[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8831) allow _version_ field to be retrievable via docValues

2016-03-11 Thread Jack Krupansky (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15191504#comment-15191504
 ] 

Jack Krupansky commented on SOLR-8831:
--

Now that docValues is supported for _version_, the question arises as to which 
is preferred (faster, less memory), stored or docValues. IOW, which should be 
the default. I presume it should be docValues, but I have no real clue.

Also, the doc for Atomic Update has this example as a Power Tip, that has BOTH 
stored and docValues set:

{code}

{code}

See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Updating+Parts+of+Documents

Should that be changed to stored="false"? Or, is there actually some aditional 
hidden benefit to store="true" AND docValues="true"?


> allow _version_ field to be retrievable via docValues
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-8831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8831
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Fix For: 6.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-8831.patch
>
>
> Right now, one is prohibited from having an unstored _version_ field, even if 
> docValues are enabled.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8831) allow _version_ field to be retrievable via docValues

2016-03-11 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15191403#comment-15191403
 ] 

Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-8831:


I think that was for searchability purposes... it allowed indexed OR docValues 
(and said nothing about stored)

> allow _version_ field to be retrievable via docValues
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-8831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8831
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Fix For: 6.0
>
> Attachments: SOLR-8831.patch
>
>
> Right now, one is prohibited from having an unstored _version_ field, even if 
> docValues are enabled.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8831) allow _version_ field to be retrievable via docValues

2016-03-11 Thread ASF subversion and git services (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15191397#comment-15191397
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-8831:
---

Commit ff8cedcb11638ee52f91bf81bad2ee01f3c3d59a in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/branch_6_0 from [~yo...@apache.org]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=ff8cedc ]

SOLR-8831: allow _version_ field to be retrievable via docValues


> allow _version_ field to be retrievable via docValues
> -
>
> Key: SOLR-8831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8831
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Attachments: SOLR-8831.patch
>
>
> Right now, one is prohibited from having an unstored _version_ field, even if 
> docValues are enabled.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org