migrating some code to Git

2017-10-03 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I'd like to work on Plugin Tools with git

While at it, looking at our plan [1], I see we have a few other components 
that are ready to migrate:
- Doxia core
- Doxia Sitetools
- Enforcer
- Jxr
- Plugin Tools
- Release

What checks are required before switching these 6 components?
Any volunteer?

Regards,

Hervé

[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Git+Migration

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven WAR Plugin version 3.2.0

2017-10-03 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1

Regards,

Hervé

Le samedi 30 septembre 2017, 17:55:00 CEST Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318121&ve
> rsion=12341372
> 
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MWAR%20AND%20reso
> lution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%
> 20updated%20DESC
> 
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1371
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1371/org/apache/mav
> en/plugins/maven-war-plugin/3.2.0/maven-war-plugin-3.2.0-source-release.zip
> 
> Source release checksum(s):
> maven-war-plugin-3.2.0-source-release.zip sha1:
> 5c661f4554616147491036dfac689ba9db90cec2
> 
> 
> Staging site:
> https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-war-plugin-LATEST/
> 
> Guide to testing staged releases:
> https://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
> 
> Vote open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
> 
> 
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: dependency:go-offline broken?

2017-10-03 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
trying my chance, because you prepared a perfect demo then we should be able 
to find where the issue is...

Here are my findings:
mvn depencendy:go-offline output for maven-resources-plugin:

[INFO] Plugin Resolved: maven-resources-plugin-2.6.jar
[INFO] Plugin Dependency Resolved: maven-plugin-api-2.0.6.jar
[INFO] Plugin Dependency Resolved: maven-project-2.0.6.jar
[INFO] Plugin Dependency Resolved: maven-core-2.0.6.jar
[INFO] Plugin Dependency Resolved: maven-artifact-2.0.6.jar
[INFO] Plugin Dependency Resolved: maven-settings-2.0.6.jar
[INFO] Plugin Dependency Resolved: maven-model-2.0.6.jar
[INFO] Plugin Dependency Resolved: maven-monitor-2.0.6.jar
[INFO] Plugin Dependency Resolved: plexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-9-
stable-1.jar
[INFO] Plugin Dependency Resolved: plexus-utils-2.0.5.jar
[INFO] Plugin Dependency Resolved: maven-filtering-1.1.jar
[INFO] Plugin Dependency Resolved: plexus-interpolation-1.13.jar


then on the failure: mvn -X -o compile

[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.6:resources (default-resources) @ 
dependency-plugin-bug ---
[DEBUG] Using mirror central (http://localhost:8081/nexus/content/groups/
public) for central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2).
[WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven:maven-core:jar:2.0.6 is missing, no 
dependency information available
[WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven:maven-monitor:jar:2.0.6 is missing, no 
dependency information available
[WARNING] The POM for org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils:jar:2.0.5 is missing, 
no dependency information available
[WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven.shared:maven-filtering:jar:1.1 is 
missing, no dependency information available
[WARNING] The POM for org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-interpolation:jar:1.13 is 
missing, no dependency information available
[DEBUG] Dependency collection stats: {ConflictMarker.analyzeTime=0, 
ConflictMarker.markTime=0, ConflictMarker.nodeCount=41, 
ConflictIdSorter.graphTime=0, ConflictIdSorter.topsortTime=0, 
ConflictIdSorter.conflictIdCount=18, ConflictIdSorter.conflictIdCycleCount=0, 
ConflictResolver.totalTime=1, ConflictResolver.conflictItemCount=38, 
DefaultDependencyCollector.collectTime=58, 
DefaultDependencyCollector.transformTime=1}
[DEBUG] org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin:jar:2.6:
[DEBUG]org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api:jar:2.0.6:compile
[DEBUG]org.apache.maven:maven-project:jar:2.0.6:compile
[DEBUG]   org.apache.maven:maven-profile:jar:2.0.6:compile
[DEBUG]   org.apache.maven:maven-artifact-manager:jar:2.0.6:compile
[DEBUG]  org.apache.maven:maven-repository-metadata:jar:2.0.6:compile
[DEBUG]   org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-registry:jar:2.0.6:compile
[DEBUG]org.apache.maven:maven-core:jar:2.0.6:compile
[DEBUG]org.apache.maven:maven-artifact:jar:2.0.6:compile
[DEBUG]org.apache.maven:maven-settings:jar:2.0.6:compile
[DEBUG]org.apache.maven:maven-model:jar:2.0.6:compile
[DEBUG]org.apache.maven:maven-monitor:jar:2.0.6:compile
[DEBUG]org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-container-default:jar:1.0-alpha-9-
stable-1:compile
[DEBUG]   junit:junit:jar:3.8.1:compile
[DEBUG]   classworlds:classworlds:jar:1.1-alpha-2:compile
[DEBUG]org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils:jar:2.0.5:compile
[DEBUG]org.apache.maven.shared:maven-filtering:jar:1.1:compile
[DEBUG]org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-interpolation:jar:1.13:compile


As you can see, the missing files maven-profile-2.0.6.jar, maven-artifact-
manager-2.0.6.jar, maven-repository-metadata-2.0.6.jar, maven-plugin-
registry-2.0.6.jar and classworlds-1.1-alpha-2.jar are in the maven-resources-
plugin effective dependencies but not detected by dependency plugin


Then you're right, it's a dependency plugin bug.

I remarked that the plugin version used was 2.8 but not the latest 3.0.2

Then I added a pluginManagement section to select version 3.0.2 and re-ran the 
test: you'll see the output is completely different.

And there is no issue any more

Regards,

Hervé

Le mercredi 20 septembre 2017, 22:48:15 CEST Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> as far as I understand it should be possible to call mvn
> dependency:go-offline and from there on work in offline mode (mvn -o). 
> I’ve put a minimal example together [1] that demonstrates that this
> currently does not work. Am I missing anything?
> 
> Thank you!
> Benedikt
> 
> [1] https://github.com/britter/dependency-plugin-bug
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven WAR Plugin version 3.2.0

2017-10-03 Thread Baptiste Mathus
+1.

Tested on Jenkins, especially after
https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/3052

Thanks a lot!

2017-10-02 15:21 GMT+02:00 Dejan Stojadinović :

> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Tested as usual (big project with dozen of plugins).
>
> Regards,
> Dejan
>
> On 2017-09-30 17:55, Karl Heinz Marbaise  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 3 issues:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12318121&version=12341372
> >
> > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> 3D%20MWAR%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%
> 20BY%20key%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> >
> > Staging repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1371
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-
> 1371/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-war-plugin/3.2.0/maven-
> war-plugin-3.2.0-source-release.zip
> >
> > Source release checksum(s):
> > maven-war-plugin-3.2.0-source-release.zip sha1:
> > 5c661f4554616147491036dfac689ba9db90cec2
> >
> >
> > Staging site:
> > https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-war-plugin-LATEST/
> >
> > Guide to testing staged releases:
> > https://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
> >
> > Vote open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1
> >
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Karl Heinz Marbaise
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-10-03 Thread Arnaud Héritier
Thanks Stephen

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am hoping I can find some time to do a final round of experiments and
> then close the vote with success and publish.
>
>
> On Tue 3 Oct 2017 at 11:13, Arnaud Héritier  wrote:
>
> > @Stephen What should we do now ?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:14 AM, Olivier Lamy  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >> Sorry a bit out of time ATM for testing this.
> >> Well I trust Arnaud testing that especially if this improve the
> >> performance
> >> of this very great/awesome/users oriented plugin :P
> >>
> >> On 13 September 2017 at 22:19, Arnaud Héritier 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Damned, can't we be anonymous on Github ?
> >> > I maintain it is a big word, I'm trying to fix more bugs than I add
> new
> >> > ones
> >> > I added Oleg in the loop as he contributed a lot on it too
> >> > I did a quick test to build on Jenkins 2.60.3 our maven core with the
> >> Evil
> >> > Maven plugin 2.17 on a local SSH agent and it is ok
> >> > But it is really a quick test ...
> >> >
> >> > Cheers
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Stephen Connolly <
> >> > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On 13 September 2017 at 01:05, Stephen Connolly <
> >> > > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> On 13 September 2017 at 00:26, Anders Hammar 
> >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Stephen Connolly <
> >> > >>> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> > Have we got any feedback from the embedder integrations yet?
> >> > >>> >
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> I haven't heard anything from the m2e people. Maybe we need to
> ping
> >> > them
> >> > >>> directly. I can contact Fred Bricon.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> /Anders
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >> Please do, also if anyone has a contact in netbeans or intellij and
> >> > could
> >> > >> let them know we'd like either feedback or "we're ok if MNG-6275
> >> makes
> >> > >> trouble for us, go ahead and release". I'd like to close the vote
> on
> >> > Friday
> >> > >> 13:00 UTC.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > > Olivier / Arnaud, have either of you had a chance to test this with
> >> the
> >> > > evil project type[1] as you two seem to be the active maintainers[2]
> >> > >
> >> > > [1]: https://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2013/11/jenkins-
> >> > > maven-job-type-considered-evil.html
> >> > > [2]: https://github.com/jenkinsci/maven-plugin/commits/master
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Arnaud
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Olivier Lamy
> >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -
> > Arnaud Héritier
> > http://aheritier.net
> > Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
> > Twitter/Skype : aheritier
> >
> --
> Sent from my phone
>



-- 
-
Arnaud Héritier
http://aheritier.net
Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
Twitter/Skype : aheritier


Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-10-03 Thread Stephen Connolly
I am hoping I can find some time to do a final round of experiments and
then close the vote with success and publish.


On Tue 3 Oct 2017 at 11:13, Arnaud Héritier  wrote:

> @Stephen What should we do now ?
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:14 AM, Olivier Lamy  wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> Sorry a bit out of time ATM for testing this.
>> Well I trust Arnaud testing that especially if this improve the
>> performance
>> of this very great/awesome/users oriented plugin :P
>>
>> On 13 September 2017 at 22:19, Arnaud Héritier 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Damned, can't we be anonymous on Github ?
>> > I maintain it is a big word, I'm trying to fix more bugs than I add new
>> > ones
>> > I added Oleg in the loop as he contributed a lot on it too
>> > I did a quick test to build on Jenkins 2.60.3 our maven core with the
>> Evil
>> > Maven plugin 2.17 on a local SSH agent and it is ok
>> > But it is really a quick test ...
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Stephen Connolly <
>> > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 13 September 2017 at 01:05, Stephen Connolly <
>> > > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> On 13 September 2017 at 00:26, Anders Hammar 
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Stephen Connolly <
>> > >>> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> > Have we got any feedback from the embedder integrations yet?
>> > >>> >
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I haven't heard anything from the m2e people. Maybe we need to ping
>> > them
>> > >>> directly. I can contact Fred Bricon.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> /Anders
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >> Please do, also if anyone has a contact in netbeans or intellij and
>> > could
>> > >> let them know we'd like either feedback or "we're ok if MNG-6275
>> makes
>> > >> trouble for us, go ahead and release". I'd like to close the vote on
>> > Friday
>> > >> 13:00 UTC.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > Olivier / Arnaud, have either of you had a chance to test this with
>> the
>> > > evil project type[1] as you two seem to be the active maintainers[2]
>> > >
>> > > [1]: https://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2013/11/jenkins-
>> > > maven-job-type-considered-evil.html
>> > > [2]: https://github.com/jenkinsci/maven-plugin/commits/master
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Arnaud
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Olivier Lamy
>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -
> Arnaud Héritier
> http://aheritier.net
> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
> Twitter/Skype : aheritier
>
-- 
Sent from my phone


[GitHub] maven-indexer pull request #19: Migrate to Lucene 7

2017-10-03 Thread scela
GitHub user scela opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/pull/19

Migrate to Lucene 7

Now that Lucene 7 is released I abandoned the 6.1 migration PR and created 
this new one which takes it straight to 7.

One thing to note is that this might need the enforced JDK to be bumped to 
8.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/scela/maven-indexer master

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/pull/19.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #19


commit b052a6fe0bf0b76a9ed0c168c31ebf02ece08126
Author: Sopot Cela 
Date:   2017-10-03T12:09:04Z

Migrate to Lucene 7




---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



[GitHub] maven-indexer issue #17: Migration to Lucene 6.1.0

2017-10-03 Thread scela
Github user scela commented on the issue:

https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/pull/17
  
I'll be preparing a migration directly to just-released Lucene 7.


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



[GitHub] maven-indexer pull request #17: Migration to Lucene 6.1.0

2017-10-03 Thread scela
Github user scela closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/maven-indexer/pull/17


---

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

2017-10-03 Thread Arnaud Héritier
@Stephen What should we do now ?


On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:14 AM, Olivier Lamy  wrote:

> Hi
> Sorry a bit out of time ATM for testing this.
> Well I trust Arnaud testing that especially if this improve the performance
> of this very great/awesome/users oriented plugin :P
>
> On 13 September 2017 at 22:19, Arnaud Héritier 
> wrote:
>
> > Damned, can't we be anonymous on Github ?
> > I maintain it is a big word, I'm trying to fix more bugs than I add new
> > ones
> > I added Oleg in the loop as he contributed a lot on it too
> > I did a quick test to build on Jenkins 2.60.3 our maven core with the
> Evil
> > Maven plugin 2.17 on a local SSH agent and it is ok
> > But it is really a quick test ...
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Stephen Connolly <
> > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 13 September 2017 at 01:05, Stephen Connolly <
> > > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 13 September 2017 at 00:26, Anders Hammar 
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Stephen Connolly <
> > >>> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Have we got any feedback from the embedder integrations yet?
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>> I haven't heard anything from the m2e people. Maybe we need to ping
> > them
> > >>> directly. I can contact Fred Bricon.
> > >>>
> > >>> /Anders
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> Please do, also if anyone has a contact in netbeans or intellij and
> > could
> > >> let them know we'd like either feedback or "we're ok if MNG-6275 makes
> > >> trouble for us, go ahead and release". I'd like to close the vote on
> > Friday
> > >> 13:00 UTC.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > Olivier / Arnaud, have either of you had a chance to test this with the
> > > evil project type[1] as you two seem to be the active maintainers[2]
> > >
> > > [1]: https://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2013/11/jenkins-
> > > maven-job-type-considered-evil.html
> > > [2]: https://github.com/jenkinsci/maven-plugin/commits/master
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>



-- 
-
Arnaud Héritier
http://aheritier.net
Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
Twitter/Skype : aheritier