Issues with getting 1.1-SNAPSHOT started

2007-04-16 Thread Orford, Ian
I hope addressing this to continuum-dev is correct.

I've been using 1.0.3 for some time now, but thought I'd check out
1.1-SNAPSHOT just to see what good things I can look forward to, or even
to start using it if it's stable.

I've build it and got the war file. I'm trying to deploy this on my
build server using winstone as the container.

First off, is there any reason why winstone isn't a good choice for a
basic container into which I can deploy this war? If it's not, what's a
good alternative?

Are there any notes I can look at re configuration? I'm getting the
following.

Thanks in advance, 
Ian




[Winstone 2007/04/16 15:30:50] - Beginning extraction from war file
[webapp 2007/04/16 15:30:53] - Loading plexus context properties from:
'/WEB-INF/plexus.properties'
[webapp 2007/04/16 15:30:53] - Could not load plexus context properties
from: '/WEB-INF/plexus.properties'
log4j:ERROR setFile(null,true) call failed.
java.io.FileNotFoundException: /logs/continuum.log (No such file or
directory)
at java.io.FileOutputStream.openAppend(Native Method)
at java.io.FileOutputStream.init(FileOutputStream.java:177)
at java.io.FileOutputStream.init(FileOutputStream.java:102)
at org.apache.log4j.FileAppender.setFile(FileAppender.java:272)
at
org.apache.log4j.FileAppender.activateOptions(FileAppender.java:151)
at
org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender.activateOptions(DailyRollingFi
leAppender.java:206)
at
org.apache.log4j.config.PropertySetter.activate(PropertySetter.java:247)
at
org.apache.log4j.config.PropertySetter.setProperties(PropertySetter.java
:123)
at
org.apache.log4j.config.PropertySetter.setProperties(PropertySetter.java
:87)
at
org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.parseAppender(PropertyConfigurator
.java:645)
at
org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.parseCategory(PropertyConfigurator
.java:603)
at
org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.configureRootCategory(PropertyConf
igurator.java:500)
at
org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.doConfigure(PropertyConfigurator.j
ava:406)
at
org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.configure(PropertyConfigurator.jav
a:340)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.logging.log4j.Log4JLoggerManager.start(Log4JLoggerMa
nager.java:299)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.personality.plexus.lifecycle.phase.StartPhase.execut
e(StartPhase.java:33)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.lifecycle.AbstractLifecycleHandler.start(AbstractLif
ecycleHandler.java:128)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.AbstractComponentManager.startComp
onentLifecycle(AbstractComponentManager.java:142)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.AbstractComponentManager.createCom
ponentInstance(AbstractComponentManager.java:132)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.ClassicSingletonComponentManager.g
etComponent(ClassicSingletonComponentManager.java:90)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultComponentLookupManager.lookup(DefaultComponen
tLookupManager.java:147)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultComponentLookupManager.lookupMap(DefaultCompo
nentLookupManager.java:199)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.lookupMap(DefaultPlexusContai
ner.java:309)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.lookupMap(DefaultPlexusContai
ner.java:303)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.container.initialization.InitializeLoggerManagerPhas
e.initializeCoreComponent(InitializeLoggerManagerPhase.java:47)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.container.initialization.AbstractCoreComponentInitia
lizationPhase.execute(AbstractCoreComponentInitializationPhase.java:37)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.initializePhases(DefaultPlexu
sContainer.java:886)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.initialize(DefaultPlexusConta
iner.java:834)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.construct(DefaultPlexusContai
ner.java:811)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.init(DefaultPlexusContainer
.java:222)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.init(DefaultPlexusContainer
.java:260)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.xwork.PlexusLifecycleListener.contextInitialized(Ple
xusLifecycleListener.java:76)
at
winstone.WebAppConfiguration.init(WebAppConfiguration.java:885)
at
winstone.HostConfiguration.initWebApp(HostConfiguration.java:131)
at winstone.HostConfiguration.init(HostConfiguration.java:73)
at winstone.HostGroup.initHost(HostGroup.java:85)
at winstone.HostGroup.init(HostGroup.java:45)
at winstone.Launcher.init(Launcher.java:194)
at winstone.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:389)


--
This e-mail is confidential and the information contained in it may be 
privileged.  It should not be read, copied or used by anyone other than the 
intended recipient.  If you have received it in error, please contact the 
sender immediately by telephoning +44 (0)20 7623 8000 or by return email, and 

RE: Issues with getting 1.1-SNAPSHOT started

2007-04-16 Thread Orford, Ian
Thanks Emmanuel,

I played with jetty and ended up with the same exception there, so no reason to 
believe that winstone is behaving differently.

I tried -Dappserver.base=., but that didn't have any noticable effect. 

I'm now going to try David Goemans' suggestion.


Regards, Ian

 -Original Message-
 From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 16 April 2007 15:55
 To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
 Subject: Re: Issues with getting 1.1-SNAPSHOT started
 
 winstone isn't tested yet, but if you can run continuum with 
 it, please update the wiki.
 
 About the exception, you need to start your container with 
 appserver.base system property, Continuum use it for some 
 paths like the log file.
 You can use what you want for this property, it's only need 
 to be a valid directory.
 
 Emmanuel
 
 Orford, Ian a écrit :
  I hope addressing this to continuum-dev is correct.
  
  I've been using 1.0.3 for some time now, but thought I'd check out 
  1.1-SNAPSHOT just to see what good things I can look forward to, or 
  even to start using it if it's stable.
  
  I've build it and got the war file. I'm trying to deploy this on my 
  build server using winstone as the container.
  
  First off, is there any reason why winstone isn't a good 
 choice for a 
  basic container into which I can deploy this war? If it's 
 not, what's 
  a good alternative?
  
  Are there any notes I can look at re configuration? I'm getting the 
  following.
  
  Thanks in advance,
  Ian
  
  
  
  
  [Winstone 2007/04/16 15:30:50] - Beginning extraction from war file 
  [webapp 2007/04/16 15:30:53] - Loading plexus context 
 properties from:
  '/WEB-INF/plexus.properties'
  [webapp 2007/04/16 15:30:53] - Could not load plexus context 
  properties
  from: '/WEB-INF/plexus.properties'
  log4j:ERROR setFile(null,true) call failed.
  java.io.FileNotFoundException: /logs/continuum.log (No such file or
  directory)
  at java.io.FileOutputStream.openAppend(Native Method)
  at 
 java.io.FileOutputStream.init(FileOutputStream.java:177)
  at 
 java.io.FileOutputStream.init(FileOutputStream.java:102)
  at 
 org.apache.log4j.FileAppender.setFile(FileAppender.java:272)
  at
  org.apache.log4j.FileAppender.activateOptions(FileAppender.java:151)
  at
  
 org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender.activateOptions(DailyRolling
  Fi
  leAppender.java:206)
  at
  
 org.apache.log4j.config.PropertySetter.activate(PropertySetter
 .java:247)
  at
  
 org.apache.log4j.config.PropertySetter.setProperties(PropertySetter.ja
  va
  :123)
  at
  
 org.apache.log4j.config.PropertySetter.setProperties(PropertySetter.ja
  va
  :87)
  at
  
 org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.parseAppender(PropertyConfigurat
  or
  .java:645)
  at
  
 org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.parseCategory(PropertyConfigurat
  or
  .java:603)
  at
  
 org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.configureRootCategory(PropertyCo
  nf
  igurator.java:500)
  at
  
 org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.doConfigure(PropertyConfigurator
  .j
  ava:406)
  at
  
 org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.configure(PropertyConfigurator.j
  av
  a:340)
  at
  
 org.codehaus.plexus.logging.log4j.Log4JLoggerManager.start(Log4JLogger
  Ma
  nager.java:299)
  at
  
 org.codehaus.plexus.personality.plexus.lifecycle.phase.StartPhase.exec
  ut
  e(StartPhase.java:33)
  at
  
 org.codehaus.plexus.lifecycle.AbstractLifecycleHandler.start(AbstractL
  if
  ecycleHandler.java:128)
  at
  
 org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.AbstractComponentManager.startCo
  mp
  onentLifecycle(AbstractComponentManager.java:142)
  at
  
 org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.AbstractComponentManager.createC
  om
  ponentInstance(AbstractComponentManager.java:132)
  at
  
 org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.ClassicSingletonComponentManager
  .g
  etComponent(ClassicSingletonComponentManager.java:90)
  at
  
 org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultComponentLookupManager.lookup(DefaultCompon
  en
  tLookupManager.java:147)
  at
  
 org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultComponentLookupManager.lookupMap(DefaultCom
  po
  nentLookupManager.java:199)
  at
  
 org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.lookupMap(DefaultPlexusCont
  ai
  ner.java:309)
  at
  
 org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.lookupMap(DefaultPlexusCont
  ai
  ner.java:303)
  at
  
 org.codehaus.plexus.container.initialization.InitializeLoggerManagerPh
  as
  e.initializeCoreComponent(InitializeLoggerManagerPhase.java:47)
  at
  
 org.codehaus.plexus.container.initialization.AbstractCoreComponentInit
  ia
  
 lizationPhase.execute(AbstractCoreComponentInitializationPhase
 .java:37)
  at
  
 org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.initializePhases(DefaultPle
  xu
  sContainer.java:886)
  at
  
 

Re: Issues with getting 1.1-SNAPSHOT started

2007-04-16 Thread Emmanuel Venisse

I think you need to create the log dir and conf dir in the directory used in 
appserver.base system property

Emmanuel

Orford, Ian a écrit :

Thanks Emmanuel,

I played with jetty and ended up with the same exception there, so no reason to 
believe that winstone is behaving differently.

I tried -Dappserver.base=., but that didn't have any noticable effect. 


I'm now going to try David Goemans' suggestion.


Regards, Ian


-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 16 April 2007 15:55

To: continuum-dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Issues with getting 1.1-SNAPSHOT started

winstone isn't tested yet, but if you can run continuum with 
it, please update the wiki.


About the exception, you need to start your container with 
appserver.base system property, Continuum use it for some 
paths like the log file.
You can use what you want for this property, it's only need 
to be a valid directory.


Emmanuel

Orford, Ian a écrit :

I hope addressing this to continuum-dev is correct.

I've been using 1.0.3 for some time now, but thought I'd check out 
1.1-SNAPSHOT just to see what good things I can look forward to, or 
even to start using it if it's stable.


I've build it and got the war file. I'm trying to deploy this on my 
build server using winstone as the container.


First off, is there any reason why winstone isn't a good 
choice for a 
basic container into which I can deploy this war? If it's 
not, what's 

a good alternative?

Are there any notes I can look at re configuration? I'm getting the 
following.


Thanks in advance,
Ian




[Winstone 2007/04/16 15:30:50] - Beginning extraction from war file 
[webapp 2007/04/16 15:30:53] - Loading plexus context 

properties from:

'/WEB-INF/plexus.properties'
[webapp 2007/04/16 15:30:53] - Could not load plexus context 
properties

from: '/WEB-INF/plexus.properties'
log4j:ERROR setFile(null,true) call failed.
java.io.FileNotFoundException: /logs/continuum.log (No such file or
directory)
at java.io.FileOutputStream.openAppend(Native Method)
at 

java.io.FileOutputStream.init(FileOutputStream.java:177)
at 

java.io.FileOutputStream.init(FileOutputStream.java:102)
at 

org.apache.log4j.FileAppender.setFile(FileAppender.java:272)

at
org.apache.log4j.FileAppender.activateOptions(FileAppender.java:151)
at


org.apache.log4j.DailyRollingFileAppender.activateOptions(DailyRolling

Fi
leAppender.java:206)
at


org.apache.log4j.config.PropertySetter.activate(PropertySetter
.java:247)

at


org.apache.log4j.config.PropertySetter.setProperties(PropertySetter.ja

va
:123)
at


org.apache.log4j.config.PropertySetter.setProperties(PropertySetter.ja

va
:87)
at


org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.parseAppender(PropertyConfigurat

or
.java:645)
at


org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.parseCategory(PropertyConfigurat

or
.java:603)
at


org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.configureRootCategory(PropertyCo

nf
igurator.java:500)
at


org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.doConfigure(PropertyConfigurator

.j
ava:406)
at


org.apache.log4j.PropertyConfigurator.configure(PropertyConfigurator.j

av
a:340)
at


org.codehaus.plexus.logging.log4j.Log4JLoggerManager.start(Log4JLogger

Ma
nager.java:299)
at


org.codehaus.plexus.personality.plexus.lifecycle.phase.StartPhase.exec

ut
e(StartPhase.java:33)
at


org.codehaus.plexus.lifecycle.AbstractLifecycleHandler.start(AbstractL

if
ecycleHandler.java:128)
at


org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.AbstractComponentManager.startCo

mp
onentLifecycle(AbstractComponentManager.java:142)
at


org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.AbstractComponentManager.createC

om
ponentInstance(AbstractComponentManager.java:132)
at


org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.ClassicSingletonComponentManager

.g
etComponent(ClassicSingletonComponentManager.java:90)
at


org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultComponentLookupManager.lookup(DefaultCompon

en
tLookupManager.java:147)
at


org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultComponentLookupManager.lookupMap(DefaultCom

po
nentLookupManager.java:199)
at


org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.lookupMap(DefaultPlexusCont

ai
ner.java:309)
at


org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.lookupMap(DefaultPlexusCont

ai
ner.java:303)
at


org.codehaus.plexus.container.initialization.InitializeLoggerManagerPh

as
e.initializeCoreComponent(InitializeLoggerManagerPhase.java:47)
at


org.codehaus.plexus.container.initialization.AbstractCoreComponentInit

ia


lizationPhase.execute(AbstractCoreComponentInitializationPhase
.java:37)

at


org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.initializePhases(DefaultPle

xu
sContainer.java:886)
at


org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.initialize(DefaultPlexusCon

ta
iner.java:834)
at



RE: Issues with getting 1.1-SNAPSHOT started

2007-04-16 Thread Orford, Ian
I guess this should start up out of the box right?

I hate to paste long and boring stack traces, but here goes

Thanks again for any suggestions.

Ian



INFO: ** FATAL ERROR STARTING UP PLEXUS-WEBWORK INTEGRATION
**
Looks like the Plexus listener was not configured for your web app!
You need to add the following to web.xml:

listener
 
listener-classorg.codehaus.plexus.xwork.PlexusLifecycleListener/liste
ner-class
/listener
[ERROR] Error while deploying appserver
continuum-plexus-application-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.ApplicationServerException: Error in the
app server lifecycle post-app-container-init-service-call phase.
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.application.deploy.DefaultApplicationDeplo
yer.deployJar(DefaultApplicationDeployer.java:119)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.application.deploy.DefaultApplicationDeplo
yer.deploy(DefaultApplicationDeployer.java:88)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.lifecycle.phase.ApplicationDeploymentPhase
$1.onJarDiscovered(ApplicationDeploymentPhase.java:44)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.supervisor.DefaultSupervisor.scanDirectory
(DefaultSupervisor.java:100)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.supervisor.DefaultSupervisor.scan(DefaultS
upervisor.java:73)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.lifecycle.phase.ApplicationDeploymentPhase
.execute(ApplicationDeploymentPhase.java:58)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.DefaultApplicationServer.start(DefaultAppl
icationServer.java:218)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.personality.plexus.lifecycle.phase.StartPhase.execut
e(StartPhase.java:33)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.lifecycle.AbstractLifecycleHandler.start(AbstractLif
ecycleHandler.java:128)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.AbstractComponentManager.startComp
onentLifecycle(AbstractComponentManager.java:142)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.AbstractComponentManager.createCom
ponentInstance(AbstractComponentManager.java:132)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.ClassicSingletonComponentManager.g
etComponent(ClassicSingletonComponentManager.java:90)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultComponentLookupManager.lookup(DefaultComponen
tLookupManager.java:147)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultComponentLookupManager.lookup(DefaultComponen
tLookupManager.java:69)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.lookup(DefaultPlexusContainer
.java:297)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.lookup(DefaultPlexusContainer
.java:291)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.PlexusApplicationHost.start(PlexusApplicat
ionHost.java:155)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.PlexusApplicationHost.start(PlexusApplicat
ionHost.java:85)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.PlexusApplicationHost.main(PlexusApplicati
onHost.java:289)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.jav
a:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessor
Impl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launche
r.java:289)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:2
29)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launc
her.java:408)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:351
)
Caused by:
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.application.deploy.lifecycle.AppDeployment
Exception: Error calling service in pre-app init phase.
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.application.deploy.lifecycle.phase.AfterAp
pStartServiceSetupPhase.execute(AfterAppStartServiceSetupPhase.java:32)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.application.deploy.DefaultApplicationDeplo
yer.deployJar(DefaultApplicationDeployer.java:107)
... 26 more
Caused by: org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.service.PlexusServiceException:
Error while starting the context /continuum
at
org.codehaus.plexus.service.jetty.JettyPlexusService.afterApplicationSta
rt(JettyPlexusService.java:252)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.application.deploy.lifecycle.phase.AfterAp
pStartServiceSetupPhase.execute(AfterAppStartServiceSetupPhase.java:28)
... 27 more
Caused by: org.codehaus.plexus.jetty.ServletContainerException: Error
while starting the context /continuum
at
org.codehaus.plexus.jetty.AbstractJettyServletContainer.startApplication
(AbstractJettyServletContainer.java:213)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.service.jetty.JettyPlexusService.afterApplicationSta
rt(JettyPlexusService.java:248)
... 28 more
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException:
org.codehaus.plexus.PlexusContainerException: Error initializaing
container in
org.codehaus.plexus.container.initialization.StartLoadOnStartComponentsP
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Issues with getting 1.1-SNAPSHOT started

2007-04-16 Thread Emmanuel Venisse

What is the version you try?

It seems a jar is missing : java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/jdom/Content

Emmanuel

Orford, Ian a écrit :

I guess this should start up out of the box right?

I hate to paste long and boring stack traces, but here goes

Thanks again for any suggestions.

Ian



INFO: ** FATAL ERROR STARTING UP PLEXUS-WEBWORK INTEGRATION
**
Looks like the Plexus listener was not configured for your web app!
You need to add the following to web.xml:

listener
 
listener-classorg.codehaus.plexus.xwork.PlexusLifecycleListener/liste

ner-class
/listener
[ERROR] Error while deploying appserver
continuum-plexus-application-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.ApplicationServerException: Error in the
app server lifecycle post-app-container-init-service-call phase.
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.application.deploy.DefaultApplicationDeplo
yer.deployJar(DefaultApplicationDeployer.java:119)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.application.deploy.DefaultApplicationDeplo
yer.deploy(DefaultApplicationDeployer.java:88)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.lifecycle.phase.ApplicationDeploymentPhase
$1.onJarDiscovered(ApplicationDeploymentPhase.java:44)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.supervisor.DefaultSupervisor.scanDirectory
(DefaultSupervisor.java:100)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.supervisor.DefaultSupervisor.scan(DefaultS
upervisor.java:73)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.lifecycle.phase.ApplicationDeploymentPhase
.execute(ApplicationDeploymentPhase.java:58)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.DefaultApplicationServer.start(DefaultAppl
icationServer.java:218)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.personality.plexus.lifecycle.phase.StartPhase.execut
e(StartPhase.java:33)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.lifecycle.AbstractLifecycleHandler.start(AbstractLif
ecycleHandler.java:128)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.AbstractComponentManager.startComp
onentLifecycle(AbstractComponentManager.java:142)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.AbstractComponentManager.createCom
ponentInstance(AbstractComponentManager.java:132)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.component.manager.ClassicSingletonComponentManager.g
etComponent(ClassicSingletonComponentManager.java:90)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultComponentLookupManager.lookup(DefaultComponen
tLookupManager.java:147)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultComponentLookupManager.lookup(DefaultComponen
tLookupManager.java:69)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.lookup(DefaultPlexusContainer
.java:297)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.DefaultPlexusContainer.lookup(DefaultPlexusContainer
.java:291)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.PlexusApplicationHost.start(PlexusApplicat
ionHost.java:155)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.PlexusApplicationHost.start(PlexusApplicat
ionHost.java:85)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.PlexusApplicationHost.main(PlexusApplicati
onHost.java:289)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.jav
a:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessor
Impl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launche
r.java:289)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:2
29)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launc
her.java:408)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.classworlds.launcher.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:351
)
Caused by:
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.application.deploy.lifecycle.AppDeployment
Exception: Error calling service in pre-app init phase.
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.application.deploy.lifecycle.phase.AfterAp
pStartServiceSetupPhase.execute(AfterAppStartServiceSetupPhase.java:32)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.application.deploy.DefaultApplicationDeplo
yer.deployJar(DefaultApplicationDeployer.java:107)
... 26 more
Caused by: org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.service.PlexusServiceException:
Error while starting the context /continuum
at
org.codehaus.plexus.service.jetty.JettyPlexusService.afterApplicationSta
rt(JettyPlexusService.java:252)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.appserver.application.deploy.lifecycle.phase.AfterAp
pStartServiceSetupPhase.execute(AfterAppStartServiceSetupPhase.java:28)
... 27 more
Caused by: org.codehaus.plexus.jetty.ServletContainerException: Error
while starting the context /continuum
at
org.codehaus.plexus.jetty.AbstractJettyServletContainer.startApplication
(AbstractJettyServletContainer.java:213)
at
org.codehaus.plexus.service.jetty.JettyPlexusService.afterApplicationSta
rt(JettyPlexusService.java:248)
... 28 more
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException:

Re: [vote] Release maven-developer-activity-plugin and maven-file-activity-plugin 1.6.1 for maven 1.X

2007-04-16 Thread Jason van Zyl

+1

On 15 Apr 07, at 8:41 PM 15 Apr 07, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:


Hi,

 Those two plugins have a similar fix and weren't release for several
months (more than 1 year in fact).

 Changes :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/ 
maven-1.x/plugins/developer-activity/changes- 
report.html#Release1_6_1-SNAPSHOThttp://people.apache.org/% 
7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes- 
report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/ 
maven-1.x/plugins/file-activity/changes-report.html#Release1_6_1- 
SNAPSHOThttp://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1- 
plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2- 
SNAPSHOT


http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/ 
maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT

Staging sites :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/ 
maven-1.x/plugins/developer-activity/http://people.apache.org/% 
7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/ 
maven-1.x/plugins/file-activity/http://people.apache.org/% 
7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/


 Download :

maven plugin:download -Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/ 
repo/ m1

-snapshot-repository/,http://repo1.maven.org/maven -DgroupId=maven
-DartifactId=maven-developer-activity-plugin -Dversion=1.6.1-SNAPSHOT
maven plugin:download -Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/ 
repo/ m1

-snapshot-repository/,http://repo1.maven.org/maven -DgroupId=maven
-DartifactId=maven-file-activity-plugin -Dversion=1.6.1-SNAPSHOT


+1 from me, 72h to vote

Cheers,



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vote] Release maven-announcement-plugin 1.4.1 for maven 1.X

2007-04-16 Thread Jason van Zyl

+1

On 15 Apr 07, at 8:42 PM 15 Apr 07, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:


On 16/04/07, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi,

  In the logic to try to release often I propose to release the
announcement which has only one minor change. It's to have these one
included in the RC1.

  Changes :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/ 
maven-1.x/plugins/announcement/changes-report.html#Release1_4_1- 
SNAPSHOThttp://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1- 
plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2- 
SNAPSHOT


http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/ 
maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT

Staging site :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/ 
maven-1.x/plugins/announcement/http://people.apache.org/% 
7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/


  Download :

maven plugin:download -Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/ 
repo/m1

-snapshot-repository/,http://repo1.maven.org/maven -DgroupId=maven
-DartifactId=maven-site-plugin -Dversion= 1.4.1-SNAPSHOT



Bad cut'n paste
maven plugin:download -Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/ 
repo/m1

-snapshot-repository/,http://repo1.maven.org/maven -DgroupId=maven
-DartifactId=maven-announcement-plugin -Dversion= 1.4.1-SNAPSHOT

+1 from me, 72h to vote


Cheers,



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Clover plugin v2.4 - Take 2

2007-04-16 Thread Maria Odea Ching

+1

Vincent Massol wrote:

Hi,

As Mike Perham pointed out the Clover license for the release clover 
plugin (ie v2.3) has expired. Thus the urgency to release version 2.4.


Here's the release notes for 2.4:

** Bug
* [MCLOVER-45] - Excluded files should be added to compiled sources
* [MCLOVER-53] - Clover plugin installs clover instrumented source in 
local repository
* [MCLOVER-66] - The report goal doesn't support a user-provided 
Clover license
* [MCLOVER-68] - XDoclet plugin executes before the Clover plugin in 
the lifecycle forked by the latter


** Improvement
* [MCLOVER-38] - Allow check Mojo to be overriden by a failOnViolation 
parameter in the same way PMD and Checkstyle can

* [MCLOVER-65] - Clover license has expired

** Task
* [MCLOVER-67] - Remove deprecated licenseFile configuration parameter

The plugin is staged at http://people.apache.org/~vmassol/maven-staging/

Here's my +1

Thanks
-Vincent




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


!DSPAM:602,46227532110829182317745!




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vote] Release maven-developer-activity-plugin and maven-file-activity-plugin 1.6.1 for maven 1.X

2007-04-16 Thread Stephane Nicoll

+1

Stéphane

On 4/16/07, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

  Those two plugins have a similar fix and weren't release for several
months (more than 1 year in fact).

  Changes :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/developer-activity/changes-report.html#Release1_6_1-SNAPSHOThttp://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/file-activity/changes-report.html#Release1_6_1-SNAPSHOThttp://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT

http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT
Staging sites :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/developer-activity/http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/file-activity/http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/

  Download :

maven plugin:download -Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/repo/ m1
-snapshot-repository/,http://repo1.maven.org/maven -DgroupId=maven
-DartifactId=maven-developer-activity-plugin -Dversion=1.6.1-SNAPSHOT
maven plugin:download -Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/repo/ m1
-snapshot-repository/,http://repo1.maven.org/maven -DgroupId=maven
-DartifactId=maven-file-activity-plugin -Dversion=1.6.1-SNAPSHOT


+1 from me, 72h to vote

Cheers,



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vote] Release maven-site-plugin 1.7.2 for maven 1.X

2007-04-16 Thread Lukas Theussl

+1

-Lukas

Arnaud HERITIER wrote:

Hi,

 I encountered some problems with the site plugin and its rsync deployment
feature.
 I propose to release a new version to fix these problems.

 Changes :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT 


 Staging site :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/ 


 Download :
 maven plugin:download
-Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/repo/m1-snapshot-repository/,
http://repo1.maven.org/maven
-DgroupId=maven -DartifactId=maven-site-plugin -Dversion=1.7.2-SNAPSHOT

+1 from me, 72h to vote

Cheers,
Arnaud



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vote] Release maven-announcement-plugin 1.4.1 for maven 1.X

2007-04-16 Thread Lukas Theussl

+1

-Lukas

Arnaud HERITIER wrote:

Hi,

 In the logic to try to release often I propose to release the announcement
which has only one minor change. It's to have these one included in the 
RC1.


 Changes :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/announcement/changes-report.html#Release1_4_1-SNAPSHOThttp://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT 



http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT 


Staging site :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/announcement/http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/ 



 Download :

maven plugin:download -Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/repo/ m1
-snapshot-repository/,http://repo1.maven.org/maven -DgroupId=maven
-DartifactId=maven-site-plugin -Dversion=1.4.1-SNAPSHOT

+1 from me, 72h to vote

Cheers,



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vote] Release maven-developer-activity-plugin and maven-file-activity-plugin 1.6.1 for maven 1.X

2007-04-16 Thread Lukas Theussl

+1

-Lukas

Arnaud HERITIER wrote:

Hi,

 Those two plugins have a similar fix and weren't release for several
months (more than 1 year in fact).

 Changes :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/developer-activity/changes-report.html#Release1_6_1-SNAPSHOThttp://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT 

http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/file-activity/changes-report.html#Release1_6_1-SNAPSHOThttp://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT 



http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT 


Staging sites :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/developer-activity/http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/ 

http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/file-activity/http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/ 



 Download :

maven plugin:download -Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/repo/ m1
-snapshot-repository/,http://repo1.maven.org/maven -DgroupId=maven
-DartifactId=maven-developer-activity-plugin -Dversion=1.6.1-SNAPSHOT
maven plugin:download -Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/repo/ m1
-snapshot-repository/,http://repo1.maven.org/maven -DgroupId=maven
-DartifactId=maven-file-activity-plugin -Dversion=1.6.1-SNAPSHOT


+1 from me, 72h to vote

Cheers,



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vote] Release maven-announcement-plugin 1.4.1 for maven 1.X

2007-04-16 Thread Stephane Nicoll

+1

Stéphane

On 4/16/07, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

  In the logic to try to release often I propose to release the announcement
which has only one minor change. It's to have these one included in the RC1.

  Changes :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/announcement/changes-report.html#Release1_4_1-SNAPSHOThttp://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT

http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT
Staging site :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/announcement/http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/

  Download :

maven plugin:download -Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/repo/ m1
-snapshot-repository/,http://repo1.maven.org/maven -DgroupId=maven
-DartifactId=maven-site-plugin -Dversion=1.4.1-SNAPSHOT

+1 from me, 72h to vote

Cheers,



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vote] Release maven-site-plugin 1.7.2 for maven 1.X

2007-04-16 Thread Stephane Nicoll

+1

Stéphane

On 4/16/07, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

  I encountered some problems with the site plugin and its rsync deployment
feature.
  I propose to release a new version to fix these problems.

  Changes :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT
  Staging site :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/
  Download :
  maven plugin:download
-Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/repo/m1-snapshot-repository/,
http://repo1.maven.org/maven
-DgroupId=maven -DartifactId=maven-site-plugin -Dversion=1.7.2-SNAPSHOT

+1 from me, 72h to vote

Cheers,
Arnaud



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Clover plugin v2.4 - Take 2

2007-04-16 Thread John Casey

+I

On 4/16/07, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


+1

Vincent Massol wrote:
 Hi,

 As Mike Perham pointed out the Clover license for the release clover
 plugin (ie v2.3) has expired. Thus the urgency to release version 2.4.

 Here's the release notes for 2.4:

 ** Bug
 * [MCLOVER-45] - Excluded files should be added to compiled sources
 * [MCLOVER-53] - Clover plugin installs clover instrumented source in
 local repository
 * [MCLOVER-66] - The report goal doesn't support a user-provided
 Clover license
 * [MCLOVER-68] - XDoclet plugin executes before the Clover plugin in
 the lifecycle forked by the latter

 ** Improvement
 * [MCLOVER-38] - Allow check Mojo to be overriden by a failOnViolation
 parameter in the same way PMD and Checkstyle can
 * [MCLOVER-65] - Clover license has expired

 ** Task
 * [MCLOVER-67] - Remove deprecated licenseFile configuration parameter

 The plugin is staged at http://people.apache.org/~vmassol/maven-staging/

 Here's my +1

 Thanks
 -Vincent




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 !DSPAM:602,46227532110829182317745!



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [VOTE] Release Clover plugin v2.4 - Take 2

2007-04-16 Thread Mike Perham

+1

On 4/15/07, Vincent Massol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

As Mike Perham pointed out the Clover license for the release clover
plugin (ie v2.3) has expired. Thus the urgency to release version 2.4.

Here's the release notes for 2.4:

** Bug
 * [MCLOVER-45] - Excluded files should be added to compiled sources
 * [MCLOVER-53] - Clover plugin installs clover instrumented
source in local repository
 * [MCLOVER-66] - The report goal doesn't support a user-provided
Clover license
 * [MCLOVER-68] - XDoclet plugin executes before the Clover
plugin in the lifecycle forked by the latter

** Improvement
 * [MCLOVER-38] - Allow check Mojo to be overriden by a
failOnViolation parameter in the same way PMD and Checkstyle can
 * [MCLOVER-65] - Clover license has expired

** Task
 * [MCLOVER-67] - Remove deprecated licenseFile configuration
parameter

The plugin is staged at http://people.apache.org/~vmassol/maven-staging/

Here's my +1

Thanks
-Vincent




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RESULT][VOTE] maven-remote-resources-plugin 1.0-alpha-5

2007-04-16 Thread Daniel Kulp


5  +1 binding votes (Jason van Zyl,  John Casey,  Emmanuel Venisse, 
Joakim Erdfelt, Vincent Siveton)
3 +1 non-binding votes (Jason Dillon, Andrew Williams, Daniel Kulp)
No -1 votes or new issues raised.

This vote passes.   

Dan



On Thursday 12 April 2007 13:13, Daniel Kulp wrote:
 I'd like to release version 1.0-alpha-5 of the
 maven-remote-resources-plugin.   This resolves one critical bug, but
 also adds some new features to make it a bit more usable.


 Release Notes - Maven 2.x Remote Resources Plugin - Version
 1.0-alpha-5

 ** Bug
 * [MRRESOURCES-18] - Error when no 'inceptionYear' is specified in
 POM

 ** Improvement
 * [MRRESOURCES-19] - Bundle mojo only looks for txt and vm files
 * [MRRESOURCES-20] - Support for binary resources
 * [MRRESOURCES-21] - Supplement the data model used by Velocity


 Staging area:
 http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_remoteresources/

 Tag:
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-remote-resour
ces-plugin-1.0-alpha-5/

-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727C: 508-380-7194
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Release Clover plugin v2.4 - Take 2

2007-04-16 Thread Andrew Williams

+1
On 15 Apr 2007, at 19:55, Vincent Massol wrote:


Hi,

As Mike Perham pointed out the Clover license for the release  
clover plugin (ie v2.3) has expired. Thus the urgency to release  
version 2.4.


Here's the release notes for 2.4:

** Bug
* [MCLOVER-45] - Excluded files should be added to compiled  
sources
* [MCLOVER-53] - Clover plugin installs clover instrumented  
source in local repository
* [MCLOVER-66] - The report goal doesn't support a user- 
provided Clover license
* [MCLOVER-68] - XDoclet plugin executes before the Clover  
plugin in the lifecycle forked by the latter


** Improvement
* [MCLOVER-38] - Allow check Mojo to be overriden by a  
failOnViolation parameter in the same way PMD and Checkstyle can

* [MCLOVER-65] - Clover license has expired

** Task
* [MCLOVER-67] - Remove deprecated licenseFile configuration  
parameter


The plugin is staged at http://people.apache.org/~vmassol/maven- 
staging/


Here's my +1

Thanks
-Vincent




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vote] release maven-release-1 parent and maven-release-manager-1.0-alpha-1

2007-04-16 Thread Jesse McConnell

Summary: 6 binding +1 (jesse, emmanuel, jdcasey, snicoll, arnaud, vsiveton)

I'll get this moved over and synced out today.

thanks!

next up, continuum 1.1 alpha 1

On 4/15/07, Stephane Nicoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 4/15/07, Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Stephane Nicoll wrote:
  On 4/14/07, Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Too late for this release, but could someone take a look at MRELEASE-137
  so it gets into the next one? It's a trivial one-liner fix. The attached
  patch is for maven-release-plugin, but the relevant class has since
  moved into maven-release-manager. It's obvious how to forward port the
  single change to the new code.
 
  The change does not seem that trivial to me. A potential
  IndexOutOfBoundsException might be trhown. Jason is the assignee but
  i'll try to have a look.

 The current code calls:

 list.get( 0 )

 the fix is to change that to:

 list.get( list.size() - 1 )

 Surely the only way the second one could cause an IOOBE is if the list
 is empty, in which case the current code would also IOOBE?

I'm missing coffee. Forget it :)



 Max.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
jesse mcconnell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Remove auto-resolution of plugin versions from Maven 2.1

2007-04-16 Thread Kevin Menard
Apologies for the delayed response.  I must've missed the message.

I'd have to check with Andrus Adamchik, since he was the guy that had to
keep fixing the POM.  I know for certain that we've been bitten numerous
times by the Geronimo folk though, both transitively and directly.  We
also got bit by the whole surefire/classloader issue, which the
suggestions in this thread would take care of.

For my own stuff, I've had to rely on SNAPSHOT for Selenium and Cargo,
because either the released versions were broken in some way or didn't
support newer releases of external software.  At least in the case of
Selenium, the authors know that they're released version is broken and
their response is to just use SNAPSHOT.  That's the sort of scenario I'd
like to see avoided if possible.

-- 
Kevin 

 -Original Message-
 From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 5:24 PM
 To: Maven Developers List
 Subject: Re: Remove auto-resolution of plugin versions from Maven 2.1
 
 I'm interested to know which snapshots bit you guys so hard? 
 Was it a [set of] internal snapshots, or were they snapshots 
 from Maven or some other OSS project that you depend on or 
 use? If we start talking seriously about shorter dev cycles 
 and milestone releases with less of a barrier to release (for 
 alpha quality, for instance)...and start shunning snapshots 
 as an acceptable mechanism for distributing pre-release 
 code...would that have helped you all?
 
 -john
 
 On 4/12/07, Kevin Menard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I agree.  I am suggesting that it's a little too easy to 
 use SNAPSHOTs 
  and that all that wonderful time maven was supposed to save you in 
  preparing releases is trumped by the time it takes to just append 
  -SNAPSHOT to a version number.  Sure, it's people abusing 
 it, but it's 
  easy to abuse and looks like it's officially condoned as proper 
  behavior.  Things get even murkier when transitive dependencies are 
  considered.  So, I'm not suggesting dumping SNAPSHOT wholesale, but 
  making it more difficult to distribute an artifact via 
 SNAPSHOT (maybe 
  require the end user to have to agree to use a new SNAPSHOT 
 each time 
  one is available or something).
 
  Maybe we'll just have to agree to disagree.  I will say that this 
  matter has bitten the Cayenne team a few times now, and we've come 
  close to dumping maven altogether.  It got to the point 
 where we had 
  to start pinning SNAPSHOTs by timestamp via a guess and 
 check method.  
  Perhaps the plugin Nigel suggested would help matters, though.
 
  --
  Kevin
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 3:10 PM
   To: Maven Developers List
   Subject: RE: Remove auto-resolution of plugin versions from Maven 
   2.1
  
Snapshots are a very good thing for internal 
 development. It would 
   be impossible to manage my builds without them. I think 
 that people 
   using snapshots of plugins are a symptom of another 
 problem -- long 
   release cycles. Just because people do bad things with snapshots 
   doesn't mean snapshots should go away.
  
   It already takes a little effort to get at them, the 
 snapshot repo 
   isn't part of the super-pom, so if you go out of your way to get 
   them, you should understand the consequences. It's like 
 me picking 
   up an unstable version of some jar and then complaining that it 
   broke later and asking the creators to stop releasing unstable 
   versions at all(that are clearly marked as such). People 
 would then 
   just go get the code anyway.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Kevin Menard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 1:09 PM
   To: Maven Developers List
   Subject: RE: Remove auto-resolution of plugin versions from Maven 
   2.1
  
   Right.
  
   My point is that regardless of what the original 
 intention may have 
   been, the current process facilitates laziness via SNAPSHOTs.  
   Without them, incremental builds would be necessary, which would 
   give fixed version numbers with known binaries.
  
   If the plan is to take actions to help prevent users from having 
   things break on them, this may be easier than the path 
 you outlined.
  
   --
   Kevin
  
   
  
   
 
   - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
   additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
  
 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
  additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [vote] Release maven-developer-activity-plugin and maven-file-activity-plugin 1.6.1 for maven 1.X

2007-04-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg

+1

Arnaud HERITIER wrote:

Hi,

 Those two plugins have a similar fix and weren't release for several
months (more than 1 year in fact).

 Changes :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/developer-activity/changes-report.html#Release1_6_1-SNAPSHOThttp://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT 

http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/file-activity/changes-report.html#Release1_6_1-SNAPSHOThttp://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT 



http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/changes-report.html#Release1_7_2-SNAPSHOT 


Staging sites :
http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/developer-activity/http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/ 

http://people.apache.org/~aheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/file-activity/http://people.apache.org/%7Eaheritier/staging-sites/m1-plugins/maven-1.x/plugins/site/ 



 Download :

maven plugin:download -Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/repo/ m1
-snapshot-repository/,http://repo1.maven.org/maven -DgroupId=maven
-DartifactId=maven-developer-activity-plugin -Dversion=1.6.1-SNAPSHOT
maven plugin:download -Dmaven.repo.remote=http://people.apache.org/repo/ m1
-snapshot-repository/,http://repo1.maven.org/maven -DgroupId=maven
-DartifactId=maven-file-activity-plugin -Dversion=1.6.1-SNAPSHOT


+1 from me, 72h to vote

Cheers,




--
Dennis Lundberg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Integration Testing

2007-04-16 Thread John Casey

Jerome, that link contains information on the strategy I've been using in
the assembly plugin, and it seems to work well (although it's a bit slower,
since it's spawning so many Maven builds). I'm hoping to converge the tools
we're using in the core ITs with those in the maven-component-test-plugin
(used to be maven-plugin-test-plugin), and the maven-invoker-plugin, and
arrive at some single solution (a plugin) that we can use everywhere...but I
haven't even been able to come up with a unified feature list yet.

-john

On 4/15/07, Jerome Lacoste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On 2/24/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 04/01/2007, at 4:32 PM, Brett Porter wrote:

  Jason - any further thoughts on this?

 Ping... No is a valid answer :)

 I'd like to get your summary put somewhere individuals can pick
 things off to work on - probably a jira project for shared. WDYT?

 I'm overcommitted for working on things right now, but I know a
 couple of people are confused about the IT testing, and we've got all
 those chronically broken plugins. Volunteers?

I want to improve the state of IT for the mojos I work with (in
particular in the mojo project). I am particularly interested in doing
it in an sort of official/standard way.


- [ ] We need to standardize on integration testing in general. We
  have people going all over the place and it's a disaster.
- [ ] We have too many IT plugins (3)
- [ ] We have too many invokers (5)
- [ ] We have too many verifiers (3)

I've found this:
http://maven.apache.org/developers/committer-testing-plugins.html

Does that represent the current IT strategy 'standard' ? Was that
written after the point above was resolved ?

Cheers,

Jerome

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Integration Testing

2007-04-16 Thread Barrie Treloar

On 4/17/07, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Jerome, that link contains information on the strategy I've been using in
the assembly plugin, and it seems to work well (although it's a bit slower,
since it's spawning so many Maven builds). I'm hoping to converge the tools
we're using in the core ITs with those in the maven-component-test-plugin
(used to be maven-plugin-test-plugin), and the maven-invoker-plugin, and
arrive at some single solution (a plugin) that we can use everywhere...but I
haven't even been able to come up with a unified feature list yet.


So, does anyone have a recommended approach so I can move forward in
the mean time?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Remove auto-resolution of plugin versions from Maven 2.1

2007-04-16 Thread Barrie Treloar

On 4/17/07, Kevin Menard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

support newer releases of external software.  At least in the case of
Selenium, the authors know that they're released version is broken and
their response is to just use SNAPSHOT.  That's the sort of scenario I'd
like to see avoided if possible.


That's not terribly helpful of the Selenium folks.

You should get more of their users to whinge.  Broken releases should
get fixed ASAP, or else dump Selenium and use something else.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Integration Testing

2007-04-16 Thread John Casey

my only recommendation would be to take a look at the maven-assembly-plugin
(SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-assembly-plugin)
and go for something like that...

On 4/16/07, Barrie Treloar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On 4/17/07, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Jerome, that link contains information on the strategy I've been using
in
 the assembly plugin, and it seems to work well (although it's a bit
slower,
 since it's spawning so many Maven builds). I'm hoping to converge the
tools
 we're using in the core ITs with those in the
maven-component-test-plugin
 (used to be maven-plugin-test-plugin), and the maven-invoker-plugin, and
 arrive at some single solution (a plugin) that we can use
everywhere...but I
 haven't even been able to come up with a unified feature list yet.

So, does anyone have a recommended approach so I can move forward in
the mean time?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]