Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1
+1 Works for Tycho (although I had to fix a couple of sloppy tests) and few our internal projects I work on. -- Regards, Igor Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 39 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16089 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&status=1 Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-042/ Staged source and binary distros: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-042/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.0-beta-1/ Guide to testing staged releases: http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html Vote open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 +1 from me Benjamin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> No.
> It's 3.x prerequisite.
It would be good if there was some mechanism so that the site
generation could be made to work with either m2 or m3. Perhaps by
activating different profiles dependant on the maven version -
something like:
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-site-plugin
${site.plugin.version}
2
2.0.1
3
3.0-beta-1
> 2010/4/20 Brett Porter :
>>
>> On 20/04/2010, at 5:10 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2010/4/20 Hervé BOUTEMY :
what about releasing maven-site-plugin 3.0-beta-1?
>>>
>>> Yup I can do that and start releasing all needed stuff.
>>>
Olivier, is there something critical missing?
>>>
>>> No except some spare time :-)
>>
>> Does that also work with Maven 2.x, or will we end up having two strands of
>> development on it?
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter
>> br...@apache.org
>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier
> http://twitter.com/olamy
> http://fr.linkedin.com/in/olamy
> http://www.viadeo.com/fr/profile/olivier.lamy7
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-beta-1
+1 Hervé Le lundi 19 avril 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : > Hi, > > We solved 39 issues: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16 > 089 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10500&st > atus=1 > > Staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-042/ > > Staged source and binary distros: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-042/org/apache/mav > en/apache-maven/3.0-beta-1/ > > Guide to testing staged releases: > http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > > +1 from me > > > Benjamin > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2
I think the cause of bad checksum is from using wagon's httpclient alternative see http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-wagon-providers.html I attempted to use it to deploy large artifact as a work around for OOM issue and saw this problem, but could not confirm if my setup is the problem. However, today i tried it again and able to reproduce the issue. -D On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Markku Saarela wrote: > HHi, > > This could cause wrong checsums: > > Quote from Kevan: "Maven 2.2 was used in creating the xbean 3.6 release. > Evidently 2.2 had an issue uploading files to Nexus twice and calculating > checksums on the doubled files." > > http://old.nabble.com/Maven-central-has-corrupted-artifact-org.apache.xbean%3Axbean-finder-shaded%3Ajar%3A3.6-ts27340027.html#a27340027 > > rgds, > > Markku > > On 21.4.2010 10:14, Milos Kleint wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Brett Porter wrote: >> >> >>> >>> On 21/04/2010, at 3:40 PM, Milos Kleint wrote: >>> >>> hmm... I did the plexus compiler release indeed. No idea how the >>> >>> checksums >>> became broken. I've done the regular release:prepare, release:perform >>> >>> combo. >>> I can't recall any problems with the process. I specifically double >>> >>> checked >>> that there are gpg signatures, but assumed checksums are correct. They >>> >>> never >>> been broken for me before. >>> >>> Did you use Maven 2.1.0, Maven 2.2.0, or the httpclient wagon perhaps? >>> >>> >> >> Not sure, I would say 2.2.x. I don't have the computer anymore where I did >> the release. >> >> >> >>> >>> What do we do now? >>> >>> If the signatures are intact, then we can say the artifacts are and you >>> could upload corrected checksums. Let me know if you need any help. >>> >>> >>> >> >> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc >> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc >> both say >> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID >> B0874707 >> gpg: Good signature from "Milos Kleint" >> >> How do I recreate and reupload the correct checksums? >> >> thanks. >> >> Milos >> >> >> >> >>> >>> - Brett >>> >>> -- >>> Brett Porter >>> br...@apache.org >>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >> >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
RE: Reference to available data for mojos?
Thanks =)
-Original Message-
From: Justin Edelson [mailto:justinedel...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 21 april 2010 15:18
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Reference to available data for mojos?
You can look at the JavaDoc of the MavenProject class:
http://maven.apache.org/ref/2.2.1/maven-project/apidocs/org/apache/maven/pro
ject/MavenProject.html
On 4/21/10 8:45 AM, Ludwig Magnusson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When writing a mojo there is a possibility to access information about the
> project running the mojo. E.g. one can access the version like this:
>
>
>
> /**
>
> * @parameter default-value="${project.version}"
>
> * @required
>
> * @readonly
>
> */
>
> private String version;
>
>
>
> Is there a reference somewhere that lists the different attributes
available
> and in what kind of object that will be representing them (String, Int,
File
> etc)?
>
> /Ludwig
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Reference to available data for mojos?
You can look at the JavaDoc of the MavenProject class:
http://maven.apache.org/ref/2.2.1/maven-project/apidocs/org/apache/maven/project/MavenProject.html
On 4/21/10 8:45 AM, Ludwig Magnusson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When writing a mojo there is a possibility to access information about the
> project running the mojo. E.g. one can access the version like this:
>
>
>
> /**
>
> * @parameter default-value="${project.version}"
>
> * @required
>
> * @readonly
>
> */
>
> private String version;
>
>
>
> Is there a reference somewhere that lists the different attributes available
> and in what kind of object that will be representing them (String, Int, File
> etc)?
>
> /Ludwig
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2
HHi, This could cause wrong checsums: Quote from Kevan: "Maven 2.2 was used in creating the xbean 3.6 release. Evidently 2.2 had an issue uploading files to Nexus twice and calculating checksums on the doubled files." http://old.nabble.com/Maven-central-has-corrupted-artifact-org.apache.xbean%3Axbean-finder-shaded%3Ajar%3A3.6-ts27340027.html#a27340027 rgds, Markku On 21.4.2010 10:14, Milos Kleint wrote: On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Brett Porter wrote: On 21/04/2010, at 3:40 PM, Milos Kleint wrote: hmm... I did the plexus compiler release indeed. No idea how the checksums became broken. I've done the regular release:prepare, release:perform combo. I can't recall any problems with the process. I specifically double checked that there are gpg signatures, but assumed checksums are correct. They never been broken for me before. Did you use Maven 2.1.0, Maven 2.2.0, or the httpclient wagon perhaps? Not sure, I would say 2.2.x. I don't have the computer anymore where I did the release. What do we do now? If the signatures are intact, then we can say the artifacts are and you could upload corrected checksums. Let me know if you need any help. gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc both say gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID B0874707 gpg: Good signature from "Milos Kleint" How do I recreate and reupload the correct checksums? thanks. Milos - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2
juven is on the case. We should have correct checksums shortly.. Milos On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 21/04/2010, at 5:59 PM, Milos Kleint wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > > > >> > >> On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote: > >> > >>> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc > >>> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc > >>> both say > >>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID > >> B0874707 > >>> gpg: Good signature from "Milos Kleint " > >>> > >>> How do I recreate and reupload the correct checksums? > >> > >> openssl md5 FILENAME >FILENAME.md5 > >> openssl sha1 FILENAME >FILENAME.sha1 > >> > >> (feel free to edit to just be the checksum) > >> > >> Then use webdav to put them onto the codehaus repository. After they are > >> correct, we can re-sync to central. > >> > > > > well, plexus-compiler artifacts are no longer deployed to r.c.o but to > > http://oss.sonatype.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2/ > > Right, I haven't deployed any plexus stuff in ages. I would have thought > that would have checked and/or corrected them in the first place. > > I could fix them on central but I'm not sure that'd persist. > > Brian, Benjamin - any ideas what happened here? > > - Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > br...@apache.org > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2
On 21/04/2010, at 5:59 PM, Milos Kleint wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > >> >> On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote: >> >>> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc >>> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc >>> both say >>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID >> B0874707 >>> gpg: Good signature from "Milos Kleint " >>> >>> How do I recreate and reupload the correct checksums? >> >> openssl md5 FILENAME >FILENAME.md5 >> openssl sha1 FILENAME >FILENAME.sha1 >> >> (feel free to edit to just be the checksum) >> >> Then use webdav to put them onto the codehaus repository. After they are >> correct, we can re-sync to central. >> > > well, plexus-compiler artifacts are no longer deployed to r.c.o but to > http://oss.sonatype.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2/ Right, I haven't deployed any plexus stuff in ages. I would have thought that would have checked and/or corrected them in the first place. I could fix them on central but I'm not sure that'd persist. Brian, Benjamin - any ideas what happened here? - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2
Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote:
>
>> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc
>> gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc
>> both say
>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID
>> B0874707 gpg: Good signature from "Milos Kleint "
>>
>> How do I recreate and reupload the correct checksums?
>
> openssl md5 FILENAME >FILENAME.md5
> openssl sha1 FILENAME >FILENAME.sha1
>
> (feel free to edit to just be the checksum)
Just a tip: I always use a small bash function that creates these like wagon
itself:
function mvnsum()
{
for z in "$@"; do
md5sum "$z" | cut -f 1 -d ' ' | tr -d '\n\r' > "$z".md5
sha1sum "$z" | cut -f 1 -d ' ' | tr -d '\n\r' > "$z".sha1
done
}
- Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Unsubscribe me
2010/4/21 : > Hello Team, > Please unsubscirbe me from the "Maven Developers list" Follow the arrow: | | | | V - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Unsubscribe me
Hello Team, Please unsubscirbe me from the "Maven Developers list" Thanks, Chandrashekar Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mails are not encrypted and cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments. UBS reserves the right to retain all messages. Messages are protected and accessed only in legally justified cases. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote: > > > gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc > > gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc > > both say > > gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID > B0874707 > > gpg: Good signature from "Milos Kleint " > > > > How do I recreate and reupload the correct checksums? > > openssl md5 FILENAME >FILENAME.md5 > openssl sha1 FILENAME >FILENAME.sha1 > > (feel free to edit to just be the checksum) > > Then use webdav to put them onto the codehaus repository. After they are > correct, we can re-sync to central. > well, plexus-compiler artifacts are no longer deployed to r.c.o but to http://oss.sonatype.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2/ Milos > > - Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > br...@apache.org > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2
On 21/04/2010, at 5:14 PM, Milos Kleint wrote: > gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc > gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc > both say > gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID B0874707 > gpg: Good signature from "Milos Kleint " > > How do I recreate and reupload the correct checksums? openssl md5 FILENAME >FILENAME.md5 openssl sha1 FILENAME >FILENAME.sha1 (feel free to edit to just be the checksum) Then use webdav to put them onto the codehaus repository. After they are correct, we can re-sync to central. - Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Compiler Plugin 2.2
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Brett Porter wrote: > > On 21/04/2010, at 3:40 PM, Milos Kleint wrote: > > > hmm... I did the plexus compiler release indeed. No idea how the > checksums > > became broken. I've done the regular release:prepare, release:perform > combo. > > I can't recall any problems with the process. I specifically double > checked > > that there are gpg signatures, but assumed checksums are correct. They > never > > been broken for me before. > > Did you use Maven 2.1.0, Maven 2.2.0, or the httpclient wagon perhaps? > Not sure, I would say 2.2.x. I don't have the computer anymore where I did the release. > > > > > What do we do now? > > If the signatures are intact, then we can say the artifacts are and you > could upload corrected checksums. Let me know if you need any help. > > gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.jar.asc gpg --verify plexus-compiler-javac-1.8.pom.asc both say gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 30 00:28:04 2010 CEST using RSA key ID B0874707 gpg: Good signature from "Milos Kleint " How do I recreate and reupload the correct checksums? thanks. Milos > - Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > br...@apache.org > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
