Re: 8.8.1 release soon

[Timothy Potter]

Hi David,

I found another issue related to this base_url issue and leader election,
so I need to respin RC1 anyway. Please go ahead and merge your fix for
LUCENE-9762.

Thanks.
Tim

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 11:10 AM Timothy Potter 
wrote:

> I'm already well into building the RC this morning, so am not going to
> respin for this given how flaky the RC building process seems to be, so
> commit to branch_8x and if we need an RC2, then you can commit to branch_8_8
>
> Tim
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 10:24 AM David Smiley  wrote:
>
>> There's a bug I just fixed:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9762  Kinda rare scenario
>> but a bug nonetheless.  It's unclear to where I should commit this to.
>>  8.8.1 would be nice.
>>
>> ~ David Smiley
>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:11 PM Anshum Gupta 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for taking care of this, Tim.
>>>
>>> I've added a note to the 'downloads' page so folks who head there know
>>> about this issue and that a release with the fix is in the works. (thanks
>>> for reviewing that too :) )
>>>
>>> -Anshum
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:37 AM Timothy Potter 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 I was a tad bit ambitious with backporting SOLR-12182 to 8.8.0 and it
 seems we have no automated SolrJ back-compat tests in our RC vetting
 process, so unfortunately older SolrJ clients don't work with Solr 8.8
 server, see SOLR-15145.

 I'd like to release 8.8.1 ASAP to address this problem and will be the
 RM.

 Let me know if you have any other issues you think need to go into
 8.8.1, otherwise I'd like to build an RC tomorrow AM US time. It looks like
 there are already a number of updates going in for 8.9 so let's keep the
 updates for 8.8.1 to a minimum please.

 Cheers,
 Tim

>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>
>>

Re: 8.8.1 release soon

[Timothy Potter]

I'm already well into building the RC this morning, so am not going to
respin for this given how flaky the RC building process seems to be, so
commit to branch_8x and if we need an RC2, then you can commit to branch_8_8

Tim

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 10:24 AM David Smiley  wrote:

> There's a bug I just fixed:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9762  Kinda rare scenario
> but a bug nonetheless.  It's unclear to where I should commit this to.
>  8.8.1 would be nice.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:11 PM Anshum Gupta 
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for taking care of this, Tim.
>>
>> I've added a note to the 'downloads' page so folks who head there know
>> about this issue and that a release with the fix is in the works. (thanks
>> for reviewing that too :) )
>>
>> -Anshum
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:37 AM Timothy Potter 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I was a tad bit ambitious with backporting SOLR-12182 to 8.8.0 and it
>>> seems we have no automated SolrJ back-compat tests in our RC vetting
>>> process, so unfortunately older SolrJ clients don't work with Solr 8.8
>>> server, see SOLR-15145.
>>>
>>> I'd like to release 8.8.1 ASAP to address this problem and will be the
>>> RM.
>>>
>>> Let me know if you have any other issues you think need to go into
>>> 8.8.1, otherwise I'd like to build an RC tomorrow AM US time. It looks like
>>> there are already a number of updates going in for 8.9 so let's keep the
>>> updates for 8.8.1 to a minimum please.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tim
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>

Re: 8.8.1 release soon

[David Smiley]

There's a bug I just fixed:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9762  Kinda rare scenario but
a bug nonetheless.  It's unclear to where I should commit this to.  8.8.1
would be nice.

~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley


On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:11 PM Anshum Gupta  wrote:

> Thanks for taking care of this, Tim.
>
> I've added a note to the 'downloads' page so folks who head there know
> about this issue and that a release with the fix is in the works. (thanks
> for reviewing that too :) )
>
> -Anshum
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:37 AM Timothy Potter 
> wrote:
>
>> I was a tad bit ambitious with backporting SOLR-12182 to 8.8.0 and it
>> seems we have no automated SolrJ back-compat tests in our RC vetting
>> process, so unfortunately older SolrJ clients don't work with Solr 8.8
>> server, see SOLR-15145.
>>
>> I'd like to release 8.8.1 ASAP to address this problem and will be the RM.
>>
>> Let me know if you have any other issues you think need to go into 8.8.1,
>> otherwise I'd like to build an RC tomorrow AM US time. It looks like there
>> are already a number of updates going in for 8.9 so let's keep the updates
>> for 8.8.1 to a minimum please.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tim
>>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>

Re: 8.8.1 release soon

[Anshum Gupta]

Thanks for taking care of this, Tim.

I've added a note to the 'downloads' page so folks who head there know
about this issue and that a release with the fix is in the works. (thanks
for reviewing that too :) )

-Anshum

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 7:37 AM Timothy Potter  wrote:

> I was a tad bit ambitious with backporting SOLR-12182 to 8.8.0 and it
> seems we have no automated SolrJ back-compat tests in our RC vetting
> process, so unfortunately older SolrJ clients don't work with Solr 8.8
> server, see SOLR-15145.
>
> I'd like to release 8.8.1 ASAP to address this problem and will be the RM.
>
> Let me know if you have any other issues you think need to go into 8.8.1,
> otherwise I'd like to build an RC tomorrow AM US time. It looks like there
> are already a number of updates going in for 8.9 so let's keep the updates
> for 8.8.1 to a minimum please.
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: 8.8.1 release soon

[Tomás Fernández Löbbe]

I'd like to get SOLR-15114
 in. It already has a
patch that I'm testing, I'll try to merge it today.

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 8:23 AM Timothy Potter  wrote:

> Hi Ishan,
>
> Please let me know how SOLR-15138 is looking on Friday and we can make a
> decision then. My hope is for 8.8.1 sooner than later, but a couple more
> days seems fine too.
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 8:55 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd like for us to include SOLR-15138 please, but the fix is still under
>> review and development. Please let us know if it should be possible for us
>> to wait until that one is done (hopefully quickly), otherwise we can
>> release it later (if you want to proceed with the release before this is
>> ready). Thanks for volunteering!
>>
>> On Wed, 10 Feb, 2021, 9:07 pm Timothy Potter, 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I was a tad bit ambitious with backporting SOLR-12182 to 8.8.0 and it
>>> seems we have no automated SolrJ back-compat tests in our RC vetting
>>> process, so unfortunately older SolrJ clients don't work with Solr 8.8
>>> server, see SOLR-15145.
>>>
>>> I'd like to release 8.8.1 ASAP to address this problem and will be the
>>> RM.
>>>
>>> Let me know if you have any other issues you think need to go into
>>> 8.8.1, otherwise I'd like to build an RC tomorrow AM US time. It looks like
>>> there are already a number of updates going in for 8.9 so let's keep the
>>> updates for 8.8.1 to a minimum please.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tim
>>>
>>

Re: 8.8.1 release soon

[Timothy Potter]

Hi Ishan,

Please let me know how SOLR-15138 is looking on Friday and we can make a
decision then. My hope is for 8.8.1 sooner than later, but a couple more
days seems fine too.

Cheers,
Tim

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 8:55 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd like for us to include SOLR-15138 please, but the fix is still under
> review and development. Please let us know if it should be possible for us
> to wait until that one is done (hopefully quickly), otherwise we can
> release it later (if you want to proceed with the release before this is
> ready). Thanks for volunteering!
>
> On Wed, 10 Feb, 2021, 9:07 pm Timothy Potter, 
> wrote:
>
>> I was a tad bit ambitious with backporting SOLR-12182 to 8.8.0 and it
>> seems we have no automated SolrJ back-compat tests in our RC vetting
>> process, so unfortunately older SolrJ clients don't work with Solr 8.8
>> server, see SOLR-15145.
>>
>> I'd like to release 8.8.1 ASAP to address this problem and will be the RM.
>>
>> Let me know if you have any other issues you think need to go into 8.8.1,
>> otherwise I'd like to build an RC tomorrow AM US time. It looks like there
>> are already a number of updates going in for 8.9 so let's keep the updates
>> for 8.8.1 to a minimum please.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tim
>>
>

Re: 8.8.1 release soon

[Ishan Chattopadhyaya]

I'd like for us to include SOLR-15138 please, but the fix is still under
review and development. Please let us know if it should be possible for us
to wait until that one is done (hopefully quickly), otherwise we can
release it later (if you want to proceed with the release before this is
ready). Thanks for volunteering!

On Wed, 10 Feb, 2021, 9:07 pm Timothy Potter,  wrote:

> I was a tad bit ambitious with backporting SOLR-12182 to 8.8.0 and it
> seems we have no automated SolrJ back-compat tests in our RC vetting
> process, so unfortunately older SolrJ clients don't work with Solr 8.8
> server, see SOLR-15145.
>
> I'd like to release 8.8.1 ASAP to address this problem and will be the RM.
>
> Let me know if you have any other issues you think need to go into 8.8.1,
> otherwise I'd like to build an RC tomorrow AM US time. It looks like there
> are already a number of updates going in for 8.9 so let's keep the updates
> for 8.8.1 to a minimum please.
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
>

8.8.1 release soon

[Timothy Potter]

I was a tad bit ambitious with backporting SOLR-12182 to 8.8.0 and it seems
we have no automated SolrJ back-compat tests in our RC vetting process, so
unfortunately older SolrJ clients don't work with Solr 8.8 server, see
SOLR-15145.

I'd like to release 8.8.1 ASAP to address this problem and will be the RM.

Let me know if you have any other issues you think need to go into 8.8.1,
otherwise I'd like to build an RC tomorrow AM US time. It looks like there
are already a number of updates going in for 8.9 so let's keep the updates
for 8.8.1 to a minimum please.

Cheers,
Tim