Re: Mahout 0.9 Release
+1, all steps passed On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Stevo Slavić ssla...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Shannon Quinn squ...@gatech.edu wrote: LGTM On 1/29/14, 4:27 PM, peng wrote: +1, can't see a bad side. On Wed 29 Jan 2014 11:33:02 AM EST, Suneel Marthi wrote: +1 from me On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:58 AM, Sebastian Schelter s...@apache.org wrote: +1 On 01/29/2014 05:25 AM, Andrew Musselman wrote: Looks good. +1 On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com wrote: a), b), c), d) all passed here. CosineDistance of clustered points from cluster-reuters.sh -1 kmeans were within the range [0,1]. Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:45:42 -0800 From: suneel_mar...@yahoo.com Subject: Mahout 0.9 Release To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org Fixed the issues that were reported with Clustering code this past week, upgraded codebase to Lucene 4.6.1 that was released today. Here's the URL for the 0.9 release in staging:- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapachemahout-1004/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.9/ The artifacts have been signed with the following key: https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/smarthi.asc Please:- a) Verify that u can unpack the release (tar or zip) b) Verify u r able to compile the distro c) Run through the unit tests: mvn clean test d) Run the example scripts under $MAHOUT_HOME/examples/bin. Please run through all the different options in each script. Need a minimum of 3 '+1' votes from PMC for the release to be finalized. -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Mahout 0.9 Release
Voting for this closes tomorrow, thus far there's been only a single +1 from PMC. I'll go ahead and release the artifacts tomorrow regardless of whether we succeed/fail to muster the minimum 3 +1 votes. Thanks On Thursday, January 30, 2014 9:45 AM, Sergey Svinarchuk ssvinarc...@hortonworks.com wrote: +1, all steps passed On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Stevo Slavić ssla...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Shannon Quinn squ...@gatech.edu wrote: LGTM On 1/29/14, 4:27 PM, peng wrote: +1, can't see a bad side. On Wed 29 Jan 2014 11:33:02 AM EST, Suneel Marthi wrote: +1 from me On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:58 AM, Sebastian Schelter s...@apache.org wrote: +1 On 01/29/2014 05:25 AM, Andrew Musselman wrote: Looks good. +1 On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Andrew Palumbo ap@outlook.com wrote: a), b), c), d) all passed here. CosineDistance of clustered points from cluster-reuters.sh -1 kmeans were within the range [0,1]. Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:45:42 -0800 From: suneel_mar...@yahoo.com Subject: Mahout 0.9 Release To: u...@mahout.apache.org; dev@mahout.apache.org Fixed the issues that were reported with Clustering code this past week, upgraded codebase to Lucene 4.6.1 that was released today. Here's the URL for the 0.9 release in staging:- https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ orgapachemahout-1004/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.9/ The artifacts have been signed with the following key: https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/smarthi.asc Please:- a) Verify that u can unpack the release (tar or zip) b) Verify u r able to compile the distro c) Run through the unit tests: mvn clean test d) Run the example scripts under $MAHOUT_HOME/examples/bin. Please run through all the different options in each script. Need a minimum of 3 '+1' votes from PMC for the release to be finalized. -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
[jira] [Commented] (MAHOUT-1385) Caching Encoders don't cache
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13887544#comment-13887544 ] Velmurugan commented on MAHOUT-1385: I'm going to start working in this! Caching Encoders don't cache Key: MAHOUT-1385 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1385 Project: Mahout Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 0.8 Reporter: Johannes Schulte Priority: Minor Attachments: MAHOUT-1385-test.patch The Caching... line of encoders contains code of caching the hash code terms added to the vector. However, the method hashForProbe inside this classes is never called as the signature has String for the parameter original form (instead of byte[] like other encoders). Changing this to byte[] however would lose the java String internal caching of the Strings hash code , that is used as a key in the cache map, triggering another hash code calculation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.5#6160)
