 
> level of a hierarchical facet, and while I was able to do that with a 
> coordinated set of dynamic fields, it occurred to me that this would have 
> been much much easier if I could have simply used PathHierarchyTokenizer and 
> written
> ="/my/current/prefix/[^/]+$"
> thereby limiting the returned facets to the next level down and not return 
> the  additional  N levels I didn't (yet) want to display (numbering in the 
> thousands near the top of the tree). I suspect there are other good use 
> cases, and the patch seemed relatively tractable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10132) Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex

2017-09-16 Thread Gus Heck (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16168923#comment-16168923
 ] 

Gus Heck commented on SOLR-10132:
-

Finally getting back to this. From the looks of things, the MATCH_ALL_TERMS 
idea has missed the boat. There are several tests now that break when I try to 
implement that and the above statement about "yet part of an official release" 
has changed too, so I think now returning null as before is the only path 
forward. Working on a new patch (that returns null here). Tests are working 
including broken out test, also added javadoc. Also the new ascii doc stuff has 
come in since the last patch here so I probably should add some documentation 
for this feature too, now that that is something I can do myself :). Should I 
do the patch vs trunk since it seems I just barely missed the boat for 7?

> Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10132
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: faceting
>Affects Versions: 6.4.1
>Reporter: Gus Heck
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
> Attachments: SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch
>
>
> I recently ran into a case where I really wanted to only return the next 
> level of a hierarchical facet, and while I was able to do that with a 
> coordinated set of dynamic fields, it occurred to me that this would have 
> been much much easier if I could have simply used PathHierarchyTokenizer and 
> written
> ="/my/current/prefix/[^/]+$"
> thereby limiting the returned facets to the next level down and not return 
> the  additional  N levels I didn't (yet) want to display (numbering in the 
> thousands near the top of the tree). I suspect there are other good use 
> cases, and the patch seemed relatively tractable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10132) Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex

2017-02-27 Thread Christine Poerschke (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15886319#comment-15886319
 ] 

Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-10132:


re: {{null}} vs. {{SimpleFacets.MATCH_ALL_TERMS}} - SOLR-9914 refactored the 
"contains" check which was a null or non-null String into a null or non-null 
SubstringBytesRefFilter object _and_ that change isn't yet part of an official 
release. On that basis, yes, I think MATCH_ALL_TERMS instead of null would make 
sense. And for clarity, could I suggest making that change separately from the 
{{facet.matches}} feature addition here - what do you think?

> Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10132
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: faceting
>Affects Versions: 6.4.1
>Reporter: Gus Heck
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
> Attachments: SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch
>
>
> I recently ran into a case where I really wanted to only return the next 
> level of a hierarchical facet, and while I was able to do that with a 
> coordinated set of dynamic fields, it occurred to me that this would have 
> been much much easier if I could have simply used PathHierarchyTokenizer and 
> written
> ="/my/current/prefix/[^/]+$"
> thereby limiting the returned facets to the next level down and not return 
> the  additional  N levels I didn't (yet) want to display (numbering in the 
> thousands near the top of the tree). I suspect there are other good use 
> cases, and the patch seemed relatively tractable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10132) Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex

2017-02-22 Thread Gus Heck (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15878097#comment-15878097
 ] 

Gus Heck commented on SOLR-10132:
-

Hmm, would it be possible to test like this:

{code}
if (termFilter != SimpleFacets.MATCH_ALL) {
  final BytesRef term = si.lookupOrd(startTermIndex+i);
  if (!termFilter.test(term)) {
continue;
  }
}
{code}

I'm generally not fond of null except when representing an unknown primitive 
value (boxed of course), which is why I tried to eliminate it. It's not very 
self documenting, and retaining it  the list + switch you have added or a 
string of if/else checking as in the original code, plus and a lot of other 
reasons. http://www.yegor256.com/2014/05/13/why-null-is-bad.html is more 
eloquent than I on this... 

Perhaps it should be named {{MATCH_ALL_TERMS}} however, to avoid sounding like 
it has something to do with {{MatchAllDocsQuery()}}

> Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10132
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: faceting
>Affects Versions: 6.4.1
>Reporter: Gus Heck
>Assignee: Christine Poerschke
> Attachments: SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch, SOLR-10132.patch
>
>
> I recently ran into a case where I really wanted to only return the next 
> level of a hierarchical facet, and while I was able to do that with a 
> coordinated set of dynamic fields, it occurred to me that this would have 
> been much much easier if I could have simply used PathHierarchyTokenizer and 
> written
> ="/my/current/prefix/[^/]+$"
> thereby limiting the returned facets to the next level down and not return 
> the  additional  N levels I didn't (yet) want to display (numbering in the 
> thousands near the top of the tree). I suspect there are other good use 
> cases, and the patch seemed relatively tractable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10132) Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex

2017-02-17 Thread Gus Heck (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15872078#comment-15872078
 ] 

Gus Heck commented on SOLR-10132:
-

Ok I'll use the suggested, somewhat hackish workaround... opened 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10155 for the review of this check

> Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10132
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: faceting
>Affects Versions: 6.4.1
>Reporter: Gus Heck
> Attachments: SOLR-10132.patch
>
>
> I recently ran into a case where I really wanted to only return the next 
> level of a hierarchical facet, and while I was able to do that with a 
> coordinated set of dynamic fields, it occurred to me that this would have 
> been much much easier if I could have simply used PathHierarchyTokenizer and 
> written
> ="/my/current/prefix/[^/]+$"
> thereby limiting the returned facets to the next level down and not return 
> the  additional  N levels I didn't (yet) want to display (numbering in the 
> thousands near the top of the tree). I suspect there are other good use 
> cases, and the patch seemed relatively tractable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10132) Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex

2017-02-16 Thread Christine Poerschke (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15870204#comment-15870204
 ] 

Christine Poerschke commented on SOLR-10132:


bq. ... still need to figure out what to do with the check for numeric facets 
...

Something like this might be hacky but should work:
{code}
public class RegexBytesRefFilter extends SubstringBytesRefFilter {

  final private String regex;
  final private Pattern compiled;

  public RegexBytesRefFilter(String regex) {
super(regex, false);
this.regex = regex;
this.compiled = Pattern.compile(regex);
  }

  @Override
  protected boolean includeString(String term) {
Matcher m = compiled.matcher(term);
return m.matches();
  }

}
{code}

In SOLR-9914 we were puzzled by the check also, perhaps its removal could be 
considered (outside the scope of this ticket) i.e. just disallow/throw if any 
_contains_ (or _matches_ or other string-matching) is used with numeric facets?

> Support facet.matches to cull facets returned with a regex
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10132
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10132
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: faceting
>Affects Versions: 6.4.1
>Reporter: Gus Heck
> Attachments: SOLR-10132.patch
>
>
> I recently ran into a case where I really wanted to only return the next 
> level of a hierarchical facet, and while I was able to do that with a 
> coordinated set of dynamic fields, it occurred to me that this would have 
> been much much easier if I could have simply used PathHierarchyTokenizer and 
> written
> ="/my/current/prefix/[^/]+$"
> thereby limiting the returned facets to the next level down and not return 
> the  additional  N levels I didn't (yet) want to display (numbering in the 
> thousands near the top of the tree). I suspect there are other good use 
> cases, and the patch seemed relatively tractable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org