RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
Hi Shawn: You have to give JAVA_HOME to ant as ENVIRONMENT VARIABLE, e.g. "JAVA_HOME=/.../... ant foobar". This makes the ant shell script (which works behind the "ant" command) to use the specified JVM. This makes the code compile with the specified java version. The 2 special variables JAVA6_HOME and JAVA7_HOME are named a little bit sub-optimal: They are passed as "system properties" and are not interpreted by ant itself. It's used by the build script when executing the smoke tester. More correct would be to pass them not in capital-letters to ANT as system property, like ant -Djava6home=... -Djava7home=..., but its as it is at the moment. JAVA_HOME and the stupid named JAVA6_HOME are two completely different things. Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org] > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 3:02 AM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1 > > On 1/19/2014 4:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > > If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using > > Java > > 6 rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant picks up what is set by the > > JAVA_HOME env variable. > > The /etc/alternatives links point all the main java executables to 7u25. > 6u26 is available. JAVA6_HOME and JAVA7_HOME were both set. > JAVA_HOME was not. > > I'll do some experimentation ... although I would think that if java 6 is > required, it could use the information it's been given about java 6. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
Should have been in my experience, not imo - have had a cold for a week and it’s getting to me. bq. it could use the information it's been given about java 6. I think it’s an Apache Ant thing. JAVA6_HOME and JAVA7_HOME are Lucene smoke tester things. - Mark On Jan 19, 2014, at 9:02 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 1/19/2014 4:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote: >> If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using Java >> 6 rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant picks up what is set by the JAVA_HOME >> env variable. > > The /etc/alternatives links point all the main java executables to 7u25. > 6u26 is available. JAVA6_HOME and JAVA7_HOME were both set. JAVA_HOME > was not. > > I'll do some experimentation ... although I would think that if java 6 > is required, it could use the information it's been given about java 6. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
On 1/19/2014 4:04 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using Java > 6 rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant picks up what is set by the JAVA_HOME > env variable. The /etc/alternatives links point all the main java executables to 7u25. 6u26 is available. JAVA6_HOME and JAVA7_HOME were both set. JAVA_HOME was not. I'll do some experimentation ... although I would think that if java 6 is required, it could use the information it's been given about java 6. Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
Hi Mark, This problem lets me remember LUCENE-5355: This one affected the “nice” javadocs created after release. I backported the patch, so the one running the “nice looking javadocs” on java 7 with java 6 bootclasspath can be sure, it was really using the correct bootclasspath. Also the documentation howto on the wiki applies only to builds with this patch. Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen <http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 12:05 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1 If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using Java 6 rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant picks up what is set by the JAVA_HOME env variable. - Mark On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: On 1/19/2014 12:59 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > Unfortunately, I think SOLR-5645 is probably worth a re spin. I think > otherwise, collection reloads will be unstable vs 4.6. Collection reloads were unstable once before, SOLR-4805. A lot of people were hit by that one. I was very glad when SOLR-4805 was fixed and we could tell people that relief was coming. I admit that I don't know why registering in ZK again is bad, but if you think the issue warrants a re-spin, I'm inclined to put my vote in that basket. -1, please respin. In other news, when I tried Friday to run nightly-smoke on the SVN checkout used to build the RC, it failed, said that a jarfile was missing something like "Created by 1.6" ... which seemed more like a problem with my setup than the code. I can obtain the exact error message by running it again, but does anyone know what my problem might be? I have Java 6u26 and 7u25 installed on a Debian system. Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- - Mark
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
If you are building the artifacts, you have to make sure it's using Java 6 rather than 7. IMO on linux, ant picks up what is set by the JAVA_HOME env variable. - Mark On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 1/19/2014 12:59 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > > Unfortunately, I think SOLR-5645 is probably worth a re spin. I think > > otherwise, collection reloads will be unstable vs 4.6. > > Collection reloads were unstable once before, SOLR-4805. A lot of > people were hit by that one. I was very glad when SOLR-4805 was fixed > and we could tell people that relief was coming. > > I admit that I don't know why registering in ZK again is bad, but if you > think the issue warrants a re-spin, I'm inclined to put my vote in that > basket. > > -1, please respin. > > In other news, when I tried Friday to run nightly-smoke on the SVN > checkout used to build the RC, it failed, said that a jarfile was > missing something like "Created by 1.6" ... which seemed more like a > problem with my setup than the code. I can obtain the exact error > message by running it again, but does anyone know what my problem might > be? I have Java 6u26 and 7u25 installed on a Debian system. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- - Mark
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
On 1/19/2014 12:59 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > Unfortunately, I think SOLR-5645 is probably worth a re spin. I think > otherwise, collection reloads will be unstable vs 4.6. Collection reloads were unstable once before, SOLR-4805. A lot of people were hit by that one. I was very glad when SOLR-4805 was fixed and we could tell people that relief was coming. I admit that I don't know why registering in ZK again is bad, but if you think the issue warrants a re-spin, I'm inclined to put my vote in that basket. -1, please respin. In other news, when I tried Friday to run nightly-smoke on the SVN checkout used to build the RC, it failed, said that a jarfile was missing something like "Created by 1.6" ... which seemed more like a problem with my setup than the code. I can obtain the exact error message by running it again, but does anyone know what my problem might be? I have Java 6u26 and 7u25 installed on a Debian system. Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
Unfortunately, I think SOLR-5645 is probably worth a re spin. I think otherwise, collection reloads will be unstable vs 4.6. On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > +1 > > Run integration tests with: > - Hibernate Search > - Infinispan (indexing/searching entries with Lucene) > - Infinispan (storing indexes from Lucene) > > All perfect, great job! > (For long we've been stuck on Lucene 3.x but that's finally resolved) > > Sanne > > > On 18 January 2014 01:51, Steve Rowe wrote: > > +1 > > > > Smoke tester says: SUCCESS! [1:03:14.565590] > > > > Changes, docs and javadocs look good. > > > > Steve > > > > On Jan 17, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > > > >> Please vote to release the following artifacts: > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/ > >> > >> Here is my +1. > >> > >> -- > >> - Mark > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- - Mark
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
+1 Run integration tests with: - Hibernate Search - Infinispan (indexing/searching entries with Lucene) - Infinispan (storing indexes from Lucene) All perfect, great job! (For long we've been stuck on Lucene 3.x but that's finally resolved) Sanne On 18 January 2014 01:51, Steve Rowe wrote: > +1 > > Smoke tester says: SUCCESS! [1:03:14.565590] > > Changes, docs and javadocs look good. > > Steve > > On Jan 17, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > >> Please vote to release the following artifacts: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/ >> >> Here is my +1. >> >> -- >> - Mark > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
+1 Smoke tester says: SUCCESS! [1:03:14.565590] Changes, docs and javadocs look good. Steve On Jan 17, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > Please vote to release the following artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/ > > Here is my +1. > > -- > - Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
+1 - passing smokeTestRelease -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com 17. jan. 2014 kl. 18:13 skrev Mark Miller : > Please vote to release the following artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/ > > Here is my +1. > > -- > - Mark
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
+1 SUCCESS! [1:11:35.695571] upgrade Elasticsearch to 4.1.6 and all tests pass simon On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Michael McCandless wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [0:48:35.505732] > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Robert Muir wrote: >> +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [1:08:56.292897] >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller wrote: >>> >>> Please vote to release the following artifacts: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/ >>> >>> Here is my +1. >>> >>> -- >>> - Mark >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
+1 SUCCESS! [0:48:35.505732] Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > +1 > > SUCCESS! [1:08:56.292897] > > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller wrote: >> >> Please vote to release the following artifacts: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/ >> >> Here is my +1. >> >> -- >> - Mark > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 4.6.1 RC1
+1 SUCCESS! [1:08:56.292897] On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Mark Miller wrote: > Please vote to release the following artifacts: > > http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_6_1r1559132/ > > Here is my +1. > > -- > - Mark >
