RE: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle JDK 1.5 on branch_3x
Robert, did you read my email at all? Your javadoc comment has a link to a non-existent class. That’s not “valid” under anybody’s jdk, regardless of version. Try running ‘ant javadoc’ under your favorite jre on branch_3x. No worky, dude. The fix is to remove “.util” from the package name. Doing so will not violate your principles. Steve From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 10:52 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle JDK 1.5 on branch_3x hi, my code is 100% valid java 5. if this oracle bug bothers you so much, perhaps you should switch to ibm's j9. this is an oracle specific bug, again there is nothing wrong with my code technically, thus no justification for revert. remember, working around bugs in particular jre implementations is optional, I've helped with this before but we need to make sure everyone understands this is not mandatory. I code to the spec On Apr 15, 2011 9:55 AM, "Steven A Rowe" mailto:sar...@syr.edu>> wrote: > Turns out that the problem is that ReusableAnalyzerBase is not in the same > package in branch_3x as on trunk, so the class reference is just wrong on > branch_3x, regardless of the JDK one uses to generate javadocs. (Oracle > 1.6.0_21 JDK triggers the same failure on branch_3x.) > > Robert, I trust you will see your way clear to fixing this, regardless of > your lack of interest in supporting Oracle's buggy implementations. > > But I still think the issue should be resolved: Robert thinks he doesn't have > to play by the rules (JDK 1.5 support for Lucene, javadocs warnings fail the > build, failed builds are not allowed), and I think that's unacceptable. I > think the proper course of action is calling a vote to change the rules, not > just blithely ignoring them because you don't feel like following them. > > Unhappily, > Steve > >> -Original Message- >> From: DM Smith [mailto:dmsmith...@gmail.com<mailto:dmsmith...@gmail.com>] >> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 9:31 AM >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org<mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle JDK >> 1.5 on branch_3x >> >> What is the bug? I have an interest in this component and am willing to >> see about fixing it. It appears that it is a Javadoc bug??? Why would we >> keep good code out for that? >> >> -- DM >> >> On 04/15/2011 09:15 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote: >> > As a result of Robert Muir's r1092398 commit on branch_3x (the Latvian >> analysis stuff), the build is now broken under Sun/Oracle JDK 1.5: >> > >> > [javadoc] >> C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\contrib\analyzers\common\src\ >> java\org\apache\lucene\analysis\lv\LatvianAnalyzer.java:118: warning - >> Tag @link: reference not found: >> org.apache.lucene.analysis.util.ReusableAnalyzerBase.TokenStreamComponent >> s >> > [...] >> > [javadoc] 5 warnings >> > >> > BUILD FAILED >> > C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\build.xml:217: The >> following error occurred while executing this line: >> > C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\common-build.xml:813: >> Javadocs warnings were found! >> > >> > Robert said on #lucene IRC: >> >> (9:02:53 AM) rmuir: its a bug in the EOL'ed java5 >> >> (9:02:57 AM) rmuir: im not fixing it >> >> (9:03:21 AM) rmuir: build isnt broken >> >> (9:04:07 AM) rmuir: jre bug = not my problem >> >> (9:04:32 AM) rmuir: complain to oracle, having hit another one of >> their bugs at 3am last night, ive had it with their crap >> >> (9:04:42 AM) rmuir: i didnt break the build >> >> (9:04:43 AM) rmuir: its a bug in your jre >> > Needless to say, I disagree vehemently with Robert. >> > >> > I think Robert should fix this or his commit should be reverted. >> > >> > I'm interested in hearing other opinions on this. >> > >> > Steve
RE: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle JDK 1.5 on branch_3x
hi, my code is 100% valid java 5. if this oracle bug bothers you so much, perhaps you should switch to ibm's j9. this is an oracle specific bug, again there is nothing wrong with my code technically, thus no justification for revert. remember, working around bugs in particular jre implementations is optional, I've helped with this before but we need to make sure everyone understands this is not mandatory. I code to the spec On Apr 15, 2011 9:55 AM, "Steven A Rowe" wrote: > Turns out that the problem is that ReusableAnalyzerBase is not in the same package in branch_3x as on trunk, so the class reference is just wrong on branch_3x, regardless of the JDK one uses to generate javadocs. (Oracle 1.6.0_21 JDK triggers the same failure on branch_3x.) > > Robert, I trust you will see your way clear to fixing this, regardless of your lack of interest in supporting Oracle's buggy implementations. > > But I still think the issue should be resolved: Robert thinks he doesn't have to play by the rules (JDK 1.5 support for Lucene, javadocs warnings fail the build, failed builds are not allowed), and I think that's unacceptable. I think the proper course of action is calling a vote to change the rules, not just blithely ignoring them because you don't feel like following them. > > Unhappily, > Steve > >> -Original Message- >> From: DM Smith [mailto:dmsmith...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 9:31 AM >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle JDK >> 1.5 on branch_3x >> >> What is the bug? I have an interest in this component and am willing to >> see about fixing it. It appears that it is a Javadoc bug??? Why would we >> keep good code out for that? >> >> -- DM >> >> On 04/15/2011 09:15 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote: >> > As a result of Robert Muir's r1092398 commit on branch_3x (the Latvian >> analysis stuff), the build is now broken under Sun/Oracle JDK 1.5: >> > >> > [javadoc] >> C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\contrib\analyzers\common\src\ >> java\org\apache\lucene\analysis\lv\LatvianAnalyzer.java:118: warning - >> Tag @link: reference not found: >> org.apache.lucene.analysis.util.ReusableAnalyzerBase.TokenStreamComponent >> s >> > [...] >> > [javadoc] 5 warnings >> > >> > BUILD FAILED >> > C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\build.xml:217: The >> following error occurred while executing this line: >> > C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\common-build.xml:813: >> Javadocs warnings were found! >> > >> > Robert said on #lucene IRC: >> >> (9:02:53 AM) rmuir: its a bug in the EOL'ed java5 >> >> (9:02:57 AM) rmuir: im not fixing it >> >> (9:03:21 AM) rmuir: build isnt broken >> >> (9:04:07 AM) rmuir: jre bug = not my problem >> >> (9:04:32 AM) rmuir: complain to oracle, having hit another one of >> their bugs at 3am last night, ive had it with their crap >> >> (9:04:42 AM) rmuir: i didnt break the build >> >> (9:04:43 AM) rmuir: its a bug in your jre >> > Needless to say, I disagree vehemently with Robert. >> > >> > I think Robert should fix this or his commit should be reverted. >> > >> > I'm interested in hearing other opinions on this. >> > >> > Steve
RE: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle JDK 1.5 on branch_3x
/me is unhappy, too. By the way, we use Java 5 also in Lucene trunk! In most cases such Javadoc bugs can be circumvented by using absolute class names. - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Steven A Rowe [mailto:sar...@syr.edu] > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 3:54 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle JDK > 1.5 on branch_3x > > Turns out that the problem is that ReusableAnalyzerBase is not in the same > package in branch_3x as on trunk, so the class reference is just wrong on > branch_3x, regardless of the JDK one uses to generate javadocs. (Oracle > 1.6.0_21 JDK triggers the same failure on branch_3x.) > > Robert, I trust you will see your way clear to fixing this, regardless of > your lack > of interest in supporting Oracle's buggy implementations. > > But I still think the issue should be resolved: Robert thinks he doesn't have > to > play by the rules (JDK 1.5 support for Lucene, javadocs warnings fail the > build, > failed builds are not allowed), and I think that's unacceptable. I think the > proper course of action is calling a vote to change the rules, not just > blithely > ignoring them because you don't feel like following them. > > Unhappily, > Steve > > > -Original Message- > > From: DM Smith [mailto:dmsmith...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 9:31 AM > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle > > JDK > > 1.5 on branch_3x > > > > What is the bug? I have an interest in this component and am willing > > to see about fixing it. It appears that it is a Javadoc bug??? Why > > would we keep good code out for that? > > > > -- DM > > > > On 04/15/2011 09:15 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote: > > > As a result of Robert Muir's r1092398 commit on branch_3x (the > > > Latvian > > analysis stuff), the build is now broken under Sun/Oracle JDK 1.5: > > > > > >[javadoc] > > > C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\contrib\analyzers\common > \s > > rc\ > > java\org\apache\lucene\analysis\lv\LatvianAnalyzer.java:118: warning - > > Tag @link: reference not found: > > > org.apache.lucene.analysis.util.ReusableAnalyzerBase.TokenStreamCompon > > ent > > s > > > [...] > > >[javadoc] 5 warnings > > > > > > BUILD FAILED > > > C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\build.xml:217: The > > following error occurred while executing this line: > > > C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\common-build.xml:813: > > Javadocs warnings were found! > > > > > > Robert said on #lucene IRC: > > >> (9:02:53 AM) rmuir: its a bug in the EOL'ed java5 > > >> (9:02:57 AM) rmuir: im not fixing it > > >> (9:03:21 AM) rmuir: build isnt broken > > >> (9:04:07 AM) rmuir: jre bug = not my problem > > >> (9:04:32 AM) rmuir: complain to oracle, having hit another one of > > their bugs at 3am last night, ive had it with their crap > > >> (9:04:42 AM) rmuir: i didnt break the build > > >> (9:04:43 AM) rmuir: its a bug in your jre > > > Needless to say, I disagree vehemently with Robert. > > > > > > I think Robert should fix this or his commit should be reverted. > > > > > > I'm interested in hearing other opinions on this. > > > > > > Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle JDK 1.5 on branch_3x
Turns out that the problem is that ReusableAnalyzerBase is not in the same package in branch_3x as on trunk, so the class reference is just wrong on branch_3x, regardless of the JDK one uses to generate javadocs. (Oracle 1.6.0_21 JDK triggers the same failure on branch_3x.) Robert, I trust you will see your way clear to fixing this, regardless of your lack of interest in supporting Oracle's buggy implementations. But I still think the issue should be resolved: Robert thinks he doesn't have to play by the rules (JDK 1.5 support for Lucene, javadocs warnings fail the build, failed builds are not allowed), and I think that's unacceptable. I think the proper course of action is calling a vote to change the rules, not just blithely ignoring them because you don't feel like following them. Unhappily, Steve > -Original Message- > From: DM Smith [mailto:dmsmith...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 9:31 AM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle JDK > 1.5 on branch_3x > > What is the bug? I have an interest in this component and am willing to > see about fixing it. It appears that it is a Javadoc bug??? Why would we > keep good code out for that? > > -- DM > > On 04/15/2011 09:15 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote: > > As a result of Robert Muir's r1092398 commit on branch_3x (the Latvian > analysis stuff), the build is now broken under Sun/Oracle JDK 1.5: > > > >[javadoc] > C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\contrib\analyzers\common\src\ > java\org\apache\lucene\analysis\lv\LatvianAnalyzer.java:118: warning - > Tag @link: reference not found: > org.apache.lucene.analysis.util.ReusableAnalyzerBase.TokenStreamComponent > s > > [...] > >[javadoc] 5 warnings > > > > BUILD FAILED > > C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\build.xml:217: The > following error occurred while executing this line: > > C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\common-build.xml:813: > Javadocs warnings were found! > > > > Robert said on #lucene IRC: > >> (9:02:53 AM) rmuir: its a bug in the EOL'ed java5 > >> (9:02:57 AM) rmuir: im not fixing it > >> (9:03:21 AM) rmuir: build isnt broken > >> (9:04:07 AM) rmuir: jre bug = not my problem > >> (9:04:32 AM) rmuir: complain to oracle, having hit another one of > their bugs at 3am last night, ive had it with their crap > >> (9:04:42 AM) rmuir: i didnt break the build > >> (9:04:43 AM) rmuir: its a bug in your jre > > Needless to say, I disagree vehemently with Robert. > > > > I think Robert should fix this or his commit should be reverted. > > > > I'm interested in hearing other opinions on this. > > > > Steve
Re: Robert Muir thinks we should stop supporting Sun/Oracle JDK 1.5 on branch_3x
What is the bug? I have an interest in this component and am willing to see about fixing it. It appears that it is a Javadoc bug??? Why would we keep good code out for that? -- DM On 04/15/2011 09:15 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote: As a result of Robert Muir's r1092398 commit on branch_3x (the Latvian analysis stuff), the build is now broken under Sun/Oracle JDK 1.5: [javadoc] C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\contrib\analyzers\common\src\java\org\apache\lucene\analysis\lv\LatvianAnalyzer.java:118: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: org.apache.lucene.analysis.util.ReusableAnalyzerBase.TokenStreamComponents [...] [javadoc] 5 warnings BUILD FAILED C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\build.xml:217: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\svn\lucene\dev\branches\branch_3x\lucene\common-build.xml:813: Javadocs warnings were found! Robert said on #lucene IRC: (9:02:53 AM) rmuir: its a bug in the EOL'ed java5 (9:02:57 AM) rmuir: im not fixing it (9:03:21 AM) rmuir: build isnt broken (9:04:07 AM) rmuir: jre bug = not my problem (9:04:32 AM) rmuir: complain to oracle, having hit another one of their bugs at 3am last night, ive had it with their crap (9:04:42 AM) rmuir: i didnt break the build (9:04:43 AM) rmuir: its a bug in your jre Needless to say, I disagree vehemently with Robert. I think Robert should fix this or his commit should be reverted. I'm interested in hearing other opinions on this. Steve - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
