[jira] Commented: (MPPOM-4) pom:install should produce a temporary standalone POM to copy to repo

2004-10-14 Thread jira
The following comment has been added to this issue:

 Author: Felipe Leme
Created: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 7:46 AM
   Body:
I was going to open a similar issue, as sometimes we have JEXL/EL expressions on the 
POM that should be resolved before being the POM is deployed. 

Take for instance the Cactus plugin:


  cactus
  cactus
  13-${pom.currentVersion}



I could start the work on the "pom:generate-standalone" task, so it would resolve the 
EL expressions, but I wouldn't be able to solve the XML issues (I don't know how to do 
it and it would take to much time to figure it out).

-- Felipe



-
View this comment:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPPOM-4?page=comments#action_25361

-
View the issue:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPPOM-4

Here is an overview of the issue:
-
Key: MPPOM-4
Summary: pom:install should produce a temporary standalone POM to copy to repo
   Type: Improvement

 Status: Open

 Original Estimate: Unknown
 Time Spent: Unknown
  Remaining: Unknown

Project: maven-pom-plugin

   Assignee: Jason van Zyl
   Reporter: John Casey

Created: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:47 AM
Updated: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 7:46 AM

Description:
Currently, pom:install does a file copy to the local repo. This has multiple problems.

* Entities are not resolved, and entity imports are not copied.
* Extends path can be relative, which makes it nearly impossible to use the pom in a 
meaningful way without also finding it's parent (usually the only way to resolve 
../project.xml would be to do an scm checkout; but that info is in the pom that won't 
parse).

I propose the following:

prior to the file copy inside pom:install and pom:deploy, there should be a 
prereq="pom:generate-standalone" which would literally take the Project instance in 
memory and serialize it to a temporary project.xml (let's say target/project.xml or 
something). The pom:install and pom:deploy goals would then copy *that file* to the 
repo rather than the original project.xml file.

It would:

* Remove the extends element, because the Project instance is the result of any merges
* Remove the issue of discorporeal entities, since entity resolution would have 
happened before parsing the project.xml at the beginning of pom:xxx

I think this is still logically valid, since any pom in the repo is considered an 
artifact, and should be able to stand on it's own without complex interpretation. It 
would also be easy to do with xstream or any other type of xml serialization...even 
xpp3's XmlSerializer could do it, and the code to do so would be of minimal size.


-
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[jira] Commented: (MPPOM-4) pom:install should produce a temporary standalone POM to copy to repo

2004-07-23 Thread jira
The following comment has been added to this issue:

 Author: John Casey
Created: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:03 PM
   Body:
seems like a better long-term solution than the doco upgrade to me...thought we should 
talk about it, so I put them both out there (one before this occurred to me, the 
second this one).
-
View this comment:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPPOM-4?page=comments#action_22199

-
View the issue:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPPOM-4

Here is an overview of the issue:
-
Key: MPPOM-4
Summary: pom:install should produce a temporary standalone POM to copy to repo
   Type: Improvement

 Status: Open

 Original Estimate: Unknown
 Time Spent: Unknown
  Remaining: Unknown

Project: maven-pom-plugin

   Assignee: Jason van Zyl
   Reporter: John Casey

Created: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:47 AM
Updated: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 12:03 PM

Description:
Currently, pom:install does a file copy to the local repo. This has multiple problems.

* Entities are not resolved, and entity imports are not copied.
* Extends path can be relative, which makes it nearly impossible to use the pom in a 
meaningful way without also finding it's parent (usually the only way to resolve 
../project.xml would be to do an scm checkout; but that info is in the pom that won't 
parse).

I propose the following:

prior to the file copy inside pom:install and pom:deploy, there should be a 
prereq="pom:generate-standalone" which would literally take the Project instance in 
memory and serialize it to a temporary project.xml (let's say target/project.xml or 
something). The pom:install and pom:deploy goals would then copy *that file* to the 
repo rather than the original project.xml file.

It would:

* Remove the extends element, because the Project instance is the result of any merges
* Remove the issue of discorporeal entities, since entity resolution would have 
happened before parsing the project.xml at the beginning of pom:xxx

I think this is still logically valid, since any pom in the repo is considered an 
artifact, and should be able to stand on it's own without complex interpretation. It 
would also be easy to do with xstream or any other type of xml serialization...even 
xpp3's XmlSerializer could do it, and the code to do so would be of minimal size.


-
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[jira] Commented: (MPPOM-4) pom:install should produce a temporary standalone POM to copy to repo

2004-07-23 Thread jira
The following comment has been added to this issue:

 Author: Julien Kirch
Created: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:59 AM
   Body:
Seems to be a sequel of MAVEN-1390 .
-
View this comment:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPPOM-4?page=comments#action_22198

-
View the issue:
  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPPOM-4

Here is an overview of the issue:
-
Key: MPPOM-4
Summary: pom:install should produce a temporary standalone POM to copy to repo
   Type: Improvement

 Status: Open

 Original Estimate: Unknown
 Time Spent: Unknown
  Remaining: Unknown

Project: maven-pom-plugin

   Assignee: Jason van Zyl
   Reporter: John Casey

Created: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:47 AM
Updated: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 11:59 AM

Description:
Currently, pom:install does a file copy to the local repo. This has multiple problems.

* Entities are not resolved, and entity imports are not copied.
* Extends path can be relative, which makes it nearly impossible to use the pom in a 
meaningful way without also finding it's parent (usually the only way to resolve 
../project.xml would be to do an scm checkout; but that info is in the pom that won't 
parse).

I propose the following:

prior to the file copy inside pom:install and pom:deploy, there should be a 
prereq="pom:generate-standalone" which would literally take the Project instance in 
memory and serialize it to a temporary project.xml (let's say target/project.xml or 
something). The pom:install and pom:deploy goals would then copy *that file* to the 
repo rather than the original project.xml file.

It would:

* Remove the extends element, because the Project instance is the result of any merges
* Remove the issue of discorporeal entities, since entity resolution would have 
happened before parsing the project.xml at the beginning of pom:xxx

I think this is still logically valid, since any pom in the repo is considered an 
artifact, and should be able to stand on it's own without complex interpretation. It 
would also be easy to do with xstream or any other type of xml serialization...even 
xpp3's XmlSerializer could do it, and the code to do so would be of minimal size.


-
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]