Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
vote passes. thanks everyone. On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
And thank you for all your hard work making this possible! On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: vote passes. thanks everyone. On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
On 10/11/2012 03:55 AM, Robert Muir wrote: vote passes. thanks everyone. Thank you! And congrats to everyone. Took a long time for this day to come. 4.0 has always felt comfortably off in the distance to me - this will be an adjustment ;) This community creates fantastic software and it's been a pleasure lending a hand to build up to this. Thanks to everyone for all the goodness you have contributed to make this release so awesome. Special thanks to our fearless release manager. - Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
+1 On 10 October 2012 05:23, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidworks.com wrote: +1 -Yonik http://lucidworks.com On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Met vriendelijke groet, Martijn van Groningen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
+1 smoketest succeeded on macos 10.7.4. Michael On 10/6/12 1:10 AM, Robert Muir wrote: artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
if buschmi votes we are good :D simon On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Michael Busch busch...@gmail.com wrote: +1 smoketest succeeded on macos 10.7.4. Michael On 10/6/12 1:10 AM, Robert Muir wrote: artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
+1 - Mark On 10/06/2012 04:10 AM, Robert Muir wrote: artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
+1 -Yonik http://lucidworks.com On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
Smoke tests passed on my computer. -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
+1 everything is smooth On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: Smoke tests passed on my computer. -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
+1 Smoke test passes on OSX 10.8.2. Believe all show stoppers are fixed now -- Jan Høydahl, search solution architect Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com 6. okt. 2012 kl. 10:10 skrev Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com: artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
: artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 +1. for the record, these are the SHA1 sigs for the files i tested... hossman@frisbee:~/tmp/4.0-final-rc/rc2$ cat *.sha1 bf7a1332767909f139217d11413a82abfe938cc9 *apache-solr-4.0.0-src.tgz 0cb61d9572516fc627785201b79b3a85e95f877d *apache-solr-4.0.0.tgz ae10d68eadbe30a2bb82a77277863d0d42d86af4 *apache-solr-4.0.0.zip 8ab307df987e375df06b7f6e1f65e85b1cda3f8d *lucene-4.0.0-src.tgz 263ef95eb1f8856c76ff22a0dad37a8705aa7db4 *lucene-4.0.0.tgz ed0ca3c1a5b4a6ec67b1fb5517696cbba4483823 *lucene-4.0.0.zip -Hoss - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
Why can't we upgrade HttpComponents to v.4.2.1 with better multithreading support? For SolrJ... 4.0 is major release indeed... Fuad Efendi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
I'm going to guess because nobody put it in JIRA and provided a patch. Otis -- Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Fuad Efendi f...@efendi.ca wrote: Why can't we upgrade HttpComponents to v.4.2.1 with better multithreading support? For SolrJ... 4.0 is major release indeed... Fuad Efendi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
+1 The smoke tester succeeded for me on Win7+Cygwin and on OS X 10.8.2, using Oracle Java 1.6.0_35 and 1.7.0_07 on both OSs. Steve -Original Message- From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 4:11 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2) artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
Success for smoke tester on my Windows 7 Cygwin machine. with Java 1.6.0_29. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Robert Muir Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 4:10 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2) artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
Hi, +1 to release this time! - I ran smoketester on Linux (JDKs: 1.6.0_33, 1.7.0_07, server, 64bit), passed! - I used the PANGAEA index (version 3.6.1, copied from our production system), ran checkindex on it (both JDKs) passed. Index size and deletions were reported correctly this time. I also checked an force-merged PANGAEA index, passed also. - I used IndexUpgrader to upgrade both 3.6.1 indexes, passed. - I checked the output of IndexUpgrader again with CheckIndex, the output for the force-merged 3.6.1 index was identical to the migrated 4.0 index (number of terms,) - I compared the index sizes of the single-segment 3.6.1 and 4.0.0 indexes: 4.0 was slightly larger. You have to know that this index contains thousands of fields (it allows to search in XML based on XQuery-like, so we have a field for every possible xpath of our rather complex XML schema in the index). The search speed improved dramatically (because of the separate term dictionaries for every field). In addition, so the bigger size is also caused by splitting fields to separate term dictionaries vs. one in 3.6. 4.0 also has more statistics. I think an index with 10 fields may be smaller, will try this a little bit later with another index - I used the demo module to run some text-only queries, they passed. On small thing: We mention (in lucene's package), that Java 6 is needed, so we should at least mention that in the release notes. We should improve our docs/index.(html|xsl) to mention system requirements. Same for Solr. We have a system requirements page on the website, but that is unversioned, so we should also add a section for 4.0 there. But this is not the way to go. We should also mention that Java 7 is the preferred Java version, if you have 1.7.0_01 at least. Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 10:11 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2) artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
I mean: we don't mention system requirements correctly - sorry - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 1:19 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2) Hi, +1 to release this time! - I ran smoketester on Linux (JDKs: 1.6.0_33, 1.7.0_07, server, 64bit), passed! - I used the PANGAEA index (version 3.6.1, copied from our production system), ran checkindex on it (both JDKs) passed. Index size and deletions were reported correctly this time. I also checked an force-merged PANGAEA index, passed also. - I used IndexUpgrader to upgrade both 3.6.1 indexes, passed. - I checked the output of IndexUpgrader again with CheckIndex, the output for the force-merged 3.6.1 index was identical to the migrated 4.0 index (number of terms,) - I compared the index sizes of the single-segment 3.6.1 and 4.0.0 indexes: 4.0 was slightly larger. You have to know that this index contains thousands of fields (it allows to search in XML based on XQuery-like, so we have a field for every possible xpath of our rather complex XML schema in the index). The search speed improved dramatically (because of the separate term dictionaries for every field). In addition, so the bigger size is also caused by splitting fields to separate term dictionaries vs. one in 3.6. 4.0 also has more statistics. I think an index with 10 fields may be smaller, will try this a little bit later with another index - I used the demo module to run some text-only queries, they passed. On small thing: We mention (in lucene's package), that Java 6 is needed, so we should at least mention that in the release notes. We should improve our docs/index.(html|xsl) to mention system requirements. Same for Solr. We have a system requirements page on the website, but that is unversioned, so we should also add a section for 4.0 there. But this is not the way to go. We should also mention that Java 7 is the preferred Java version, if you have 1.7.0_01 at least. Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 10:11 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2) artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
+1 Smoke tester is happy in my env (Ubuntu 12.04, Javas 1.6.0_32 / 1.7.0_04). Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (RC2)
+1 smoke tests are ok. Tommaso 2012/10/6 Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com +1 Smoke tester is happy in my env (Ubuntu 12.04, Javas 1.6.0_32 / 1.7.0_04). Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: artifacts here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc2 Thanks for the good inspection of rc#1 and finding bugs, which found test bugs and other bugs! I am happy this was all discovered and sorted out before release. vote stays open until wednesday, the weekend is just extra time for evaluating the RC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
Both merged in the lucene_solr_4_0 Branch :) On Monday, October 1, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Robert Muir wrote: Patch looks fine: though it should have a CHANGES entry (since it was introduced after the beta release from what I can tell) The only other things i see listed as bugs are https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3637 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3560 If these things are safe and useful to fix in 4.0 (the three patches look safe to me), then do it asap (but of course run the proper tests). - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
NOTE: vote stays open until Tuesday (since it was over a weekend). On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1 By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
Hi, -1 to release those artifacts! First the good thing: I ran smoketester on an Ubuntu 12.04.1 Server with 2 older Opteron CPUs (NUMA), passed perfectly (1.6.0_33 and 1.7.0_07). I also inspected the artifacts and had a look at JavaDocs. I found some typos in READMEs, but all not very problematic. I had no real Lucene 4.0 Application ready to test with (I am still in process to upgrade PANGAEA), but so far so good. But I found a serious bug when comparing the output of checkindex on the same index in 4.0 and 3.6.1 (used a 7 GiB PANGAEA index): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4455; The deletions are reported negative (segment with no deletions is reported to have them) and the size of the segments is doubled, causing MergePolicy to behave wrong (depending on settings). In any case: Many thanks to Robert for making the release - if we must respin, depends on you! Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 9:16 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two) artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1 By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
Lets fix this stuff. I don't like this sizeInBytes double-counting! On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: Hi, -1 to release those artifacts! First the good thing: I ran smoketester on an Ubuntu 12.04.1 Server with 2 older Opteron CPUs (NUMA), passed perfectly (1.6.0_33 and 1.7.0_07). I also inspected the artifacts and had a look at JavaDocs. I found some typos in READMEs, but all not very problematic. I had no real Lucene 4.0 Application ready to test with (I am still in process to upgrade PANGAEA), but so far so good. But I found a serious bug when comparing the output of checkindex on the same index in 4.0 and 3.6.1 (used a 7 GiB PANGAEA index): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4455; The deletions are reported negative (segment with no deletions is reported to have them) and the size of the segments is doubled, causing MergePolicy to behave wrong (depending on settings). In any case: Many thanks to Robert for making the release - if we must respin, depends on you! Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 9:16 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two) artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1 By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
Does this mean a re-spin? I have a low-risk but high impact (in terms of features) bug-fix I would like to get in to 4.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE- but I did not want to put the breaks on any release that was being voted on. ~ David - Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-release-4-0-take-two-tp4010808p4011255.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
Patch looks fine: though it should have a CHANGES entry (since it was introduced after the beta release from what I can tell) The only other things i see listed as bugs are https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3637 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3560 If these things are safe and useful to fix in 4.0 (the three patches look safe to me), then do it asap (but of course run the proper tests). Thanks On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:46 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) dsmi...@mitre.org wrote: Does this mean a re-spin? I have a low-risk but high impact (in terms of features) bug-fix I would like to get in to 4.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE- but I did not want to put the breaks on any release that was being voted on. ~ David - Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-release-4-0-take-two-tp4010808p4011255.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
Sorry, i had this backwards: if it makes 4.0 it needs no CHANGES entry :) If it doesnt, then it should have one for 4.1 On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Patch looks fine: though it should have a CHANGES entry (since it was introduced after the beta release from what I can tell) The only other things i see listed as bugs are https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3637 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3560 If these things are safe and useful to fix in 4.0 (the three patches look safe to me), then do it asap (but of course run the proper tests). Thanks On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:46 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) dsmi...@mitre.org wrote: Does this mean a re-spin? I have a low-risk but high impact (in terms of features) bug-fix I would like to get in to 4.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE- but I did not want to put the breaks on any release that was being voted on. ~ David - Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-release-4-0-take-two-tp4010808p4011255.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
I just got it committed to the 4.0 release branch, after I ran tests. I didn't add a CHANGES.txt entry because this is basically a bug to an existing entry that is already post-beta (SOLR-3304). ~ David - Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-release-4-0-take-two-tp4010808p4011273.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
: artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1 VOTE: +1 for the following artifacts (sha1)... 378a1077b9b8806e8a972e8b56722696c07c1078 *apache-solr-4.0.0-src.tgz 787c41de747053bd22dfbb24ebbd1a6184038eef *apache-solr-4.0.0.tgz 5c7d5143dbe02b430a5dd0243385f55b928f1f40 *apache-solr-4.0.0.zip e12d373a1bc965f4045e4d87d4ab4cf64313653b *lucene-4.0.0-src.tgz 0e200f8ef943d3238c9759ca96ca3fbe97398407 *lucene-4.0.0.tgz c00131a926cfad1e3e9654f326cf78199bf9eea7 *lucene-4.0.0.zip -Hoss - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
+1 smoketested + tested in 4.0 apps. Looks good to me! simon On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote: Smoke test succeeded on MacOSX 10.7, plus tested in various running projects and everything seems fine. one thing I noticed is : no package description (missing package.html in src?) for most of the Solr source code therefore we should add those package(-info).html for the javadoc. However I don't think it's a blocker so +1. Regards, Tommaso 2012/9/27 Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1 By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
Smoke test passed successfully on my computer (Ubuntu 12.04.1 , locale=fr_FR). Good that lucene-core JAR now is 2.0 MB (vs. 2.3 in 4.0-BETA). -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
+1 Tested on Ubuntu 12.01 i386, Java 1.7 On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1 By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
+1 On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1 By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Chris Male | Open Source Search Developer | elasticsearch | www.ehttp://www.dutchworks.nl lasticsearch.com
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
I'm continuously indexing Japanese Wikipedia while introducing a constant query load of approx. 200 queries per second using unique Japanese terms with highlighting turned on. I'm running Mac OS X 10.8.2 and Java 1.6.0_35. Things are looking good. +1 Thanks again for being release manager, Robert! Best, Christian http://atilika.com On Sep 28, 2012, at 4:15 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1 By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Christian Moen c...@atilika.com wrote: Thanks again for being release manager, Robert! +1 Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
Smoke test passes on my machine, I've been doing other checks and verification, and I'm happy with the results. +1 - Mark On 09/27/2012 03:15 PM, Robert Muir wrote: artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1 By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
+1, smoke tester is happy on my [Linux] env. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1 By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
+1 smoke tester is also happy on my machine. Martijn On 27 September 2012 21:16, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: +1, smoke tester is happy on my [Linux] env. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1 By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
+1: smoker admitted SUCCESS! on Win7+Cygwin -Original Message- From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 3:16 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two) artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1 By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0 (take two)
Smoke test succeeded on MacOSX 10.7, plus tested in various running projects and everything seems fine. one thing I noticed is : no package description (missing package.html in src?) for most of the Solr source code therefore we should add those package(-info).html for the javadoc. However I don't think it's a blocker so +1. Regards, Tommaso 2012/9/27 Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc1 By the way, thanks for all the help improving smoketesting and packaging and so on. This will pay off in the future! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: VOTE: release 4.0
On a separate box with Win7+Cygwin, I just now successfully ran the smoke tester (it even says so now: SUCCESS!). So I think it's not a problem with running the smoke tester on Windows. Also, on -Original Message- From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 2:32 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: VOTE: release 4.0 On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote: Running smokeTestRelease.py on Win7+Cygwin, I can't get past the Solr example test under Java7. I'm not really sure thats a reflection on this release candidate: I'm not sure the smoke tester works on windows. I think you may have to test manually. -- lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
: Artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc0 For the record: My vote for RC0 is -1. In my opinion, SOLR-3875, SOLR-3879, and LUCENE-4430 seem serious enough to warrant a respin (and if a few of the other recently fixed bugs can make it in even better). I don't want to speak on behalf of anyone but myself, but the sense i get from various comments in Jira IRC is that I am not alone in thinking we should respin a new RC1 -- however this should in no way discourage people from continuing to test RC0, because that's the only way we are going to find more bugs that we should fix for RC1 (even though i've already voted -1, I'm sure as hell going to keep hammering away on RC0) -Hoss - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
+1, smoke tester is happy on Ubuntu 12.04. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc0 Thanks, Robert -- lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
+1, Smoker tester also ran successfully on my machine (Ubuntu 12.04.1) Martijn On 24 September 2012 14:48, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: +1, smoke tester is happy on Ubuntu 12.04. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc0 Thanks, Robert -- lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 06:11 +0200, Robert Muir wrote: Artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc0 Sorry to interrupt as a non-voter, but I am afraid that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3875 might be a blocker for 4.0. Maybe a veteran could take a quick look? - Toke Eskildsen, State and University Library, Denmark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
Somebody is going to need to make a call on whether support for Solr Admin UI in IE 9 is required for 4.0 release. See SOLR-3876. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3876 I marked it only as critical, for now. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Robert Muir Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 12:11 AM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: VOTE: release 4.0 Artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc0 Thanks, Robert -- lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
+1 smoke test is happy. I integrated it in my 4.0 apps and ran tests, everything looks good. thanks robert for all the hard work! On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Martijn v Groningen martijn.v.gronin...@gmail.com wrote: +1, Smoker tester also ran successfully on my machine (Ubuntu 12.04.1) Martijn On 24 September 2012 14:48, Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote: +1, smoke tester is happy on Ubuntu 12.04. Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc0 Thanks, Robert -- lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
+1, I ran my usual workflow on Solr, indexing example content and poking around. I did notice one issue in the /browse UI, and haven't researched when this happened, but after indexing the the Solr example docs (java -jar post.jar *.xml) I got this in the UI: In Stock: true jEOE: software search That jEOE should be Cat or Category instead. I'll open a JIRA. Cosmetic, though confusing. Erik On Sep 23, 2012, at 21:11 , Robert Muir wrote: Artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc0 Thanks, Robert -- lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: VOTE: release 4.0
Running smokeTestRelease.py on Win7+Cygwin, I can't get past the Solr example
test under Java7.
I ran the smoke tester three times using Oracle v1.7.0_01 64-bit, and then two
times using Oracle v1.7.0_07 64-bit. Four out of the five runs failed on the
first Java7 Solr example test (from the unpacked .tgz distribution), while one
run passed the .tgz Solr example test, but then failed on the .zip Solr example
test.
All Java6 (v1.6.0_34) Solr example test runs always pass for me.
Here's the output from the most recent attempt - below I also have included the
corresponding solr-example.log:
-
Test Solr...
test basics...
get KEYS
0.1 MB
download apache-solr-4.0.0-src.tgz...
29.8 MB
verify md5/sha1 digests
verify sig
GPG: gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
verify trust
GPG: gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
download apache-solr-4.0.0.tgz...
102.8 MB
verify md5/sha1 digests
verify sig
GPG: gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
verify trust
GPG: gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
download apache-solr-4.0.0.zip...
107.0 MB
verify md5/sha1 digests
verify sig
GPG: gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
verify trust
GPG: gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
unpack apache-solr-4.0.0.tgz...
test solr example w/ Java 6...
start Solr instance
(log=/home/sarowe/temp/tmpDir/unpack/apache-solr-4.0.0/solr-example.log)...
startup done
test utf8...
index example docs...
run query...
stop server (SIGINT)...
test solr example w/ Java 7...
start Solr instance
(log=/home/sarowe/temp/tmpDir/unpack/apache-solr-4.0.0/solr-example.log)...
startup done
test utf8...
index example docs...
run query...
FAILED: response is:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
response
lst name=responseHeaderint name=status0/intint
name=QTime0/intlst name=paramsstr
name=qvideo/str/lst/lstresult name=response numFound=0
start=0/result
/response
stop server (SIGINT)...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py, line 1121, in module
File dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py, line 1071, in main
File dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py, line 1113, in smokeTest
File dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py, line 424, in unpack
File dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py, line 540, in verifyUnpacked
File dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py, line 612, in testSolrExample
RuntimeError: query on solr example instance failed
-
And the solr-example.log:
-
2012-09-24 14:08:56.153:INFO:oejs.Server:jetty-8.1.2.v20120308
2012-09-24 14:08:56.166:INFO:oejdp.ScanningAppProvider:Deployment monitor
C:\cygwin\home\sarowe\temp\tmpDir\unpack\apache-solr-4.0.0\example\contexts at
interval 0
2012-09-24 14:08:56.171:INFO:oejd.DeploymentManager:Deployable added:
C:\cygwin\home\sarowe\temp\tmpDir\unpack\apache-solr-4.0.0\example\contexts\solr.xml
2012-09-24 14:08:56.719:INFO:oejw.StandardDescriptorProcessor:NO JSP Support
for /solr, did not find org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet
2012-09-24 14:08:56.737:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:started
o.e.j.w.WebAppContext{/solr,file:/C:/cygwin/home/sarowe/temp/tmpDir/unpack/apache-solr-4.0.0/example/solr-webapp/webapp/},C:\cygwin\home\sarowe\temp\tmpDir\unpack\apache-solr-4.0.0\example/webapps/solr.war
2012-09-24 14:08:56.737:INFO:oejsh.ContextHandler:started
o.e.j.w.WebAppContext{/solr,file:/C:/cygwin/home/sarowe/temp/tmpDir/unpack/apache-solr-4.0.0/example/solr-webapp/webapp/},C:\cygwin\home\sarowe\temp\tmpDir\unpack\apache-solr-4.0.0\example/webapps/solr.war
Sep 24, 2012 2:08:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader locateSolrHome
INFO: JNDI not configured for solr (NoInitialContextEx)
Sep 24, 2012 2:08:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader locateSolrHome
INFO: solr home defaulted to 'solr/' (could not find system property or JNDI)
Sep 24, 2012 2:08:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader init
INFO: new SolrResourceLoader for deduced Solr Home: 'solr/'
Sep 24, 2012 2:08:56 PM org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter init
INFO: SolrDispatchFilter.init()
Sep 24, 2012 2:08:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader locateSolrHome
INFO: JNDI not configured for solr (NoInitialContextEx)
Sep 24, 2012 2:08:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader locateSolrHome
INFO: solr home defaulted to 'solr/' (could not find system property or JNDI)
Sep 24, 2012 2:08:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$Initializer
initialize
INFO: looking for solr.xml:
C:\cygwin\home\sarowe\temp\tmpDir\unpack\apache-solr-4.0.0\example\solr\solr.xml
Sep 24, 2012 2:08:56 PM org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer init
INFO: New CoreContainer 1612487865
Sep 24,
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote: Running smokeTestRelease.py on Win7+Cygwin, I can't get past the Solr example test under Java7. I'm not really sure thats a reflection on this release candidate: I'm not sure the smoke tester works on windows. I think you may have to test manually. -- lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
Wow; that looks like a serious issue to me. - Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-release-4-0-tp4009770p4009941.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
Folks, it looks like there definitely should be a respin, so please remember to back-port fixes that should go into 4.0 to the 4.0 branch in addition to the 4x branch. -Yonik http://lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: VOTE: release 4.0
+1, If we do this, I would be happy to also fix the servlet-api.jar issue. If you want to add ecj-linter, I would also be happy, but that's not important, just nice to have! - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 11:39 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: VOTE: release 4.0 Folks, it looks like there definitely should be a respin, so please remember to back-port fixes that should go into 4.0 to the 4.0 branch in addition to the 4x branch. -Yonik http://lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
I'm voting for the respin as well. We should wait a brief time to let any other issues surface I think though. On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: +1, If we do this, I would be happy to also fix the servlet-api.jar issue. If you want to add ecj-linter, I would also be happy, but that's not important, just nice to have! - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 11:39 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: VOTE: release 4.0 Folks, it looks like there definitely should be a respin, so please remember to back-port fixes that should go into 4.0 to the 4.0 branch in addition to the 4x branch. -Yonik http://lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- - Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
I'm voting for the respin as well. We should wait a brief time to let any other issues surface I think though. On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: +1, If we do this, I would be happy to also fix the servlet-api.jar issue. If you want to add ecj-linter, I would also be happy, but that's not important, just nice to have! - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 11:39 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: VOTE: release 4.0 Folks, it looks like there definitely should be a respin, so please remember to back-port fixes that should go into 4.0 to the 4.0 branch in addition to the 4x branch. -Yonik http://lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- - Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
I think Roman is working on trying to coerce the linter into testing that the .war file is correct. Maybe you can help him (python is hard for me)? As far as the ecj-linter, its technically a test: I don't object to it being backported except for the fact that I would prefer we only do what is minimal and necessary. This is really important: we need to maintain stability. the release branch shouldn't be a free-for-all, even for bugfixes. On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: +1, If we do this, I would be happy to also fix the servlet-api.jar issue. If you want to add ecj-linter, I would also be happy, but that's not important, just nice to have! - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 11:39 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: VOTE: release 4.0 Folks, it looks like there definitely should be a respin, so please remember to back-port fixes that should go into 4.0 to the 4.0 branch in addition to the 4x branch. -Yonik http://lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
Well, if you want to save me from being embarrassed by a zillion search installations trying the /browse handler and seeing my initials in the output, respin this beast. Fortunately, it looks like maybe I get covered by SOLR-3875 and maybe SOLR-3879 being enough reasons for a re-spin G If so, SOLR-3880 is the fix for jEOE appearing in the /browse output. Erick On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote: +1, I ran my usual workflow on Solr, indexing example content and poking around. I did notice one issue in the /browse UI, and haven't researched when this happened, but after indexing the the Solr example docs (java -jar post.jar *.xml) I got this in the UI: In Stock: true jEOE: software search That jEOE should be Cat or Category instead. I'll open a JIRA. Cosmetic, though confusing. Erik On Sep 23, 2012, at 21:11 , Robert Muir wrote: Artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc0 Thanks, Robert -- lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: VOTE: release 4.0
I think Roman is working on trying to coerce the linter into testing that the .war file is correct. Maybe you can help him (python is hard for me)? I would do this check with ANT, but with python it should be possible by doing a pexec on unzip -l WARFILE | grep -v servlet-api As far as the ecj-linter, its technically a test: I don't object to it being backported except for the fact that I would prefer we only do what is minimal and necessary. As I said, I don't care, would be nice for later tests on this release branch with e.g. Jähnkins. This is really important: we need to maintain stability. the release branch shouldn't be a free-for-all, even for bugfixes. In other Open Source projects, the stable release branch is closed down and only the RM has commit rights (e.g., PHP before it used to use GIT). On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: +1, If we do this, I would be happy to also fix the servlet-api.jar issue. If you want to add ecj-linter, I would also be happy, but that's not important, just nice to have! - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik Seeley Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 11:39 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: VOTE: release 4.0 Folks, it looks like there definitely should be a respin, so please remember to back-port fixes that should go into 4.0 to the 4.0 branch in addition to the 4x branch. -Yonik http://lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
On Sep 24, 2012, at 6:11 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: In other Open Source projects, the stable release branch is closed down and only the RM has commit rights (e.g., PHP before it used to use GIT). Personally, I think our system is better - use consensus wherever you can avoid hard rules wherever you can. Consensus and Lazy Consensus, 3 +1's for a release. Who needs any more :) - Mark
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote: Personally, I think our system is better - use consensus wherever you can avoid hard rules wherever you can. Consensus and Lazy Consensus, 3 +1's for a release. Who needs any more :) yeah, i dont want to be the one guy committing to this thing, I don't currently have the time to manage all the fixes, nor do i necessarily know enough about all the pieces involved to do the correct cost-benefit analysis. instead i'm asking that other people do this: maybe the 'correct' fix for some bugs is too risky to go in the release branch and a safe workaround makes more sense (we have 4.x/5.x for bigger changes, thats fine). and please be conservative, just open the issue with Fix version: 4.0 and Blocker, and take your time. let changes bake. add tests to ensure additional regressions are not introduced by fixes (I am concerned about that). run 'ant nightly-smoke' before committing to the release branch (because my jenkins is running this continously, and is configured to automatically revert commits that break the build). of course I want a solid release that isn't full of bugs, I am just of course pushing back on *all changes* because I'm trying to encourage stability. -- lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
: I'm not really sure thats a reflection on this release candidate: I'm : not sure the smoke tester works on windows. I think you may have to : test manually. FWIW: smokeTestRelease.py says... # This tool expects to find /lucene and /solr off the base URL. You # must have a working gpg, tar, unzip in your path. This has been # tested on Linux and on Cygwin under Windows 7. I think what sarowe is seeing is a symptom of a bug in how commits are dealt with during the recovery phase on server startup, but i'm not certain (nor am i certain how significant of a bug this would be i na typical situation)... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3884#comment-13462233 Steve: if you could attach *both* of hte solr-example logs from a failed run (the one from java6 that passes, and then the one from java7 that fails) that would probably be helpful. -Hoss - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: VOTE: release 4.0
Sweet, thanks! Mark On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote: Artifacts are here: http://s.apache.org/lusolr40rc0 Thanks, Robert -- lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- - Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
