PWC and Apache Marvin AI
Hi Guys, I would like to introduce you Vinston and Samir, they have ve working with Marvin for while now, and looks like they have also many use cases using Marvin inside PWC. How cool is that? lol @Viston has a PR approved, and now looks like he is facing some performance issues. Welcome guys, Taka
Re: PWC and Apache Marvin AI
It's great to read that. Welcome folks! Feel free to reach out to us here in the list with any suggestions/issues you may have. - Lucas On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:43 PM Daniel Takabayashi < daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > > I would like to introduce you Vinston and Samir, they have ve working with > Marvin for while now, and looks like they have also many use cases using > Marvin inside PWC. > > How cool is that? lol > > @Viston has a PR approved, and now looks like he is facing some > performance issues. > > Welcome guys, > Taka >
Architecture meeting
Folks, our meeting was interrupted due to Google Meets issues: [image: image.png] It was a good discussions. Let's share our notes here. Best, Lucas
Re: PWC and Apache Marvin AI
Hi Vinston / Samir, Lucas Bonnato is the one who creates the initial version of the executor. Why don't you describe the problem you are facing to scale the GRPC server? Em qui., 24 de set. de 2020 às 17:36, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu: > It's great to read that. > > Welcome folks! Feel free to reach out to us here in the list with any > suggestions/issues you may have. > > - Lucas > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:43 PM Daniel Takabayashi < > daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > I would like to introduce you Vinston and Samir, they have ve working > with > > Marvin for while now, and looks like they have also many use cases using > > Marvin inside PWC. > > > > How cool is that? lol > > > > @Viston has a PR approved, and now looks like he is facing some > > performance issues. > > > > Welcome guys, > > Taka > > >
Re: Architecture meeting
Hello guys, the meeting was interrupted but I believe we were almost finishing anyway. It was a good discussion! My notes: 1. We need to work continuously on the documentation, as it is currently a weak spot. We discussed and more or less agreed on the following: - Let's use ReadTheDocs for the user guides (we will need to configure that in the Github repository and configure redirect and DNS in Apache infrastructure). - Let's include "deeper" use cases, in the form of guides. We can divide this work and invite more contributors to write. We need to decide on what topics could appear in the documentation, so that we can start writing. - For development, we can use RFC format. Maybe we can start by writing a RFC with the proposal for Marvin's new direction (see item 3 below) 2. "We should focus on what we are good at, and reuse what others are good at" (Taka's words). It is very difficult to be always updated with the industry and new technologies. 3. A "new" direction for Marvin started to appear, with two main "new features": - We could provide alternatives to Marvin's serving. Like TFX, as it seems close enough to DASFE (it might even have been inspired by it!). The idea is to make Marvin extensible, more like a SDK, and focus on making the learning curve for these tools smoother (as DASFE is a really easy to learn design pattern). - We could use Apache Beam to improve data acquisition in Marvin. - I could try to write a simple RFC for this, so that we can work out the details! Did I forget something? Best regards! Em qui., 24 de set. de 2020 às 22:05, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu: > Folks, our meeting was interrupted due to Google Meets issues: > [image: image.png] > > It was a good discussions. Let's share our notes here. > > Best, > Lucas >
Re: PWC and Apache Marvin AI
Vinston, Could you just describe your problem here? In this way, we could also use everybody else knowledge to help solve your problem. Just describe your use case and how we could replicate it. Em qui., 24 de set. de 2020 às 19:02, Vinston Sundara Pandiyan Sigamani < vinston.pandi...@pwc.com> escreveu: > Hi Daniel and Lucas, > > We are happy to setup call with you, please let me know when you are > available? > > Thank you, > Vinston > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 9:57 PM Daniel Takabayashi < > daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Vinston / Samir, >> >> Lucas Bonnato is the one who creates the initial version of the executor. >> Why don't you describe the problem you are facing to scale the GRPC server? >> >> >> >> Em qui., 24 de set. de 2020 às 17:36, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < >> lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu: >> >>> It's great to read that. >>> >>> Welcome folks! Feel free to reach out to us here in the list with any >>> suggestions/issues you may have. >>> >>> - Lucas >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:43 PM Daniel Takabayashi < >>> daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi Guys, >>> > >>> > >>> > I would like to introduce you Vinston and Samir, they have ve working >>> with >>> > Marvin for while now, and looks like they have also many use cases >>> using >>> > Marvin inside PWC. >>> > >>> > How cool is that? lol >>> > >>> > @Viston has a PR approved, and now looks like he is facing some >>> > performance issues. >>> > >>> > Welcome guys, >>> > Taka >>> > >>> >> > The information transmitted, including any attachments, is intended only > for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain > confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, > dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, > this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient > is prohibited, and all liability arising therefrom is disclaimed. If you > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material > from any computer. > > > In the event the content of this email includes Tax advice, the content of > this email is limited to the matters specifically addressed herein and is > not intended to address other potential tax consequences or the potential > application of tax penalties to this or any other matter. > > > PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is a Delaware limited liability partnership. > This communication may come from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP or one of its > subsidiaries. >
Re: Architecture meeting
Hello Lucas and All, Thanks for the note! Sorry that I couldn't make it to the meeting. Should we consolidate these items as action points in our Jira? Best Regards, Wei On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:03 AM Lucas Cardoso Silva < cardosolucas61@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello guys, the meeting was interrupted but I believe we were almost > finishing anyway. It was a good discussion! > > My notes: > > 1. We need to work continuously on the documentation, as it is currently a > weak spot. We discussed and more or less agreed on the following: > - Let's use ReadTheDocs for the user guides (we will need to configure that > in the Github repository and configure redirect and DNS in Apache > infrastructure). > - Let's include "deeper" use cases, in the form of guides. We can divide > this work and invite more contributors to write. We need to decide on what > topics could appear in the documentation, so that we can start writing. > - For development, we can use RFC format. Maybe we can start by writing a > RFC with the proposal for Marvin's new direction (see item 3 below) > > 2. "We should focus on what we are good at, and reuse what others are good > at" (Taka's words). It is very difficult to be always updated with the > industry and new technologies. > > 3. A "new" direction for Marvin started to appear, with two main "new > features": > - We could provide alternatives to Marvin's serving. Like TFX, as it seems > close enough to DASFE (it might even have been inspired by it!). The idea > is to make Marvin extensible, more like a SDK, and focus on making the > learning curve for these tools smoother (as DASFE is a really easy to learn > design pattern). > - We could use Apache Beam to improve data acquisition in Marvin. > - I could try to write a simple RFC for this, so that we can work out the > details! > > Did I forget something? > > Best regards! > > Em qui., 24 de set. de 2020 às 22:05, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < > lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu: > > > Folks, our meeting was interrupted due to Google Meets issues: > > [image: image.png] > > > > It was a good discussions. Let's share our notes here. > > > > Best, > > Lucas > > >
