Re: Marvin’s mission discussion

2020-07-22 Thread Lucas Cardoso Silva
Hi guys.
I would like to know if anyone else has any ideas about this evaluation
phase. Both the opinion of those who have been in the community for a long
time and those who are still getting to know Marvin is now important for
this step, so your suggestion or validation of the initial text is always
welcome!

Best regards,
Lucas Cardoso

Em sex., 10 de jul. de 2020 às 13:48, Lucas Cardoso Silva <
cardosolucas61@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hello guys. The time has come for us to take the first step in
> architectural assessment: the definition of the mission. Basically we have
> to decide here what is important in Marvin and what is outside the scope of
> the project. This is important because, during this analysis and the
> development process as a whole, we will be able to segment what is really
> important and make things more simple and functional. Also, if it looks
> cool, we can include that on the Marvin-AI homepage.
>
> As stated earlier, I will post an initial draft and would like to receive
> your feedback to complete a few points:
>
> The Apache Marvin-AI platform aims to offer:
>
>-
>
>a practical and standardized solution,
>-
>
>for the development and deployment of machine learning applications.
>
>
> Aiming to offer the user:
>
>-
>
>scalability,
>-
>
>language agnosticism,
>-
>
>standardized pipeline (DASFE),
>-
>
>possibility of remote versioning of artifacts.
>
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions for more important features, resources or
> design decisions in Marvin?
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Lucas Cardoso
>


Re: Marvin’s mission discussion

2020-07-22 Thread Wei Chen
Hello Lucas,

I have some ideas:

1. Should we consider to use K8S or similar tools for inference container
scaling and management?
Marvin's current container management is not as powerful as some container
focus projects.
K8S can also be deployed into most environments now.

2. Is our current data cleaning stage flexible enough for multiple data
sources with table join?
Or if we should cut the data preparation stage out for the user to make
their own data pipeline on their data storage.
I figured that preprocessing might be too complex to be generalized for
different ML projects.

Best Regards
Wei



On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:26 AM Lucas Cardoso Silva <
cardosolucas61@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi guys.
> I would like to know if anyone else has any ideas about this evaluation
> phase. Both the opinion of those who have been in the community for a long
> time and those who are still getting to know Marvin is now important for
> this step, so your suggestion or validation of the initial text is always
> welcome!
>
> Best regards,
> Lucas Cardoso
>
> Em sex., 10 de jul. de 2020 às 13:48, Lucas Cardoso Silva <
> cardosolucas61@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> > Hello guys. The time has come for us to take the first step in
> > architectural assessment: the definition of the mission. Basically we
> have
> > to decide here what is important in Marvin and what is outside the scope
> of
> > the project. This is important because, during this analysis and the
> > development process as a whole, we will be able to segment what is really
> > important and make things more simple and functional. Also, if it looks
> > cool, we can include that on the Marvin-AI homepage.
> >
> > As stated earlier, I will post an initial draft and would like to receive
> > your feedback to complete a few points:
> >
> > The Apache Marvin-AI platform aims to offer:
> >
> >-
> >
> >a practical and standardized solution,
> >-
> >
> >for the development and deployment of machine learning applications.
> >
> >
> > Aiming to offer the user:
> >
> >-
> >
> >scalability,
> >-
> >
> >language agnosticism,
> >-
> >
> >standardized pipeline (DASFE),
> >-
> >
> >possibility of remote versioning of artifacts.
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have any suggestions for more important features, resources
> or
> > design decisions in Marvin?
> >
> > Thank you very much,
> >
> > Lucas Cardoso
> >
>