Re: [offlist] More MyFaces artifacts for ibiblio

2006-04-18 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Done.

The best way is to send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think I have to remind you that non PMC approved releases
never can be put in the http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository. I
have deleted them from the mirror this time

On 4/18/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carlos,
>
> We have some artifacts that need to be published in ibiblio now that
> we have done another official release.
>
> Basically everything in:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/apache/myfaces/core/.
> This is the first mavenized release of these artifacts so there is
> only one version in these directories.
>
> Also, we had an arifact accidentally published a while back.
>
> group id: org.apache.myfaces.commons
> artifact: myfaces-commons
>
> We had "published" the jar to /www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository
> before the final vote.  We then decided to refactor and eliminate this
> artifact.  Unfortunately it was published automatically (or manually)
> without our request.  Could you please eliminate it?
>
> Sorry about the confusion.
>
> Sean Schofield
> (MyFaces PMC)
>
> p.s. Let me know if this is not an acceptable way to request ibiblio
> fixes.  I could file a JIRA ticket also but I'm unable to assign them
> directly to you.
>


--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
 -- The Princess Bride

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3

2006-04-18 Thread Kaare Nilsen
On 19/04/06, Trygve Laugstøl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 20:31 +0200, Kaare Nilsen wrote:
> > The speed improvements are impressive.. thanx for that !!
> > I still would like to have my instance running for a couple of days to
> > test the memoryleak in more detail, and also i have found a bug that
> > when importing a multiproject one or more of the modules are added
> > twice (dupplicates), and then it is not possible to delete one of them
> > (I am going to file a jira issue tomorrow when i have the stacktrace
> > available).
>
> I'm voting -0 on this release as there seems to be new issue that has
> come up lately which I at least would like Emmanuel to take a look at
> before continuing with the release.
>
> The issue is the one reported by Kaare Nilsen and Jorg (and possibly
> related to 641[1]).

That would be http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-660

>
> [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-641
>
> --
> Trygve
>
>


Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3

2006-04-18 Thread Trygve Laugstøl
On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 20:31 +0200, Kaare Nilsen wrote:
> The speed improvements are impressive.. thanx for that !!
> I still would like to have my instance running for a couple of days to
> test the memoryleak in more detail, and also i have found a bug that
> when importing a multiproject one or more of the modules are added
> twice (dupplicates), and then it is not possible to delete one of them
> (I am going to file a jira issue tomorrow when i have the stacktrace
> available).

I'm voting -0 on this release as there seems to be new issue that has
come up lately which I at least would like Emmanuel to take a look at
before continuing with the release.

The issue is the one reported by Kaare Nilsen and Jorg (and possibly
related to 641[1]).

[1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-641

--
Trygve



Re: 1.5 release ?

2006-04-18 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Hi Will,

  And what about a bug fix release for velocity 1.4 as Daniel suggested?
  I'm not sure that we'll be ready before your 1.5 final release (If
possible I prefer to not use a beta), but if it were the case we were happy
to be able to fix our problem.

  Cheers

Arnaud

On 4/17/06, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> Thanks for the note.  We have just a little to do before a release,
> but we've all been tied up this Spring, it seems.
>
> Been thinking about this over the last few days.  Let me try to finish
> VELOCITY-403 (a documentation task) in the next two weeks, then I'll
> propose a vote to release 1.5-beta.  I know there are a couple of
> frameworks out there waiting for such a release.
>
> There's some obscure bugs remaining, but the quantity of bug fixes and
> new features is much greater than the bugs that are left. (most of
> these have been present for multiple versions).
>
> WILL
>
> On 4/15/06, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Daniel,
> >
> >   Yes if it's possible.
> >   I think that it is sufficient.
> >   Actually we are using velocity 1.4 and we are satisfied about it.
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
> > PS : I didn't subscribe to your list. If you reply, can you add my
> > email in copy please?
> >
> > > On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > >
> > > >   Do you have an idea when you'll be able to release the version 1.5of
> > > > velocity ?
> > > >   We particularly need it in maven to avoid log4j errors coming from
> > > > VELOCITY-193
> > > >   We would like to have it before to release maven 1.1.
> > >
> > > If 1.5 isn't immediately forthcoming, how about a 1.4.x release to
> > > satisfy the Maven folks?
> > > --
> > >
> > > Daniel Rall
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Forio Business Simulations
>
> Will Glass-Husain
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.forio.com
>


Re: multi-page reports

2006-04-18 Thread Kenney Westerhof

Hi,

I'm trying to implement a multi-page report.

The problem is that currently the ReportDocumentRenderer from
maven-site-plugin creates the SiteRendererSink and calls
report.generate(sink,locale).

There's no way to create more SiteRendererSinks within the report,
because those sinks are from a different classloader. You can't use
the SiteRenderer component to create sinks because of the same reason.

The only way I see to support multiple pages for reports without running
into classloading issues is to give a SinkFactory to the MavenReport
instance - a SinkFactory from the maven-reporting-api, if possible,
otherwise from the Doxia api.
I believe that Report plugins should only implement/work with a Maven
reporting api, not with underlying libraries, if possible.
A 'main' sink for the report page could (still) be supplied.

Thoughts?

I'm currently working on a solution in trunk..

-- Kenney

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 17:35:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: Kenney Westerhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: multi-page reports


Hi,

I'm trying to create a multi-page report. I use the main sink to
render an overview page, and use the SiteRenderer to create a sink
for each page.

Unfortunately no files are created. I looked at the doxia api
and it has some methods for rendering pages using velocity merging.
Unfortunately I don't have a SiteRenderingContext object handy,
so I can't call the public (or private) methods.

In maven-reporting-impl I saw an AbstractMavenMultiPageReport class
but it is not used anywhere.

Anybody got an idea on how to render multiple pages in a report?

I cannot create a separate mojo for the pages - it renders
a page for each file in a given set of source files.

When this issue is resolved I'll post a request for adding a new
plugin to the mojo project.

-- Kenney

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3

2006-04-18 Thread John Casey

+1

Emmanuel Venisse wrote:

Hi,

I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)

Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/

Let's do another 72h round of voting.

+1/+0/-1

Here's my +1.

Thanks,

Emmanuel





RE: rsync-ability for maven-snapshot-repository on apache?

2006-04-18 Thread Brian E. Fox
Yes. If I ever need a snapshot, I take it an deploy it to my corp
repository, at least that way when it works I know it will stay working.
It is a pain to keep changing the repo though if you depend on many
snapshots and maybe that's the case here.

Here's something I thought of several times that might help the internal
deploy issue. What if in the pom you could only specify the repository
id and not the url. Then in the settings you could define or override
the pom
s url. This would allow someone to redefine the repository to point
local for deployment and make it easy to get the code and redeploy
internally. I originally thought about this to use for continuum, my
instance is on the same machine as my repo For example I would
rather have it pointed to the file folder than use ftp for deploying. 

You can effectively do this now for "regular" repositories using
mirrors, but I'm talking about redirecting distributionManagement
repositories.

-Original Message-
From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 8:28 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: RE: rsync-ability for maven-snapshot-repository on apache?

Why on earth are you depending on the network at all?  We have our build
locked down by using an  internal mirror of central + custom snapshots.
Anything else is non-deterministic and then management starts asking
questions...

-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 8:03 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Cc: Brett Porter; Carlos Sanchez
Subject: Re: rsync-ability for maven-snapshot-repository on apache?


Brett,

> This is the main concern. We should be cutting releases this week, and

> fewer people using the snapshots off of Apache.
>
> I'm curious why a maven-proxy in the middle doesn't alleviate this 
> issue for you.

The maven-proxy doesn't help much on Monday mornings.   The rest of the 
week it's OK.   We have the timeout for snapshots set at 48 hours.   If 
no-one does anything over the weekend (and this was a holiday weekend so

no-one did), then the caches are pretty much moot on Monday.   

It was kind of amusing (not) this morning when we all came in.   There 
were four of us trying to build and each of our builds were failing at 
different spots.   Each would get a little bit further.   All while 
trying to check the snapshot server. By the afternoon, we were
pretty 
much all set, but I really don't want this to happen everyweek (or on
Wednesday when the timeouts from today start expiring).

We used to have the same problem with ibiblio (and even the mirrors) so
we started rsyncing ibiblio local.  Now we don't have problems with
that, just the apache snapshot server.  (the codehaus snapshot server is
much better behaved)

Thanks!
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727  C: 508-380-7194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



plexus

2006-04-18 Thread David J. M. Karlsen

Hi!

I'm using org.codehaus.plexus.util.cli.Commandline to execute shell 
commands. Does anybody know if it's possible to configure it to use 
another shell? (e.g. 4dos instead of CMD.EXE) ?



--
David J. M. Karlsen - +47 90 68 22 43
http://www.davidkarlsen.com
http://mp3.davidkarlsen.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vote] Release Continuum 1.0.3

2006-04-18 Thread Brett Porter

+1

Emmanuel Venisse wrote:

Hi,

I've fixed some issues since latest RC (memory leak, performance...)

Here is the latest RC. Please give it a try before voting.
http://www.codehaus.org/~evenisse/continuum/

Let's do another 72h round of voting.

+1/+0/-1

Here's my +1.

Thanks,

Emmanuel



Can't bootstrap svn head

2006-04-18 Thread Giorgio Gallo
Hi,

This is to inform you the current svn head is not passing the
integration tests: specifically tests it0100, it0098, it0096, it0095 and
it0094 fail.

This happens with both Sun's jdk 1.4 and 1.5, on a reasonably updated
Kubuntu system.

Please be patient if this is already known - I've just subscribed to the
list :)

Regards,
Giorgio

PS: in attachment, you'll find the output of bootstrap.sh on my system
whith jdk 1.4 (that for jdk 1.5 is practically identical)


bootstrap.out.jdk14.txt.gz
Description: application/gzip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]