Re: 8.8 section in the changelog?
OK, thanks Gus! On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 7:34 PM Gus Heck wrote: > That is only for master, because I was intending on merging back after the > branch so all aqp related features would stay together and to not drop it > in 8.7 with no time for it to get used/validated by the motivating use case. > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2020, 1:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I'm confused that master now has a non-empty 8.8 section in the Changelog >> while branch_8_7 has not been cut yet, was it done by mistake? >> >> -- >> Adrien >> > -- Adrien
Re: 8.8 section in the changelog?
That is only for master, because I was intending on merging back after the branch so all aqp related features would stay together and to not drop it in 8.7 with no time for it to get used/validated by the motivating use case. On Fri, Oct 16, 2020, 1:07 PM Adrien Grand wrote: > Hello, > > I'm confused that master now has a non-empty 8.8 section in the Changelog > while branch_8_7 has not been cut yet, was it done by mistake? > > -- > Adrien >
8.8 section in the changelog?
Hello, I'm confused that master now has a non-empty 8.8 section in the Changelog while branch_8_7 has not been cut yet, was it done by mistake? -- Adrien
