[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12697) pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislav Livotov updated SOLR-12697: - Attachment: SOLR-12697.patch > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: contrib - LTR >Reporter: Stanislav Livotov >Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch, > SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch > > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12697) pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke updated SOLR-12697: --- Attachment: SOLR-12697.patch > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: contrib - LTR >Reporter: Stanislav Livotov >Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch, > SOLR-12697.patch > > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12697) pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erick Erickson updated SOLR-12697: -- Attachment: SOLR-12697.patch > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: contrib - LTR >Reporter: Stanislav Livotov >Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch > > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12697) pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislav Livotov updated SOLR-12697: - Attachment: (was: SOLR-12697.patch) > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: contrib - LTR >Reporter: Stanislav Livotov >Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch > > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12697) pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislav Livotov updated SOLR-12697: - Attachment: SOLR-12697.patch > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: contrib - LTR >Reporter: Stanislav Livotov >Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch > > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12697) pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislav Livotov updated SOLR-12697: - Attachment: (was: SOLR-12697.patch) > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: contrib - LTR >Reporter: Stanislav Livotov >Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch > > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12697) pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislav Livotov updated SOLR-12697: - Attachment: SOLR-12697.patch > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: contrib - LTR >Reporter: Stanislav Livotov >Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch > > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12697) pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislav Livotov updated SOLR-12697: - Attachment: SOLR-12697.patch > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: contrib - LTR >Reporter: Stanislav Livotov >Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch, SOLR-12697.patch > > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12697) pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stanislav Livotov updated SOLR-12697: - Attachment: SOLR-12697.patch > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: contrib - LTR >Reporter: Stanislav Livotov >Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-12697.patch > > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-12697) pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke updated SOLR-12697: --- Reporter: Stanislav Livotov (was: Christine Poerschke) > pure DocValues support for FieldValueFeature > > > Key: SOLR-12697 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12697 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: contrib - LTR >Reporter: Stanislav Livotov >Priority: Major > > [~slivotov] wrote in SOLR-12688: > bq. ... FieldValueFeature doesn't support pure DocValues fields (Stored > false). Please also note that for fields which are both stored and DocValues > it is working not optimal because it is extracting just one field from the > stored document. DocValues are obviously faster for such usecases. ... > (Please see SOLR-12688 description for overall context and analysis results.) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
