[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3243) eDismax and non-fielded range query

2013-06-06 Thread Naomi Dushay (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13677711#comment-13677711
 ] 

Naomi Dushay commented on SOLR-3243:


should this be linked to SOLR-2368 ?

> eDismax and non-fielded range query
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-3243
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3243
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: query parsers
>Affects Versions: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5
>Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>Assignee: Jan Høydahl
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 4.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-3243.patch
>
>
> Reported by Bill Bell in SOLR-3085:
> If you enter a non-fielded open-ended range in the search box, like [* TO *], 
> eDismax will expand it to all fields:
> {noformat}
> +DisjunctionMaxQuery((content:[* TO *]^2.0 | id:[* TO *]^50.0 | author:[* TO 
> *]^15.0 | meta:[* TO *]^10.0 | name:[* TO *]^20.0))
> {noformat}
> This does not make sense, and a side effect is that range queries for strings 
> are very expensive, open-ended even more, and you can totally crash the 
> search server by hammering something like ([* TO *] OR [* TO *] OR [* TO *]) 
> a few times...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3243) eDismax and non-fielded range query

2013-02-27 Thread JIRA

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13588167#comment-13588167
 ] 

Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-3243:
---

Have anyone else tested the attached patch? Should we aim to get it in for 4.2? 
Needs some unit tests..

> eDismax and non-fielded range query
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-3243
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3243
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: query parsers
>Affects Versions: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5
>Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>Assignee: Jan Høydahl
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 4.2, 5.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-3243.patch
>
>
> Reported by Bill Bell in SOLR-3085:
> If you enter a non-fielded open-ended range in the search box, like [* TO *], 
> eDismax will expand it to all fields:
> {noformat}
> +DisjunctionMaxQuery((content:[* TO *]^2.0 | id:[* TO *]^50.0 | author:[* TO 
> *]^15.0 | meta:[* TO *]^10.0 | name:[* TO *]^20.0))
> {noformat}
> This does not make sense, and a side effect is that range queries for strings 
> are very expensive, open-ended even more, and you can totally crash the 
> search server by hammering something like ([* TO *] OR [* TO *] OR [* TO *]) 
> a few times...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3243) eDismax and non-fielded range query

2013-01-30 Thread JIRA

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13566414#comment-13566414
 ] 

Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-3243:
---

[~billnbell], have you tested the patch? What do you think about doing the same 
for a plain "*"?

> eDismax and non-fielded range query
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-3243
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3243
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: query parsers
>Affects Versions: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5
>Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>Assignee: Jan Høydahl
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-3243.patch
>
>
> Reported by Bill Bell in SOLR-3085:
> If you enter a non-fielded open-ended range in the search box, like [* TO *], 
> eDismax will expand it to all fields:
> {noformat}
> +DisjunctionMaxQuery((content:[* TO *]^2.0 | id:[* TO *]^50.0 | author:[* TO 
> *]^15.0 | meta:[* TO *]^10.0 | name:[* TO *]^20.0))
> {noformat}
> This does not make sense, and a side effect is that range queries for strings 
> are very expensive, open-ended even more, and you can totally crash the 
> search server by hammering something like ([* TO *] OR [* TO *] OR [* TO *]) 
> a few times...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3243) eDismax and non-fielded range query

2012-09-11 Thread JIRA

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453021#comment-13453021
 ] 

Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-3243:
---

Bill Bell, would you care to test this and comment.

I think there is still a loophole for a bare * query - it gets expanded across 
all fields as well and is less efficient than a MatchAllDocsQuery, which is 
more likely to be the intent when issuing a *. Perhaps we can incorporate that 
in this issue as well?

> eDismax and non-fielded range query
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-3243
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3243
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: query parsers
>Affects Versions: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5
>Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>Assignee: Jan Høydahl
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 5.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-3243.patch
>
>
> Reported by Bill Bell in SOLR-3085:
> If you enter a non-fielded open-ended range in the search box, like [* TO *], 
> eDismax will expand it to all fields:
> {noformat}
> +DisjunctionMaxQuery((content:[* TO *]^2.0 | id:[* TO *]^50.0 | author:[* TO 
> *]^15.0 | meta:[* TO *]^10.0 | name:[* TO *]^20.0))
> {noformat}
> This does not make sense, and a side effect is that range queries for strings 
> are very expensive, open-ended even more, and you can totally crash the 
> search server by hammering something like ([* TO *] OR [* TO *] OR [* TO *]) 
> a few times...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3243) eDismax and non-fielded range query

2012-03-17 Thread Bill Bell (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13232174#comment-13232174
 ] 

Bill Bell commented on SOLR-3243:
-

If production sites are using edismax this seems like a very critical issue.

> eDismax and non-fielded range query
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-3243
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3243
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: query parsers
>Affects Versions: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5
>Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.6, 4.0
>
>
> Reported by Bill Bell in SOLR-3085:
> If you enter a non-fielded open-ended range in the search box, like [* TO *], 
> eDismax will expand it to all fields:
> {noformat}
> +DisjunctionMaxQuery((content:[* TO *]^2.0 | id:[* TO *]^50.0 | author:[* TO 
> *]^15.0 | meta:[* TO *]^10.0 | name:[* TO *]^20.0))
> {noformat}
> This does not make sense, and a side effect is that range queries for strings 
> are very expensive, open-ended even more, and you can totally crash the 
> search server by hammering something like ([* TO *] OR [* TO *] OR [* TO *]) 
> a few times...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-3243) eDismax and non-fielded range query

2012-03-17 Thread Bill Bell (Commented) (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13232173#comment-13232173
 ] 

Bill Bell commented on SOLR-3243:
-

If production sites are using edismax this seems like a very critical issue.

> eDismax and non-fielded range query
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-3243
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3243
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: query parsers
>Affects Versions: 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5
>Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 3.6, 4.0
>
>
> Reported by Bill Bell in SOLR-3085:
> If you enter a non-fielded open-ended range in the search box, like [* TO *], 
> eDismax will expand it to all fields:
> {noformat}
> +DisjunctionMaxQuery((content:[* TO *]^2.0 | id:[* TO *]^50.0 | author:[* TO 
> *]^15.0 | meta:[* TO *]^10.0 | name:[* TO *]^20.0))
> {noformat}
> This does not make sense, and a side effect is that range queries for strings 
> are very expensive, open-ended even more, and you can totally crash the 
> search server by hammering something like ([* TO *] OR [* TO *] OR [* TO *]) 
> a few times...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org